专题:安全韧性

基于人群疏散行为的西南山地城镇住区安全韧性提升对策

  • 范乐 ,
  • 王燕语 ,
  • 张靖岩 ,
  • 韦雅云
展开
  • 1. 中国建筑科学研究院有限公司 西南分院, 成都 610041;
    2. 哈尔滨工业大学 建筑学院, 哈尔滨 150006;
    3. 中国建筑科学研究院有限公司 科技处, 北京 100013

收稿日期: 2019-06-03

  网络出版日期: 2020-01-03

Safety resilience promotion strategies for mountainous neighborhoods in southwestern China based on crowd evacuation behavior

  • FAN Le ,
  • WANG Yanyu ,
  • ZHANG Jingyan ,
  • WEI Yayun
Expand
  • 1. Southwest Institute, China Academy of Building Research, Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150006, China;
    3. Department of Science and Technology, China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China

Received date: 2019-06-03

  Online published: 2020-01-03

摘要

该研究采用人群疏散模拟来评估山地住区的疏散能力和现行灾害响应预案,从建筑布局形式、路网结构、出入口分布和绿地形态等方面出发,基于模拟结果提出了人群的疏散组织方案。采用线程代理模型开展了人群疏散模拟,基于潜在路径、空间围合程度和绿地空间布局3个变量设立了对比组,分析了总体耗时、累计路径、拥堵特征和不同路段的人数变化,总结了山地空间结构对人群疏散行为和总体安全的影响机制,为中国西南山地城镇住区的疏散安全规划和适灾性设计提供了支撑。

本文引用格式

范乐 , 王燕语 , 张靖岩 , 韦雅云 . 基于人群疏散行为的西南山地城镇住区安全韧性提升对策[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020 , 60(1) : 32 -40 . DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.22.047

Abstract

Crowd evacuation simulations were used to evaluate evacuation capabilities and disaster response strategies for mountainous neighborhoods. The results were used to develop evacuation plans based on the building layout, road networks, exit distribution and greenery morphology. The simulations used an agent based model for the crowd evacuation simulations with control groups based on potential paths, spatial enclosure degree and green space layout. The simulations give the overall evacuation time, best paths, congestion characteristics and changes in the number of people in various sections. The results also show how the structure affects the crowd evacuation behavior and the overall safety to support mountainous neighborhood safety evacuation planning and disaster response planning in southwest China.

参考文献

[1] 孙澄, 王燕语, 范乐. 基于疏散模拟的东北地区居住区路网结构优化策略研究[J]. 建筑学报, 2018(2):38-43. SUN C, WANG Y Y, FAN L. A study on the optimal strategies of community road network in northeast China based on evacuation simulation[J]. Architectural Journal, 2018(2):38-43. (in Chinese)
[2] 刘晓然, 苏经宇, 王威, 等. 城市抗震防灾能力评估的系统动力学模型[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2013, 22(5):71-76. LIU X R, SU J Y, WANG W, et al. System dynamics model of urban earthquake disaster resistance and prevention capacity evaluation[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2013, 22(5):71-76. (in Chinese)
[3] 刘敏, 权瑞松, 许世远. 城市暴雨内涝灾害风险评估:理论、方法与实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012. LIU M, QUAN R S, XU S Y. Risk assessment of urban rainstorm waterlogging disaster:Theory, method and practice[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
[4] 丁俊, 魏伦武, 赖绍民, 等. 我国西南地区城市地质灾害与防治对策[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2004, 15(S1):119-122, 146. DING J, WEI L W, LAI S M, et al. Urban geological hazard and countermeasures of control in southwest of China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2004, 15(S1):119-122, 146. (in Chinese)
[5] 季伟峰, 胡时友, 宋军. 中国西南地区主要地质灾害及常用监测方法[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2007, 18(S1):38-41. JI W F, HU S Y, SONG J. Main geological hazards and monitoring methods in common use in the southwest region of China[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2007, 18(S1):38-41. (in Chinese)
[6] 章诗芳, 王玉芬, 贾蓓, 等. 中国2005-2016年地质灾害的时空变化及影响因素分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(12):1567-1574. ZHANG S F, WANG Y F, JIA B, et al. Spatial-temporal changes and influencing factors of geologic disasters from 2005 to 2016 in China[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2017, 19(12):1567-1574. (in Chinese)
[7] 孙琦, 李彦巧. 从环境行为心理探讨居住户外空间环境的人性化设计[J]. 城市地理, 2017(14):34. SUN Q, LI Y Q. Humanization design of outdoor living space based on environmental behavior psychology[J]. Cultural Geography, 2017(14):34. (in Chinese)
[8] 霍俊青, 张天戈. 论环境行为学与住区外部空间人性化设计[J]. 城市建筑, 2016(21):15-16. HUO J Q, ZHANG T G. Research on humanization design of community outdoor space based on environmental behavior[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2016(21):15-16. (in Chinese)
[9] 黄弘, 李瑞奇, 范维澄, 等. 安全韧性城市特征分析及对雄安新区安全发展的启示[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(7):5-11. HUANG H, LI R Q, FAN W C, et al. Analysis on characteristics of safety resilient city and enlightenments for safe development of Xiongan New Area[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(7):5-11. (in Chinese)
[10] 邵亦文, 徐江. 城市韧性:基于国际文献综述的概念解析[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30(2):48-54. SHAO Y W, XU J. Understanding urban resilience:A conceptual analysis based on integrated international literature review[J]. Urban Planning International, 2015, 30(2):48-54. (in Chinese)
[11] 李鑫, 罗彦. 基于城市公共安全的韧性城市构建和规划思考[J]. 城市, 2017(10):41-48. LI X, LUO Y. Construction and planning of resilience city based on urban public security[J]. City, 2017(10):41-48. (in Chinese)
[12] MA X Y, PEI T, SONG C, et al. A new assessment model for evacuation vulnerability in urban areas[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2016, 30(12):2401-2420.
[13] 范乐, 孙澄, 王燕语. 中学教学区地震救援仿真训练废墟结构坠物场景设计研究[J]. 城市建筑, 2017(16):118-123. FAN L, SUN C, WANG Y Y. Research on the scenic design of the falling debris scenario of the simulative training of earthquake rescue in teaching area of secondary schools[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2017(16):118-123. (in Chinese)
[14] 文晓枫. 环境行为学视角下的开敞空间环境分析[J]. 山西建筑, 2010, 36(28):12-14. WEN X F. On analysis of open space environment from environment behavior studies[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2010, 36(28):12-14. (in Chinese)
[15] 王新平, 葛学礼, 崔健. 避震疏散模拟在城市抗震规划中的应用[J]. 山东建筑工程学院学报, 2004, 19(3):34-37. WANG X P, GE X L, CUI J. The application of computer simulation of earthquake evacuating in the planning of city calamity proofing[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Architecture and Engineering, 2004, 19(3):34-37. (in Chinese)
文章导航

/