Research progress and challenges in chip atomic layer polishing

Liang JIANG, Yuan WU, Yongshun ZHANG, Jiaxin ZHENG, Yushan CHEN, Xia ZHONG, Liao ZHOU, Yuting WEI, Lei CHEN, Linmao QIAN

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2) : 215-232.

PDF(22560 KB)
PDF(22560 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2) : 215-232. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.010

Research progress and challenges in chip atomic layer polishing

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Significance: This review highlights the progress and challenges in chip atomic layer polishing. Chips are fundamental to the modern information society. According to Moore's Law, the chip feature size is shrinking and approaching the physical limit. At the same time, advanced packaging technologies such as hybrid bonding continuously evolve. These create pressing needs to develop atomic layer polishing, a technique that enables extremely precise material removal at the atomic layer level, to achieve surfaces with atomic-level precision for demanding processes such as photolithography and bonding. Currently, chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is the only key technology in chip manufacturing capable of simultaneously achieving local and global planarization of the wafer surface, with the potential to realize atomic layer polishing. This review provides a systematic summary of the mechanisms and processes of CMP for chip substrate surfaces and interconnect heterogeneous surfaces. Progress: Significant progress has been made in the controlled removal with a single atomic layer precision at the microscopic level and in the CMP with surface roughness close to the theoretical limit at the macroscopic level for the monocrystalline silicon substrate. These advances highlight the extreme precision processing capability of CMP for the wafer surface. Furthermore, ongoing developments in multi-field assisted CMP and energy particle beam polishing hold promise for enabling atomic layer polishing for new substrates like GaN, SiC and diamond. In the case of interconnect heterogeneous surfaces, two material removal modes in CMP are summarized from a tribological perspective based on the interactions between the abrasive and material surfaces: mechanical plowing and chemical bonding. Copper, cobalt, and nickel are mainly removed through the mechanical plowing mode, while tantalum, ruthenium, and titanium are mainly removed through chemical bonding. According to this foundation, control principles and methods for achieving equivalent removal of heterogeneous surfaces are proposed based on different material removal modes. In the mechanical plowing material removal mode, corrosion and its impact on the mechanical strength of the material surface can be adjusted through the modulation of the effects of oxidation, complexation, and corrosion inhibition, as well as their synergistic effects. This approach allows for controlling the material removal rate (MRR). In the chemical bonding material removal mode, the number of reactive sites and their influence on interfacial chemical bonds can be regulated through the adjustment of pH, oxidation, and ionic strength, along with their synergistic effects, thus controlling the MRR. According to these control principles, a systematic summary of the planarization processes for interconnect heterogeneous surfaces, such as copper/tantalum, copper/cobalt, and copper/ruthenium, is provided. Finally, based on existing research progress, it is proposed to leverage the synergistic effects of mechanical, chemical, and electrical/optical/plasma/energy beams to confine chemical reactions and mechanical-chemical reactions to the surface atomic layer, to achieve atomic layer polishing. Specifically, for the mechanical plowing material removal mode, the focus is on designing the molecular structures of chemical additives to precisely modulate the effects of oxidation, complexation, and corrosion inhibition. This approach confines the corrosion behavior to the outermost atomic layer while controlling the mechanical action of the abrasive to enable precise, controllable atomic layer removal. For the chemical bonding material removal mode, the investigation focuses on confining chemical bonding reactions to the outermost atomic layer, weakening back bonds, and simultaneously controlling the mechanical action of the abrasive to disrupt chemical bonds between the outermost and sub-surface atoms, thus achieving controlled atomic layer removal. Conclusions and Prospects: This review highlights the growing demand for atomic-level manufacturing of high-end chips and the development of atomic layer polishing. It provides a systematic summary of the mechanisms, progress, and challenges in atomic layer polishing, with the aim of offering critical theoretical and technical support for the atomic-level manufacturing of advanced chips. The findings from this research have potential applications in key areas such as high-end optical components and superlubricity devices.

