山火情景下输电通道动态韧性评估

朱伟, 钟少波, 赵丹青, 梅新

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 530-541.

PDF(11624 KB)
PDF(11624 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 530-541. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.049
电网灾害应急科学

山火情景下输电通道动态韧性评估

作者信息 +

Dynamic resilience assessment of transmission corridors under wildfire scenarios

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

开展山火情景下输电通道韧性评估是提升电网应对山火灾害能力的关键。针对当前山火情景下输电通道韧性定义尚未统一, 缺乏针对灾害孕育、发生和发展全过程韧性关键维度的考虑, 以及现有评估方法建模复杂等问题, 该文旨在构建一套可量化和可操作的山火情景下输电通道动态韧性评估模型。该文首先结合韧性理论与输电通道山火事故特征, 梳理了山火情景下输电通道韧性的核心内涵, 并构建了涵盖预防能力、抵抗能力、吸收能力、恢复能力和适应能力5个维度的韧性评估指标体系; 其次, 引入地理信息系统和遥感技术, 整合多源数据并提取指标数据, 采用组合赋权法确定指标权重, 构建了山火情景下输电通道的韧性评估流程; 最后, 以泰安市为例进行实例验证, 并对韧性评估结果进行了时空分析和敏感性分析。研究结果表明:该文所提评估模型能针对山火灾害全过程, 系统和量化地评估输电通道韧性状态; 该模型的可操作性和适用性均较好, 可有效支持韧性水平的时空分析和关键影响因素识别, 还可及时识别输电通道韧性薄弱环节, 为制定针对性韧性提升策略提供决策支持。该文研究结果可为后续相关研究和工程实践提供参考。

Abstract

Objective: Conducting resilience assessments of transmission corridors under wildfire scenarios is crucial for enhancing the power grid's ability to respond to wildfire disasters. Given the lack of a unified definition for the resilience of transmission corridors under wildfire scenarios, the insufficient consideration of key resilience dimensions throughout the process of disaster incubation, occurrence, and development; and the complexity of existing assessment methods, this study aims to establish a quantifiable and operable dynamic resilience assessment framework for transmission corridors under wildfire scenarios. Methods: Combining resilience theory with the characteristics of wildfire incidents affecting transmission corridors, this study clarified the core connotations of resilience in wildfire scenarios. On this basis, a resilience assessment index system was developed considering 5 dimensions, namely preventive, resistance, absorptive, recovery, and adaptive capabilities, and 37 indicators, such as relative air humidity, temperature, vegetation coverage, operating voltage of power transmission lines, and centrality degree of transmission lines. By incorporating geographic information systems and remote sensing technologies, multisource data were integrated, and the data of the indicators were extracted. The analytic hierarchy process-entropy weight combination method was employed to determine indicator weights, and a systematic resilience assessment framework was developed. The framework was applied to the Tai'an region as a case study, with spatiotemporal analysis and sensitivity analysis conducted on the resilience assessment results. Results: (1) The spatiotemporal analysis revealed that on the whole, more than 70.00% of the transmission corridors in Tai'an presented high or very high resilience levels. The resilience levels of transmission corridors in different months and regions fluctuated to varying degrees. The resilience level of the transmission corridors at the border between the Daiyue District and Xintai City remained low for a long time. In May and September 2024, the proportions of transmission corridors with low resilience levels in Tai'an were 0.66% and 0.02%, respectively. Compared with that in the entire year, the resilience level of the transmission corridors significantly decreased in May and September 2024, indicating that these months are the key periods for strengthening the management of system resilience levels. (2) The sensitivity analysis showed that indicators such as the centrality degree of transmission lines, the density of the power department, vegetation coverage, distributed power sources, and transmission-line material significantly affect the overall resilience level of a system. Management measures for enhancing the resilience level of transmission corridors can be formulated based on such indicators. Conclusions: The research results revealed the following: (1) The proposed assessment framework systematically and quantitatively evaluated the resilience status of transmission corridors throughout wildfire disasters using geographic information systems and remote sensing technologies. (2) This framework shows good operability and applicability and can effectively support the spatiotemporal analysis of resilience levels and the identification of key influencing factors. (3) This framework can also promptly identify weak links in the resilience of transmission corridors, providing decision support for the formulation of targeted resilience improvement strategies.

关键词

韧性 / 输电通道 / 山火 / 时空分析 / 层次分析法-熵权法

Key words

resilience / power transmission corridor / wildfire / spatiotemporal analysis / analytic hierarchy process-entropy weight method

引用本文

导出引用
朱伟, 钟少波, 赵丹青, . 山火情景下输电通道动态韧性评估[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 66(3): 530-541 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.049
Wei ZHU, Shaobo ZHONG, Danqing ZHAO, et al. Dynamic resilience assessment of transmission corridors under wildfire scenarios[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(3): 530-541 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.049
中图分类号: X932   

参考文献

1
刘泽洪, 周原冰, 李隽, 等. 中国西北西南电网互联研究[J]. 全球能源互联网, 2023, 6 (4): 341- 352.
LIU Z H , ZHOU Y B , LI J , et al. The study on interconnection of northwest and southwest power grid in China[J]. Journal of Global Energy Interconnection, 2023, 6 (4): 341- 352.
2
郭剑波. 我国电力科技现状与发展趋势[J]. 电网技术, 2006, 30 (18): 1- 7.
GUO J B . Present situation and development trend of power science and technology in China[J]. Power System Technology, 2006, 30 (18): 1- 7.
3
田鑫, 王林钰, 冀星沛, 等. 基于现代化基础设施体系政策要求的电网规模预测及优化需求[J]. 中国电力, 2024, 57 (2): 1- 8.
TIAN X , WANG L Y , JI X P , et al. Power grid scale prediction and optimization needs based on policy requirements of modern infrastructure system[J]. Electric Power, 2024, 57 (2): 1- 8.
4
张雷. 华北电网输电线路受山火影响特征分析[J]. 山东电力技术, 2019, 46 (9): 18- 22.
ZHANG L . Feature analysis of transmission line affected by mountain fire in north China power grid[J]. Shandong Electric Power, 2019, 46 (9): 18- 22.
5
周恩泽, 龚博, 刘淑琴, 等. 南方电网架空线路因山火跳闸故障统计分析[J]. 广东电力, 2022, 35 (4): 80- 86.
ZHOU E Z , GONG B , LIU S Q , et al. Statistics and analysis on tripping fault of overhead transmission lines caused by mountain fires in China southern power grids[J]. Guangdong Electric Power, 2022, 35 (4): 80- 86.
6
VUGRIN E D, CASTILLO A, SILVA-MONROY C A. Resilience metrics for the electric power system: A performance-based approach [R]. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories, 2017.
7
别朝红, 林雁翎, 邱爱慈. 弹性电网及其恢复力的基本概念与研究展望[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2015, 39 (22): 1- 9.
BIE Z H , LIN Y L , QIU A C . Concept and research prospects of power system resilience[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2015, 39 (22): 1- 9.
8
CHAUDRY M, EKINS P, RAMACHANDRAN K, et al. Building a resilient UK energy system: Research report [R]. London: UK Energy Research Centre, 2009.
9
PANTELI M , MANCARELLA P . Influence of extreme weather and climate change on the resilience of power systems: Impacts and possible mitigation strategies[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2015, 127, 259- 270.
10
PANTELI M , MANCARELLA P . The grid: Stronger, bigger, smarter?: Presenting a conceptual framework of power system resilience[J]. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 2015, 13 (3): 58- 66.
11
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . Enhancing the resilience of the nation's electricity system[M]. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2017.
12
许寅, 和敬涵, 王颖, 等. 韧性背景下的配网故障恢复研究综述及展望[J]. 电工技术学报, 2019, 34 (16): 3416- 3429.
XU Y , HE J H , WANG Y , et al. A review on distribution system restoration for resilience enhancement[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2019, 34 (16): 3416- 3429.
13
阮前途, 谢伟, 许寅, 等. 韧性电网的概念与关键特征[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40 (21): 6773- 6783.
RUAN Q T , XIE W , XU Y , et al. Concept and key features of resilient power grids[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40 (21): 6773- 6783.
14
别朝红, 卞艺衡, 张理寅, 等. 新型电力系统应对极端事件的风险防范与应急管理关键技术[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44 (18): 7049- 7067.
BIE Z H , BIAN Y H , ZHANG L Y , et al. Key technologies of risk prevention and emergency management against extreme events for new power systems[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44 (18): 7049- 7067.
15
TARI A N , SEPASIAN M S , KENARI M T . Resilience assessment and improvement of distribution networks against extreme weather events[J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2021, 125, 106414.
16
方超颖, 许军, 丁志龙, 等. 山火灾害下输电系统的弹性评估方法及其提升措施[J]. 电力工程技术, 2024, 43 (2): 239- 247.
FANG C Y , XU J , DING Z L , et al. Resilience assessment method and enhancement measures of power transmission system under mountain fire disasters[J]. Electric Power Engineering Technology, 2024, 43 (2): 239- 247.
17
DAELI A , MOHAGHEGHI S . Power grid infrastructural resilience against extreme events[J]. Energies, 2023, 16 (1): 64.
18
李正兆, 傅大放, 王君娴, 等. 应对内涝灾害的城市韧性评估模型及应用[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62 (2): 266- 276.
LI Z Z , FU D F , WANG J X , et al. Urban resilience assessment model for waterlogging disasters and its application[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62 (2): 266- 276.
19
姜沣珊, 傅星峰, 赵雷, 等. 基于洪涝灾害韧性GIS空间量化评价的城市应急避难规划[J]. 测绘通报, 2024 (1): 169- 174.
JIANG F S , FU X F , ZHAO L , et al. Urban emergency shelter planning based on GIS spatial quantitative evaluation of flood resilience[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2024 (1): 169- 174.
20
WALKER B , HOLLIN C S , CARPENTER S R , et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2004, 9 (2): 5.
21
FOLKE C , CARPENTER S R , WALKER B , et al. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability[J]. Ecology and Society, 2010, 15 (4): 20.
22
JAYATHILAKE S , RAJEEV P , GAD E . Performance assessment of overhead conductors subjected to combined thermal and wind loads[J]. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2024, 64, 137- 144.
23
AL SAEED Q, NAZARIPOUYA H. Impact of wildfires on power systems [C]//Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe. Prague, Czech Republic: IEEE, 2022: 1-5.
24
ROBLEDO-MARTINEZ A , GUZMAN E , HERNANDEZ J L . Dielectric characteristics of a model transmission line in the presence of fire[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, 1991, 26 (4): 776- 782.
25
普子恒, 阮江军, 黄道春, 等. 火焰条件下间隙的直流电压击穿特性研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34 (3): 453- 459.
PU Z H , RUAN J J , HUANG D C , et al. Study on DC voltage breakdown characteristics of gap under fire conditions[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34 (3): 453- 459.
26
ERMIDA S L , SOARES P , MANTAS V , et al. Google earth engine open-source code for land surface temperature estimation from the landsat series[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12 (9): 1471.
27
吕常笑, 秦乃花, 李萍, 等. 山东省森林火灾时空分布及火源特征研究[J]. 森林防火, 2023, 41 (2): 1- 6.
C X , QIN N H , LI P , et al. Study on the spatiotemporal distribution and fire source characteristics of forest fires in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Wildland Fire Science, 2023, 41 (2): 1- 6.
28
ZHANG X , LIU L Y , CHEN X D , et al. GLC_FCS30: Global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series Landsat imagery[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13 (6): 2753- 2776.

基金

中国科学技术大学引进人才科研启动专项经费项目(KY2160000016)
国家自然科学基金面上项目(72174031)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(11624 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/