PDF(4279 KB)
Research on launch vehicle gas jet environment and safe deflection
Yongyi ZHOU, Junlin LIU, Zhicheng ZHANG, Zhanpeng CUI
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 429-439.
PDF(4279 KB)
PDF(4279 KB)
Research on launch vehicle gas jet environment and safe deflection
Significance: With the expansion of deep space exploration endeavors and increasing demand for satellite constellation networking, the global aerospace industry is experiencing a strategic shift from singular payload launches toward a high-cadence and cost-effective transportation paradigm. Consequently, launch vehicle technology has exhibited a discernible trend toward heavy-lift capacity and reusability. To achieve the technical objective of obtaining substantial takeoff thrust, heavy-lift rocket primary engines typically employ a power architecture involving multiple engines operating in parallel. Heavy-lift rockets are poised to assume a pivotal role in forthcoming space transportation missions. As a fundamental component of a rocket launch system, the primary function of the deflector is to direct the controlled diffusion of high-temperature and high-velocity gas jets through a precisely engineered aerodynamic configuration. This mitigates aerodynamic forces exerted on the rocket body and payload resulting from shock wave reflection and attenuates the thermal loading induced by gas backflow. The deflector ensures the structural integrity of the rocket body. Consequently, future heavy-lift rocket launch missions present unprecedented technical challenges for launch site deflectors. These deflectors must achieve large-scale gas evacuation, high-reliability thermal protection, and rapid reusability capabilities in an extreme gas jet environment. The formulation of a deflector design amenable to future heavy-lift rockets necessitates the resolution of several key scientific questions and the circumvention of prevailing technical limitations. Progress: In the field of the flow characteristics of multinozzle gas jets, the multiphysical field coupling process is the main focus. The interaction between the jets and the free flow forms a complex flow structure comprising shear layers, recirculation vortices, and impingement-reversed flows. The pressure ratio of combustion chamber to ambient has a decisive influence on the interaction mode of gas jets. The coupling of the reignition reaction and jet interaction can induce the formation of local high-temperature regions, and the entrainment effect of the vortex structure on high-temperature gas will intensify thermal erosion, which has important guiding significance for the design of thermal protection systems. In the field of the impingement flow of gas jets on inclined plates, the typical flow pattern under the jet-wall interaction is studied. The factors influencing the flow pattern include the impingement height, impingement angle, jet core Mach number, jet underexpansion ratio, and shock system structural parameters. In the field of flame deflectors, the basic configuration is discussed. The core parameters—impingement height, impingement angle, and deflection direction—are investigated, and the performance characteristics of different configurations of flame deflectors are compared. In the field of flame deflector thermal protection technology, two methods, namely active water-cooling technology and passive material thermal protection technology, are discussed. The cooling efficiency of water sprays is influenced by multiple parameters, such as the spray nozzle layout, spray angle, and mass flow rate. To cope with high-frequency and low-cost launch requirements, the rapid post-launch repair of launch facilities is also an important step in the research of thermal protection technology. Conclusions and Prospects: In terms of flow mechanism, the coupling effect of dense nozzle gas-jet should be analyzed, and the laws of the evolution of the jet mixing boundary layers and water spray mixing should be explored. For thermal protection technology, it is necessary to continue developing high-efficiency and low-cost materials for flame deflector thermal protection to improve the reusability and maintainability of diversion facilities.
space launch / heavy-lift rocket / gas jet / flame deflector / aerodynamic scheme / thermal protection
| 1 |
杨开, 曲晶. 2023年国外重复使用运载火箭发展综述[J]. 国际太空, 2024 (4): 34- 39.
|
| 2 |
李利群, 马翀, 王二亮. 国内外航天发射技术现状与未来发展综述[J]. 上海航天(中英文), 2024, 41 (2): 1- 6.
|
| 3 |
朱雄峰, 刘阳, 刘鹰, 等. 中国运载火箭型谱发展[J]. 科技导报, 2023, 41 (19): 16- 28.
|
| 4 |
鲁宇, 张烽, 汪小卫. 走向深空的航天运输系统[J]. 空间科学与试验学报, 2024, 1 (3): 26- 35.