Key words

chip / atomic layer polishing / chemical mechanical polishing / heterogeneous surfaces / equivalent removal / planarization

Cite this article

Download Citations
Liang JIANG , Yuan WU , Yongshun ZHANG , et al . Research progress and challenges in chip atomic layer polishing[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(2): 215-232 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.010

References

1
LI Y Z. Microelectronic applications of chemical mechanical planarization[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007.
2
ZHAO D W, LU X C. Chemical mechanical polishing: Theory and experiment[J]. Friction, 2013, 1(4): 306- 326.
3
雒建斌, 郭东明, 杨华勇, 等. 原子级制造的关键基础科学问题[J]. 中国科学基金, 2024, 38(1): 86- 98.
LUO J B, GUO D M, YANG H Y, et al. Key basic scientific issues in atomic level manufacturing[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2024, 38(1): 86- 98.
4
钱林茂, 陈蓉, 朱利民, 等. 原子层制造的研究现状与科学挑战[J]. 中国科学基金, 2024, 38(1): 99- 114.
QIAN L M, CHEN R, ZHU L M, et al. Current status and scientific challenges of atomic layer manufacturing[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2024, 38(1): 99- 114.
5
FANG Z D, ZHANG Y, LI R L, et al. An efficient approach for atomic-scale polishing of single-crystal silicon via plasma-based atom-selective etching[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2020, 159, 103649.
6
YU J X, KIM S H, YU B J, et al. Role of tribochemistry in nanowear of single-crystalline silicon[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2012, 4(3): 1585- 1593.
7
XIAO C, CHEN C, WANG H B, et al. Effect of counter-surface chemistry on defect-free material removal of monocrystalline silicon[J]. Wear, 2019, 426-427, 1233- 1239.
8
XIAO C, DENG C B, ZHANG P, et al. Interplay between solution chemistry and mechanical activation in friction-induced material removal of silicon surface in aqueous solution[J]. Tribology International, 2020, 148, 106319.
9
CHEN L, WEN J L, ZHANG P, et al. Nanomanufacturing of silicon surface with a single atomic layer precision via mechanochemical reactions[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 1542.
10
LI J, LIU Y H, DAI Y J, et al. Achievement of a near-perfect smooth silicon surface[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2013, 56(11): 2847- 2853.
11
YANG X, YANG X Z, AOKI K, et al. Slurryless electrochemical mechanical polishing of 4-inch 4H-SiC (0001) and (000-1) surfaces[J]. Precision Engineering, 2023, 83, 237- 249.
12
WANG J, WANG T Q, PAN G S, et al. Effect of photocatalytic oxidation technology on GaN CMP[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2016, 361, 18- 24.
13
HE Y, YUAN Z W, SONG S Y, et al. Investigation on material removal mechanisms in photocatalysis-assisted chemical mechanical polishing of 4H-SiC wafers[J]. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2021, 22(5): 951- 963.
14
LIU W T, LU J B, XIONG Q, et al. Investigation on influence of polishing disc materials in UV-catalytic polishing of single crystal diamond[J]. Diamond and Related Materials, 2024, 141, 110678.
15
LIU N, LEI L, LU H, et al. C-C bond rupture initiated graphitization achieves highly efficient diamond polishing[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2025, 287, 109958.
16
张翊, 吴兵, 张临风, 等. 面向原子级表面制造的等离子体诱导原子选择刻蚀技术[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2022, 52(6): 882- 892.
ZHANG Y, WU B, ZHANG L F, et al. Atomic surface manufacturing based on plasma-induced atom-selective etching[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2022, 52(6): 882- 892.
17
ZHANG Y J, TANG J, LIANG S X, et al. Atomic-scale smoothing of semiconducting oxides via plasma-enabled atomic-scale reconstruction[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2024, 196, 104119.
18
LUO Z, ZHANG Z Y, ZHAO F, et al. Advanced polishing methods for atomic-scale surfaces: A review[J]. Materials Today Sustainability, 2024, 27, 100841.
19
SRINIVASAN R, DANDU P V R, BABU S V. Shallow trench isolation chemical mechanical planarization: A review[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2015, 4(11): P5029- P5039.
20
烜芯微. CMOS工艺详解, CMOS工艺流程图文介绍[EB/OL]. (2024-06-01)[2025-01-15]. http://www.ejiguan.cn/2024/changjianwtjd_0601/7888.html.Xuanxinwei.
