Seismic reliability analysis of the valve hall system in an ±800 kV converter station

Xinzhu QIAO, Qiang XIE

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1295-1306.

PDF(2450 KB)
PDF(2450 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1295-1306. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.054

Seismic reliability analysis of the valve hall system in an ±800 kV converter station

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: As a crucial component of power systems, the valve hall plays a vital role in ensuring the safe and stable operation of converter stations, as well as the reliable transmission of electricity. However, earthquakes pose a significant threat to the integrity and functionality of these systems. Under seismic loading, due to the uniformity of the ground motion input and the mechanical and functional coupling between components, the dynamic responses of the equipment are correlated. This interdependence challenges the conventional assumption of independent component failures, highlighting the need for more advanced reliability modeling. Methods: To demonstrate the importance of considering response correlation between components, this study first analyzes the reliability of series and parallel systems under two extreme conditions: complete independence and complete correlation. The findings show that the correlation between equipment responses has a significant effect on system reliability, especially when the number of components increases or the failure probability varies widely. To quantify the correlations within the valve hall system, finite element simulations were conducted on both high-voltage and low-voltage valve halls of a ±800 kV converter station. The seismic responses of individual equipment were obtained under various ground motion inputs. Based on these data, a Gaussian copula-based method was employed to model the joint behavior of equipment responses. This method captures their statistical dependencies without assuming a predefined joint distribution. The analysis process mainly consists of marginal distribution modeling of the responses, transformation to uniform and normal distributions, determination of the correlation matrix, generation of independent normal samples, singular value decomposition of the correlation matrix, standard normal transformation, inverse mapping to the uniform domain, and generation of correlated samples. This approach enables the construction of a realistic joint distribution of equipment responses while preserving their marginal characteristics. Using the correlated samples generated through the Gaussian copula method, the system-level reliability of the valve hall was evaluated while accounting for dependent failure behavior. Results: The Gaussian copula method effectively modeled the correlation structure of variables using the correlation matrix, enabling accurate modeling of the correlation structure of the response states of the whole system. The assumption of complete independence of component states underestimated the actual system reliability. The degree of underestimation varied significantly with the peak ground acceleration (PGA), with the most pronounced effect observed at PGA=0.400g. Furthermore, neglecting the correlation between component failures resulted in an overestimation of the economic losses of the converter station, and the magnitude of this overestimation increased with the system's design life. Conclusions: The proposed reliability assessment framework incorporates equipment response correlations, yielding more accurate and realistic assessments of valve hall system performance under seismic conditions. This method also overcomes the limitations of traditional approaches based on independent assumptions, which are commonly adopted in large-scale system reliability analysis due to their computational simplicity. The proposed method is flexible and extensible, with broad application prospects in the reliability and risk assessment of complex infrastructure systems subjected to extreme events.

Key words

valve hall system / seismic reliability / failure correlation / economic losses

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xinzhu QIAO , Qiang XIE. Seismic reliability analysis of the valve hall system in an ±800 kV converter station[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(7): 1295-1306 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.26.054

References

1
梁黄彬, 谢强, 何畅, 等. ±800kV特高压直流穿墙套管的地震易损性分析[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2020, 40 (2): 91- 100.
LIANG H B , XIE Q , HE C , et al. Seismic vulnerability analysis of ±800 kV ultra-high voltage direct current(UHVDC)wall bushing[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2020, 40 (2): 91- 100.
2
梁黄彬, 谢强. 变电站系统抗震韧性量化评估方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56 (12): 71- 81.
LIANG H B , XIE Q . Quantitative assessment method for seismic resilience of substation system[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2023, 56 (12): 71- 81.
3
刘潇, 谢强, 朱旺. 基于韧性评估的变电站抗震性能提升策略[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42 (23): 8772- 8780.
LIU X , XIE Q , ZHU W . Substation retrofitting strategy based on seismic resilience assessment[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42 (23): 8772- 8780.
4
何畅, 谢强, 杨振宇, 等. 特高压直流穿墙套管–阀厅体系地震响应及抗震性能提升措施[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43 (10): 3215- 3223.
HE C , XIE Q , YANG Z Y , et al. Seismic responses and retrofitting countermeasures for UHVDC wall bushing-valve hall system[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2017, 43 (10): 3215- 3223.
5
廖德芳, 卓然, 谢强. ±800 kV特高压直流穿墙套管抗震性能研究[J]. 智能电网, 2017, 5 (3): 239- 244.
LIAO D F , ZHUO R , XIE Q . Study on seismic performance of ±800 kV ultra-high voltage DC wall bushing[J]. Smart Grid, 2017, 5 (3): 239- 244.
6
HE C , LIU R P , HE Z W . Seismic vulnerability assessment on porcelain electrical equipment based on Kriging model[J]. Structures, 2023, 55, 1692- 1703.
7
刘潇, 谢强. 特高压换流站抗震韧性及震后修复策略快速评估方法[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44 (3): 1224- 1236.
LIU X , XIE Q . Rapid evaluation method for seismic resilience and post-earthquake repair strategy of UHV converter station[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2024, 44 (3): 1224- 1236.
8
LI J C , WANG T , SHANG Q X . Probability-based seismic reliability assessment method for substation systems[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2019, 48 (3): 328- 346.
9
LIANG H B , XIE Q . System vulnerability analysis simulation model for substation subjected to earthquakes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2022, 37 (4): 2684- 2692.
10
MI D , ZHANG W , LI J W , et al. A copula-function-based structural system reliability analysis method[J]. Acta Mechanica, 2022, 233 (4): 1371- 1391.
11
DUFERA A G , LIU T T , XU J . Regression models of Pearson correlation coefficient[J]. Statistical Theory and Related Fields, 2023, 7 (2): 97- 106.
12
陈天赐, 李艳玲, 张芳, 等. 基于Vine-Copula的高土石坝变形监控模型研究[J]. 人民长江, 2024, 55 (5): 206- 212.
CHEN T C , LI Y L , ZHANG F , et al. Research on deformation monitoring model for high earth-rock dams based on Vine-Copula[J]. Yangtze River, 2024, 55 (5): 206- 212.
13
宋帅, 吴元昊, 徐佰顺, 等. 斜拉桥系统地震易损性评估的Pair Copula技术[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38 (9): 110- 123.
SONG S , WU Y H , XU B S , et al. Pair Copula technique of seismic vulnerability assessment of cable-stayed bridge system[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2021, 38 (9): 110- 123.
14
刘敬一, 庄新臣, 张玉刚, 等. 基于Copula函数的多功能机械系统竞争失效分析方法[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2022, 40 (4): 909- 917.
LIU J Y , ZHUANG X C , ZHANG Y G , et al. Competing failure method for multi-performance mechanism systems based on Copula function[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2022, 40 (4): 909- 917.
15
LIU Y M , CHEN Y . Dynamic reliability evaluation of high-speed train gearbox based on copula function[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10, 51792- 51803.
16
AN H , YIN H , HE F K . Analysis and application of mechanical system reliability model based on copula function[J]. Polish Maritime Research, 2016, 23 (S1): 187- 191.
17
TÓMASSON E, SÖDER L. Multi-area power system reliability evaluation by application of copula theory [C]//Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). Boston, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1-5.
18
方泽华, 陶辉. 利用MCI指数和Gumbel-Copula函数评估新疆干旱灾害危险性[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39 (23): 133- 141.
FANG Z H , TAO H . Assessing drought disaster hazard in Xinjiang of China using MCI and Gumbel-Copula function[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39 (23): 133- 141.
19
樊学平, 周衡, 刘月飞. 基于Gaussian Copula-贝叶斯动态模型的桥梁构件时变可靠性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54 (2): 485- 493.
FAN X P , ZHOU H , LIU Y F . Time-variant reliability analysis of bridge members based on Gaussian Copula-Bayesian dynamic models[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54 (2): 485- 493.
20
李典庆, 吕天健, 唐小松. 基于多维Gaussian Copula的岩土体设计参数概率转换模型构建方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43 (9): 1592- 1601.
LI D Q , T J , TANG X S . Establishing probabilistic transformation models for geotechnical design parameters using multivariate Gaussian Copula[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43 (9): 1592- 1601.
21
WEN J Y , LI X X , XUE J W . Feasibility evaluation of Copula theory for substation equipment with multiple nonlinear-related seismic response indexes[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2024, 247, 110132.
22
WEN J Y , LI X X , ZHU Y X . Improved seismic risk evaluation for high-voltage switchgear equipment: A copula-based framework considering joint failure modes[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2024, 53 (2): 694- 716.
23
LI Y H , DONG Y , GUO H Y . Copula-based multivariate renewal model for life-cycle analysis of civil infrastructure considering multiple dependent deterioration processes[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 231, 108992.
24
SKLAR M . Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges[J]. Annales de l'ISUP, 1959, 8 (3): 229- 231.
25
ZHANG J X , ZHANG M J , JIANG X L , et al. Pair-Copula-based trivariate joint probability model of wind speed, wind direction and angle of attack[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2022, 225, 105010.
26
BEDFORD T , COOKE R M . Probability density decomposition for conditionally dependent random variables modeled by vines[J]. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2001, 32 (1): 245- 268.
27
BARROS B , CONDE B , RIVEIRO B , et al. Gaussian Copula-based Bayesian network approach for characterizing spatial variability in aging steel bridges[J]. Structural Safety, 2024, 106, 102403.
28
TANG X S , LI D Q , ZHOU C B , et al. Copula-based approaches for evaluating slope reliability under incomplete probability information[J]. Structural Safety, 2015, 52, 90- 99.
29
IEEE. IEEE recommended practice for seismic design of substations: IEEE Std 693-2018[S]. New York: IEEE, 2019.
30
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 电力设施抗震设计规范: GB 50260-2013[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Code for seismic design of electrical installations: GB 50260-2013[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
31
QIAO X Z , XIE Q , SHI G Y , et al. Seismic reliability assessment for valve hall in converter station based on Copula theory[J]. Structures, 2025, 77, 109002.
32
高小旺, 鲍霭斌. 地震作用的概率模型及其统计参数[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 1985, 5 (1): 13- 22.
GAO X W , BAO A B . Probabilistic model and it's statistical parameters for seismic load[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1985, 5 (1): 13- 22.
33
孟建国. 基于全寿命设计的钢筋混凝土结构安全度研究与应用[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.
MENG J G. Reinforced concrete structure reliability research and application based on life-cycle design [D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2016. (in Chinese)
34
WU S Y , LIU X , CHEN J H , et al. BN-based seismic risk analysis and mitigation strategy for UHV converter station[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2024, 53 (14): 4477- 4492.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(2450 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/