Burning rate and flame soot behavior of solid materials in different flow environments

Kai ZHANG, Feng ZHU, Kun LIU, Shuangfeng WANG

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (9) : 1653-1658.

PDF(5137 KB)
PDF(5137 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (9) : 1653-1658. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.27.043
Microgravity Combustion

Burning rate and flame soot behavior of solid materials in different flow environments

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: The flame spread rate, burning rate, and heat release rate are the key aspects of flammability, which determines the fire development process and the intensity of the heat release. The burning characteristics of a solid fuel strongly depend on the environmental conditions, such as the oxygen concentration, flow rate, and ambient pressure. Most studies have focused on the flame spread rate, and only a few have focused on the burning rate, heat release rate, and soot generation characteristics. When the burning rate of solid materials exceeds the smoke point, the distribution of soot within the flame and the volume fraction of soot undergo a large transformation, thus affecting the heat release rate and changing the flame propagation process. In addition, the generation and transport of soot are crucial for fire safety. An urgent need exists to understand the combustion and soot behavior during flame propagation in real fire scenarios. Methods: In this study, flame spread phenomena over a cylindrical polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) at different airflow velocities have been experimentally studied under microgravity and normal gravity conditions. Microgravity experiments were performed in a drop tower. In microgravity experiments, flame spread in purely opposed flow was observed, and in normal gravity experiments, downward flame spread behaviors in the mixed flow with buoyancy-induced and forced flows were investigated. The airflow velocities used in both experiments were 1-35 cm/s, and the diameter of the solid sample was 2—10 mm. In the normal gravity environment, the variation in the sample mass during the flame spread process was recorded using an electronic balance, and the soot volume fraction inside the flame was tested using the light extinction method. In both sets of experiments, the luminescent flame and the stoichiometric flame contour photographed with the CH filter were recorded. Results: The flame area, which is estimated from the stoichiometric contour of the CH radicals of the flame, shows a good linear correlation with the measured mass burning rate. Meanwhile, the flame area decreases with increasing flow rate in a normal gravity environment, while in a microgravity environment, the flame area increases to a maximum value and then decreases with increasing opposed flow velocity, indicating a nonmonotonic variation trend. The soot formation of PMMA specimens depends on the diameter of the specimen and the flow conditions, and the experiments in normal gravity show that larger specimen diameters and lower flow rates favor soot formation. However, the flow velocities corresponding to the smoke points of PMMA specimens in different gravity environments are quite different. The flow velocities corresponding to the smoke points of specimens in microgravity environments are even lower. In normal gravity, the soot concentration in the flame decreases with increasing flow velocity. In contrast, in microgravity, solid materials have different smoke points, and the soot concentration increases with the convection velocity. Conclusions: The fuel burning rate and soot formation depend on the airflow velocity. The relationship between the flame area and the burning rate is independent of the fuel smoke point. Because of the variation in the flow condition, the resident time and oxidization time become different, resulting in variation in the soot formation characteristics.

Key words

microgravity / mass burning rate / soot / solid materials

Cite this article

Download Citations
Kai ZHANG , Feng ZHU , Kun LIU , et al. Burning rate and flame soot behavior of solid materials in different flow environments[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(9): 1653-1658 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.27.043

References

1
LAUTENBERGER C, TORERO J, FERNANDEZ-PELLO C. Understanding material flammability[M]// APTE V. Flammability Testing of Materials Used in Construction, Transport and Mining. 2nd ed. New York, USA: CRC Press, 2022.
2
T'IEN J S, SHIH H Y, JIANG C B, et al. Mechanisms of flame spread and smolder wave propagation[M]// ROSS H D. Microgravity Combustion: Fire in Free Fall. San Diego, USA: Academic Press, 2001.
3
DE RIS J . Spread of a laminar diffusion flame[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1969, 12 (1): 241- 252.
4
FERNANDEZ-PELLO A C , SANTORO R J . On the dominant mode of heat transfer in downward flame spread[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1979, 17 (1): 1201- 1209.
5
DE RIS J L , CHENG X F . The of role of smoke-point in material flammability testing[J]. Fire Safety Science, 1994, 4, 301- 312.
6
LINTERIS G T , RAFFERTY I P . Flame size, heat release, and smoke points in materials flammability[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2008, 43 (6): 442- 450.
7
DEHGHANI P , SUNDERLAND P B , QUINTIERE J G , et al. Burning in microgravity: Experimental results and analysis[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2021, 228, 315- 330.
8
GOMEZ A , SIDEBOTHAM G , GLASSMAN I . Sooting behavior in temperature-controlled laminar diffusion flames[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1984, 58 (1): 45- 57.
9
KENT J H . A quantitative relationship between soot yield and smoke point measurements[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1986, 63 (3): 349- 358.
10
Meyer F , Schwenteck T , Ruhe M , et al. UB-FIRE experiment results on upward flame propagation along cylindrical PMMA samples in reduced gravity[J]. 47th International Conference on Environmental Systems, 2017,
11
XIONG C Y , FAN H R , HUANG X Y , et al. Evaluation of burning rate in microgravity based on the fuel regression, flame area, and spread rate[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 237, 111846.
12
DOTSON K T , SUNDERLAND P B , YUAN Z G , et al. Laminar smoke points of coflowing flames in microgravity[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2011, 46 (8): 550- 555.
13
LINK S , HUANG X Y , FERNANDEZ-PELLO C , et al. The effect of gravity on flame spread over PMMA cylinders[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8 (1): 120.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(5137 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/