CMOS process detailed explanation and process graphic introduction[EB/OL]. (2024-06-01)[2025-01-15]. http://www.ejiguan.cn/2024/changjianwtjd_0601/7888.html. (in Chinese)
21
QIAN K Q, ZHANG H Z, WANG L, et al. Research on thick copper CMP based on multilayer wiring of radio frequency microsystem[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, 1209(1): 012010.
22
ZHANG W Q, LIU Y L, WANG C W, et al. Effect of non-ionic surfactant on copper dishing and dielectric erosion correction in alkaline barrier CMP solution free of inhibitors[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2017, 6(5): P270- P275.
23
李秀娟, 金洙吉, 康仁科, 等. ULSI制造中铜化学机械抛光的腐蚀磨损机理分析[J]. 润滑与密封, 2005(4): 77- 80.
LI X J, JIN Z J, KANG R K, et al. Corrosive wear analysis of the copper chemical-mechanical polishing in ULSI manufacturing[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2005(4): 77- 80.
24
LI J, LU X C, HE Y Y, et al. Modeling the chemical-mechanical synergy during copper CMP[J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(2): H197- H202.
25
LI J, CHAI Z M, LIU Y H, et al. Tribo-chemical behavior of copper in chemical mechanical planarization[J]. Tribology Letters, 2013, 50(2): 177- 184.
26
LI J, LIU Y H, LU X C, et al. Material removal mechanism of copper CMP from a chemical-mechanical synergy perspective[J]. Tribology Letters, 2013, 49(1): 11- 19.
27
WEN S Z, HUANG P. Principles of tribology[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2012.
28
KAWAGUCHI K, ITO H, KUWAHARA T, et al. Atomistic mechanisms of chemical mechanical polishing of a Cu surface in aqueous H2O2: Tight-binding quantum chemical molecular dynamics simulations[J]. ACS applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(18): 11830- 11841.
29
GUO X G, WANG X L, JIN Z J, et al. Atomistic mechanisms of Cu CMP in aqueous H2O2: Molecular dynamics simulations using ReaxFF reactive force field[J]. Computational Materials Science, 2018, 155, 476- 482.
30
GUO X G, YUAN S, GOU Y J, et al. Study on chemical effects of H2O2 and glycine in the Copper CMP process using ReaxFF MD[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 508, 145262.
31
IHNFELDT R, TALBOT J B. Effect of CMP slurry chemistry on copper nanohardness[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2008, 155(6): H412- H420.
32
WU Y, JIANG L, LI W H, et al. Two material removal modes in chemical mechanical polishing: Mechanical plowing vs. chemical bonding[J]. Friction, 2024, 12(5): 897- 905.
33
KAUFMAN F B, THOMPSON D B, BROADIE R E, et al. Chemical-mechanical polishing for fabricating patterned W metal features as chip interconnects[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1991, 138(11): 3460.
34
ZHANG Z Y, CUI J F, ZHANG J B, et al. Environment friendly chemical mechanical polishing of copper[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 467-468, 5- 11.
35
LIU D D, ZHANG Z Y, ZHOU H X, et al. Angstrom surface on copper induced by novel green chemical mechanical polishing using ceria and silica composite abrasives[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 640, 158382.
36
LIU D D, ZHANG Z Y, FENG J J, et al. Environment-friendly chemical mechanical polishing for copper with atomic surface confirmed by transmission electron microscopy[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2023, 656, 130500.
37
LIU D D, ZHANG Z Y, FENG J J, et al. Atomic-level flatness on oxygen-free copper surface in lapping and chemical mechanical polishing[J]. Nanoscale Advances, 2022, 4(20): 4263- 4271.
38
VIJAYAKUMAR A, DU T, SUNDARAM K B, et al. Polishing mechanism of tantalum films by SiO2 particles[J]. Microelectronic Engineering, 2003, 70(1): 93- 101.
39
LI Y, HARIHARAPUTHIRAN M, BABU S V. Chemical-mechanical polishing of copper and tantalum with silica abrasives[J]. Journal of Materials Research, 2001, 16(4): 1066- 1073.
40
LI Y, ZHAO J Z, WU P, et al. Interaction between abrasive particles and films during chemical-mechanical polishing of copper and tantalum[J]. Thin Solid Films, 2006, 497(1-2): 321- 328.
41
LEI R, JIANG L, ZHANG H L, et al. Interaction mechanism of Al2O3 abrasive in tantalum chemical mechanical polishing[J]. RSC Advances, 2024, 14(40): 29559- 29568.
