Erection procedure optimization of a long-span suspension bridge considering flutter risk in mixed wind climates

Teng MA, Bingyao CHEN, Wei CUI, Huanyong CHEN, Shenyou SONG, Lin ZHAO

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (7) : 1284-1290.

PDF(5635 KB)
PDF(5635 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (7) : 1284-1290. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.012
Shenzhen-Zhongshan Link

Erection procedure optimization of a long-span suspension bridge considering flutter risk in mixed wind climates

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: During the erection stage of suspension bridges, the critical flutter wind speed varies continuously owing to changes in structural dynamic properties, including mass and stiffness. Concurrently, the wind climate fluctuates seasonally or even monthly throughout the bridge erection process. To evaluate the flutter risk of suspension bridges exposed to varying wind conditions, a framework is proposed to optimize the deck erection timeline under complex wind climates, with a summary of the flutter risk flow. Methods: The aerodynamic flutter stability for each construction stage was tested by full-model wind tunnel tests. The time-varying wind climate is represented as an extreme wind speed annual exceedance probability distribution function for each month. Data for synoptic wind speed analysis were extracted from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Global Integrated Surface Dataset, while tropical cyclone wind speeds were modeled using Vickery's full-track Monte Carlo simulations. The mixed extreme wind speed, resulting from the combination of tropical cyclones and monsoons, was calculated using probability theory for independent events. An optimization algorithm was used to determine the optimal deck erection starting timeline to minimize on-site flutter probability during the entire deck erection construction process. Results: Two specific analytical methods and visualizations were proposed. The flutter risk flow illustrates the flutter performance of a single program, while the erection flutter risk box plot provides a horizontal comparison of different erection processes. The study also discussed how to choose the best deck erection plan for different erection procedure configurations. The Shenzhong Link, built on the southern coastline of China, served as a case study. A full-bridge aeroelastic model wind tunnel test was conducted to determine the critical flutter speed at different erection stages. As the construction of the main beam progressed, the critical wind speed of the bridge generally increased. In addition, a negative angle of attack was detrimental when the main beam assembly rate was low, while a positive angle of attack was unfavorable at higher assembly rates. Extreme wind speeds from typhoons and synoptic winds were analyzed using Monte Carlo typhoon simulations and meteorological data statistics, respectively. The results indicated strong seasonality in coastal mixed climates owing to typhoon influence. The optimization algorithm identified an optimal timeline for the Lingdingyang Bridge, minimizing flutter risk. However, selecting the worst timeline could exponentially increase flutter risk. Conclusions: This paper proposes a construction process optimization strategy for suspension bridge girder that minimizes the flutter risk during the overall construction process. The mixed climatic wind environment including typhoons and benign winds and the continuous time-varying bridge structure state are considered, and the time-varying construction period flutter probability is calculated. Research has shown that timeline optimization is a more economical and viable approach than structural and aerodynamic interventions, especially in mixed wind climates. Horizontal comparison of desk erection plans should consider not only the lowest flutter speed but also the flutter risk probability across all timelines. The erection risk box plot is an effective tool in this case. If the erection starting time is flexible, minimizing the flutter probability should be the main indicator. When the timeline is uncertain, greater attention should be given on the mean-value and quartile box indicators.

Key words

suspension bridge / mixture wind climate / flutter risk probability / erection process optimization

Cite this article

Download Citations
Teng MA , Bingyao CHEN , Wei CUI , et al . Erection procedure optimization of a long-span suspension bridge considering flutter risk in mixed wind climates[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(7): 1284-1290 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.012

References

1
DING Y J , ZHAO L , XIAN R , et al. Aerodynamic stability evolution tendency of suspension bridges with spans from 1000 to 5000 m[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2023, 17 (10): 1465- 1476.
2
陈政清. 桥梁风工程[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2005.
CHEN Z Q . Bridge wind engineering[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2005.
3
黄成造, 赵林, 宋神友, 等. 全离岸海中超大跨径悬索桥抗风关键技术研究[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2024.
HUANG C Z , ZHAO L , SONG S Y , et al. Research on key technologies of wind resistance of super long-span suspension bridge in offshore sea[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2024.
4
ZHAO L , CHENG Y , LIU S Y , et al. Instantaneous power balance algorithm for flutter critical wind speed prediction of bridge girders[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 150 (2): 04023120.
5
项海帆, 葛耀君. 大跨度桥梁抗风技术挑战与基础研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2011, 13 (9): 8- 21.
XIANG H F , GE Y J . Wind resistance challenges and fundamental research on long-span bridges[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2011, 13 (9): 8- 21.
6
ZHANG X J . Investigation on aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension bridges under erection[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2004, 92 (1): 1- 8.
7
BAKIS K N , LIMEBEER D J N , WILLIAMS M S , et al. Passive aeroelastic control of a suspension bridge during erection[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016, 66, 543- 570.
8
LARSEN A . Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridge across the Great Belt[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 48 (2-3): 261- 285.
9
YANG Y X , ZHANG L , DING Q S , et al. Flutter performance and improvement for a suspension bridge with central-slotted box girder during erection[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018, 179, 118- 124.
10
GE Y J , TANAKA H . Aerodynamic stability of long-span suspension bridges under erection[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126 (12): 1404- 1412.
11
SVENSSON H S, KOVACS I. Examples of analytical aerodynamic investigations of long-span bridges[M]// LARSEN A. Aerodynamics of Large Bridges. London: Routledge, 2017: 171-182.
12
LARSEN A . Prediction of aeroelastic stability of suspension bridges during erection[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1997, 72, 265- 274.
13
ARCO D C D , APARICIO A C . Improving the wind stability of suspension bridges during construction[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001, 127 (8): 869- 875.
14
CUI W , MA T , ZHAO L , et al. Data-based windstorm type identification algorithm and extreme wind speed prediction[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2021, 147 (5): 04021053.
15
MIYATA T , YAMAGUCHI K . Aerodynamics of wind effects on the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 48 (2-3): 287- 315.
16
ZHENG J , FANG G S , WANG Z L , et al. Shape optimization of closed-box girder considering dynamic and aerodynamic effects on flutter: A CFD-enabled and Kriging surrogate-based strategy[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 17 (1): 2191693.
17
SMITH A , LOTT N , VOSE R . The integrated surface database: Recent developments and partnerships[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2011, 92 (6): 704- 708.
18
VICKERY P J , SKERLJ P F , TWISDALE L A . Simulation of hurricane risk in the U.S. using empirical track model[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126 (10): 1222- 1237.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(5635 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/