PDF(10364 KB)
考虑冲刷影响的海上风电单桩基础动力响应分析
焦钰祺, 乔东生, 唐国强, 吕林, 欧进萍
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (8) : 1455-1464.
PDF(10364 KB)
PDF(10364 KB)
考虑冲刷影响的海上风电单桩基础动力响应分析
Dynamic response of monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines with scour effects
大直径单桩基础在近海风电中被广泛应用,但海洋动力环境导致的冲刷效应会显著影响桩基础的承载力以及结构的整体动力响应。为了评估整体冲刷和局部冲刷效应的影响,该文基于Abaqus有限元软件建立了冲刷平衡后的桩-土相互作用数值分析模型,采用考虑粒间应变张量的土体亚塑性动本构模型开展分析计算,揭示冲刷平衡后大直径单桩的承载机理,探究冲刷引起的剩余土体固结状态改变和局部冲刷深度对循环受荷单桩水平承载力响应的影响。结果表明,冲刷地形中大直径单桩水平土抗力主要由浅层楔形破坏区和基底旋转剪切区的土阻力贡献,局部冲刷深度变化主要影响桩周楔形破坏区的土阻力大小。此外,冲刷会诱发剩余土体固结状态改变,采用冲刷前的土体参数确定的桩-土相互作用刚度评估冲刷后单桩水平位移响应,会使位移峰值高估约23%。
Objective: Large-diameter monopiles are the primary foundations for offshore wind turbines. However, in challenging marine hydrodynamic environments, flow disturbances around these monopiles often cause significant scour in the adjacent sandy seabed. This scour reduces the effective embedment depth, increases the length of the cantilever section of the monopiles, initiates sediment transport, and modifies the consolidation state of the underlying soil. These changes weaken monopiles' lateral bearing capacity and affect wind turbines' overall dynamic responses. Consequently, developing an accurate and efficient method to assess scour effects on the lateral bearing capacities and dynamic responses of monopiles is imperative. Methods: In this research, finite element models of pile-soil interactions after scour equilibrium were developed in Abaqus; these models integrate a cyclic dynamic hypoplastic constitutive model that captures the mechanical behavior of sand under complex loading paths and accounts for soil consolidation states. Turbulent wind loads and irregular wave loads acting on wind turbine foundations were computed using OpenFAST and Abaqus/Aqua, respectively. The numerical simulation unfolds in three phases: 1) The first phase involves assigning the initial stress fields and applying gravity loads to the complete pile-soil model to achieve geostatic equilibrium with the soil in a normally consolidated state. 2) The second phase involves removing soil elements within a predefined scour depth to simulate the unloading process, shifting the underlying soil to an over-consolidated state. 3) The third phase involves imposing the turbulent wind and irregular wave load on the monopiles to evaluate horizontal dynamic responses, accounting for scour effects. The pile-soil interaction model was validated using centrifuge test data. Based on this model, the soil flow mechanisms of monopiles under horizontal cyclic loads after scour equilibrium were analyzed, revealing the impacts of changing stress histories in remaining soils and local scour depths on the horizontal bearing capacity responses of cyclically loaded monopiles. Results: Numerical analysis results reveal the following key findings: 1) Scour significantly accelerates deformation accumulation in monopiles and reduces the lateral stiffness of pile-soil interactions. At identical scour depths, peak horizontal displacement at the mudline is twice as high for global scour compared to local scour. 2) Scour-induced changes in soil consolidation states enhance the remaining soil's shear strength and compressive resistance. Assessing post-scour horizontal displacement responses using pile-soil interaction stiffness derived from pre-scour soil parameters overestimates peak displacement by approximately 23%. 3) The influence of scour depth and lateral extent on pile-soil interactions is confined to a wedge-shaped failure zone surrounding the monopile. The zone's width and depth scale linearly with increasing local scour depth. Conclusions: The finite element analysis models of pile-soil interactions developed in this study are effective for evaluating scour impacts on the dynamic response of monopile foundations under cyclic loading. Unlike API and DNV standards, which only account for scour by simply reducing foundation embedment depth, this study highlights the critical role of scour-induced changes in soil consolidation state; incorporating them further reduces monopile displacement responses.
冲刷 / 大直径单桩 / 海上风电 / 动力响应 / 循环加载
scour / monopile / offshore wind turbine / dynamic response / cyclic loading
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
API. Geotechnical and foundation design considerations: API RP 2GEO-2014 [S]. Washington, USA: American Petroleum Institute, 2011.
|
| 6 |
DNV. Support structures for wind turbines: DNVGL- ST-0126 [S]. Oslo, Norway: DNV, 2016.
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
REESE L C, COX W R, KOOP F D. Analysis of laterally loaded piles in sand [C]// Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas: OTC, 1974.
|
| 14 |
GAERTNER E, RINKER J, SETHURAMAN L, et al. IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt offshore reference wind turbine [R]. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2020.
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
王磊. 福建标准砂加筋硬化与循环累积变形三轴试验及本构模型[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2014.
WANG L. Triaxial testing and constitutive modeling for fiber reinforcement and cyclic accumulative strain of Fujian sand [D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2014. (in Chinese)
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
ONG M C, LI H, LEIRA B J, et al. Dynamic analysis of offshore monopile wind turbine including the effects of wind-wave loading and soil properties [C]//Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Nantes, France: ASME, 2013: OMAE2013-10527.
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
李玉成, 滕斌. 波浪对海上建筑物的作用[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2015.
|
| 27 |
MORIARTY P J, HANSEN A C. AeroDyn Theory Manual [R]. Salt Lake City: NREL, 2005.
|
| 28 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |