BIM与GBDT在连续箱梁内支撑加固方案中的应用

苗如松, 马宇杨, 沈聪, 黄晓龙, 袁爽, 叶志辉, 黄生铜

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 2078-2090.

PDF(5488 KB)
PDF(5488 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 2078-2090. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.043
土木工程

BIM与GBDT在连续箱梁内支撑加固方案中的应用

作者信息 +

Application of BIM and GBDT in internal bracing reinforcement solution for continuous box girder

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对某施工期间产生不可逆预应力缺陷的新建连续箱梁结构,为提高其刚度和抗力储备,该文采用建筑信息模型(building information modeling,BIM)和梯度提升决策树(gradient boosting decision tree,GBDT)算法,对其进行内支撑桁架-体外束组合加固方案设计、工序模拟,以及智能静态和动态工期预测。首先,采用桥梁结构专业有限元分析软件,分析了桁架加固对梁体刚度和受力情况的改善效果,验证了所提方案的有效性;其次,建立了加固项目的BIM参数化模型,并完成了碰撞检查和工序模拟等工作;最后,结合BIM特征指标,采用GBDT算法训练了加固项目的静态和动态工期预测模型,并采用数值模拟试验方法分析了动态预测模型的性能。结果表明:内支撑桁架可有效提高箱梁刚度,改善其弯矩,对于起控制作用的中支点负弯矩区段,恒载和活载(车道荷载)产生的弯矩平均分别减小12%和14%,但对支点附近的剪力几乎无影响;BIM定位并统计出1 300余处钢混构件穿插碰撞,指导了加固构造的优化设计,消除了设计阶段的构件碰撞;GBDT算法在各加固分项工程的相关训练集上,表现出较高的拟合及泛化能力,决定系数${R^2}$为0.89~0.93;相较于线性动态工期预测,GBDT动态工期预测的精度和可靠性更高,最低${R^2}$由0.66增至0.95,特别是在碰撞率未知的情况下,后者对于剩余工期的预测误差更小,最大误差由5.1%降至3.6%。该文研究结果可为同类工程箱梁结构的加固方案设计及工程应用提供参考。

Abstract

Objective: Prestressed concrete structures often require active strengthening measures to improve structural behavior and increase stiffness when there is insufficient prestress. The strengthening design needs to efficiently handle the complex connection relationships between new strengthening members and the original structure, aiming to minimize component clashes during the design stage. A scientific evaluation of the corresponding construction duration is also crucial for assessing the scheme's feasibility. Targeting a newly constructed continuous box-girder structure with irreversible prestress defects arising during construction, this paper designs a combined strengthening scheme using internal support trusses and external tendons, along with process simulation and intelligent static/dynamic duration prediction, using building information modeling (BIM) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) methods to increase its stiffness and resistance reserve. Methods: First, specialized bridge structural finite element analysis software was used to analyze the improvement efficiency of truss strengthening on the girder stiffness and internal forces, thereby verifying the scheme effectiveness. Second, a BIM parametric model of the strengthening project was established to complete tasks such as clash detection and construction process simulation. Furthermore, upon integrating BIM feature indicators, the GBDT algorithm was used to train static duration prediction models for the four subprojects involved in the strengthening project: support erection, installation of internal steel support trusses, tensioning and anchoring of external prestressing strands, and bridge deck pavement construction. Thereafter, the accuracy of the prediction results was analyzed. Finally, for the internal steel support truss installation subproject, a GBDT dynamic duration prediction model that accounts for random clash rates across construction segments was built. This model's performance was analyzed through numerical experiments, and its prediction accuracy was compared with that of a linear prediction model. Results: The results revealed the following: 1) The internal support trusses were effective in improving the box-girder stiffness and bending moment distribution. For the controlling mid-support negative moment region, the bending moments caused by the dead load and the live load (lane load) were reduced by an average of 12% and 14%, respectively, but there was no effect on the shear force near the supports. 2) BIM technology identified and counted more than 1 300 clashes between the steel and concrete components, guiding the optimization of the strengthening details and eliminating clashes at the design stage. 3) The GBDT algorithm demonstrated high fitting and generalization capabilities on the relevant training sets for each strengthening subproject, with the coefficients of determination ranging between 0.89 and 0.93. 4) The GBDT dynamic duration prediction model showed higher accuracy and reliability than the linear prediction. Furthermore, the minimum coefficient of determination increased from 0.66 to 0.95. In particular, under unknown clash rate conditions, the former also had smaller prediction errors for the remaining duration, with the maximum error decreasing from 5.1% to 3.6%. Conclusions: The BIM–GBDT method efficiently completes the forward design of this strengthening project and accurately predicts the project duration, thereby demonstrating the feasibility of the active strengthening scheme for a prestressed concrete structure. The methodological workflow described in this paper can serve as a reference for similar projects.

