火星热发射试验装置方案设计及误差分析

隋毅, 武昊, 王禹衡, 贾贺

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 483-497.

PDF(11469 KB)
PDF(11469 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 483-497. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.046
航天发射支持技术与工程应用

火星热发射试验装置方案设计及误差分析

作者信息 +

Scheme design and error analysis of test facility for Mars thermal launches

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为实现火星采样返回任务中火星上升器热发射过程的高精度地面模拟, 该文提出一种包含水平随动机构的5索驱动低重力模拟试验装置。该文基于运动学和动力学建立了动态误差传递模型, 分析了水平随动机构位移误差、索力误差和外扰力对火星上升器6自由度轨迹精度的影响, 并提出了基于模型预测的动态误差限求解方法。仿真结果表明:单误差源/多误差源作用下模型计算与多体动力学仿真所得的误差曲线均吻合, 随机正弦波误差源输入下轨迹误差均位于理论误差限内, 验证了动态误差传递模型和动态误差限求解方法的有效性。该文研究结果可为试验装置的可行性评估及误差综合提供理论依据, 也可为后续控制优化和工程应用提供参考。

Abstract

Objective: Mars sample-return missions require high-precision ground testing of the Mars Ascent Vehicle thermal launch process to verify key technologies in a low-gravity environment. This task requires a simulation mechanism with high operating speed, large stroke, and heavy load, which aligns well with the advantages of cable-driven mechanisms. However, although dynamic error analysis is critical for the early-stage design of such cable-driven systems, it has not been fully discussed—specifically regarding trajectory accuracy under the influence of multiple time-varying error sources. This study aims to design a low-gravity ground test facility and develop a dynamic error calculation method for evaluating the facility's feasibility for Mars Ascent Vehicle thermal launch simulations. Methods: In this study, a test facility that is driven by five cables and equipped with a horizontal follow-up mechanism is presented. The system consists of a test tower, a fixture for inclined launch, a cable-suspension gravity unloading system, and a cable-driven thrust-simulation system. Kinematic and dynamic models are developed to depict the six-degree-of-freedom motion of the Mars Ascent Vehicle mockup. The dynamic error propagation model is obtained through first-order perturbation expansion around the nominal trajectory, considering displacement errors of the two horizontal platforms, cable force fluctuations, and external disturbances as error sources. A model-predictive approach based on linear time-varying system discretization and linear programming is used to determine dynamic error bounds for trajectory deviations. The dynamic error propagation model is verified using the error calculation results of the model under single and multiple error sources, with a multibody dynamics model established in Maplesim as a reference. Tests for a random sine wave error input are also conducted through simulation to verify the effectiveness of dynamic error bounds calculated by the proposed method. Results: Theoretical analysis showed that an approximately linear propagation relationship existed between the error sources and the Mars Ascent Vehicle trajectory error in the test facility, which enabled the decomposition of error analysis problems under complex error sources into individual analysis problems under single-error-source conditions. When each error source acted independently, the maximum displacement error for each degree of freedom during the Mars Ascent Vehicle thermal launch process mostly increased over time, which was consistent with the error accumulation effect. The effects of different error sources displayed significant magnitude variations. The simulation results further revealed the following: (1) Under the conditions of single-and multiple-error sources, the trajectory errors computed by the dynamic error propagation model agreed well with those from the dynamics simulations, which suggested the effectiveness of the model in characterizing the error transmission mechanisms of the test facility. (2) When random sine wave error sources within specified amplitude ranges were presented, all the Mars Ascent Vehicle trajectory errors persisted within the theoretical error bounds forecasted by the proposed method, which demonstrated its capability to produce reliable dynamic error range estimates for uncertain environments. Conclusions: This study offers a design scheme for cable-driven ground test facilities for spacecraft. The dynamic error analysis of the facility reveals its error propagation mechanism, which lays a foundation for its error synthesis, optimization of mechanical structures, and control method design. In addition, this research also develops a generalizable theoretical framework for dynamic error analysis in similar cable-driven parallel mechanisms.

关键词

火星采样返回 / 索驱动机构 / 低重力模拟 / 误差分析

Key words

Mars sample-return / cable-driven mechanism / low-gravity simulation / error analysis

引用本文

导出引用
隋毅, 武昊, 王禹衡, . 火星热发射试验装置方案设计及误差分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 66(3): 483-497 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.046
Yi SUI, Hao WU, Yuheng WANG, et al. Scheme design and error analysis of test facility for Mars thermal launches[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(3): 483-497 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.046
中图分类号: TP242.2   

参考文献

1
于登云, 孙泽洲, 孟林智, 等. 火星探测发展历程与未来展望[J]. 深空探测学报, 2016, 3 (2): 108- 113.
YU D Y , SUN Z Z , MENG L Z , et al. The development process and prospects for Mars exploration[J]. Journal of Deep Space Exploration, 2016, 3 (2): 108- 113.
2
彭玉明, 李爽, 满益云, 等. 火星进入、下降与着陆技术的新进展: 以"火星科学实验室"为例[J]. 航天返回与遥感, 2010, 31 (4): 7- 14.
PENG Y M , LI S , MAN Y Y , et al. New progress of Mars entry, descent and landing technologies: Mars science laboratory case study[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2010, 31 (4): 7- 14.
3
YAGHOUBI D, MAYNOR S. Integrated design results for the MSR SRC Mars Ascent Vehicle[C]//Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO). Big Sky, USA: IEEE, 2022: 1-20.
4
JONES A. China to launch Mars sample return mission in 2028, will follow planetary protection guidelines. (2024-09-05). https://spacenews.com/china-to-launch-mars-sample-return-mission-in-2028-will-follow-plane-tary-protection-guidelines/.
5
滕锐, 焦子涵, 张宇飞, 等. 火星六自由度大气进入制导方法对比分析[J]. 航天返回与遥感, 2020, 41 (1): 18- 27.
TENG R , JIAO Z H , ZHANG Y F , et al. Analysis and comparison of Mars atmospheric entry guidance methods in 6-DOF model[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2020, 41 (1): 18- 27.
6
张胜, 唐晓峰, 刘可平, 等. 火星上升器发射技术综述[J]. 空天防御, 2023, 6 (3): 66- 76.
ZHANG S , TANG X F , LIU K P , et al. Review on research status of Mars Ascent Vehicle's launching technology[J]. Air & Space Defense, 2023, 6 (3): 66- 76.
7
TANG X Q , SHAO Z F . Trajectory generation and tracking control of a multi-level hybrid support manipulator in FAST[J]. Mechatronics, 2013, 23 (8): 1113- 1122.
8
JAMSHIDIFAR H , KHAJEPOUR A , FIDAN B , et al. Kinematically-constrained redundant cable-driven parallel robots: Modeling, redundancy analysis, and stiffness optimization[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22 (2): 921- 930.
9
陈强, 董强, 黄科, 等. 低重力模拟试验平台索并联驱动系统张力优化策略[J]. 航天返回与遥感, 2020, 41 (6): 66- 76.
CHEN Q , DONG Q , HUANG K , et al. Tension optimization strategy research of the wire-driven parallel system of low gravity simulation platform[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2020, 41 (6): 66- 76.
10
NORCROSS J R, CHAPPELL S P, CLOWERS K G, et al. Characterization of partial-gravity analog environments for extravehicular activity suit testing: NASA-TM-2010-216139[R]. Washington, D. C. : NASA, 2010.
11
杨晓青, 罗小桃, 刘殿富, 等. 月球车移动系统可靠性试验技术研究[J]. 载人航天, 2019, 25 (5): 631- 639.
YANG X Q , LUO X T , LIU D F , et al. Research on reliability test technology for mobile system of lunar rover[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2019, 25 (5): 631- 639.
12
WANG J, MASORY O. On the accuracy of a Stewart platform. Ⅰ. The effect of manufacturing tolerances[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Atlanta, USA: IEEE, 1993: 114-120.
13
KARIM S , PIANO S , LEACH R , et al. Error modelling and validation of a high-precision five degree of freedom hybrid mechanism for high-power high-repetition rate laser operations[J]. Precision Engineering, 2018, 54, 182- 197.
14
ZHAO Y , LI T M , TANG X Q . Geometric error modeling of machine tools based on screw theory[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 24, 845- 849.
15
CHEN G H , ZHANG L , WANG C , et al. High-precision modeling of CNCs' spatial errors based on screw theory[J]. SN Applied Sciences, 2022, 4, 45.
16
TANG T F , CHI C C , FANG H L , et al. Geometric error propagation model-based accuracy synthesis and its application to a 1T2R parallel manipulator[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2022, 144 (7): 073304.
17
吕盾, 刘青, 刘沛, 等. 五轴机床加工零件轮廓误差预测方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2020, 54 (2): 9- 15.
D , LIU Q , LIU P , et al. Contour error prediction method of part for five-axis machining[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2020, 54 (2): 9- 15.
18
吕盾, 罗世有, 王大伟, 等. 考虑几何误差和跟随误差的五轴联动轨迹误差预测方法[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2021, 55 (10): 38- 49.
D , LUO S Y , WANG D W , et al. A trajectory error prediction method considering geometric errors and tracking errors for five-axis machine tools[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2021, 55 (10): 38- 49.
19
ZHENG K M , ZHANG Q J . Comprehensive analysis of the position error and vibration characteristics of Delta robot[J]. Advanced Robotics, 2016, 30 (20): 1322- 1340.
20
KAN F W, EGGERS D W. Wind vibration analyses of Giant Magellan Telescope[C]//Proceedings of the SPIE 6271, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy Ⅱ. Orlando, USA: SPIE, 2006: 62710Q.
21
LI J L , HUANG H Z , YAN S Z , et al. Kinematic accuracy and dynamic performance of a simple planar space deployable mechanism with joint clearance considering parameter uncertainty[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 136, 34- 45.
22
WU J L , ZHANG Y Q , CHEN L P , et al. A Chebyshev interval method for nonlinear dynamic systems under uncertainty[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37 (6): 4578- 4591.
23
邱志平, 马丽红, 王晓军. 不确定非线性结构动力响应的区间分析方法[J]. 力学学报, 2006, 38 (5): 645- 651.
QIU Z P , MA L H , WANG X J . Interval analysis for dynamic response of nonlinear structures with uncertainties[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2006, 38 (5): 645- 651.
24
JAMSHIDIFAR H , KHOSRAVANI S , FIDAN B , et al. Vibration decoupled modeling and robust control of redundant cable-driven parallel robots[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2018, 23 (2): 690- 701.
25
HOU S H , TANG X Q , SUN H N , et al. Analysis of cable-force transmission characteristics and disturbing force/moment of high-acceleration cable-driven parallel mechanism[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2022, 27 (1): 348- 359.
26
SANTOS J C, CHEMORI A, GOUTTEFARDE M. Redundancy resolution integrated model predictive control of CDPRs: Concept, implementation and experiments[C]//Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Paris, France: IEEE, 2020: 3889-3895.

基金

载人航天领域第四批预先研究项目(060201)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(11469 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/