Affective brain-computer interfaces: Insights from psychology and neuroscience

Jingjing CHEN, Xin HU, Xinke SHEN, Dan ZHANG

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (12) : 2341-2350.

PDF(2279 KB)
PDF(2279 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (12) : 2341-2350. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.049

Affective brain-computer interfaces: Insights from psychology and neuroscience

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Significance: Empowering machines to understand human emotions remains one of the primary challenges in developing artificial intelligence (AI). The affective brain-computer interface (BCI), which decodes emotional states based on brain signals, is an emerging field combining psychology, neuroscience, and AI. Brain signals are inherently uncontrollable, contain rich emotion-specific information, and provide a promising physiological basis for developing computing systems that support continual emotion monitoring. Since its inception, affective BCI research has required close collaboration across various disciplines: it depends on the use of information science for feature engineering and algorithm development, psychology for theoretical frameworks of emotion, and neuroscience for revealing the neural mechanisms underlying emotional processes. Such a demand for multidisciplinary co-operation forms the core focus of this review. Specifically, this paper focuses on the methods by which psychology-and neuroscience-based insights can inspire and advance affective BCI research. Progress: We summarize the current progress at three levels: theoretical, technical, and applied. In the first one, recent advances in affective science offer new perspectives for shaping affective BCI paradigms. The traditional discrete and dimensional frameworks have laid the groundwork for emotion decoding but often overlook positive emotions and the dynamic intensity of affective experiences. Recent emotion theories emphasizing refined positive emotions, mixed emotions, and context-dependent emotions provide valuable directions for improving emotion representation. Affective computing should align with these developments, integrating them into computational models to enhance ecological validity. In turn, affective BCI research may also contribute to psychology by offering evidence to test and refine emotion theories, fostering reciprocal progress across disciplines. At the technical level, neuroscience provides crucial insights for building more robust affective BCIs. Findings on emotional valence lateralization and distributed emotion-associated brain representations can inform the design of models that better capture emotional processing complexity. Moreover, inter-subject brain synchronization research has revealed mechanisms that enhance model generalizability across users, suggesting that incorporating neuroscientific findings can substantially improve the performance and reliability of affective BCIs. At the application level, affective BCIs are expanding beyond emotion recognition toward understanding emotion-related individual differences. Variability between individuals—often treated as noise—may instead offer meaningful information about personality traits or mental health conditions. In the long term, the goal of affective BCI systems may evolve from accurately identifying emotions to comprehensively understanding each individual's psychological tendencies and dynamic affective patterns across multimodal neural and behavioral data. We advocate for stronger integration between affective BCI technologies and practical domains. Such integration allows practical demands to drive technological development, ensuring that affective BCI remains human-centered. Conclusions and Prospects: Finally, we discuss the technical challenges of affective BCI, including extending algorithms from controlled laboratory settings to real-world scenarios, advancing sensor technology for more convenient and reliable brain-signal acquisition, and leveraging large models to enhance performance for affective BCI. Specifically, we emphasize the vital role of ethical considerations: as affective BCIs move from passive emotion detection toward active emotional support or intervention, the responsibility of humans as rational moral agents in a future era of man-computer symbiosis must be considered, ensuring the autonomy of human emotions.

Key words

brain-computer interface / affective computing / psychology / neuroscience

Cite this article

Download Citations
Jingjing CHEN , Xin HU , Xinke SHEN , et al. Affective brain-computer interfaces: Insights from psychology and neuroscience[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(12): 2341-2350 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.21.049

References

1
MINSKY M . The society of mind[M]. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986.
2
PICARD R W . Affective computing[M]. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.
3
WU D R , LU B L , HU B , et al. Affective brain-computer interfaces (abcis): A tutorial[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2023, 111 (10): 1314- 1332.
4
CHEN H Y , LI J X , HE H H , et al. Toward the construction of affective brain-computer interface: A systematic review[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2025, 57 (6): 156.
5
赵国朕, 宋金晶, 葛燕, 等. 基于生理大数据的情绪识别研究进展[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2016, 53 (1): 80- 92.
ZHAO G Z , SONG J J , GE Y , et al. Advances in emotion recognition based on physiological big data[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2016, 53 (1): 80- 92.
6
UDOVI AČG I AĆG G, DEREK J, RUSSO M, et al. Wearable emotion recognition system based on GSR and PPG signals[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Multimedia for Personal Health and Health Care. Mountain View, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017: 53-59.
7
ALARCÃO S M , FONSECA M J . Emotions recognition using EEG signals: A survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2019, 10 (3): 374- 393.
8
SI X P , HE H , YU J Y , et al. Cross-subject emotion recognition brain-computer interface based on fNIRS and DBJNet[J]. Cyborg and Bionic Systems, 2023, 4, 0045.
9
HU X , CHEN J J , WANG F , et al. Ten challenges for EEG-based affective computing[J]. Brain Science Advances, 2019, 5 (1): 1- 20.
10
EKMAN P . An argument for basic emotions[J]. Cognition and Emotion, 1992, 6 (3-4): 169- 200.
11
RUSSELL J A . A circumplex model of affect[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39 (6): 1161- 1178.
12
KOELSTRA S , MUHL C , SOLEYMANI M , et al. DEAP: A database for emotion analysis; using physiological signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2012, 3 (1): 18- 31.
13
WANG Y , SONG W , TAO W , et al. A systematic review on affective computing: Emotion models, databases, and recent advances[J]. Information Fusion, 2022, 83-84, 19- 52.
14
ZHENG W L , LU B L . Investigating critical frequency bands and channels for EEG-based emotion recognition with deep neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental development, 2015, 7 (3): 162- 175.
15
JIANG W B , LIU X H , ZHENG W L , et al. SEED-Ⅶ: A multimodal dataset of six basic emotions with continuous labels for emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2025, 16 (2): 969- 985.
16
COWEN A S , KELTNER D . Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114 (38): E7900- E7909.
17
RUSSELL J A . Culture and the categorization of emotions[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 110 (3): 426- 450.
18
TRAMPE D , QUOIDBACH J , TAQUET M . Emotions in everyday life[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10 (12): e0145450.
19
FREDRICKSON B L . Chapter One-Positive emotions broaden and build[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2013, 47, 1- 53.
20
HU X , YU J W , SONG M D , et al. EEG correlates of ten positive emotions[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017, 11, 26.
21
HU X , ZHUANG C , WANG F , et al. fNIRS evidence for recognizably different positive emotions[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2019, 13, 120.
22
ZHAO G Z , ZHANG Y L , ZHANG G H , et al. Multi-target positive emotion recognition from EEG signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2023, 14 (1): 370- 381.
23
BRIESEMEISTER B B , KUCHINKE L , JACOBS A M . Emotional valence: A bipolar continuum or two independent dimensions?[J]. Sage Open, 2012, 2 (4): 1- 12.
24
BERRIOS R , TOTTERDELL P , KELLETT S . Eliciting mixed emotions: A meta-analysis comparing models, types, and measures[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2015, 6, 428.
25
LIU F , YANG P , SHU Y Z , et al. Emotion dictionary learning with modality attentions for mixed emotion exploration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2024, 15 (3): 1289- 1302.
26
YANG P , LIU N Q , LIU X G , et al. A multimodal dataset for mixed emotion recognition[J]. Scientific Data, 2024, 11 (1): 847.
27
BARRETT L F . The conceptual act theory: A précis[J]. Emotion Review, 2014, 6 (4): 292- 297.
28
COWEN A S , FANG X , SAUTER D , et al. What music makes us feel: At least 13 dimensions organize subjective experiences associated with music across different cultures[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, 117 (4): 1924- 1934.
29
TANG L L , YUAN P J , ZHANG D . Emotional experience during human-computer interaction: A survey[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2024, 40 (8): 1845- 1855.
30
