该文研究了中国于2013年9月重启国债期货交易对利率市场波动性的影响。基于双重差分模型和双向集群标准误差调整,实证检验了国债期货对于利率波动性的影响,并应用倾向得分匹配方法进行了稳健性检验。结果发现:国债期货正式交易的推出显著降低了利率市场的波动性;国债期货仿真交易的推出也降低了波动性,但是降低幅度小于国债期货的正式推出。据此,加快国债期货市场建设,推出更加多元化的国债期货合约,能提高利率市场的稳定性。
Abstract
China reopened the treasury futures market in September, 2013. This study used a difference in difference model and a two-way clustering method to study the influence of treasury futures on interest rate volatility with a propensity score matching method for robust checks. The reopening of the treasury futures market significantly reduced the interest rate volatility. Emulational treasury futures trading also reduced the interest rate volatility, but the effect was weaker than with real trading of treasury futures. The results suggest that more treasury futures contracts can promote the interest rate market stability.
关键词
金融市场 /
国债期货 /
利率波动性 /
双重差分模型 /
集群标准误差
Key words
financial market /
treasury futures /
interest rate volatility /
difference in difference model /
clustered standard error
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
"[1] Danthine J P. Information, futures prices, and stabilizing speculation [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1978, 17(1): 79-98. [2] Jacobs R L, Jones R A. The treasury bill futures market [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980, 88(4): 699-721. [3] Bortz G A. Does the treasury bond futures market destabilize the treasury bond cash market [J]. The Journal of Futures Market, 1984, 4(1): 25-38. [4] Simpson W G, Ireland T C. The impact of financial futures on the cash market for treasury bills [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1985, 20(3): 371-379. [5] Weller P, Yano M. Forward exchange, futures trading, and spot price variability: A general equilibrium approach [J]. Econometrica, 1987, 55(6): 1433-1450. [6] Ely D P. Derivative securities and cash market stability [J]. Applied Economics, 1991, 23(2): 391-402. [7] Edwards F R. Futures trading and cash market volatility: Stock index and interest rate futures [J]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 1988, 8(4): 421-439. [8] Jochum C, Kodres L. Does the introduction of futures on emerging market currencies destabilize the underlying currencies [J]. International Monetary Fund, 1998, 45(3): 486-521. [9] Chatrath A, Song F. Information and volatility in futures and spot markets: The case of the Japanese Yen [J]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 1998, 18(2): 201-223. [10] Brandt M W, Kavajecz K A, Underwood S E. Price discover in the treasury futures market [J]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 2007, 27(11): 1021-1051. [11] 艾华, 万红. 关于恢复我国国债期货的思考[J]. 财政研究, 2002(9): 60-62.AI Hua, WAN Hong. Reflections on the recovery of Chinese treasury bond futures [J]. Public Finance Research, 2002(9): 60-62. (in Chinese) [12] 鲍建平, 杨建明. 利率期货交易对债券现货市场价格发现的影响分析[J]. 金融研究, 2004(2): 62-70.BAO Jianping, YANG Jianming. Analysis of the effect of interest rate futures trading on the price discovery of spot market [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2004(2): 62-70. (in Chinese) [13] 周冰, 陈杨龙. 国债期货核心功能研究及实证检验: 基于我国国债期货仿真交易观察[J]. 财政研究, 2013(4): 24-28.ZHOU Bing, CHEN Yanglong. The research and empirical test of the core function of treasury bond futures: Based on the simulation trading of treasury bond futures in China [J]. Public Finance Research, 2013(4): 24-28. (in Chinese) [14] Petersen M A. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(1): 435-480. [15] Bologna P, Cavallo L. Does the introduction of stock index futures effectively reduce stock market volatility? Is the “futures effect” immediate? Evidence from the Italian stock exchange using GARCH [J]. Applied Financial Economics, 2002, 12(3): 183-192. [16] Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences in differences estimates [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004, 119(1): 249-275. [17] Thompson S B. Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 99(1): 1-10. [18] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects [J]. Biometrika, 1983, 70(1): 41-55."