关键词

桥梁工程 / 结构加固改造 / 工期预测 / 建筑信息模型 / 机器学习 / 劲性骨架

Key words

bridge engineering / structural retrofit / construction schedule prediction / building information modeling / machine learning / stiffened skeleton

引用本文

导出引用
苗如松, 马宇杨, 沈聪, 等. BIM与GBDT在连续箱梁内支撑加固方案中的应用[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 66(10): 2078-2090 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.043
Rusong MIAO, Yuyang MA, Cong SHEN, et al. Application of BIM and GBDT in internal bracing reinforcement solution for continuous box girder[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(10): 2078-2090 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.043
中图分类号: TU17   

参考文献

1
赵诗华, 刘栋, 余香林, 等. 基于钢结构BIM模型的结构分析数据转换和软件开发[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2025, 57(1): 161- 169.
ZHAO S H , LIU D , YU X L , et al. Development of BIM-based analysis modeling for steel structures[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2025, 57(1): 161- 169.
2
GIRARDET A , BOTON C . A parametric BIM approach to foster bridge project design and analysis[J]. Automation in Construction, 2021, 126, 103679.
3
ARTUS M , KOCH C . State of the art in damage information modeling for RC bridges: A literature review[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2020, 46, 101171.
4
杨彬, 刘伯达, 肖建庄. 基于BIM的钢框架结构的拆解分析及其实现[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2022, 43(S1): 305- 314.
YANG B , LIU B D , XIAO J Z . Disassembly analysis and realization of steel frame structure based on BIM[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43(S1): 305- 314.
5
YU B , WANG Y C , CHEN Q H , et al. A review of road 3D modeling based on light detection and ranging point clouds[J]. Journal of Road Engineering, 2024, 4(4): 386- 398.
6
LU R D , BRILAKIS I . Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters[J]. Automation in Construction, 2019, 105, 102837.
7
齐宏拓, 刘界鹏, 程国忠, 等. 基于点云数据的大型复杂钢结构智能化施工方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2024, 57(1): 65- 75.
QI H T , LIU J P , CHENG G Z , et al. Intelligent construction of large and complex steel structure based on point cloud data[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57(1): 65- 75.
8
刘红波, 杨智锋, 周婷, 等. 基于Revit二次开发与深度学习的钢框架节点智能审图[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2024, 45(7): 43- 55.
LIU H B , YANG Z F , ZHOU T , et al. Intelligent drawing review of steel frame structure joints based on Revit secondary development and deep learning[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2024, 45(7): 43- 55.
9
杨春, 李鹏麟, 熊帅, 等. 基于BIM和神经网络的大跨度钢屋盖监测数据解析[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(9): 10- 19.
YANG C , LI P L , XIONG S , et al. Analysis of monitoring data of a long-span steel roof based on BIM and BP neural network[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(9): 10- 19.
10
LI J H , LI P X , GUO D , et al. Advanced prediction of tunnel boring machine performance based on big data[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12(1): 331- 338.
11
陈祖煜, 范立涛, 张云旆, 等. 知识驱动和数据驱动在TBM智能施工机器学习中的应用[J]. 土木工程学报, 2024, 57(6): 1- 12.
CHEN Z Y , FAN L T , ZHANG Y P , et al. Knowledge-based and data-based machine learning in intelligent TBM construction[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2024, 57(6): 1- 12.
12
邓志兴, 谢康, 肖宪普, 等. 基于机器学习的粗粒土振动压实频率预测研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2025, 38(1): 95- 107.
DENG Z X , XIE K , XIAO X P , et al. Predicting the vibration compaction frequency of coarse-grained soil based on machine learning[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2025, 38(1): 95- 107.
13