PEKRUN R, LINNENBRINK-GARCIA L. Academic emotions and student engagement[M]//CHRISTENSON S L, RESCHLY A L, WYLIE C. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Boston, USA: Springer, 2012: 259-282.
31
HE W H , LUO H F , ZHANG D , et al. Student's subjective feelings during classroom learning[J]. Learning and Instruction, 2024, 91, 101891.
32
XU T , WANG J B , ZHANG G T , et al. Confused or not: Decoding brain activity and recognizing confusion in reasoning learning using EEG[J]. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2023, 20 (2): 026018.
33
胡鑫, 蒋俏蕾, 宋磊, 等. "萌"的媒介效果: 基于脑电情感计算的"萌"视频情绪分析[J]. 全球传媒学刊, 2021, 8 (6): 27- 44.
HU X , JIANG Q L , SONG L , et al. The media effect of "Moe": EEG-based affective computing of the emotions evoked by "Moe" videos[J]. Global Journal of Media Studies, 2021, 8 (6): 27- 44.
34
WU S F , LU Y L , LIEN C J . Detecting students' flow states and their construct through electroencephalogram: Reflective flow experiences, balance of challenge and skill, and sense of control[J]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2021, 58 (8): 1515- 1540.
35
陈菁菁, 王非, 高小榕, 等. 教育领域中的脑-机接口应用: 动向与挑战[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40 (12): 90- 101.
CHEN J J , WANG F , GAO X R , et al. Brain-computer interface applications in education: Trends and challenges[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40 (12): 90- 101.
36
FAIRCLOUGH S H . Fundamentals of physiological computing[J]. Interacting with Computers, 2009, 21 (1-2): 133- 145.
37
KRAGEL P A , LABAR K S . Decoding the nature of emotion in the brain[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2016, 20 (6): 444- 455.
38
KELLEY N J , HORTENSIUS R , SCHUTTER D J L G , et al. The relationship of approach/avoidance motivation and asymmetric frontal cortical activity: A review of studies manipulating frontal asymmetry[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2017, 119, 19- 30.
39
SUTTON S K , DAVIDSON R J . Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems[J]. Psychological Science, 1997, 8 (3): 204- 210.
40
OCKLENBURG S , PETERBURS J , MUNDORF A . Hemispheric asymmetries in the amygdala: A comparative primer[J]. Progress in Neurobiology, 2022, 214, 102283.
41
LIN Y P , WANG C H , JUNG T P , et al. EEG-based emotion recognition in music listening[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2010, 57 (7): 1798- 1806.
42
LI Y , WANG L , ZHENG W M , et al. A novel bi-hemispheric discrepancy model for EEG emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2021, 13 (2): 354- 367.
43
CUI H , LIU A P , ZHANG X , et al. EEG-based emotion recognition using an end-to-end regional-asymmetric convolutional neural network[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 205, 106243.
44
YAN R F , LU N , YAN Y X , et al. A fine-grained hemispheric asymmetry network for accurate and interpretable EEG-based emotion classification[J]. Neural Networks, 2025, 184, 107127.
45
LINDQUIST K A , SATPUTE A B , WAGER T D , et al. The brain basis of positive and negative affect: Evidence from a meta-analysis of the human neuroimaging literature[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2016, 26 (5): 1910- 1922.
46
WAGER T D , KANG J , JOHNSON T D , et al. A bayesian model of category-specific emotional brain responses[J]. PLoS Computational Biology, 2015, 11 (4): e1004066.
47
SAARIMÄKI H , EJTEHADIAN L F , GLEREAN E , et al. Distributed affective space represents multiple emotion categories across the human brain[J]. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2018, 13 (5): 471- 482.
48
PESSOA L . A network model of the emotional brain[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2017, 21 (5): 357- 371.
49
LI P Y , LIU H , SI Y J , et al. EEG based emotion recognition by combining functional connectivity network and local activations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 66 (10): 2869- 2881.
50
WU X , ZHENG W L , LI Z Y , et al. Investigating EEG-based functional connectivity patterns for multimodal emotion recognition[J]. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2022, 19 (1): 016012.
51
SONG T F , ZHENG W M , SONG P , et al. EEG emotion recognition using dynamical graph convolutional neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2020, 11 (3): 532- 541.
52
LI C B , TANG T , PAN Y , et al. An efficient graph learning system for emotion recognition inspired by the cognitive prior graph of EEG brain network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2025, 36 (4): 7130- 7144.
53
DING Y , TONG C X , ZHANG S L , et al. EmT: A novel transformer for generalized cross-subject EEG emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2025, 36 (6): 10381- 10393.
54
HASSON U , NIR Y , LEVY I , et al. Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision[J]. Science, 2004, 303 (5664): 1634- 1640.
55
DMOCHOWSKI J P , SAJDA P , DIAS J , et al. Correlated components of ongoing EEG point to emotionally laden attention—a possible marker of engagement?[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2012, 6, 112.
56
DMOCHOWSKI J P , BEZDEK M A , ABELSON B P , et al. Audience preferences are predicted by temporal reliability of neural processing[J]. Nature Communications, 2014, 5 (1): 4567.
57
DING Y , HU X , XIA Z Y , et al. Inter-brain EEG feature extraction and analysis for continuous implicit emotion tagging during video watching[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2021, 12 (1): 92- 102.
58
SHEN X K , LIU X G , HU X , et al. Contrastive learning of subject-invariant EEG representations for cross-subject emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2023, 14 (3): 2496- 2511.
59
CHANG J , ZHANG Z X , QIAN Y H , et al. Multi-scale hyperbolic contrastive learning for cross-subject EEG emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2025, 16 (3): 1716- 1731.
60
HU M T , XU D , HE K J , et al. Cross-subject emotion recognition with contrastive learning based on EEG signal correlations[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2025, 104, 107511.
61
SHEN X K, GAN R M, WANG K X, et al. Dynamic-attention-based EEG state transition modeling for emotion recognition[J/OL]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. (2025-07-29)[2025-07-30]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11098886.
62
权学良, 曾志刚, 蒋建华, 等. 基于生理信号的情感计算研究综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2021, 47 (8): 1769- 1784.
QUAN X L , ZENG Z G , JIANG J H , et al. Physiological signals based affective computing: A systematic review[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2021, 47 (8): 1769- 1784.
63
SI X P , HUANG H , YU J Y , et al. EEG microstates and fNIRS metrics reveal the spatiotemporal joint neural processing features of human emotions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2024, 15 (4): 2128- 2138.
64
GAO C G , UCHITOMI H , MIYAKE Y . Cross-sensory EEG emotion recognition with filter bank riemannian feature and adversarial domain adaptation[J]. Brain Sciences, 2023, 13 (9): 1326.
65
LIU Y J , YU M J , ZHAO G Z , et al. Real-time movie-induced discrete emotion recognition from EEG Signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2018, 9 (4): 550- 562.
66
HUANG W C , WU W , LUCAS M V , et al. Neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface enhances emotion regulation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2023, 14 (2): 998- 1011.
67
CANO S , ARAUJO N , GUZMAN C , et al. Low-cost assessment of user experience through EEG signals[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 158475- 158487.
68
FREY J, DANIEL M, CASTET J, et al. Framework for electroencephalography-based evaluation of user experience[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Jose, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016: 2283-2294.
69
KUMAR N , KUMAR J . Measurement of cognitive load in HCI systems using EEG power spectrum: An experimental study[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 84, 70- 78.
70
ZHAO M R , GAO H N , WANG W , et al. Research on human-computer interaction intention recognition based on EEG and eye movement[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 145824- 145832.
71
HAMANN S , CANLI T . Individual differences in emotion processing[J]. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2004, 14 (2): 233- 238.
72
BODEN M T , THOMPSON R J . Facets of emotional awareness and associations with emotion regulation and depression[J]. Emotion, 2015, 15 (3): 399- 410.
73
LANE R D , SCHWARTZ G E . Levels of emotional awareness: A cognitive-developmental theory and its application to psychopathology[J]. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 1987, 144 (2): 133- 143.
74
CHEN H Y , SUN S T , LI J X , et al. Personal-zscore: Eliminating individual difference for EEG-based cross-subject emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2023, 14 (3): 2077- 2088.
75
LI J P , QIU S , SHEN Y Y , et al. Multisource transfer learning for cross-subject EEG emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2020, 50 (7): 3281- 3293.
76
LI W , HUAN W , HOU B W , et al. Can emotion be transferred? A review on transfer learning for EEG-based emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2022, 14 (3): 833- 846.
77
LIN Y P , JUNG T P . Improving EEG-based emotion classification using conditional transfer learning[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2017, 11, 334.
78
DAI S , LI M , WU X , et al. Contrastive learning of EEG representation of brain area for emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2025, 74, 2506913.
79
MCCRAE R R , JOHN O P . An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications[J]. Journal of Personality, 1992, 60 (2): 175- 215.
80
WATSON D, CLARK L A. Chapter 29-Extraversion and its positive emotional core[M]//HOGAN R, JOHNSON J, BRIGGS S. Handbook of Personality Psychology. San Diego, USA: Academic Press, 1997: 767-793.
81
LI W Y , WU C P , HU X , et al. Quantitative personality predictions from a brief EEG recording[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2022, 13 (3): 1514- 1527.
82
LI W Y , HU X , LONG X F , et al. EEG responses to emotional videos can quantitatively predict big-five personality traits[J]. Neurocomputing, 2020, 415, 368- 381.
83
ABI-DARGHAM A , MOELLER S J , ALI F , et al. Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: State of the field[J]. World Psychiatry, 2023, 22 (2): 236- 262.
84
BYLSMA L M , MORRIS B H , ROTTENBERG J . A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder[J]. Clinical Psychology Review, 2008, 28 (4): 676- 691.
85
SHESTYUK A Y , DELDIN P J , BRAND J E , et al. Reduced sustained brain activity during processing of positive emotional stimuli in major depression[J]. Biological Psychiatry, 2005, 57 (10): 1089- 1096.
86
CAI H S , HAN J S , CHEN Y F , et al. A pervasive approach to EEG-based depression detection[J]. Complexity, 2018, 2018, 5238028.
87
LI X W , HU B , SUN S T , et al. EEG-based mild depressive detection using feature selection methods and classifiers[J]. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2016, 136, 151- 161.
88
WU C T , DILLON D G , HSU H C , et al. Depression detection using relative EEG power induced by emotionally positive images and a conformal kernel support vector machine[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8 (8): 1244.
89
LAI C H . Promising neuroimaging biomarkers in depression[J]. Psychiatry Investigation, 2019, 16 (9): 662- 670.
90
AL-EZZI A , KAMEL N , FAYE I , et al. Review of EEG, ERP, and brain connectivity estimators as predictive biomarkers of social anxiety disorder[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11, 730.
91
ZHANG L , PENG S Y , WINKLER S . PersEmoN: A deep network for joint analysis of apparent personality, emotion and their relationship[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2022, 13 (1): 298- 305.
92
SHEPSTONE S E , TAN Z H , JENSEN S H . Audio-based granularity-adapted emotion classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2018, 9 (2): 176- 190.
93
LI J L, LEE C C. Attention learning with retrievable acoustic embedding of personality for emotion recognition[C]//2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). Cambridge, UK: IEEE, 2019: 171-177.
94
SONG S Y , JAISWAL S , SANCHEZ E , et al. Self-supervised learning of person-specific facial dynamics for automatic personality recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2023, 14 (1): 178- 195.
95
JIANG W B, ZHAO L M, LU B L. Large brain model for learning generic representations with tremendous EEG data in BCI[EB/OL]. (2024-05-29)[2025-07-04]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18765.
96
WANG Z H , SHI N L , ZHANG Y C , et al. Conformal in-ear bioelectronics for visual and auditory brain-computer interfaces[J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14 (1): 4213.
97
SHANECHI M M . Brain-machine interfaces from motor to mood[J]. Nature Neuroscience, 2019, 22 (10): 1554- 1564.
98
SCANGOS K W , KHAMBHATI A N , DALY P M , et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression[J]. Nature Medicine, 2021, 27 (10): 1696- 1700.
99
LICKLIDER J C R . Man-computer symbiosis[J]. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1960, HFE-1 (1): 4- 11.
100
张丹, 李佳蔚. 探索思维的力量: 脑机接口研究现状与展望[J]. 科技导报, 2017, 35 (9): 62- 67.
ZHANG D , LI J W . Exploring the power of mind: Status and prospect of brain-computer interfaces[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2017, 35 (9): 62- 67.
101
YUSTE R , GOERING S , ARCAS B A Y , et al. Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI[J]. Nature, 2017, 551 (7679): 159- 163.
102
IENCA M , HASELAGER P , EMANUEL E J . Brain leaks and consumer neurotechnology[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36 (9): 805- 810.
103
GORDON E C , SETH A K . Ethical considerations for the use of brain-computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement[J]. PLoS Biology, 2024, 22 (10): e3002899.
104
柯晓宇. 情感脑机智能中的责任反思[N]. 社会科学报, 2025-04-10(6).
KE X Y. Reflections on responsibility in emotional brain-computer intelligence[N]. Social Sciences Weekly, 2025-04-10(6). (in Chinese)
105
CHEN J J , WANG X B , HUANG C , et al. A large finer-grained affective computing EEG dataset[J]. Scientific Data, 2023, 10 (1): 740.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(2279 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/