42
COOK L M. Chemical processes in glass polishing[J]. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1990, 120(1-3): 152- 171.
43
XU Q Z, CHEN L, YANG F, et al. Influence of slurry components on copper CMP performance in alkaline slurry[J]. Microelectronic Engineering, 2017, 183-184, 1- 11.
44
DU T B, VIJAYAKUMAR A, DESAI V. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on oxidation of copper in CMP slurries containing glycine and Cu ions[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2004, 49(25): 4505- 4512.
45
JIANG L, LAN Y Q, HE Y Y, et al. 1, 2, 4-Triazole as a corrosion inhibitor in copper chemical mechanical polishing[J]. Thin Solid Films, 2014, 556, 395- 404.
46
JIANG L, HE Y Y, LI J, et al. Passivation kinetics of 1, 2, 4-triazole in copper chemical mechanical polishing[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2016, 5(5): P272- P279.
47
JIANG L, LAN Y Q, HE Y Y, et al. Functions of Trilon? P as a polyamine in copper chemical mechanical polishing[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 288, 265- 274.
48
JIANG L, LI Q Y, CHEN Y S, et al. Polyacrylic acid as a lubricant and a complement to 1, 2, 4-triazole for copper chemical mechanical polishing[J]. Tribology Letters, 2023, 71(2): 62.
49
JIANG L, HE Y Y, LIANG H, et al. Effect of potassium ions on tantalum chemical mechanical polishing in H2O2-based alkaline slurries[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2016, 5(2): P100- P111.
50
KATSUKI F, SAGUCHI A, TAKAHASHI W, et al. The atomic-scale removal mechanism during si tip scratching on Si and SiO2 surfaces in aqueous KOH with an atomic force microscope[J]. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2002, 41(7S): 4919- 4923.
51
XU F, WANG W L, XU A X, et al. Effect of particle size and pH value of slurry on chemical mechanical polishing of SiO2 film[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2022, 11(1): 013004.
52
SONG H, WANG L Y, LIU W L, et al. Effect of cations on the chemical mechanical polishing of SiO2 film[J]. Chinese Physics Letters, 2013, 30(9): 098103.
53
KANG H G, KATOH T, LEE M Y, et al. Effect of molecular weight of surfactant in nano ceria slurry on shallow trench isolation chemical mechanical polishing (CMP)[J]. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2004, 43(8B): L1060.
54
SAGI K V, TEUGELS L G, VAN DER VEEN M H, et al. Chemical mechanical polishing of chemical vapor deposited Co films with minimal corrosion in the Cu/Co/Mn/SiCOH patterned structures[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2017, 6(5): P276- P283.
55
WANG C W, LIU Y L, NIU X H, et al. An advanced alkaline slurry for barrier chemical mechanical planarization on patterned wafers[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2012, 33(4): 046001.
56
BABU S V, JINDAL A, LI Y. Chemical-mechanical planarization of Cu and Ta[J]. JOM, 2001, 53(6): 50- 52.
57
CHIU S Y, WANG Y L, LIU C P, et al. High-selectivity damascene chemical mechanical polishing[J]. Thin Solid Films, 2006, 498(1-2): 60- 63.
58
李海龙, 刘玉岭, 王辰伟, 等. 阻挡层CMP中盐酸胍对铜和钽抛光速率的影响[J]. 微纳电子技术, 2013, 50(9): 586- 591.
LI H L, LIU Y L, WANG C W, et al. Effect of guanidine hydrochloride on the polishing rate of copper and tantalum in CMP for the barrier layer[J]. Micronanoelectronic Technology, 2013, 50(9): 586- 591.
59
GOVINDARAJAN R, VENKATARAMAN N, RAGHAVAN S. Effect of KIO3 on electrochemical mechanical removal of Ta/TaN films[J]. ECS Transactions, 2009, 19(7): 31- 38.
60
MUTHUKUMARAN A, VENKATARAMAN N, RAGHAVAN S. Evaluation of sulfonic acid-based solutions for electrochemical mechanical removal of tantalum[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2008, 155(3): H184.
61
MA T D, TAN B M, LIU Y L, et al. Role of 1, 2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (BIT) in the improvement of barrier CMP performance with alkaline slurry[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2019, 8(9): P449- P456.
62
ROULE A, AMUNTENCEI M, DERONZIER E, et al. Seed layer enhancement by electrochemical deposition: The copper seed solution for beyond 45nm[J]. Microelectronic Engineering, 2007, 84(11): 2610- 2614.
63
CHYAN O, ARUNAGIRI T N, PONNUSWAMY T. Electrodeposition of copper thin film on ruthenium: A potential diffusion barrier for Cu interconnects[J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2003, 150(5): C347- C350.
64
CHAN R, ARUNAGIRI T N, ZHANG Y, et al. Diffusion studies of copper on ruthenium thin film: A plateable copper diffusion barrier[J]. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2004, 7(8): G154.
65
ZHANG L F, WANG T Q, LU X C. Potassium persulfate as an oxidizer in chemical mechanical polishing slurries relevant for copper interconnects with cobalt barrier layers[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2020, 55(21): 8992- 9002.
66
CHENG J, PAN J S, WANG T Q, et al. Micro-galvanic corrosion of Cu/Ru couple in potassium periodate (KIO4) solution[J]. Corrosion Science, 2018, 137, 184- 193.
67
ARUNAGIRI T N, ZHANG Y, CHYAN O, et al. 5 nm ruthenium thin film as a directly plateable copper diffusion barrier[J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2005, 86(8): 083104.
68
潘辉, 王胜利, 张乐, 等. H2O2基的碱性阻挡层抛光液对Co CMP的影响[J]. 半导体技术, 2016, 41(1): 42-45, 75.
PAN H, WANG S L, ZHANG L, et al. Effects of the H2O2-based alkaline barrier slurry on Co CMP[J]. Semiconductor Technology, 2016, 41(1): 42-45, 75.
69
PEETHALA B C, AMANAPU H P, LAGUDU U R K, et al. Cobalt polishing with reduced galvanic corrosion at copper/cobalt interface using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidizer in colloidal silica-based slurries[J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(6): H582- H588.
70
HE P, WU B B, SHAO S, et al. Characterization of 1, 2, 4-triazole as corrosion inhibitor for chemical mechanical polishing of cobalt in H2O2 based acid slurry[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2019, 8(5): P3075- P3084.
71
YANG X F, ZHANG B G, YANG Z X. Study of novel chelator and 1, 2, 4-triazole on cobalt corrosion and Co/Cu surface finishing in barrier CMP[J]. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 278, 125630.
72
FU L, LIU Y L, WANG C W, et al. Effect of 1, 2, 4-triazole on galvanic corrosion between cobalt and copper in CMP based alkaline slurry[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2018, 39(4): 046001.
73
HU L J, PAN G F, XU Y, et al. The effect of hydroxyethylidene diphosphonic acid on the chemical mechanical polishing of cobalt in H2O2 based alkaline slurries[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2020, 9(3): 034007.
74
PEETHALA B C, BABU S V. Ruthenium polishing using potassium periodate as the oxidizer and silica abrasives[J]. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(3): H271- H276.
75
PEETHALA B C, ROY D, BABU S V. Controlling the galvanic corrosion of copper during chemical mechanical planarization of ruthenium barrier films[J]. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2011, 14(7): H306- H310.
76
ZENG X, WANG J X, LU H S, et al. Improved removal selectivity of ruthenium and copper by glycine in potassium periodate (KIO4)-based slurry[J]. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(11): C525- C529.
77
SAGI K V, AMANAPU H P, ALETY S R, et al. Potassium permanganate-based slurry to reduce the galvanic corrosion of the Cu/Ru/TiN barrier liner stack during CMP in the BEOL interconnects[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2016, 5(5): P256- P263.
78
XU Y, TAN B M, HU L J, et al. Synergetic effect of 5-Methyl-1H-benzotriazole and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate on CMP performance of ruthenium barrier layer in KIO4-based slurry[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2020, 9(10): 104005.
79
SHAO S, WU B B, WANG P, et al. Investigation on inhibition of ruthenium corrosion by glycine in alkaline sodium hypochlorite based solution[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2020, 506, 144976.
80
SAGI K V, TEUGELS L G, VAN DER VEEN M H, et al. Chemical mechanical polishing and planarization of Mn-based barrier/Ru liner films in Cu interconnects for advanced metallization nodes[J]. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 2017, 6(5): P259- P264.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(22560 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/