基于时序条件生成对抗网络的建筑火灾温度场演化快速预测

杨成志, 洪瑶, 张洪, 胡奕晗, 李俊毅, 史聪灵

清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 1977-1990.

PDF(3243 KB)
PDF(3243 KB)
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 1977-1990. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.059
公共安全

基于时序条件生成对抗网络的建筑火灾温度场演化快速预测

作者信息 +

Fast prediction of temperature fields in building fires based on a temporal conditional generative adversarial network

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为显著提升建筑消防安全设计过程中数值模拟验证的计算效率,该文构建了一种引入历史状态条件约束的时序条件生成对抗网络(temporal conditional generative adversarial network, TC-GAN),基于由35种不同单层建筑布局与2种随机火源位置组合而成的70个火灾案例数据集,进行了模型的训练、优化及评估,实现了单层建筑火灾温度场演化的快速预测。结果表明:通过对比多步损失、计划采样和视频判别器3种TC-GAN模型的优化策略,筛选出了计划采样为相对最优策略;优化后的TC-GAN模型相较传统pix2pix模型预测性能得到提升,安全高度处预测温度场的平均归一化均方根误差降低39.3%,结构相似性指数提高24.6%,2项指标性能分别达到0.098 4和0.884 2,且温度空间分布与关键温度测点时间演化预测曲线吻合度也相对显著提升。该文研究结果有效实现了单层建筑火灾演化的快速预测,节省了数值模拟的时间与计算成本,为建筑消防设计辅助评估提供了一种新的技术路径。

Abstract

Objective: Building fire safety design commonly relies on computational fluid dynamics simulations to obtain fire temperature fields. However, simulating the complete fire process in complex scenarios is time-consuming and cannot readily meet rapid assessment requirements. Existing methods for predicting fire temperature fields with conditional generative adversarial networks mostly rely on static mappings from building conditions to single-frame temperature fields, without fully accounting for the temporal dependencies between temperature fields at adjacent time steps as a fire develops. To address this issue, this study develops a temporal conditional generative adversarial network (TC-GAN), incorporating historical-state constraints into the pix2pix model. This study further optimizes the model to mitigate error accumulation in autoregressive prediction, thereby enabling rapid dynamic prediction of temperature-field evolution in single-story building fires. Methods: A fire dataset was constructed using Fire Dynamics Simulator. It comprised 35 single-story building layouts, each configured with two fire-source locations, resulting in a total of 70 fire scenarios. Given the building layout, fire-source location, and prediction time, TC-GAN introduces the temperature field at the previous time step as a historical-state input and, during inference, continuously generates temperature-field sequences in an autoregressive manner. To mitigate error accumulation, three optimization strategies, namely, multi-step loss, scheduled sampling, and a video discriminator, were compared. Model performance was comprehensively evaluated using the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), temperature-evolution curves at key monitoring points, and the intersection over union (IoU) and area error of high-temperature regions above 70 ℃. Results: The results showed that TC-GAN with only historical-state constraints was affected by autoregressive error accumulation and exhibited lower predictive performance than pix2pix, whereas the model with scheduled sampling achieved the best performance. On the test set, the model with scheduled sampling reduced average NRMSE by 39.3% and increased average SSIM by 24.6% compared with pix2pix. Temperature-field visualizations showed that this variant captured the temperature diffusion process in complex building spaces more consistently, reducing the local high-temperature accumulation, spatial-pattern fragmentation, and abnormal diffusion observed in the pix2pix predictions. The predicted curves at key monitoring points likewise showed closer agreement with the reference temperature trends. For regions with temperatures above 70 ℃, the model with scheduled sampling increased the average IoU from 0.357 4 to 0.561 1 and decreased the average absolute area error from 0.276 5 to 0.212 2, indicating improved predictive capability for capturing the location and extent of high-temperature regions. Conclusions: Historical-state constraints supply temporal evolution information for building-fire temperature-field prediction, but effective error-suppression strategies are required to mitigate autoregressive error accumulation. Under the conditions investigated in this study, TC-GAN combining scheduled sampling with historical-state constraints achieved the best overall predictive performance, outperforming the conventional pix2pix model in temperature-field accuracy, spatial structural consistency, temporal evolution at key monitoring points, and prediction of high-temperature regions. This method enables rapid prediction of temperature-field evolution in single-story building fires, reduces the time and computational costs of conventional numerical simulation, and provides a potential technical pathway for building fire safety design and rapid fire-risk assessment.

关键词

建筑火灾 / 人工智能 / 时序预测 / 消防设计 / 性能优化

Key words

building fire / artificial intelligence / time series prediction / fire protection design / performance optimization

引用本文

导出引用
杨成志, 洪瑶, 张洪, 等. 基于时序条件生成对抗网络的建筑火灾温度场演化快速预测[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版). 2026, 66(10): 1977-1990 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.059
Chengzhi YANG, Yao HONG, Hong ZHANG, et al. Fast prediction of temperature fields in building fires based on a temporal conditional generative adversarial network[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(10): 1977-1990 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.059
中图分类号: X932   

参考文献

1
胡俊, 吴家浩, 申世飞, 等. 消防应急科普场馆中的场景化科普模式研究[J]. 科普研究, 2021, 16(5): 51- 58.
HU J, WU J H, SHEN S F, et al. Study on scenario-based science popularization model in fire emergency science popularization museum[J]. Studies on Science Popularization, 2021, 16(5): 51- 58.
2
ZHANG Y X, DING Y F, CHRAIBI M, et al. Multi-scale analysis of fire and evacuation drill in a multi-functional university high-rise building[J]. Developments in the Built Environment, 2025, 21, 100626.
3
国家消防救援局. 国家消防救援局举行通报2025年消防安全形势和消防救援队伍出动情况例行新闻发布会[EB/OL]. (2026-03-17) [2026-09-16]. http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwfb/bwxwfb/gbwfbh/gjxfjyj/202604/t20260410_984263.html.
National Fire and Rescue Administration. The National Fire and Rescue Bureau held a regular press conference to inform the 2025 fire safety situation and the dispatch of fire and rescue teams[EB/OL]. (2026-03-17)[2026-09-16]. http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwfb/bwxwfb/gbwfbh/gjxfjyj/202604/t20260410_984263.html. (in Chinese)
4
疏学明, 颜峻, 胡俊, 等. 基于Bayes网络的建筑火灾风险评估模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 60(4): 321- 327.
SHU X M, YAN J, HU J, et al. Risk assessment model for building fires based on a Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2020, 60(4): 321- 327.
5
ZHOU H, CONG H Y, WANG Y Y, et al. A computer-vision- based deep learning model of smoke diffusion[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2024, 187, 721- 735.
6
VERMESI I, REIN G, COLELLA F, et al. Reducing the computational requirements for simulating tunnel fires by combining multiscale modelling and multiple processor calculation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 64, 146- 153.
7
HAGHIGHAT A, LUXBACHER K, LATTIMER B Y. Development of a methodology for interface boundary selection in the multiscale road tunnel fire simulations[J]. Fire Technology, 2018, 54(4): 1029- 1066.
8
HODGES J L, LATTIMER B Y, LUXBACHER K D. Compartment fire predictions using transpose convolutional neural networks[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2019, 108, 102854.
9
SU L C, WU X Q, ZHANG X N, et al. Smart performance-based design for building fire safety: Prediction of smoke motion via AI[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 43, 102529.
10
ZENG Y F, ZHENG Z, ZHANG T H, et al. AI-powered fire engineering design and smoke flow analysis for complex-shaped buildings[J]. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2024, 11(3): 359- 373.
11
ZENG Y F, LI Y Z, DU P L, et al. Smart fire detection analysis in complex building floorplans powered by GAN[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 79, 107858.
12
HAN J, ZHENG Z, GU Y, et al. Generative model-based building evacuation simulation for safety design[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 116, 114644.
13
RIANTO S, ZENG Y F, HUANG X Y, et al. Generative artificial intelligence for fire scenario analysis in complex building design layouts[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2025, 155, 104427.
14
CHENG Q L, WANG X Y, ZHUANG J, et al. Fire scenario simulation method for residential buildings based on generative adversarial network[J]. Developments in the Built Environment, 2025, 23, 100720.
15
NGUYEN T, SHAH R, BANSAL H, et al. Scaling transformer neural networks for skillful and reliable medium-range weather forecasting[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024, 37, 68740- 68771.
16
BENGIO S, VINYALS O, JAITLY N, et al. Scheduled sampling for sequence prediction with recurrent neural networks [C]//Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Montreal, Canada: MIT Press, 2015: 1171–1179.
17
VONDRICK C, PIRSIAVASH H, TORRALBA A. Generating videos with scene dynamics[C]//Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Barcelona, Spain: Curran Associates Inc., 2016: 613–621.
18
MCGRATTAN K B, BAUM H R, REHM R G, et al. Fire dynamics simulator: Technical reference guide: NISTIR 6467 [R]. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2000.
19
ZHAO G X, BEJI T, MERCI B. Study of FDS simulations of buoyant fire-induced smoke movement in a high-rise building stairwell[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2017, 91, 276- 283.
20
高子鹤, 蔡佳俊, 范传刚, 等. 高海拔环境竖井长宽比对隧道竖井自然排烟性能的影响[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2024, 43(9): 1234- 1239.
GAO Z H, CAI J J, FAN C G, et al. Research on the impact of shaft aspect ratio on natural smoke exhaust performance of tunnel shafts in high-altitude tunnels[J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2024, 43(9): 1234- 1239.
21
钟茂华, 胡鹏, 陈俊沣, 等. 顶部多点竖向排烟下地铁隧道烟气控制研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(5): 754- 764.
ZHONG M H, HU P, CHEN J F, et al. Research for smoke control in a subway tunnel under the ceiling multi-point vertical smoke exhaust[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2023, 63(5): 754- 764.
22
WANG X Y, FLEISCHMANN C, SPEARPOINT M. Applying the FDS pyrolysis model to predict heat release rate in small-scale forced ventilation tunnel experiments[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2020, 112, 102946.
23
KHAN M M, TEWARSON A, CHAOS M. Combustion characteristics of materials and generation of fire products [M]//HURLEY M J, GOTTUK D, HALL J R, et al. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. New York: Springer, 2016: 1143–1232.
24
田向亮, 钟茂华, 刘畅, 等. 不同阻塞条件下的隧道火灾全尺寸试验研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(2): 93- 101.
TIAN X L, ZHONG M H, LIU C, et al. Experimental study on safety full-scale of tunnel fire disaster under different blocking conditions[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(2): 93- 101.
25
ZHANG C H, CHEN J Q, KANG X. Simulation study on the spread characteristics of fires and control measures in high-inclination belt conveyors[J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2024, 60, 104767.
26
洪瑶, 史聪灵, 李俊毅, 等. 隧道火灾中物理场与关键控制参数间的快速双向预测[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(6): 1024- 1031.
HONG Y, SHI C L, LI J Y, et al. Rapid bidirectional prediction between the physical fields and key control parameters in tunnel fires[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2024, 64(6): 1024- 1031.
27
ISOLA P, ZHU J Y, ZHOU T H, et al. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Honolulu, USA: IEEE, 2017: 5967–5976.
28
BI K F, XIE L X, ZHANG H H, et al. Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks[J]. Nature, 2023, 619(7970): 533- 538.
29
VLACHAS P R, KOUMOUTSAKOS P. Learning on predictions: Fusing training and autoregressive inference for long-term spatiotemporal forecasts[J]. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2024, 470, 134371.
30
MENTASCHI L, BESIO G, CASSOLA F, et al. Problems in RMSE-based wave model validations[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2013, 72, 53- 58.
31
SARA U, AKTER M, UDDIN M S. Image quality assessment through FSIM, SSIM, MSE and PSNR—A comparative study[J]. Journal of Computer and Communications, 2019, 7(3): 8- 18.
32
吴乐, 岳顺禹, 程辉航, 等. 高层建筑地下室火灾烟气蔓延试验[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 65(3): 469- 478.
WU L, YUE S Y, CHENG H H, et al. Fire smoke spread experiment in the basement of high-rise buildings[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2025, 65(3): 469- 478.
33
COLINO M P, ROSENSTEIN E B. Smoke Flow Control in Tunnels Using Natural Ventilation[C]//ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018, 50978: V001T06A019.

基金

国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(52404255)
中国安全生产科学研究院基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2024JBKY02)

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载。
PDF(3243 KB)

审稿意见

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