PDF(6303 KB)
基于“力碳”双控的永临结合装配式地连墙碳效率评估
何秋凤, 陈坤阳, 邱桐, 陈湘生, 陈武雄, 杨立
清华大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (10) : 1957-1967.
PDF(6303 KB)
PDF(6303 KB)
基于“力碳”双控的永临结合装配式地连墙碳效率评估
Carbon efficiency evaluation for permanent-temporary integration prefabricated diaphragm wall based on "mechanical-carbon" dual control model
永临结合装配式地连墙作为一种新型基坑支护体系,具有单墙受力和全预制建造2种相互制约的显著特征。为科学地界定其在受力和产业链运作中的性能,该文首先根据力学试验构建了力学性能理论评估模型;其次,通过对建造过程分析构建了碳排放理论评估模型;然后基于以上模型,进一步建立了适用于永临结合装配式地连墙的“力-碳”双控评估模型,以评估单位力学性能下的建造碳排放量即碳效率;最后,运用该双控评估模型对永临结合装配式地连墙和永临分离结构体系的碳效率进行了对比分析。研究结果表明:相比采用双墙模式的现浇永临分离结构体系,永临结合装配式地连墙因使用高强度预制混凝土,在施工和使用阶段的抗弯承载性能分别提升了74.5 kN·m (增幅4.55%)和426.5 kN·m (增幅26.05%);同时得益于临时支护的取消,平均每环碳排放(以CO2当量计算)降低了8.05 t (降幅30.99%)。此外,实心永临结合装配式地连墙虽然抗弯承载性能比带空腔设置方案高出81 kN·m (增幅5.07%),但每环建造碳排放也增加1.21 t (增幅6.98%)。进一步评估发现,带空腔设置方案每单位抗弯承载性能下的建造碳排放比实心方案降低了0.2 t (降幅1.81%),表明带空腔设置方案的碳效率更优。该研究结果有助于为复杂地质环境中高强低碳建造技术提供科学评估方法,以促进地下工程的绿色低碳转型。
Objective: As a novel foundation pit support system, a permanently integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall exhibits two mutually constrained characteristics: single-wall bearing and fully prefabricated production. However, these characteristics demonstrate a significant trade-off relationship: the structural volume must be increased to enhance structural mechanics capacity, which adversely impacts the efficiency of the prefabricated production and construction supply chain. Meanwhile, improving supply chain efficiency requires reducing the structural volume or material consumption, which compromises the structural mechanics capacity of the single-wall system. Traditional structural performance evaluations typically rely on a single evaluation metric, failing to synergistically balance mechanical properties and supply chain efficiency for identifying optimal integrated solutions. Given the escalating scale of engineering projects in the complex geological environment, there is an urgent need to develop a novel integrated performance evaluation model to provide actionable guidance for the design decisions of high-strength, low-carbon structural solutions. Methods: This study first establishes a theoretical flexural-load-bearing performance evaluation model based on mechanical experiments. Subsequently, a carbon emission assessment model is developed based on the analysis of the construction process. Using these models, a "mechanical-carbon" dual control evaluation framework is formulated specifically for the permanently integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall system to quantify carbon emission efficiency—defined as construction-related carbon emissions per unit of flexural-load-bearing performance. Finally, a comparative analysis of carbon emission efficiency is conducted between the permanently integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall system and a conventional permanently separated structural system using this dual control model. Results: Research findings indicate that, utilizing single-wall load bearing, the permanent-temporary integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall achieves higher flexural-load-bearing performance than the dual-wall separated system, with performance increasing by 74.5 kN·m (an increase of 4.55%) during the construction stage and 426.5 kN·m (an increase of 26.05%) during the service stage, attributable to the use of high-strength prefabricated concrete. Concurrently, thanks to the removal of a temporary support, average carbon emissions per ring (calculated as the CO2 equivalent) are reduced by 8.05 t (a decrease of 30.99%). Meanwhile, the solid permanent-temporary integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall exhibits 81 kN·m (an increase of 5.07%) higher flexural-load-bearing capacity than cavity-containing configurations and incurs an additional carbon emission of 1.21 t (an increase of 6.98%). Further dual control evaluation reveals that the cavity-containing configuration exhibits 0.2 t (a reduction of 1.81%) lower carbon emissions per unit flexural-load-bearing performance than the solid configuration, indicating that the carbon emission efficiency of the scheme with the cavity configuration is better. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the cavity-optimized permanently integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall configurations outperform the solid permanently integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall and conventional permanently separated structural systems in terms of carbon emission efficiency, achieving equivalent flexural-load-bearing performance with reduced carbon emissions and resource consumption. This research further indicates that, in the future, more key indicators can be integrated to establish a more complete and adaptive decision-making performance evaluation framework and method for underground structure construction technology. This research offers a scientific evaluation methodology for high-performance, low-carbon construction technologies in the complex geological environment, advancing the green transformation of underground engineering practices.
永临结合装配式地连墙 / 抗弯承载性能 / 碳排放 / 单墙受力 / 预制建造产业链
permanently-temporarily integrated prefabricated diaphragm wall / flexural-load-bearing performance / carbon emissions / single-wall load bearing / prefabrication industry chain
| 1 |
陈湘生, 何秋凤, 吴泽洲, 等. 隧道及地下工程低碳可持续发展现状与思考[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024, 61 (2): 5- 17.
|
| 2 |
黄嘉欢, 饶伟, 邱桐, 等. 两墙合一预制地下连续墙纵向拼缝力学性能试验研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2025, 45 (3): 556- 566.
|
| 3 |
孙超, 郭浩天. 深基坑支护新技术现状及展望[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2018, 35 (3): 104- 117.
|
| 4 |
中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于大力发展装配式建筑的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2016-09-30)[2024-12-23]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-09/30/content_5114118.htm.
General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. Guideline of The General Office of the State Council on vigorously developing prefabricated buildings[EB/OL]. (2016-09-30)[2024-12-23]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-09/30/content_5114118.htm. (in Chinese)
|
| 5 |
中华人民共和国商务部. 中共中央国务院印发《质量强国建设纲要》 [EB/OL]. (2023-03-13)[2024-12-23]. https://m.mofcom.gov.cn/article/zcfb/zcwg/202306/20230603414738.shtml.
Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China. CPC Central Committee and State Council issued the outline of building a quality country[EB/OL]. (2023-03-13)[2024-12-23]. https://m.mofcom.gov.cn/article/zcfb/zcwg/202306/20230603414738.shtml. (in Chinese)
|
| 6 |
中华人民共和国自然资源部. 自然资源部关于探索推进城市地下空间开发利用的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2024-07-31)[2024-12-23]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202409/content_6974170.htm.
Ministry of Natural Resources, People's Republic of China. Guiding opinions of the Ministry of Natural Resources on exploring and promoting the development and utilization of urban underground space[EB/OL]. (2024-07-31)[2024-12-23]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202409/content_6974170.htm. (in Chinese)
|
| 7 |
李育慧, 麦家儿, 孙菁, 等. 永临结合装配式地铁车站构件型式与拼装模式比选[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2023, 26 (9): 27- 32.
|
| 8 |
朱旻, 孙晓辉, 陈湘生, 等. 地铁地下车站绿色高效智能建造的思考[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41 (12): 2037- 2047.
|
| 9 |
张红州, 张志允. 兼做永久墙的地下连续墙防水设计和施工控制要点[J]. 建筑结构, 2020, 50 (增刊1): 779- 782.
|
| 10 |
建筑工程鲁班联盟. 墙板柱也能"永临结合"?最新建造技术[EB/OL]. (2024-09-23)[2024-12-23]. https://www.ccpa.com.cn/site/content/18512.html.
Construction Engineering Luban Alliance. Can wall panels and columns also be "permanently combined"? The latest construction technology[EB/OL]. (2024-09-23)[2024-12-23]. https://www.ccpa.com.cn/site/content/18512.html. (in Chinese)
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
曹新颖, 孟凡凡, 李小冬. 基于精益管理的装配式建造过程返工风险智能识别[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (2): 201- 209.
|
| 18 |
陈珂, 丁烈云. 我国智能建造关键领域技术发展的战略思考[J]. 中国工程科学, 2021, 23 (4): 64- 70.
|
| 19 |
黄跃群, 刘耀儒, 许文彬, 等. 水利水电工程全生命周期碳排放研究——以犬木塘工程为例[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62 (8): 1366- 1373.
|
| 20 |
周尧, 苗向光, 廖文智, 等. "两墙合一"双环形支撑体系基坑变形特性分析[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2023, 37 (6): 669- 675.
|
| 21 |
赖明宇. 中国南方航空大厦地下连续墙两墙合一技术初探[J]. 低碳世界, 2017 (11): 186- 188.
|
| 22 |
戴清峰, 谭宇, 黄涛, 等. 中风化岩超深基坑"两墙合一"地下连续墙设计研究与实践[J]. 建筑结构, 2020, 50 (20): 133-137, 117.
|
| 23 |
贾曾潘, 陈保国. "两墙合一"条件下地铁车站深基坑变形特性[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2021, 45 (3): 47- 54.
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
白一凡. 装配式地下连续墙设计制造技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2022 (1): 61-64, 86.
|
| 26 |
杨毅秋, 周慧超, 杨贵生, 等. 装配式地下连续墙设计施工技术研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2020, 37 (2): 91- 97.
|
| 27 |
陈伟. 装配式地连墙两墙合一永临结合应用技术研究[J/OL]. 施工技术(中英文). (2024-06-11)[2024-12-23]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1768.TU.20240611.1622.004.html.
CHEN W. Research on the application technology of prefabricated ground wall and two wall integration for permanent and temporary construction[J]. Construction Technology. (2024-06-11)[2024-12-23]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1768.TU.20240611.1622.004.html. (in Chinese)
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
陈锋, 谌艳, 李衍航, 等. 深基坑嵌岩地下连续墙弯矩计算及风险评估研究[J]. 广东土木与建筑, 2024, 31 (5): 77- 80.
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[EB/OL]. (2007-06-28)[2024-12-23]. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/support/Primer_2006GLs.pdf.
|
| 35 |
崔光耀, 戴艾蒙, 麻建飞, 等. 矩形顶管隧道施工碳排放计算方法及影响因素研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024, 61 (4): 126- 134.
|
| 36 |
王彦哲, 周胜, 王宇, 等. 中国核电和其他电力技术环境影响综合评价[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61 (4): 377- 384.
|
| 37 |
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑碳排放计算标准: GB/T 51366—2019[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Standard for building carbon emission calculation: GB/T 51366—2019[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |