水动力作用下特大型堆积体滑坡变形的阶段性演进机制

郭宇, 卢波, 吴勇进, 朱瑜劼

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (2) : 324-334.

PDF(9177 KB)
PDF(9177 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (2) : 324-334. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.027
水利水电工程

水动力作用下特大型堆积体滑坡变形的阶段性演进机制

作者信息 +

Staged deformation evolution mechanism of an extremely large landslide accumulation under hydrodynamic influence

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

YMM滑坡是三峡库区近坝库段距离大坝最近、规模最大的崩滑堆积体,因规模巨大、位置敏感且一旦失稳后果严重而备受关注。近20 a的观测数据表明,滑坡变形持续缓慢增长且未收敛。该文采用逐步线性回归方法和水动力触发机制力学模型,深入探究滑坡地质条件、外部影响因素与变形特征之间的关系。基于外部触发因素作用效应的阶段性转换时间节点,将滑坡体自蓄水以来的变形演化过程划分为3个阶段:1) 2003年6月至2006年9月,受库水位大幅抬升影响,滑坡以前缘牵引变形的方式复活。2) 2006年10月至2018年9月,YMM滑坡的变形模式由蓄水初期的前缘牵引转变为整体蠕滑,其实质为滑坡岩土介质因库水浸泡产生的劣化效应导致的变形调整;滑坡变形速率随着劣化效应的衰减而逐渐减小;在这个阶段库水位波动的影响要明显大于季节性降雨的影响。3) 2018年10月至2024年2月,水岩作用引起的岩土介质物理力学性状劣化过程基本完成,滑坡体适应了地下水环境改变所产生的影响,滑坡整体变形速率进一步明显降低,季节性降雨对滑坡变形的影响超越库水位波动的影响。研究表明,滑坡整体呈稳定的收敛型蠕滑,极端降雨将是滑坡产生局部失稳的重要触发因素。识别滑坡的变形演化阶段并确定各阶段居主导地位的外部影响因素是滑坡研究的关键,该文对此提供了一种有效的研究范式。

Abstract

Objective: The YMM landslide is the largest landslide accumulation body nearest to the dam in the near-dam reservoir section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. The landslide, located on the north bank of the Yangtze River within Zigui County, Yichang City, Hubei Province, with a surface area of approximately 0.48 km2 and has a total volume of approximately 2 000 × 104 m3. It is situated 17 km upstream of the Three Gorges Dam. Owing to its massive scale, sensitive location, and severe consequences of potential instability, the YMM landslide has attracted significant attention. Nearly 20 years of observation data indicate that although the landslide's deformation has been slow, it has continued without convergence. Methods: This study comprehensively considers the relationships among geological conditions, external influencing factors, and deformation characteristics of the landslide. A stepwise linear regression method is applied to analyze the observational data. Combined with a mechanical model of the hydrodynamic triggering mechanism of reservoir bank landslide deformation, the study quantitatively decomposes the roles and effects of various external triggering factors in the landslide's deformation process. Based on the phase-transition time nodes of these effects, the deformation evolution process due to reservoir impoundment is divided into three stages. Results: The study shows that the YMM landslide was stable before the impoundment. The reservoir impoundment led to its reactivation, which was followed by a complex deformation adjustment process. In the first stage (June 2003—September 2006), the landslide was reactivated in a retrogressive mode by a significant rise in the reservoir water level. In the second stage (October 2006—September 2018), the deformation mode shifted from front retrogressive to overall creep deformation, mainly due to the deterioration of the landslide rock-soil medium caused by reservoir water infiltration. The deformation rate gradually decreased as the deterioration effect weakened, and reservoir water level fluctuations had a more significant influence than seasonal rainfall during this period. In the third stage (October 2018—February 2024), the deterioration process of the physical and mechanical properties of the rock-soil medium induced by water-rock interaction was essentially complete. The landslide adapted to changes in the groundwater environment, resulting in a further significant reduction in the overall deformation rate. During this stage, the influence of seasonal rainfall on landslide deformation exceeded that of reservoir water level fluctuations. In terms of geological conditions, landslide characteristics, and deformation patterns, time-dependent deformation mainly convergent creep indicates that the landslide is generally stable. However, extreme rainfall remains a key triggering factor for potential local instability of the YMM landslide. Conclusions: This study provides a robust framework for interpreting the long-term deformation evolution of large-scale reservoir landslides by integrating monitoring data, statistical modeling, and mechanical analysis. Identifying stage-specific deformation patterns and dominant triggers enhances the understanding of landslide behavior in response to external forcing. These insights are crucial for improving early warning systems and developing targeted mitigation strategies in similarly high-risk reservoir environments.

关键词

三峡库区 / 近坝库岸滑坡 / 水岩相互作用 / 逐步回归模型 / 变形发展阶段

Key words

three Gorges Reservoir area / near-dam reservoir landslide / water-rock interaction / stepwise regression model / deformation development stages

引用本文

导出引用
郭宇, 卢波, 吴勇进, . 水动力作用下特大型堆积体滑坡变形的阶段性演进机制[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 66(2): 324-334 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.027
Yu GUO, Bo LU, Yongjin WU, et al. Staged deformation evolution mechanism of an extremely large landslide accumulation under hydrodynamic influence[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(2): 324-334 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.027
中图分类号: TU457   

参考文献

1
BARLA G , PARONUZZI P . The 1963 Vajont landslide: 50th anniversary[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2013, 46 (6): 1267- 1270.
2
HUANG D , LUO S L , ZHONG Z , et al. Analysis and modeling of the combined effects of hydrological factors on a reservoir bank slope in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2020, 279, 105858.
3
JIA G W , ZHAN T L T , CHEN Y M , et al. Performance of a large-scale slope model subjected to rising and lowering water levels[J]. Engineering Geology, 2009, 106 (1-2): 92- 103.
4
XIA M , REN G M , ZHU S S , et al. Relationship between landslide stability and reservoir water level variation[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2015, 74 (3): 909- 917.
5
ZHANG Y G , ZHU S Y , TAN J K , et al. The influence of water level fluctuation on the stability of landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13 (17): 845.
6
LIN P , LIU X L , HU S Y , et al. Large deformation analysis of a high steep slope relating to the Laxiwa Reservoir, China[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49 (6): 2253- 2276.
7
SHI X G , HU X , SITAR N , et al. Hydrological control shift from river level to rainfall in the reactivated Guobu slope besides the Laxiwa hydropower station in China[J]. Remote sensing of environment, 2021, 265, 112664.
8
LI M W , ZHOU Z F , ZHUANG C , et al. The cause and statistical analysis of the river valley contractions at the Xiluodu hydropower Station, China[J]. Water, 2020, 12 (3): 791.
9
ZHOU C B , JIANG Q H , WEI W , et al. Safety monitoring and stability analysis of left bank high slope at Jinping-I hydropower station[J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2016, 49 (4): 308- 321.
10
YE X , ZHU H H , CHANG F N , et al. Revisiting spatiotemporal evolution process and mechanism of a giant reservoir landslide during weather extremes[J]. Engineering Geology, 2024, 332, 107480.
11
QI S W , YAN F Z , WANG S J , et al. Characteristics, mechanism and development tendency of deformation of Maoping landslide after commission of Geheyan reservoir on the Qingjiang River, Hubei Province, China[J]. Engineering Geology, 2006, 86 (1): 37- 51.
12
ZHANG X C , CHEN L X , ZHOU C . Deformation monitoring and trend analysis of reservoir bank landslides by combining time-series InSAR and Hurst Index[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15 (3): 619.
13
ZHANG L , SHI B , ZHU H H , et al. PSO-SVM-based deep displacement prediction of Majiagou landslide considering the deformation hysteresis effect[J]. Landslides, 2021, 18 (1): 179- 193.
14
NAVA L , CARRARO E , REYES-CARMONA C , et al. Landslide displacement forecasting using deep learning and monitoring data across selected sites[J]. Landslides, 2023, 20 (10): 2111- 2129.
15
SUN J F , YAN T S , HU J S , et al. Slope-scale landslide susceptibility assessment based on coupled models of frequency ratio and multiple regression analysis with limited historical hazards data[J]. Natural Hazards, 2024, 120 (1): 1- 23.
16
杨杰, 胡德秀, 关文海. 李家峡拱坝左岸高边坡岩体变位与安全性态分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24 (19): 3551- 3560.
YANG J , HU D X , GUAN W H . Analysis of high slope rock deformation and safety performance for left bank of Lijiaxia arch dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24 (19): 3551- 3560.
17
郑东健, 顾冲时, 吴中如. 边坡变形的多因素时变预测模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24 (17): 3180- 3184.
ZHEGN D J , GU C S , WU Z R . Time series evolution forecasting model of slope deformation based on multiple factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24 (17): 3180- 3184.
18
HE C C , HU X L , TANNANT D D , et al. Response of a landslide to reservoir impoundment in model tests[J]. Engineering geology, 2018, 247, 84- 93.
19
YI X Y , FENG W K , WU M T , et al. The initial impoundment of the Baihetan reservoir region (China) exacerbated the deformation of the Wangjiashan landslide: Characteristics and mechanism[J]. Landslides, 2022, 19 (8): 1897- 1912.
20
VASSILEVA M , MOTAGH M , ROESSNER S , et al. Reactivation of an old landslide in north-central Iran following reservoir impoundment: Results from multisensor satellite time-series analysis[J]. Engineering Geology, 2023, 327, 107337.
21
WANG F W , ZHANG Y M , HUO Z T , et al. The July 14, 2003 Qianjiangping landslide, three gorges reservoir, China[J]. Landslides, 2004, 1 (2): 157- 162.
22
YANG B Y , LIU Z Q , LACASSE S , et al. Spatiotemporal deformation characteristics of Outang landslide and identification of triggering factors using data mining[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 16 (10): 4088- 4104.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(U2340226)
国家自然科学基金面上项目(12072047)
国家自然科学基金面上项目(42277186)
三峡集团三期科调项目(0799291)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(9177 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/