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
张恩豪, 樊建龙, 朱亮, 等. 固体火箭发动机燃气射流与超声速来流相互作用数值研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2024, 44 (2): 30- 35.
|
| 9 |
陈劲松. 火箭发射燃气动力学[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2022.
|
| 10 |
张津泽, 王国辉, 徐珊姝. 喷管间距及偏角对超声速喷流噪声特性影响研究[J]. 强度与环境, 2022, 49 (1): 42- 47.
|
| 11 |
赵晨耕, 王辉, 孙中一, 等. 火箭燃气射流冲击发射平台的流场和热环境研究[J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2024, 48 (3): 253- 261.
|
| 12 |
王浩轩, 容易, 曾耀祥. 多喷管火箭起飞噪声环境预示方法[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64 (8): 1357- 1366.
|
| 13 |
谭胜, 朱雄峰, 刘鹰, 等. "超重-星舰"基本情况与应用前景分析[J]. 国际太空, 2023 (5): 35- 39.
|
| 14 |
李东, 李平岐. 长征五号火箭技术突破与中国运载火箭未来发展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43 (10): 527269.
|
| 15 |
樊晨霄, 朱海洋, 陈晓飞, 等. SpaceX公司超重-星舰组合体首飞异常情况初步分析[J]. 宇航学报, 2023, 44 (5): 805- 813.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
RUDMAN S. Multinozzle plume flow fields-structure and numerical calculation[C]// 10th Fluid and Plasmadynamics Conference. Albuquerque, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1977: 1-12.
|
| 18 |
BARDINA J, LOMBARD C. Three dimensional CSCM method for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations with application to a multi-nozzle exhaust flowfield[C]// 21st Joint Propulsion Conference. Monterey, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1985: 1-8.
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
刘利宏, 周旭, 张志成. 火箭发动机射流动力学仿真研究[J]. 中国制造业信息化, 2008, 37 (24): 62- 65.
|
| 21 |
苏虹, 徐珊姝, 何巍, 等. 新一代大火箭底部热环境研究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2021 (5): 20- 24.
|
| 22 |
乔野, 聂万胜, 吴高杨, 等. 双机并联氢氧火箭发动机尾焰流场特性三维数值仿真研究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2015 (5): 30- 34.
|
| 23 |
闫指江, 吴彦森, 张耘隆, 等. 国内外运载火箭一级底部喷流热环境研究综述[J]. 载人航天, 2021, 27 (2): 262- 268.
|
| 24 |
郁伟, 张春, 王宝寿. 多喷管超声速射流噪声的实验及数值模拟研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2023, 44 (8): 234- 239.
|
| 25 |
闫指江, 沈丹, 吴彦森, 等. 多喷管运载火箭底部热环境研究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2021 (1): 105- 109.
|
| 26 |
乔野, 聂万胜, 丰松江, 等. 多喷管液体火箭动力系统尾焰流场特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38 (2): 356- 363.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
周志坛, 李怡庆, 江平, 等. 二次燃烧对多喷管运载火箭底部热环境影响研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39 (6): 20210694.
|
| 29 |
任帆涛, 姜毅, 刘汉宇, 等. 多喷管火箭上升段羽流流场及其底部热环境[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40 (5): 20230575.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
MCILROY K, FUJⅡ K. Computational analysis of supersonic underexpanded jets impinging on an inclined flat plate[C]// 37th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Miami, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007: 1-12.
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
马艳丽, 姜毅, 郝继光, 等. 固体发动机燃气射流对发射平台冲击效应研究[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2010, 33 (4): 373- 376.
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
王革, 徐文奇, 郜冶. 两相冲击射流对垂直挡板冲蚀的研究[J]. 弹道学报, 2009, 21 (2): 10- 14.
|
| 37 |
聂万胜, 蔡红华. 导弹/火箭燃烧尾焰冲击特性计算研究综述[J]. 装备学院学报, 2016, 27 (3): 1- 6.
|
| 38 |
黄伟, 贺虎成, 王铁龙, 等. 导流槽检测鉴定及仿真数值分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2007, 37 (4): 45- 47.
|
| 39 |
周志坛, 乐贵高, 梁晓扬, 等. 多喷管运载火箭尾焰对导流槽的冲击特性研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2019, 40 (9): 2027- 2035.
|
| 40 |
刘利宏, 张志成, 周旭. 航天发射场导流槽综合性能评价指标体系研究[J]. 载人航天, 2014, 20 (3): 233- 237.
|
| 41 |
蔡红华, 聂万胜, 苏凌宇, 等. 液氧煤油发动机尾焰冲击导流槽三维数值模拟[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2017, 38 (10): 2202- 2207.
|
| 42 |
乔野, 聂万胜, 吴高杨, 等. 多喷管液体火箭动力系统尾焰冲击特性研究[J]. 推进技术, 2017, 38 (3): 498- 503.
|
| 43 |
赵晨耕, 乐贵高, 苏逸飞, 等. 双喷管运载火箭起飞阶段发射平台热环境研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39 (9): 20220717.
|
| 44 |
穆洪斌, 毕莹, 王晖, 等. 热发射导流器型面仿真计算优化设计[J]. 强度与环境, 2022, 49 (5): 119- 124.
|
| 45 |
陈劲松, 张国栋, 王帅, 等. 高燃压中型运载火箭发射地面低高度排导技术[J]. 宇航学报, 2024, 45 (1): 12- 20.
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
马艳丽, 姜毅, 王伟臣, 等. 喷水对火箭发动机羽流红外特性的抑制作用研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2011, 31 (7): 776- 780.
|
| 49 |
周帆, 姜毅, 郝继光. 火箭发动机尾焰流场注水降温效果初探[J]. 推进技术, 2012, 33 (2): 249- 252.
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
LI M, LUO T P, LIU R M, et al. Numerical analysis of water-cooling deflector for a high-power rocket engine test stand[C]// 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Grapevine, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017: 1-11.
|
| 52 |
罗天培, 刘瑞敏, 李茂, 等. 基于DPM的试验台导流槽喷水冷却数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33 (2): 497- 507.
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
刘俊林, 张子赫, 张志成, 等. 注水参数对火箭喷流流场的影响规律研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38 (10): 2415- 2429.
|
| 55 |
张伟, 方维, 王树光, 等. 大型火箭发动机试验导流槽热防护设计[J]. 传感器世界, 2019, 25 (2): 7- 12.
|
| 56 |
李茂, 陈春富, 朱子勇. 架空钢板对火箭发动机试车中地面热载的影响[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2013 (2): 41- 45.
|
| 57 |
李茂, 王占林. 氢氧火箭发动机射流仿真与试验台热防护[J]. 载人航天, 2014, 20 (5): 421- 426.
|
| 58 |
李茂, 陈世哲, 陈春富. 火箭发动机地面水平试车尾流温度场仿真分析[J]. 火箭推进, 2012, 38 (6): 29- 34.
|
| 59 |
罗天培, 卜玉, 李茂, 等. 某型运载火箭一子级动力系统试验尾流辐射场的数值模拟[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2016 (4): 67- 71.
|
| 60 |
张巍, 马磊, 王国鹏, 等. 长征5号火箭发射台耐火材料应用研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2019, 27 (4): 804- 811.
|
| 61 |
张巍, 马磊, 王国鹏, 等. 火箭发射台用热防护涂层材料的应用研究[J]. 表面技术, 2017, 46 (2): 144- 148.
|
| 62 |
马志宏, 李斌, 马钢, 等. 高温射流冲蚀下耐火混凝土的热致劣化研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2022, 51 (1): 196- 206.
|
| 63 |
冯超, 徐铮, 王亚洲, 等. 发射台可快速修复的热防护方法探究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术(中英文), 2024 (4): 64- 69.
|
| 64 |
冯超, 徐铮, 平仕良, 等. 重型火箭发射平台热防护方法探究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2021 (4): 93- 97.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |