镍钴锰酸锂电池在运输箱内热失控及预警

汪凯璇, 张平, 吴金中

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (9) : 1925-1932.

PDF(2245 KB)
PDF(2245 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (9) : 1925-1932. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.055
公共安全

镍钴锰酸锂电池在运输箱内热失控及预警

作者信息 +

Thermal runaway and early warning of lithium nickel–cobalt–manganese oxide (NCM) batteries in transport containers

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

运输箱内的镍钴锰酸锂(NCM)电池因其高能量密度,且热失控中会产生大量危害性气体,导致运输事故风险更为突出。本文将长短期记忆神经网络(LSTM)和非接触式传感技术相结合,研究运输箱内NCM电池热失控特性及预警方法。首先,搭建运输箱热失控实验平台,选取50% SOC的NCM单体电池及模组电池为实验对象,开展加热触发条件下的热失控实验,对比了2种动力锂电池在运输箱内的热失控特性;其次,基于LSTM构建了融合电化学气体(H2、CO)传感器与红外温度传感器的多源非接触式传感动态预警算法,分析多种非接触式传感器的监测预警效果。结果表明:NCM模组热失控时间较单体电池热失控时间可更快地监测运输过程中的动力锂电池安全状态。针对运输对象为NCM单体及模组,该模型提出了风险概率评判标准,对不同运输对象均实现了精准的早期识别,平均提前预警时间达120 s。研究将为道路运输过程中的NCM动力锂电池运输风险管控提供重要参考。

Abstract

Objective: Nickel–cobalt–manganese oxide (NCM) lithium-ion batteries are widely used in electric vehicles because of their high energy density. However, external heating, mechanical damage, internal short circuits, or other abnormal conditions can trigger thermal runaway, resulting in rapid temperature rise, fire, explosion, and the release of hazardous gases such as hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO). Inside a closed transport container, heat and gases may accumulate rapidly, increasing transportation risks. However, conventional monitoring methods, which mainly rely on battery voltage, current, or contact temperature measurements, are difficult to directly apply to transported batteries. This study therefore investigates the thermal runaway characteristics of NCM cells and modules in a closed transport container and develops a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based early-warning method using multisource, noncontact sensor data. Methods: A thermal runaway experimental platform in a transport container was established, and NCM single cells and battery modules at 50% state of charge were selected as the experimental objects. Heating-triggered thermal runaway experiments were conducted under comparable conditions, and the valve-opening time, thermal runaway time, temperature variation, and characteristic gas release of the two battery forms were analyzed. Noncontact monitoring was achieved using electrochemical H2 and CO sensors and an infrared temperature sensor installed inside the container. The gas sensors detected characteristic gases generated by battery decomposition reactions, whereas the infrared sensor monitored battery temperature changes. The collected infrared temperature, H2, and CO time-series data were input simultaneously into an LSTM neural network, which extracted temporal correlations and synergistic changes among the multisource sensor signals. Based on these outputs, a risk probability criterion was proposed to determine whether the transported battery was in a thermal runaway risk state; the model output was used for binary risk-state identification rather than for classifying multiple risk levels or different thermal runaway stages. Results: The experimental results showed clear differences between the thermal runaway behaviors of the NCM cell and module. The module’s valve-opening and thermal runaway times were 770 and 896 s, respectively, which were earlier than the corresponding times of 890 and 1 037 s for the single cell. Owing to thermal interactions within the module, its thermal runaway onset and maximum temperatures were 98.0 ℃ and 672.8 ℃, respectively, which were lower than the corresponding values of 139.8 ℃ and 734.5 ℃ for the single cell. These results indicated that thermal interactions among cells substantially changed the module’s thermal runaway evolution, accelerating triggering and causing the module to enter a hazardous state earlier than the single cell. Therefore, NCM modules presented more prominent thermal runaway risks and imposed higher requirements on early-warning technologies. Infrared temperature and electrochemical gas sensors showed good detection capability during the early development of thermal runaway, with infrared temperature reflecting the external thermal response of the batteries and H2 and CO signals reflecting the internal gas-generating reactions. Together, these combined signals provided complementary information on battery temperature and gas release and were suitable for monitoring NCM cells and modules under transportation conditions. By integrating temporal changes in infrared temperature, H2, and CO signals and analyzing the synergistic variations in temperature gradients and characteristic gas concentrations, the LSTM-based multisource early-warning model accurately identified the thermal runaway risk state of NCM cells or modules. The model achieved an average warning lead time of 120 s, providing additional time for vehicle stopping, cargo isolation, cooling, fire suppression, and personnel evacuation. Conclusions: Thermal interactions within an NCM module substantially accelerate thermal runaway development in a closed transport container. Compared with a single cell, the module exhibits earlier valve opening and thermal runaway, as well as lower thermal runaway onset and maximum temperatures. Noncontact infrared temperature and electrochemical gas sensors can effectively monitor the thermal and gas-release characteristics of NCM batteries during transportation. The proposed LSTM-based method, which integrates multisource sensor data and determines thermal runaway risk using a risk probability criterion, enables accurate early warning for NCM cells and modules. The results provide a reference for intelligent monitoring and emergency response during the road transportation of NCM lithium-ion batteries.

关键词

镍钴锰酸锂电池 / 运输安全 / 热失控特性 / 热失控预警

Key words

lithium nickel–cobalt–manganese oxide battery / transport safety / thermal runaway characteristics / thermal runaway early warning

引用本文

导出引用
汪凯璇, 张平, 吴金中. 镍钴锰酸锂电池在运输箱内热失控及预警[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 66(9): 1925-1932 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.055
Kaixuan WANG, Ping ZHANG, Jinzhong WU. Thermal runaway and early warning of lithium nickel–cobalt–manganese oxide (NCM) batteries in transport containers[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(9): 1925-1932 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.055
中图分类号: X951   

参考文献

1
E J Q, XIAO H X, TIAN S C, et al. A comprehensive review on thermal runaway model of a lithium-ion battery: Mechanism, thermal, mechanical, propagation, gas venting and combustion[J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 229, 120762.
2
UEDA A, KIM Y, KIM W. Laminar burning velocity of lithium-ion battery thermal runaway vent gas in air[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2024, 89, 105293.
3
李竑序. 动力电池热失控蔓延及其控制研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2025.
LI H X. Research on thermal runaway propagation of power battery and its management[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2025. (in Chinese)
4
JIN Y, ZHAO Z X, MIAO S, et al. Explosion hazards study of grid-scale lithium-ion battery energy storage station[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 42, 102987.
5
YANG J, TONG J C, YANG Y, et al. Characteristics of thermal runaway and propagation for 18650 lithium batteries in top-confined space[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2025, 241, 126663.
6
HUANG J, JIN J Q, LIANG J X, et al. Experimental study on fire suppression of NCM lithium-ion battery by C6F12O in a confined space[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2025, 259, 124932.
7
FENG X N, OUYANG M G, LIU X, et al. Thermal runaway mechanism of lithium ion battery for electric vehicles: A review[J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2018, 10, 246- 267.
8
CHEN M Y, OUYANG D X, LIU J H, et al. Investigation on thermal and fire propagation behaviors of multiple lithium-ion batteries within the package[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 157, 113750.
9
WANG J L, LI L, YU K H, et al. Functionalized MXenes nanosheets inspired flame retardant epoxy composites: Mechanisms investigation and safety evaluation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 464, 140124.
10
ZHAO C P, SUN J H, WANG Q S. Thermal runaway hazards investigation on 18650 lithium-ion battery using extended volume accelerating rate calorimeter[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 28, 101232.
11
LIAO Z H, ZHANG S, LI K, et al. Hazard analysis of thermally abused lithium-ion batteries at different state of charges[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 27, 101065.
12
MAO N, GADKARI S, WANG Z R, et al. A systematic investigation of thermal runaway characteristics, inflame evolution and post-mortem analysis caused by overcharging for lithium-ion batteries with different cathode materials[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 74, 109421.
13
LIU P J, WANG C D, SUN S J, et al. Understanding the influence of the confined cabinet on thermal runaway of large format batteries with different chemistries: A comparison and safety assessment study[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 74, 109337.
14
ALI A O, ABDELREHIM O, SAAFAN M M, et al. Comprehensive review of battery management systems for electric vehicles: Thermal management, charging strategies, and emerging technologies[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2025, 658, 238269.
15
余威. 锂离子电池储能系统消防安全技术研究进展[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2026, 45(1): 64- 74.
YU W. Research progress on fire safety technology for lithium-ion battery energy storage system[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2026, 45(1): 64- 74.
16
张青松, 曲奕润, 郝朝龙, 等. 三元锂离子电池热失控气体原位分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48(7): 2817- 2825.
ZHANG Q S, QU Y R, HAO C L, et al. In-situ analysis of thermal runaway gas in ternary lithium-ion battery[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2022, 48(7): 2817- 2825.
17
FLEMING J, AMIETSZAJEW T, CHARMET J, et al. The design and impact of in-situ and operando thermal sensing for smart energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2019, 22, 36- 43.
18
CHENG Z X, JU L R, LI J Y, et al. Early warning of thermal runaway for larger-format lithium iron-phosphate battery by coupling internal pressure and temperature[J]. Applied Energy, 2025, 383, 125396.
19
MEI W X, LIU Z, WANG C D, et al. Operando monitoring of thermal runaway in commercial lithium-ion cells via advanced lab-on-fiber technologies[J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 5251.
20
LIAO Z H, ZHANG J G, GAN Z Y, et al. Thermal runaway warning of lithium-ion batteries based on photoacoustic spectroscopy gas sensing technology[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2022, 46(15): 21694- 21702.
21
YANG M J, RONG M Z, YE Y J, et al. A comprehensive study of thermal runaway behavior and Early warning subjected to internal short-circuit[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2024, 620, 235213.
22
YANG M J, RONG M Z, YE Y J, et al. Comprehensive analysis of gas production for commercial LiFePO4 batteries during overcharge-thermal runaway[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 72, 108323.
23
LI J Z, LI Y Q, ZENG W. Gas sensing technology as the key to safety warning of lithium-ion battery: Recent advance[J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2024, 365, 114890.
24
HU D N, HUANG S, WEN Z, et al. A review on thermal runaway warning technology for lithium-ion batteries[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 206, 114882.
25
ZHAO R X, KOLLMEYER P J, LORENZ R D, et al. A compact unified methodology via a recurrent neural network for accurate modeling of lithium-ion battery voltage and state-of-charge [C]//2017 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE). Cincinnati, USA: IEEE, 2017: 5234–5241.
26
WANG H W, ZHANG Y J, LI W F, et al. Experimental study on the cell-jet temperatures of abused prismatic Ni-rich automotive batteries under medium and high states of charge[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 202, 117859.

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3009500)
重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX0550)
四川省科技计划重点研发项目(2025YFCY0019)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(2245 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/