PDF(1259 KB)
PDF(1259 KB)
PDF(1259 KB)
基于FC模型的产业转移的福利效应三地区理论模型
Economic effects of industry transfers in a three-region model based on the footloose capital model
厂商的区位选择与产业的集聚无论对于经济系统整体还是经济系统中的每一个个体,均隐含着丰富的福利含义。本文基于新经济地理学框架下的自由资本模型(FC模型)分析产业转移过程中的福利效应,扩展了现有研究的两地区模型,建立了一个更为一般化的三地区理论模型。模型得到市场均衡状态下整体福利出现正负转换时各地区产业份额所在的临界点的显性解析解,并通过数值模拟的方式分析了产业转移对各地区的个体福利与整体经济系统整体福利的影响。本文的分析有助于解释不同区域间产业转移带来的福利水平变化差异。
The locations of manufacturers and the agglomeration of industries steady affect the entire economic system and the individual agents in this system. This study uses the footloose capital (FC) model with a new economic geography to extend the two-region model into a more generalized three-region model to analyze the economic effects of industry transfers. This model gives explicit equations for the industry shares in each region when the overall economics turn from positive to negative with market equilibrium. The impact of industry transfers on the economics of the entire economy and of single individuals is investigated numerically. This paper provides a better understanding of the disparities in economic improvements caused by cross-region industry transfers.
新经济地理学 / 福利效应 / 产业转移 / 自由资本模型 / 三地区模型
new economic geography / economic effects / industry transfers / footloose capital (FC) model / three-region model
| [1] | Krugman P. Scaleeconomies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade[J]. American Economic Review, 1980, 70(5): 950-959. |
| [2] | Behrens K, Lamorgese A R, Ottaviano G I P, et al. Testing The ‘Home Market Effect’ in a Multi-Country World, 4468 [R]. London, UK: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), 2004. |
| [3] | 钱学锋,梁琦. 本地市场效应: 理论和经验研究的新近进展[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2007, 6(3):969-990. QIAN Xuefeng, LIANG Qi. The home market effect: Recent developments in theoretical and empirical research[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2007, 6(3): 969-990.(in Chinese) |
| [4] | Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99(3): 483-499. |
| [5] | Martin P, Rogers C A. Industrial location and public infrastructure[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1995, 39(3-4): 335-351. |
| [6] | Forslid R, Ottaviano G I P. An analytically solvable core-periphery model[J]. Journal of Economic Geography,2003, 3(3): 229-240. |
| [7] | Baldwin R, Forslid R, Martin P, et al.Manuscript Chapter for Economic Geography and Public Policy [M]. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press, 2002. |
| [8] | 何伟. 新经济地理学研究文献综述[J]. 经济学动态, 2004(7):100-105. HE Wei. Literature review onnew economic geography[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2004(7): 100-105.(in Chinese) |
| [9] | Ago T, Isono I, Tabuchi T. Locational disadvantage of the hub[J]. Annals of Regional Science, 2006, 40(4): 819-848. |
| [10] | Combes P P, Mayer T, Thisse J F. Economic Geography: The International of Regions and Nations [M]. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press, 2008. |
| [11] | Suedekum J. Identifying the dynamic home market effect in a three-country model [J]. Journal of Economics, 2007, 92(3): 209-228. |
| [12] | 宋华盛, 何力力, 朱希伟. 二重开放、产业集聚与区域协调[J]. 浙江大学学报:人文社会科学版, 2010, 40(5): 104-115. SONG Huasheng, HE Lili, ZHU Xiwei. Dual integration, agglomeration and regional coordination[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2010, 40(5): 104-115.(in Chinese) |
| [13] | 安虎森. 新经济地理学原理 [M]. 第二版. 北京:经济科学出版社, 2009. AN Husen. Principles on New Economic Geography [M]. 2nd Ed. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 2009.(in Chinese) |
| [14] | Ottaviano G I P. Home Market Effects and the (in) Efficiency of International Specialization [R]. Milan, Italy: Bocconi University, 2001. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
