PDF(17896 KB)
Closed-loop smart management method and application of offshore wind power assets through the full life cycle
Qixiang FAN, Peng LIN, Xin WANG, Zhongyuan YAO, Xin LIU, Zhuojing YU
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4) : 796-809.
PDF(17896 KB)
PDF(17896 KB)
Closed-loop smart management method and application of offshore wind power assets through the full life cycle
Objective: As China gradually phases out its subsidy policy for offshore wind power (OWP), the industry has entered a decisive cost reduction and efficiency enhancement stage. Unlike onshore wind projects, OWP projects still face substantially higher construction and operating costs, which makes competitiveness under grid-parity conditions highly challenging. However, the theoretical framework for managing the smart lifecycle of OWP projects remains underdeveloped, with incomplete asset management and evaluation methods. The smart lifecycle management of OWP projects is in its nascent stage, with fragmented data systems and poor integration across planning, construction, and operations. Consequently, there is an urgent need for an innovative, lifecycle-oriented management approach to support the OWP industry's high-quality and sustainable development. Methods: This study proposes a closed-loop smart management mechanism for OWP projects, focusing on four key dimensions: perception, analysis, real-time control, and optimization. This study summarizes the digital transformation and smart management pathways of OWP assets throughout their lifecycle, from feasibility to construction, operation, and final decommissioning. This study classifies management elements into cost, efficiency, and risk, creating a closed-loop evaluation model for OWP assets. This model enables a dynamic representation of each asset's status in terms of cost, efficiency, and risk levels at any moment. Furthermore, this study identifies and analyzes key smart management technologies relevant to various phases of the lifecycle. Accordingly, a smart lifecycle management platform has been designed with a five-layer architecture: data acquisition, data management, modular functional applications, decision support, and interactive visualization. A prototype system was developed to address project development and design, smart construction, and smart operation and maintenance. The system was applied in a large offshore wind farm in Jiangsu Province, China, and the asset conditions were compared before and after its implementation. Results: A comparative analysis based on actual operational data showed significant improvements: (1) Effective cost control was achieved during the construction period, along with rational planning for operation and maintenance, reduced downtime, and improved generation efficiency. Thus, the lifecycle levelized cost of energy decreased from 0.92 yuan/(kW·h) to 0.76 yuan/(kW·h), which was approximately 17.4%. (2) When evaluated against three key efficiency indicators—compliance rate of power generation, effective operation time assurance rate, and average failure rate—the poorly performing turbines (#3, #10, and #16) showed significant improvements after rectification, with lower osculating values. (3) Comprehensive risk assessment identified anomalies in the transmission and blade systems as primary concerns, which allowed for targeted maintenance interventions, improved equipment availability, and reduced unplanned maintenance requirements. Conclusions: The proposed closed-loop smart lifecycle management system offers a new technical solution for reducing costs and improving efficiency in OWP projects. Practical application shows that the system can enhance project planning and design, reduce development and operational costs, improve asset equipment reliability, extend the power generation lifecycle, and ensure ongoing value creation throughout the lifecycle. The study findings offer valuable guidance for smart management in similar offshore renewable energy projects, thereby contributing to the sustainable development of the wind power industry through digital transformation.
offshore wind power / full life cycle / intelligent construction / closed-loop control / asset management
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
樊启祥, 陈晓路, 王鑫. 海上风电项目全生命周期资产管理[J]. 项目管理评论, 2022 (2): 72- 77.
|
| 3 |
BESNARD F, PATRIKSSON M, STRÖMBERG A B, et al. An optimization framework for opportunistic maintenance of offshore wind power system[C]//Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech. Bucharest, Romania: IEEE, 2009: 1-7.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
WILLIAMS R, CRABTREE C, HOGG S. Offshore wind farm asset management: Past experiences and future challenges[C]//ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. San Antonio, USA: ASME, 2013: 94434.
|
| 6 |
黄必清, 张毅, 易晓春. 海上风电场运行维护系统[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 54 (4): 522- 529.
|
| 7 |
ZAJONC M, SCHEU M, HOHRATH P. Asset management in the offshore wind industry[C]//Proceedings of WindEurope 2016 Conference. Hamburg, Germany: WindEurope, 2016: 1-5.
|
| 8 |
吴智泉, 王政霞. 智慧风电体系架构研究[J]. 分布式能源, 2019, 4 (2): 8- 15.
|
| 9 |
韩斌, 王忠杰, 赵勇, 等. 智慧风电场发展现状及规划建议[J]. 热力发电, 2019, 48 (9): 34- 39.
|
| 10 |
陈亮, 阳熹, 杨源. 智慧海上风电场的定义、架构体系和建设路径[J]. 南方能源建设, 2020, 7 (3): 62- 69.
|
| 11 |
YANG Y, YANG X, TAN J P, et al. The scheme design of smart offshore wind farm[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Qingdao). Qingdao, China: IEEE, 2019: 1-6.
|
| 12 |
金飞, 叶晓冬, 马斐, 等. 海上风电工程全生命周期数字孪生解决方案[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2021 (10): 135- 139.
|
| 13 |
胡云石. 茂名供电局电网资产全生命周期管理研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2012.
HU Y S. Research on life cycle assets management of Maoming power supply bureau[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
|
| 14 |
樊启祥, 林鹏, 魏鹏程, 等. 智能建造闭环控制理论[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61 (7): 660- 670.
|
| 15 |
刘心报, 胡俊迎, 陆少军, 等. 新一代信息技术环境下的全生命周期质量管理[J]. 管理科学学报, 2022, 25 (7): 2- 11.
|
| 16 |
盛金保, 向衍, 杨德玮, 等. 水库大坝安全诊断与智慧管理关键技术与应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44 (7): 1351- 1366.
|
| 17 |
樊启祥, 陆佑楣, 李果, 等. 金沙江下游大型水电工程智能建造管理创新与实践[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37 (11): 206- 226.
|
| 18 |
朱合华, 李晓军, 林晓东. 基础设施智慧服务系统(iS3)及其应用[J]. 土木工程学报, 2018, 51 (1): 1- 12.
|
| 19 |
孟韬. 太原供电公司电力资产全寿命周期管理综合效益评价[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2016.
MENG T. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of electric power assets whole life cycle assets management of Taiyuan Power Supply Company[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2016. (in Chinese)
|
| 20 |
顼志芬, 尉胜伟, 徐澄. 工程项目全过程风险管理模式探讨[J]. 管理工程学报, 2005, 19 (S1): 207- 209.
|
| 21 |
尹贻林, 徐志超. 工程项目组织中信任状态的发展与演进: 中国管理情景下的探索性研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2017, 31 (2): 74- 83.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
樊启祥, 林鹏, 李果, 等. 基础设施工程建设安全智能化管理理论和实践创新[J]. 水力发电, 2025, 51 (3): 1- 5.
|
| 24 |
吕晓静, 杭兆峰, 杨立华, 等. 海上风电支撑结构智慧安全管理系统[J]. 电力大数据, 2022, 25 (11): 77- 84.
|
| 25 |
王燕, 韩斌, 赵文超, 等. 海上风电应急检修经济性评价模型的建立及分析[J]. 船舶工程, 2020, 42 (S1): 605- 608.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |