机械工程

经颅直流电刺激对注意力广度的影响

  • 王建凯 ,
  • 吴方芳 ,
  • 狄雅政 ,
  • 张洁 ,
  • 李翀 ,
  • 季林红
展开
  • 1. 清华大学 摩擦学国家重点实验室, 智能与生物机械分室, 北京 100084
    2. 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101
    3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
    4. 烟台大学 机电汽车工程学院, 烟台 264005

收稿日期: 2019-10-22

  网络出版日期: 2020-10-14

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual attention span

  • Chien-kai WANG ,
  • Fangfang WU ,
  • Yazheng DI ,
  • Jie ZHANG ,
  • Chong LI ,
  • Linhong JI
Expand
  • 1. Division of Intelligent and Biomechanical System, State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    2. Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    4. School of Electromechanical and Automotive Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China

Received date: 2019-10-22

  Online published: 2020-10-14

摘要

该文探讨经颅直流电刺激(transcranial direct-current stimulation,tDCS)是否能提升注意力广度,并通过脑电(electroencephalogram,EEG)分析探讨其中的机理。实验招募7名健康被试,每名被试完成3次实验,每次实验接受不同的tDCS刺激方案并完成注意力广度任务。3种tDCS刺激方案分别为:对背外侧前额叶皮层进行阳极tDCS、阴极tDCS以及假刺激。结果显示:相较于假刺激组,阳极tDCS组被试的注意力广度有显著地提升(p=0.034 7),而阴极tDCS组则有显著降低(p=0.029 4)。脑电分析显示:在字符串长度为3~5的难度下,阳极tDCS组被试的刺激前Alpha波功率(prestimulus Alpha power)有显著地降低,阴极tDCS组无此现象。本研究验证了tDCS提升注意力广度的有效性,以及分析了其如何影响脑电。

本文引用格式

王建凯 , 吴方芳 , 狄雅政 , 张洁 , 李翀 , 季林红 . 经颅直流电刺激对注意力广度的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020 , 60(12) : 999 -1006 . DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2020.25.025

Abstract

This study investigated whether transcranial direct current stimulation can increase the visual attention span and the controlling mechanism for this effect through EEG (electroencephalogram) analyses. Seven healthy subjects participated in three experiments on three different days for comparison. Two stimulation protocols, anodal and cathodal stimulation, were performed on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with sham stimulations used in control tests. The visual attention span of the anodal stimulation group was significantly improved compared with the control (p=0.034 7), while that of the cathodal stimulation group was significantly reduced (p=0.029 4). The EEG records showed that the prestimulus alpha power was significantly reduced in the anodal stimulation group with difficulty string lengths of 3~5. The result indicated that transcranial direct current stimulation can modulate the prestimulus Alpha power which influences the visual attention span.

参考文献

1 NITSCHE M A , PAULUS W . Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. The Journal of Physiology, 2000. 527 (3): 633- 639.
2 NITSCHE M A , LIEBETANZ D , ANTAL A , et al. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation-technical, safety and functional aspects[J]. Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology, 2003. 56, 255- 276.
3 FREGNI F , BOGGIO P S , NITSCHE M , et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory[J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2005. 166 (1): 23- 30.
4 OHN S H , PARK C I , YOO W K , et al. Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory[J]. Neuroreport, 2008. 19 (1): 43- 47.
5 BOGGIO P S , FERRUCCI R , RIGONATTI S P , et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease[J]. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 2006. 249 (1): 31- 38.
6 BOGGIO P S , KHOURY L P , MARTINS D C S , et al. Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease[J]. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2009. 80 (4): 444- 447.
7 GLADWIN T E , DEN UYL T E , FREGNI F F , et al. Enhancement of selective attention by tDCS:Interaction with interference in a Sternberg task[J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2012. 512 (1): 33- 37.
8 MOOS K , VOSSEL S , WEIDNER R , et al. Enhanced visual selection after 2 mA cathodal tDCS of right intraparietal sulcus in healthy subjects[J]. Klinische Neurophysiologie, 2012. 43, P142.
9 STONE D B , TESCHE C D . Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates shifts in global/local attention[J]. Neuroreport, 2009. 20 (12): 1115- 1119.
10 SPARING R , THIMM M , HESSE M D , et al. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation[J]. Brain, 2009. 132 (11): 3011- 3020.
11 COFFMAN B A , TRUMBO M C , CLARK V P . Enhancement of object detection with transcranial direct current stimulation is associated with increased attention[J]. BMC Neuroscience, 2012. 13, 108.
12 KANG E K , BAEK M J , KIM S Y , et al. Non-invasive cortical stimulation improves post-stroke attention decline[J]. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 2009. 27 (6): 647- 652.
13 NELSON J T , MCKINLEY R A , GOLOB E J , et al. Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)[J]. Neuroimage, 2014. 853 (Pt): 909- 917.
15 BOSSE M L , TAINTURIER M J , VALDOIS S . Developmental dyslexia:The visual attention span deficit hypothesis[J]. Cognition, 2007. 104 (2): 198- 230.
16 PRADO C , DUBOIS M , VALDOIS S . The eye movements of dyslexic children during reading and visual search:Impact of the visual attention span[J]. Vision Research, 2007. 47 (19): 2521- 2530.
17 LOBIER M , ZOUBRINETZKY R , VALDOIS S . The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal[J]. Cortex, 2012. 48 (6): 768- 773.
18 HORVATH J C , FORTE J D , CARTER O . Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects:A systematic review[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2015. 66, 213- 236.
19 WESTWOOD S J , ROMANI C . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulation of picture naming and word reading:A meta-analysis of single session tDCS applied to healthy participants[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2017. 104, 234- 249.
20 ALONZO A , BRASSIL J , TAYLOR J L , et al. Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leads to greater increases in cortical excitability than second daily transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. Brain Stimulation, 2012. 5 (3): 208- 213.
21 PAYNE L , GUILLORY S , SEKULER R . Attention-modulated alpha-band oscillations protect against intrusion of irrelevant information[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2013. 25 (9): 1463- 1476.
22 SAUSENG P , KLIMESCH W , STADLER W , et al. A shift of visual spatial attention is selectively associated with human EEG alpha activity[J]. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2005. 22 (11): 2917- 2926.
23 KLIMESCH W , SAUSENG P , HANSLMAYR S . EEG alpha oscillations:The inhibition-timing hypothesis[J]. Brain Research Reviews, 2007. 53 (1): 63- 88.
24 BABILONI C , VECCHIO F , BULTRINI A , et al. Pre-and poststimulus alpha rhythms are related to conscious visual perception:A high-resolution EEG study[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2006. 16 (12): 1690- 1700.
25 ERGENOGLU T , DEMIRALP T , BAYRAKTAROGLU Z , et al. Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans[J]. Cognitive Brain Research, 2004. 20 (3): 376- 383.
26 ROHENKOHL G , NOBRE A C . Alpha oscillations related to anticipatory attention follow temporal expectations[J]. Journal of Neuroscience, 2011. 31 (40): 14076- 14084.
27 RAJAGOVINDAN R , DING M Z . From prestimulus alpha oscillation to visual-evoked response:An inverted-U function and its attentional modulation[J]. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011. 23 (6): 1379- 1394.
28 HANSLMAYR S , ASLAN A , STAUDIGL T , et al. Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects[J]. Neuroimage, 2007. 37 (4): 1465- 1473.
29 HSU T Y , TSENG P , LIANG W K , et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task[J]. Neuroimage, 2014. 98, 306- 313.
30 NITSCHE M A , PAULUS W . Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans[J]. Neurology, 2001. 57 (10): 1899- 1901.
31 GANDIGA P C , HUMMEL F C , COHEN L G . Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS):A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation[J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2006. 117 (4): 845- 850.
32 FRIES P , WOMELSDORF T , OOSTENVELD R , et al. The effects of visual stimulation and selective visual attention on rhythmic neuronal synchronization in macaque area V4[J]. Journal of Neuroscience, 2008. 28 (18): 4823- 4835.
33 JENSEN O , MAZAHERI A . Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity:Gating by inhibition[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2010. 4, 186.
34 GALLICCHIO G , FINKENZELLER T , SATTLECKER G , et al. Shooting under cardiovascular load:Electroencephalographic activity in preparation for biathlon shooting[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2016. 109, 92- 99.
35 UTZ K S , DIMOVA V , OPPENL?NDER K , et al. Electrified minds:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology-A review of current data and future implications[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2010. 48 (10): 2789- 2810.
36 MINIUSSI C , BRIGNANI D , PELLICCIARI M C . Combining transcranial electrical stimulation with electroencephalography:A multimodal approach[J]. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 2012. 43 (3): 184- 191.
37 BERRYHILL M E , WENCIL E B , BRANCH COSLETT H , et al. A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe[J]. Neuroscience Letters, 2010. 479 (3): 312- 316.
文章导航

/