专题:防灾减灾

突发事件分析的EOC概念模型

  • 钱静 ,
  • 刘奕
展开
  • 清华大学 工程物理系, 公共安全研究院, 北京 100084
钱静(1989-),女,博士研究生

收稿日期: 2021-06-10

  网络出版日期: 2022-01-22

基金资助

国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0809700);国家自然科学基金项目(71673158,91646101)

EOC model: A conceptual model to analyze emergencies

  • QIAN Jing ,
  • LIU Yi
Expand
  • Institute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received date: 2021-06-10

  Online published: 2022-01-22

摘要

突发事件包含信息类型繁多,内在逻辑复杂。为解决突发事件分析领域缺乏支持信息结构化表达方法的问题,该文提出一种针对突发事件分析的框架模型——要素-对象-结果(EOC)模型。EOC模型首先定义突发事件包含的“要素”“对象”“结果”“环境”“响应与管理”和“情景”6个基本概念,然后在关联上述6个概念组成成分的基础上构建突发事件分析框架,实现从概念和数学上对突发事件进行分析和呈现。火灾案例研究表明:EOC模型能够辅助实现突发事件相关信息从非结构化、半结构化到结构化的分析、表达和存储,并实现定性和定量呈现突发事件发展全过程。

本文引用格式

钱静 , 刘奕 . 突发事件分析的EOC概念模型[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022 , 62(2) : 259 -265 . DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.22.040

Abstract

Emergencies include various types of information that have very complex internal logic structures. This paper presents an emergency analysis model, element-object-consequence (EOC) model, for information frames that lack structured information expressions for emergency information analyses. The EOC model uses the basic concepts of "element", "object", "consequence", "environment", "response and management" and "scenario" to organize the emergency information. The model then uses conceptual and mathematical analyses and presentations with frameworks based on these six concepts. A case study shows that this model provides analyses, expressions and storage of information from unstructured, semi-structured and structured sources, as well as qualitative and quantitative presentations of the entire emergency development process.

参考文献

[1] LU T L, LU G L. Classification and characteristics of events impacts on public safety[J]. China Public Security (Academy Edition), 2010(4):37-39. (in Chinese)逯田力, 鹿广利. 对于突发公共事件分类的认识和理解[J]. 中国公共安全(学术版), 2010(4):37-39.
[2] NOJAVAN M, SALEHI E, OMIDVAR B. Conceptual change of disaster management models:A thematic analysis[J]. Jàmbá:Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 2018, 10(1):a451.
[3] GOODE N, SALMON P M, SPENCER C, et al. Defining disaster resilience:Comparisons from key stakeholders involved in emergency management in Victoria, Australia[J]. Disasters, 2017, 41(1):171-193.
[4] SHAN C C, XUE L. Introduction to emergency management:Theory and practice[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2012. (in Chinese)闪淳昌, 薛澜. 应急管理概论:理论与实践[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2012.
[5] FENG Y, LI X Y. Improving emergency response to cascading disasters:Applying case-based reasoning towards urban critical infrastructure[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, 30:244-256.
[6] JIANG Z G, JIANG Y, WANG Y, et al. A hybrid approach of rough set and case-based reasoning to remanufacturing process planning[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2019, 30(1):19-32.
[7] MISHRA D, KUMAR S, HASSINI E. Current trends in disaster management simulation modelling research[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 283(1-2):1387-1411.
[8] HAN X, FENG Y Q. Negotiation support system based on case-based reasoning[J]. Control and Decision, 2008, 23(7):791-794. (in Chinese)韩雪, 冯玉强. 基于案例推理的谈判支持系统的研究[J]. 控制与决策, 2008, 23(7):791-794.
[9] SHE L, ZHANG M H, HUANG C. Research on structured representation of the public emergency case[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2015, 17(6):69-75. (in Chinese)佘廉, 张明红, 黄超. 公共突发事件案例表达结构化模式探讨[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(6):69-75.
[10] WANG J Y, WANG J T. A study of emergency decision support system based on case-based reasoning[J]. Management Sciences in China, 2003, 16(6):46-51. (in Chinese)汪季玉, 王金桃. 基于案例推理的应急决策支持系统研究[J]. 管理科学, 2003, 16(6):46-51.
[11] AUYANG S Y. Foundations of complex-system theories:In economics, evolutionary biology, and statistical physics[M]. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[12] FAN W C, LIU Y, WENG W G, et al. Introduction to the science of public safety[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2013. (in Chinese)范维澄, 刘奕, 翁文国, 等. 公共安全科学导论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2013.
文章导航

/