输电通道地表典型植被燃烧特性试验研究

彭俊杰, 安伟光, 刘畅

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 553-562.

PDF(12442 KB)
PDF(12442 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 553-562. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.048
电网灾害应急科学

输电通道地表典型植被燃烧特性试验研究

作者信息 +

Experimental study on the combustion characteristics of typical surface vegetation in power transmission corridors

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

地表可燃物是引发山火和输电通道跳闸的基础因素, 研究其燃烧特性有利于山火防控和输电通道安全运行。该文以灌木丛、针叶和阔叶3种输电通道地表典型植被为研究对象开展燃烧特性试验, 分析不同堆积厚度下输电通道地表典型植被燃烧过程中火焰蔓延特性、质量损失速率、温度分布特征和烟气体积分数特性及其演变规律。研究结果表明:输电通道地表典型植被燃烧过程可分为初始、发展、全盛和熄灭阶段; 火焰蔓延呈圆弧形扩展趋势, 且火焰高度、质量损失速率和温度峰值均随堆积厚度的增加而升高; CO2体积分数变化呈“陡升—缓降”趋势, 而CO体积分数在初始和熄灭阶段呈集中释放的阶段性特征; 在相同堆积厚度下, 针叶具有最高的燃烧强度、火焰高度、质量损失速率和更明显的多峰波动特征。该文研究结果可为输电通道火灾风险评估与防控提供参考。

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, global climate change and intensified human activities have significantly increased surface fire risk in power transmission corridors spanning mountainous and forested areas, posing a serious threat to the safe and stable operation of modern power grids. Surface vegetation serves as the primary fuel for ground fires and wildfires, directly influencing the flame spread velocity, fire development stages, and combustion intensity. Therefore, investigating the combustion characteristics of surface vegetation is crucial for improving wildfire prevention systems, enhancing the accuracy of fire behavior predictions, and ensuring the operational reliability of transmission infrastructures. However, current research on the combustibility and fire behavior of various surface fuels in transmission corridors remains insufficient, particularly in terms of comparative analyses across different vegetation types and accumulation thicknesses. There is a pressing need for systematic experimental studies to reveal the heat release mechanisms, fire growth, and gas emission characteristics of these vegetation types. Methods: This study aimed to experimentally explore the combustion characteristics of typical surface vegetation in transmission corridors under varying accumulation thicknesses, compare differences in fire behavior among vegetation types, and identify key parameters, including flame spread patterns, mass loss rate evolution, temperature distributions, and gas volume fraction dynamics. The combustion characteristics of different types of surface vegetation in transmission corridors were investigated through small-scale experiments. A self-designed 1m2 small-scale combustion platform was constructed and equipped with cameras, a thermocouple array, a high-precision electronic balance, and gas sensors to collect key combustion data, including flame behavior, temperature distribution, mass loss, and gas volume fractions, during the tests. Three typical vegetation types—shrubs, coniferous litter (pine needles), and broadleaf litter (maple leaves)—were selected as the research objects. For each vegetation type, three accumulation thicknesses (10, 15, and 20cm) were specified. Under an ambient wind speed of 1 m/s, key parameters, including flame morphology, flame height, mass loss rate, temperature distributions, and smoke gas volume fraction, were recorded and analyzed to reveal the spatiotemporal evolution of their combustion characteristics. Results: The results showed that the combustion process of typical surface vegetation in transmission corridors could be divided into four stages: initial, development, peak, and extinguishment. Flame propagation exhibited an arc-shaped outward expansion pattern. As the accumulation thickness increased, the flame height, mass loss rate, and peak temperature also increased. The CO2 volume fraction followed a "sharp rise-gradual decline" trend, whereas the volume fraction of CO exhibited a phased characteristic of concentrated release in the initial and extinguishing stages. The volume fractions of both CO and CO2 increased with increasing accumulation thickness. At the same accumulation thickness, flame heights ranked from highest to lowest as coniferous litter, shrubs, and broadleaf litter. Among them, coniferous litter exhibited the highest combustion intensity, greatest flame height, maximum mass loss rate, and most pronounced multipeak fluctuation behavior. Conclusions: This study reveals the combustion characteristics of typical surface vegetation in transmission corridors under varying accumulation thicknesses. This study also systematically analyzes the differences in flame spread characteristics, thermal behavior, and gas emissions across vegetation types. The findings provide a robust experimental basis for assessing surface fire risk, modeling fire behavior, and developing wildfire warning strategies for power transmission corridors.

关键词

输电通道 / 地表植被 / 火焰蔓延特性 / 质量损失 / 温度分布 / 烟气体积分数

Key words

transmission corridor / surface vegetation / fire spread characteristics / mass loss / temperature distribution / smoke volume fraction

引用本文

导出引用
彭俊杰, 安伟光, 刘畅. 输电通道地表典型植被燃烧特性试验研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 66(3): 553-562 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.048
Junjie PENG, Weiguang AN, Chang LIU. Experimental study on the combustion characteristics of typical surface vegetation in power transmission corridors[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(3): 553-562 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.048
中图分类号: X932   

参考文献

1
电力规划设计总院. 中国电力发展报告[M]. 北京: 人民日报出版社, 2024.
China Electric Power Planning & Engineering Institute . Report on China electric power development[M]. Beijing: People's Daily Press, 2024.
2
刘畅, 姬昆鹏, 李军辉, 等. 电网山火"天空地"联合感测大尺度试验平台设计[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2025, 42 (5): 19- 27.
LIU C , JI K P , LI J H , et al. Design of a large-scale experimental platform for joint "sky-ground" sensing of power grid wildfires[J]. Experimental Technology and Management, 2025, 42 (5): 19- 27.
3
SULLIVAN A, BAKER E, KURVITS T, et al. Spreading like wildfire: The rising threat of extraordinary landscape fires [Z]. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 2022.
4
宗学政, 田晓瑞. 林火行为和扑救技术研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2019, 32 (6): 31- 36.
ZONG X Z , TIAN X R . Research progress in forest fire behavior and suppression technology[J]. World Forestry Research, 2019, 32 (6): 31- 36.
5
El-ZOHRI E H , ABDEL-SALAM M , SHAFEY H M , et al. Mathematical modeling of flashover mechanism due to deposition of fire-produced soot particles on suspension insulators of a HVTL[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2013, 95 (1): 232- 246.
6
HONG R C , LI J L , WANG J , et al. Effects of prescribed burning on understory quercus species of Pinus yunnanensis forest[J]. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2023, 6, 1208682.
7
ÀGUEDA A , PASTOR E , PÉREZ Y , et al. Fire intensity reduction in straw fuel beds treated with a long-term retardant[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2011, 46 (1-2): 41- 47.
8
PÉREZ Y , PASTOR E , ÀGUEDA A , et al. Effect of wind and slope when scaling the forest fires rate of spread of laboratory experiments[J]. Fire Technology, 2011, 47 (2): 475- 489.
9
KRAAIJ T , BAARD J A , ARNDT J , et al. An assessment of climate, weather, and fuel factors influencing a large, destructive wildfire in the Knysna region, South Africa[J]. Fire Ecology, 2018, 14, 4.
10
BLONDIN F , BLANCHET P , DAGENAIS C , et al. Fire hazard of compressed straw as an insulation material for wooden structures[J]. Fire and Materials, 2020, 44 (5): 736- 746.
11
闫想想, 王秋华, 李晓娜, 等. 昆明周边主要林型地表可燃物的燃烧特性研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2020, 40 (5): 135- 142.
YAN X X , WANG Q H , LI X N , et al. Combustibility of surface fuels in major forest types around Kunming[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2020, 40 (5): 135- 142.
12
许师瑛, 朱熙隆, 杨志林, 等. 昆明地区华山松林抚育后地表可燃物燃烧性研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2025, 44 (1): 119- 124.
XU S Y , ZHU X L , YANG Z L , et al. Study on combustion of surface fuels of Pinus armandii forest after nurturing in Kunming[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2025, 44 (1): 119- 124.
13
XU Y , ZHAI M , ZHANG Y C , et al. Effect of the ash melting behavior of a corn straw pellet on its heat and mass transfer characteristics and combustion rate[J]. Fuel, 2021, 286, 119483.
14
LI C , XU W B , CHENG H T , et al. Experimental study of fire propagation and heat transfer of biomass straw fuel with different stacked diameters and thicknesses[J]. Fuel, 2022, 315, 123260.
15
杜伟, 程海涛, 邹彪, 等. 基于点状火源的秸秆火焰蔓延及燃烧特性[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62 (6): 1088- 1093.
DU W , CHENG H T , ZOU B , et al. Flame spread and combustion characteristics of straw bales from a point fire source[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62 (6): 1088- 1093.
16
杜伟, 程海涛, 邹彪, 等. 堆积尺寸对秸秆燃烧特性影响的试验研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2022, 41 (6): 753- 757.
DU W , CHENG H T , ZOU B , et al. Experimental study on the influence of cumulated dimensions on the combustion characteristics of straw[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41 (6): 753- 757.
17
兰鑫宇, 胡泊. 堆积密度对秸秆燃烧及蔓延特性试验研究[J]. 安全与健康, 2023 (4): 59- 62.
LAN X Y , HU P . Experimental study on the influence of cumulated density on the combustion characteristics of straw[J]. Safety & Health, 2023 (4): 59- 62.
18
胡皓玮, 祁桢尧, 时敬军, 等. 不同外部辐射热流下小尺寸原木燃烧特性试验研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62 (6): 1023- 1030.
HU H W , QI Z Y , SHI J J , et al. Experimental investigation of the burning behavior of small logs with various external radiative heat fluxes[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62 (6): 1023- 1030.
19
马诚, 王劲, 韩正宝, 等. 滇东地区海寨林场针叶林地表可燃物潜在火行为研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2024, 43 (2): 265- 270.
MA C , WANG J , HAN Z B , et al. Study on the potential fire behavior of surface fuels in coniferous forests in Haizhai forestry, east Yunnan region[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2024, 43 (2): 265- 270.
20
文刚, 周仿荣, 马仪, 等. 滇西南地区典型森林可燃物燃烧特性试验研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2024, 46 (6): 871- 877.
WEN G , ZHOU F R , MA Y , et al. Experimental study on the combustion characteristics of typical forest fuels in the southwest area of Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Information & Management Engineering), 2024, 46 (6): 871- 877.
21
王劲, 张文文, 王秋华, 等. 滇中地区萌生栓皮栎地表可燃物燃烧火行为研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2022, 41 (8): 1133- 1137.
WANG J , ZHANG W W , WANG Q H , et al. Study on the burning behavior of surface fuels of sprouting quercus variabilis in central Yunnan province[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41 (8): 1133- 1137.
22
DUPUY J L , MARÉCHAL J . Slope effect on laboratory fire spread: Contribution of radiation and convection to fuel bed preheating[J]. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2011, 20 (2): 289- 307.
23
张玉春, 孔林毅, 郭瀚文, 等. 燃料载荷和含水率对平坡地表火蔓延影响试验研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2022, 41 (2): 261- 265.
ZHANG Y C , KONG L Y , GUO H W , et al. Experimental study on the effects of fuel load and water content on surface fire spread over flat fuel bed[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2022, 41 (2): 261- 265.
24
张文文, 闫想想, 王秋华, 等. 计划烧除对云南松林地表可燃物火行为的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44 (5): 69- 76.
ZHANG W W , YAN X X , WANG Q H , et al. Effects of prescribed burning on fire behavior of surface fuel in Pinus yunnanensis forest land[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44 (5): 69- 76.
25
王劲, 张文文, 王秋华, 等. 云南松林下计划烧除的火行为特征[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2023, 40 (4): 828- 835.
WANG J , ZHANG W W , WANG Q H , et al. Characteristics of fire behavior in prescribed burning under Pinus yunnanensis forest[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2023, 40 (4): 828- 835.
26
范俊城. 中国植被物候变化及其对气候变化的响应[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2024.
FAN J C. Changes in vegetation phenology in China and their response to climate change [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2024. (in Chinese)
27
冯瑞, 田润和, 陈科位, 等. 低气压环境对固体燃烧特性影响的试验研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 59 (2): 111- 121.
FENG R , TIAN R H , CHEN K W , et al. Experimental study of the effect of low pressures on solid fuel combustion characteristics[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2019, 59 (2): 111- 121.

基金

北京市自然科学基金项目(8232014)
江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2023049)
江苏省创新能力建设计划项目(BM2022013)
中国矿业大学科研发展基金项目(2024GNYZ5002)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(12442 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/