PDF(11739 KB)
PDF(11739 KB)
PDF(11739 KB)
基于云控的高密度交通下高速互通立交出入口协同优化方法
Coordinated optimization of highway interchange on-ramp and off-ramp under high-density traffic using cloud control systems
交通事业的蓬勃发展推动了高速公路立交的大量建设。为了解决高速公路互通立交出入口因匝道分流和匝道合流引发的交通拥堵问题, 该文提出一种基于云控系统的智能网联汽车协同多车道调度方法, 通过联合优化分流区与合流区的车辆通行次序, 实现整体通行效率的提升。首先, 针对分流车辆的强制换道需求, 构建基于三元组的分组描述, 并建立三元组次序决策的混合整数线性规划模型, 通过在代价函数中引入对后续车辆影响的考量, 保证三元组次序决策对整体交通效率的优化效果。在此基础上, 设计考虑直行车辆自由换道策略的滚动遍历规划机制, 将整体规划问题拆解为多个易于求解的三元组规划问题, 以优化主道车流分配, 提升通行效率。此外, 还建立了双模保障轨迹规划方法以生成兼顾通行效率与舒适性的行驶轨迹和车速规划。为验证方法有效性, 通过Python搭建仿真平台对不同交通流量下的情景进行模拟。结果表明:相较于分别优化匝道分流和合流的对比方法, 该文所提方法显著降低了全局车辆通行时间延误, 在各车道的流量为1440队列/h的情况下, 对比方法出现明显拥堵, 而该文所提方法仍能保持相对畅通的交通状况, 平均车速提升24.6%。
Objective: Urban expressway interchanges with closely spaced diverging and merging areas are typical recurrent bottlenecks under high demand. Mandatory divergence toward off-ramps and merging from on-ramps induce intensive weaving conflicts, and local disturbances may propagate across adjacent bottlenecks, resulting in system-level congestion. Conventional traffic management approaches (e.g., ramp metering and variable speed limits) are usually designed at a macroscopic level and often target isolated bottleneck segments; therefore, they can mitigate local congestion but may not effectively suppress congestion coupling between successive diverge–merge areas within an interchange network. With the development of intelligent connected vehicles (ICVs) and cloud control systems, vehicle-level cooperative decision-making has become feasible. Nevertheless, existing studies predominantly address either a single merging zone or a single diverging zone, while integrated interchange-level coordination of diverging and merging operations remains insufficient. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes an interchange-level cloud-based cooperative optimization framework that jointly coordinates diverging and merging operations. The objective of this study is to compute a near-optimal passing sequence and trajectory plan that minimizes the weighted sum of travel delay (WD) for all vehicles while ensuring safety and comfort. The main challenge lies in the combinatorial complexity caused by multilane interactions and mixed mandatory and discretionary lane changes. Methods: To improve computational scalability, a rolling traversal scheduling (RTS) mechanism is developed. Instead of solving a single large-scale optimization for all vehicles at the interchange, the RTS constructs a rolling decision group comprising the current leading vehicle (or platoon) from each relevant lane. At each decision step, the cloud controller formulates a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) subproblem to determine which candidate to serve next in the conflict area, along with the corresponding discrete sequence decisions. Once the decision is fixed, the selected candidate leaves the group, the next vehicle in that lane enters, and another MILP is solved. Through this rolling update, the interchange-level scheduling task is decomposed into a sequence of tractable MILP subproblems, while the cost design accounts for the delay impacts on other vehicles to preserve near-global optimality. To further enhance multilane utilization, a free lane-change strategy for through vehicles is proposed that jointly searches for discretionary lane-change positions alongside mandatory lane-change requirements to create gaps and reduce conflicts. In addition, a dual-mode trajectory planning method is introduced to translate the optimized sequence into implementable motion: an optimal-control-based trajectory is generated for efficiency and smoothness, while a car-following-model-based trajectory is retained as a safety-guaranteed fallback. Results: A simulation platform is implemented on an interchange segment with stochastic arrivals under 720, 1 080, and 1 440 pla·h-1·ln-1. Compared with a baseline strategy that optimizes diverging and merging areas separately, the proposed method reduces WD by 22.5% in an illustrative case, exhibits considerably better resilience at 1 080 pla·h-1·ln-1 (delay increase 33.7% versus 320.0%), and maintains a relatively fluent state at 1 440 pla·h-1·ln-1 with a 24.6% higher average speed and markedly lower average delay (~15.5 s versus 55.0 s). Conclusions: Overall, the proposed framework integrates rolling MILP scheduling, discretionary lane-change coordination, and robust trajectory planning, demonstrating the potential of cloud-controlled ICV coordination to mitigate congestion coupling and enhance interchange operational efficiency.
智能网联汽车 / 多车协同规划 / 高速公路互通立交 / 云控系统
intelligent connected vehicles / multi-vehicle cooperative planning / highway interchange / cloud control system
| 1 |
张鸿轩. 面向规划设计的路网堵点解析及预防策略[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2023.
ZHANG H X. Analysis and prevention strategy of road network blockage points for planning and design[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
马芳臣. 城郊高速公路立交路段常发性交通拥堵成因分析及缓解策略研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2023.
MA F C. Cause analysis and mitigation strategy research of recurring traffic congestion in interchange section of suburban expressway[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2023. (in Chinese)
|
| 7 |
李健, 贾元华, 姚晓白, 等. 互通式立交网络流的协同控制[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2011, 35 (3): 39- 45.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
李克强, 常雪阳, 李家文, 等. 智能网联汽车云控系统及其实现[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42 (12): 1595- 1605.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets[M]. 7th ed. Washington: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2018.
|
| 21 |
TREIBER M, KESTING A. Traffic flow dynamics: Data, models and simulation[M]. TREIBER M, THIEMANN C, trans. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.
|
| 22 |
Gurobi Optimization. Gurobi Optimizer: Gurobi 13.0[M/OL]. 2023[2025-09-18]. https://www.gurobi.com.
|
| 23 |
WANG H R, LI X, HU J. Lane change like a snake: Cooperative adaptive cruise control with platoon lane change capability[C]//IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (Ⅳ). Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 2020: 348.
|
| 24 |
中华人民共和国交通运输部. 高速公路改扩建交通组织设计规范: JTG/T 3392—2022[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2022.
Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. Design specification for traffic organization of expressway reconstruction and extension: JTG/T 3392—2022[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2022. (in Chinese)
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |