专题:建设管理

基于伙伴关系的国际EPC项目风险管理

  • 王腾飞 ,
  • 王运宏 ,
  • 沈文欣 ,
  • 唐文哲
展开
  • 1. 清华大学 学生处, 北京 100084;
    2. 清华大学 土木水利学院, 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室, 北京 100084;
    3. 北京交通大学 经济管理学院, 北京 100044
王腾飞(1991-),男,讲师

收稿日期: 2021-08-06

  网络出版日期: 2022-01-22

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(72171128,51579135,51779124);中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2021T140047);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2020M680333)

Risk management of international EPCprojects through partnering

  • WANG Tengfei ,
  • WANG Yunhong ,
  • SHEN Wenxin ,
  • TANG Wenzhe
Expand
  • 1. Division of Student Affairs, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
    3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received date: 2021-08-06

  Online published: 2022-01-22

摘要

在“一带一路”倡议的推动下,中国企业积极参与国际工程设计-采购-施工(EPC)市场竞争。风险管理是决定国际EPC项目成败的关键,然而已有研究仅从概念层面提出伙伴关系在风险管理中的应用,缺乏对其内在机理的分析和系统性实证。该文提出基于伙伴关系的风险管理理论模型,并通过问卷数据和偏最小平方法结构方程对模型进行验证。该研究结果揭示了国际EPC项目伙伴关系、风险管理与项目绩效之间的作用机理;验证了总承包商与利益相关方的伙伴关系有助于加强接口管理、组织能力与合同管理,进而实现风险的有效控制和项目绩效的持续提升;并强调了伙伴关系和风险管理对于项目绩效具有重要作用。该研究结果有助于指导中国EPC总承包商有针对性地提高风险管理水平。

本文引用格式

王腾飞 , 王运宏 , 沈文欣 , 唐文哲 . 基于伙伴关系的国际EPC项目风险管理[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022 , 62(2) : 242 -249 . DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2022.22.008

Abstract

The Belt and Road Initiative has lead to many Chinese enterprises actively participating in the international engineering- procurement-construction (EPC) market. Risk management is essential for EPC project delivery. However, existing research has mostly used only conceptual studies to explore the use of partnering strategies in risk management without mechanism analyses and validation using empirical data. This paper presents a risk management model based on partnering theory that is evaluated using questionnaire data and the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. The results show the relationships among partnering, risk management and project performance and verify that partnerships between the contractor and various stakeholders improve interface management, organizational capacity and contract management to achieve effective risk management and continuous improvement of project performance. The results highlight the importance of partnering and risk management for EPC project performance and contribute to improving risk management of Chinese EPC contractors.

参考文献

[1] LIU J Y. Risk management of international EPC projects[M]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2017. (in Chinese)刘俊颖. 国际工程EPC项目风险管理[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
[2] TAROUN A. Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk:Insights from a literature review[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(1):101-115.
[3] CHANG A S, SHEN F Y, IBBS W. Design and construction coordination problems and planning for design-build project new users[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 37(12):1525-1534.
[4] TANG W Z, LI Z Y, QIANG M S, et al. Risk management of hydropower development in China[J]. Energy, 2013, 60:316-324.
[5] WANG T F, TANG W Z, QI D S, et al. Enhancing design management by partnering in delivery of international EPC projects:Evidence from Chinese construction companies[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2016, 142(4):04015099.
[6] YANG J, SHEN G Q, DREW D S, et al. Critical success factors for stakeholder management:Construction practitioners' perspectives[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(7):778-786.
[7] DAVIS P R, WALKER D H T. Building capability in construction projects:A relationship-based approach[J]. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2009, 16(5):475-489.
[8] ANVUUR A M, KUMARASWAMY M M. Conceptual model of partnering and alliancing[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2007, 133(3):225-234.
[9] TANG W Z, DUFFIELD C F, YOUNG D M. Partnering mechanism in construction:An empirical study on the Chinese construction industry[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, 132(3):217-229.
[10] BLACK C, AKINTOYE A, FITZGERALD E. An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2000, 18(6):423-434.
[11] KADEFORS A. Trust in project relationships:Inside the black box[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22:175-182.
[12] NG S T, ROSE T M, MAK M, et al. Problematic issues associated with project partnering:The contractor perspective[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2002, 20(6):437-449.
[13] LOVE P E D, DAVIS P R, CHEVIS R, et al. Risk/reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011, 137(2):127-136.
[14] ZHAO Z Y, LIU Y S, WU Y N. A study on partnering in construction project management[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(8):123-127. (in Chinese)赵振宇, 刘伊生, 乌云娜. 建设工程项目Partnering管理方式探究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2005, 38(8):123-127.
[15] KLIEM R L, LUDIN I S. Reducing project risk[M]. Brookfield, USA:Gower, 1997.
[16] DAFT R L. Organization theory and design[M]. 11th ed. Mason, USA:South-Western Cengage Learning, 2010.
[17] ZOU P X W, CHEN Y, CHAN T Y. Understanding and improving your risk management capability:Assessment model for construction organizations[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010, 136(8):854-863.
[18] Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Enterprise risk management:Integrated framework[Z]. New York, USA:COSO, 2004.
[19] Construction Industry Institute (CⅡ). Interface management implementation guideline (IMIGe)[M]. Austin, USA:University of Texas at Austin, 2014.
[20] GALLOWAY P. Design-build/EPC contractor's heightened risk:Changes in a changing world[J]. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2009, 1(1):7-15.
[21] ZHAO Z Y, SHEN L Y, ZUO J. Performance and strategy of Chinese contractors in the international market[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009, 135(2):108-118.
[22] WANG S L, TANG W Z, LI Y X. Relationship between owners' capabilities and project performance on development of hydropower projects in China[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, 139(9):1168-1178.
[23] WANG T F, TANG W Z, DU L, et al. Relationships among risk management, partnering, and contractor capability in international EPC project delivery[J]. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2016, 32(6):04016017.
[24] DU L, TANG W Z, LIU C N, et al. Enhancing engineer-procure-construct project performance by partnering in international markets:Perspective from Chinese construction companies[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, 34(1):30-43.
[25] ZHANG S B, CHEN Y Q. Contract management for international EPC/turnkey projects[M]. Beijing:China Electric Power Press, 2008. (in Chinese)张水波, 陈勇强. 国际工程总承包EPC交钥匙合同与管理[M]. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2008.
[26] BABIN B J, HAIR J F, BOLES J S. Publishing research in marketing journals using structural equations modeling[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2008, 16(4):279-285.
[27] HAIR JR J F, HULT G T M, RINGLE C M, et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)[M]. London, UK:Sage Publications, 2014.
[28] CALVO-MORA A, NAVARRO-GARCÍA A, PERIAÑEZ-CRISTOBAL R. Project to improve knowledge management and key business results through the EFQM excellence model[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2015, 33(8):1638-1651.
文章导航

/