土木工程

湿喷混凝土流动性对喷射产尘特性的影响

  • 郭禛 ,
  • 汪澍 ,
  • 刘昆华 ,
  • 赵佳玮 ,
  • 郭海峰 ,
  • 金龙哲 ,
  • 魏祎璇 ,
  • 欧盛南
展开
  • 1. 北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院, 北京 100083;
    2. 国家卫生健康委粉尘危害工程防护重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国铁道科学研究院集团有限公司 节能环保劳卫研究所, 北京 100081
郭禛(1998—),男,硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2023-08-11

  网络出版日期: 2024-08-21

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(51874015)

Influence of the flowability of wet sprayed concrete on dust production characteristics during the wet shotcrete process

  • GUO Zhen ,
  • WANG Shu ,
  • LIU Kunhua ,
  • ZHAO Jiawei ,
  • GUO Haifeng ,
  • JIN Longzhe ,
  • WEI Yixuan ,
  • OU Shengnan
Expand
  • 1. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. National Health Commission Key Laboratory for Engineering Control of Dust Hazard, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Energy Saving and Environmental Protection and Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd., Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2023-08-11

  Online published: 2024-08-21

摘要

湿喷混凝土作为新Austrian隧道施工方法(new Austrian tunnelling method, NATM)中重要的初期支护方式, 施工过程中产生的粉尘、 氯等有害物质会严重危害工人健康。截至2023年, 许多研究的重点为湿式喷浆技术粉尘来源与降尘措施, 而关于湿喷混凝土射流产尘机理仍认识不足, 有待深入研究。该文通过改变湿喷混凝土配方中聚羧酸减水剂(polycarboxylate superplasticizer, PCE)的掺量获取不同流动性的混凝土, 利用自行搭建的喷射射流多维测试平台进行不同流动性新拌混凝土的流动性实验和喷射实验。结合射流破碎、 表面波动等理论, 分析湿喷混凝土的射流破碎过程和产尘特性, 以探究其产尘机理。该文基于射流状态将射流循环划分为初始期、 剧烈期和结束期3个阶段。初始期和结束期未形成稳定射流, 剧烈期射流形态变化较小且射流破碎、 雾化程度较高, 对粉尘浓度的升高起决定性作用; 此外, 次级破碎阶段平均粉尘浓度与初级破碎阶段相比提高了138%。该文得到了粉尘浓度最低、 粉尘粒径分布最集中的混凝土配比, 即水泥、 水、 细骨料、 粗骨料、 PCE的质量比为1.000 0∶0.370 0∶1.837 5∶1.562 5∶0.011 5。该研究成果可为湿式喷浆降尘的研究提供借鉴。

本文引用格式

郭禛 , 汪澍 , 刘昆华 , 赵佳玮 , 郭海峰 , 金龙哲 , 魏祎璇 , 欧盛南 . 湿喷混凝土流动性对喷射产尘特性的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024 , 64(9) : 1637 -1645 . DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.26.040