夏元友, 张宏伟, 吝曼卿, 等. 基于数据预处理技术并考虑围岩应力梯度影响的隧洞岩爆预测[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2023, 45(10): 1987- 1994.
XIA Y Y , ZHANG H W , LIN M Q , et al. Prediction of tunnel rockbursts based on data preprocessing technology considering influences of stress gradient of surrounding rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 45(10): 1987- 1994.
14
刘亚平, 骆欢. 基于数据驱动的施工任务时间风险预测系统研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2026, 59(7): 151- 160.
LIU Y P , LUO H . Research on data-driven construction task time risk prediction system[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2026, 59(7): 151- 160.
15
刘文硕, 钟明锋, 周博, 等. 基于机器学习的高速铁路斜拉桥钢箱梁温度模式研究[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(6): 25- 33.
LIU W S , ZHONG M F , ZHOU B , et al. Research on temperature model of steel box girder of high-speed railway cable-stayed bridge based on machine learning[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 53(6): 25- 33.
16
刘世忠, 马朝旭, 李丽园, 等. 火灾下PC箱梁的损伤评估与加固设计[J]. 桥梁建设, 2014, 44(6): 94- 100.
LIU S Z , MA C X , LI L Y , et al. Assessment and strengthening design of PC box girder subjected to fire damage[J]. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(6): 94- 100.
17
张阳, 党祺, 穆程. UHPC加固箱梁顶板受弯性能试验研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 44(3): 8- 18.
ZHANG Y , DANG Q , MU C . Experimental study on flexural behavior of top deck of box girder strengthened with ultra high performance concrete[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2017, 44(3): 8- 18.
18
王世超, 王春生, 段兰, 等. 组合加固足尺预应力混凝土箱梁抗弯性能试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(5): 56- 65.
WANG S C , WANG C S , DUAN L , et al. Flexural behavior experiment of full-scale PC box girder strengthened by composite technique[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(5): 56- 65.
19
交通运输部公路科学研究院. 公路桥梁加固改造技术指南(征求意见稿)[M]. 北京: 交通运输部公路科学研究院, 2017.
Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport . Technical guide for reinforcement of highway bridge (draft for comments)[M]. Beijing: Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, 2017.
20
李俊祥, 任彦, 王静宇, 等. 基于融合特征选择协同GBDT的热连轧板宽预测[J]. 塑性工程学报, 2025, 32(3): 152- 161.
LI J X , REN Y , WANG J Y , et al. Prediction of hot rolling strip width based on fusion feature selection cooperative GBDT[J]. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2025, 32(3): 152- 161.
21
黄晓龙. 混凝土连续箱梁桥精细化分析及其在加固设计中的应用研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2025.
HUANG X L. Refined analysis of concrete continuous box girder bridges and its application in strengthening design[D]. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2025. (in Chinese)
22
中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范: JTG 3362—2018[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2018.
Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. Specifications for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts: JTG 3362—2018[S]. Beijing: People's Communications Publishing House, 2018. (in Chinese)
23
刘效尧, 徐岳. 公路桥涵设计手册 梁桥[M]. 2版 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2011.
LIU X Y , XU Y . Highway bridge and culvert design handbook: Girder bridges[M]. 2nd ed Beijing: People's Communications Publishing House, 2011.
24
马宇杨. 建筑工程多因素关联的工期动态预测预警系统V1.0[Z]. 北京: 国家版权局, 2025-08-05.
MA Y Y. Dynamic prediction and early warning system for construction project duration with multi-factor correlation (Version 1.0)[Z]. Beijing: National Copyright Administration, 2025-08-05. (in Chinese)

基金

云南省基础研究专项面上项目(202501AT070197)
云南省“兴滇英才支持计划”青年人才专项项目(20220653)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(5488 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