Abstract

[Objective] Wet spray concrete is an important initial support method in new Austrian tunneling method construction. However, the production of harmful substances, such as dust and chloride, during construction remains a serious threat to the health of workers. At present, much research has been on the sources of dust and dust control measures in wet spray technology, whereas scarce research was on dust generation in wet spray concrete until 2023, and there is insufficient understanding of the dust generation mechanism. [Methods] In this study, concrete with different flowabilities was prepared by changing the polycarboxylate superplasticizer (PCE) dosage in the wet spray concrete mixture. A self-constructed multidimensional test platform for jet flow was used to perform flowability and spray tests on fresh concrete with different flowabilities. This work coupled the theories of jet fragmentation and surface oscillation to examine the jet fragmentation process and dust production characteristics of wet spray concrete, investigating its dust generation mechanism. The flowability tests characterized the concrete’s flowability using slump and plastic viscosity. The jet tests primarily included capturing wet spray concrete jets using a high-speed camera and computer vision tools, such as OpenCV, to process the images, including grayscale conversion, noise reduction, sharpening, binarization, morphological operations, and contour extraction. The spread angle of the jet was measured to evaluate its coherence. In addition, MATLAB was used to examine the size of concrete droplets splashed on the side plate lightbox in the experimental chamber to calculate dust concentration and particle size distribution during the wet spraying process, which was compared with the results of a laser dust analyzer. [Results] According to the jet states, the jet flow cycle was classified into primary, intense, and ending stages. The initial and ending stages did not form stable jets, whereas the intense stage demonstrated less variation in jet morphology and high levels of jet fragmentation and atomization, considerably impacting the dust concentration. For the initial and ending stages, the PCE dosages of 1.00%, 1.10%, 1.15%, and 1.20% led to relatively stable jets with minimal fragmentation. The PCE dosages of 1.25%, 1.30%, and 1.35% mainly had primary fragmentation, and a PCE dosage of 1.40% had secondary fragmentation. In the intense stage, the PCE dosages of 1.00%, 1.10%, and 1.15% mainly showed primary fragmentation, whereas the PCE dosages of 1.20%, 1.25%, 1.30%, 1.35%, and 1.40% primarily exhibited secondary fragmentation. The average dust concentration increased by 138% in the secondary fragmentation stage compared with the primary fragmentation stage. The particle size distribution of the dust decreased and then increased with increasing PCE dosage, with the smallest dispersion observed at 1.15% PCE (10.40-19.80 μm). As the PCE dosage increased, the frequency of small particle dust decreased, and the distribution of dust frequency approached uniformity while the particle size dispersion increased. The concrete mixture with the lowest dust concentration and most concentrated dust particle size distribution was identified as cement, water, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, PCE (1.000 0∶0.370 0∶1.837 5∶1.562 5∶0.011 5). This work examined the mechanism of concrete jet fragmentation and dust production. Intense aerodynamic effects resulting from substantial velocity differences at the nozzle produced surface waves as the jet moved further, resulting in the detachment of surface concrete droplets and causing primary or secondary fragmentation and dust formation. At higher PCE dosages, a portion of free water adhered to the surface of the mixed material, producing a lubrication layer between the filled mixture and the delivery pipe during pumping. At the nozzle, the concrete aggregates and lubrication layer underwent primary and secondary fragmentation, producing small liquid droplets that collided and bonded to form dust.[Conclusions] This work investigated the dust generation mechanism and characteristics of wet spray concrete jets, classified the jet spray stage, and explored the mechanism of concrete jet fragmentation and dust generation. This offers valuable insights and references to dust reduction work in wet spraying; however, exploring the microlevel aspects of jet fragmentation in concrete with different flowabilities warrants further investigation, with several questions remaining to be answered in the future.

参考文献

[1] MALTESE C, PISTOLESI C, BRAVO A, et al. A case history:Effect of moisture on the setting behaviour of a Portland cement reacting with an alkali-free accelerator[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(6):856-865.
[2] KARAKUŞ M, FOWELL R J. An insight into the New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM)[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Regional Rock Mechanics Symposium. Sivas, Türkiye:ROCKMEC, 2004:1-14.
[3] 李小冬,苏舒,黄天健.施工粉尘健康损害量化评价[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 55(1):50-55.LI X D, SU S, HUANG T J. Health damage assessment model for construction dust[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science&Technology), 2015, 55(1):50-55.(in Chinese)
[4] CHEN L J, LI P C, LIU G M, et al. Development of cement dust suppression technology during shotcrete in mine of China-A review[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 55:232-242.
[5] PAN G, LI P C, CHEN L J, et al. A study of the effect of rheological properties of fresh concrete on shotcrete-rebound based on different additive components[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 224:1069-1080.
[6] LI P C, ZHOU Z, CHEN L J, et al. Research on dust suppression technology of shotcrete based on new spray equipment and process optimization[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2019, 2019:4831215.
[7] ZHOU G, CHENG W M, CAO S. Development of a new type of alkali-free liquid accelerator for wet shotcrete in coal mine and its engineering application[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015, 2015:813052.
[8] 曾宪桃,任振华,王兴国.磁化水降低喷射混凝土粉尘浓度与减少回弹的试验研究[J].煤炭学报, 2014, 39(4):705-712.ZENG X T, REN Z H, WANG X G. Experimental investigations on reducing the dust density and the rebound rate of shotcrete by using magnetized water[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(4):705-712.(in Chinese)
[9] GELARDI G, FLATT R J. Working mechanisms of water reducers and superplasticizers[M]//AÏTCIN P C, FLATT R J. Science and technology of concrete admixtures. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2016:257-278.
[10] YOSHIOKA K, SAKAI E, DAIMON M, et al. Role of steric hindrance in the performance of superplasticizers for concrete[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1997, 80(10):2667-2671.
[11] LIU J, YU C, SHU X, et al. Recent advance of chemical admixtures in concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 124:105834.
[12] ALSADEY S. Effect of superplasticizer on fresh and hardened properties of concrete[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2015, 1(2):70-74.
[13] LEWIS J A, MATSUYAMA H, KIRBY G, et al. Polyelectrolyte effects on the rheological properties of concentrated cement suspensions[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2000, 83(8):1905-1913.
[14] MA Y H, BAI J J, SHI C J, et al. Effect of PCEs with different structures on hydration and properties of cementitious materials with low water-to-binder ratio[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 142:106343.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.通用硅酸盐水泥:GB 175-2023[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2023.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Common portland cement:GB 175-2023[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2023.(in Chinese)
[16] 中华人民共和国建设部.普通混凝土用砂、石质量及检验方法标准:JGJ52-2006[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2006.Ministry of Construction of the People's Republic of China. Standard for technical requirements and test method of sand and crushed stone (or gravel) for ordinary concrete:JGJ52-2006[S]. Beijing:China Building Industry Press, 2006.(in Chinese)
[17] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.混凝土外加剂:GB 8076-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2008.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Concrete admixtures:GB 8076-2008[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2008.(in Chinese)
[18] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.混凝土外加剂中释放氨的限量:GB18588-2001[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2001.General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Limit of ammonia emitted from the concrete admixtures:GB18588-2001[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2001.(in Chinese)
[19] 黄大能.流变学与泵送混凝土[J].混凝土与水泥制品, 1992(1):4-6, 10. HUANG D N. Rheology and pumped concrete[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 1992(1):4-6, 10.(in Chinese)
[20] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部,中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.普通混凝土拌合物性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50080-2016[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Standard for test method of performance on ordinary fresh concrete:GB/T 50080-2016[S]. Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press, 2017.(in Chinese)
[21] HOVER K C. The influence of water on the performance of concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(7):3003-3013.
[22] BANFILL P F G. Additivity effects in the rheology of fresh concrete containing water-reducing admixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(6):2955-2960.
[23] FAROUG F, SZWABOWSKI J, WILD S. Influence of superplasticizers on workability of concrete[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 1999, 11(2):151-157.
[24] AÏTCIN P C, FLATT R J. Science and technology of concrete admixtures[M]. Cambridge:Woodhead Publishing, 2016.
[25] ANDRé M A, BARDET P M. Experimental study of shear layer instability below a free surface[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2015, 27(11):112103.
[26] ANDRé M A, BARDET P M. Free surface over a horizontal shear layer:Vorticity generation and air entrainment mechanisms[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2017, 813:1007-1044.
[27] GONG C, YANG M G. The experimental and numerical study of the stability of ultra-high pressure water jet[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 860-863:1495-1498.
[28] 薛胜雄.高压水射流技术与应用[M].北京:机械工业出版社, 1998.XUE S X. High pressure water jet technology and application[M]. Beijing:China Machine Press, 1998.(in Chinese)
[29] BENAICHA M, ALAOUI A H, JALBAUD O, et al. Dosage effect of superplasticizer on self-compacting concrete:Correlation between rheology and strength[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2019, 8(2):2063-2069.
[30] FERRARI L, KAUFMANN J, WINNEFELD F, et al. Interaction of cement model systems with superplasticizers investigated by atomic force microscopy, zeta potential, and adsorption measurements[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2010, 347(1):15-24.
[31] FUNG W W S, KWAN A K H. Role of water film thickness in rheology of CSF mortar[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(4):255-264.
[32] KWAN A K H, FUNG W W S, WONG H H C. Water film thickness, flowability and rheology of cement-sand mortar[J]. Advances in Cement Research, 2010, 22(1):3-14.
[33] BIROUK M, LEKIC N. Liquid jet breakup in quiescent atmosphere:A review[J]. Atomization and Sprays, 2009, 19(6):501-528.
[34] JAISWAL A, UPADHYAY J, SOMKUWAR A. Image denoising and quality measurements by using filtering and wavelet based techniques[J]. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 2014, 68(8):699-705.
[35] FAN H H, ZHU H J. Preservation of image edge feature based on snowfall model smoothing filter[J]. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 2018, 2018(1):67.
[36] BESSAIES-BEY H, PALACIOS M, PUSTOVGAR E, et al. Non-adsorbing polymers and yield stress of cement paste:Effect of depletion forces[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 111:209-217.
[37] EL-DIEB A S. Self-curing concrete:Water retention, hydration and moisture transport[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2007, 21(6):1282-1287.
[38] FLATT R J. Dispersion forces in cement suspensions[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(3):399-408.
[39] MALECOT Y, ZINGG L, BRIFFAUT M, et al. Influence of free water on concrete triaxial behavior:The effect of porosity[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 120:207-216.
文章导航

/