PDF(3416 KB)
Overview of floating offshore wind foundation optimization design technology and its applications
Yajun REN, Sheng LI, Wei SHI, Jungang HAO, Ling ZHU, Shuai LI
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (8) : 1387-1402.
PDF(3416 KB)
PDF(3416 KB)
Overview of floating offshore wind foundation optimization design technology and its applications
Significance: The global offshore wind power industry is experiencing rapid growth, with floating offshore wind energy technology emerging as a pivotal solution for exploiting wind resources in deep sea areas. The floating foundation, a critical component of floating offshore wind power systems, plays an essential role in ensuring the stability and safe operation of wind turbines. However, the design and analysis of these foundations are fraught with challenges due to their intricate system composition, distinctive dynamic characteristics, and the harsh marine environment they must endure. Traditional design methods, which rely heavily on experience and trial-and-error, are not only inefficient but also fail to integrate multidisciplinary theories, highlighting the need for the more scientific design and optimization tools. Progress: As research delves deeper, technological advancements, and accumulated development experience have led to the application of multidisciplinary optimization design and analysis techniques in the floating wind power sector. The field of floating offshore wind power foundation optimization has seen significant advancements in recent years, with a shift towards more sophisticated multidisciplinary, multi-objective optimization techniques. These techniques have been crucial in addressing the complex interplay between various factors such as structural mechanics, hydrodynamics, aerodynamics, and economic considerations. MDAO techniques, initially from aerospace, enable system-wide optimization by considering interdisciplinary interactions, crucial for managing the complex dynamics between wind turbines and environmental loads. In the realm of optimization algorithms, genetic algorithms, particularly the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm Ⅱ (NSGA-Ⅱ), have become prominent due to their ability to handle multiple conflicting objectives simultaneously. These algorithms have been effectively utilized to identify a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, providing a range of options that balance different performance criteria such as cost, structural fatigue, motion response, and tower acceleration. The use of frequency domain analysis has been widespread for early-stage optimization research due to its efficiency in capturing key dynamic characteristics of the floating structures. However, the industry has also recognized the need for time-domain simulations to capture the nonlinear dynamics of the system, especially when precision is paramount. Hybrid methods that combine the benefits of both frequency and time-domain analyses, as well as the application of surrogate model, are being developed to achieve a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy. These innovative techniques offer scientific guidance for the scale planning and optimization design of floating foundations, striving to achieve an optimal balance in cost, performance, and environmental adaptability. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the evolution and application of multi-objective, multidisciplinary optimization methods in the scale optimization of floating offshore wind power foundations. Conclusions: The integration of multi-objective, multi-disciplinary optimization technology is of paramount importance for the optimized design of floating offshore wind power foundations. By merging structural optimization concepts with efficient optimization algorithms and precise simulation tools, it is possible to enhance design efficiency, abbreviate the design cycle, and more scientifically and swiftly obtain floating foundation design that exhibit superior comprehensive performance. This approach not only streamlines the design process but also ensures that the final scheme is more robust and cost-effective, meeting the stringent requirements of the offshore wind power industry. Looking ahead, the field is expected to see further integration of advanced computational methods, machine learning techniques, and high-fidelity simulations to push the boundaries of floating offshore wind power foundation design, leading to more efficient, cost-effective, and durable solutions that can withstand the test of time and the rigors of the marine environment.
offshore wind / floating offshore wind turbine / optimization / floating wind foundati
| 1 |
刘功鹏, 杨羽霏, 杨翠兰, 等. 中欧漂浮式海上风电成本比较与变化趋势研究[J]. 水利水电快报, 2024, 45 (7): 70-73, 80.
|
| 2 |
何鸿圣, 李春, 王博, 等. 2种海上风力机漂浮式风电场平台动态响应对比[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44 (4): 1- 8.
|
| 3 |
傅强, 刘笑语, 唐品, 等. 基于AHP-CRITIC法的半潜式钻井平台主尺度多准则决策[J]. 中国海洋平台, 2021, 36 (5): 63- 70.
|
| 4 |
郭海宇, 张英豪, 刘颖明, 等. 基于动力学模型和多种群遗传算法的漂浮式风电机组调谐质量阻尼器参数优化[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44 (11): 217- 223.
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
王宇航, 王文玲, 周绪红, 等. 海上风电机组格构式浮式基础结构优化及响应分析[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (5): 21- 31.
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
杜宇, 王凯, 高子予. 海上风电半潜式基础初步选型ParetoOptimal评价[J]. 海洋工程, 2022, 40 (4): 121- 128.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
姚寿文, 崔红伟. 机械结构优化设计[M]. 2版. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2018.
|
| 16 |
刘浩洋, 户将, 李勇锋, 等. 最优化: 建模、算法与理论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2020.
|
| 17 |
KOOPMANS T C. An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities[M]//KOOPMANS T C. Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. Hoboken: Wiley, 1951: 33-97.
|
| 18 |
程耿东. 工程结构优化设计基础[M]. 大连: 大连理工大学出版社, 2012.
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
姜宜辰, 段英杰, 王传晟, 等. 一种用于海上风电浮式基础主尺度的智能优化方法: CN115577629A[P]. 2023-01-06.
JIANG Y C, DUAN Y J, WANG C S, et al. Intelligent optimization method for main scale of offshore wind power floating foundation: CN115577629A[P]. 2023-01-06. (in Chinese)
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
LEIMEISTER M. Reliability-based optimization of floating wind turbine support structures[D]. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 2020.
|
| 23 |
STEINERT A, EHLERS S. Cost assessment for a semi-submersible floating wind turbine with respect to the hydrodynamic response and tower base bending moments using Particle Swarm optimisation[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. Rhodes, Greece: ISOPE, 2016: 419.
|
| 24 |
HALL M, BUCKHAM B, CRAWFORD C. Evolving offshore wind: A genetic algorithm-based support structure optimization framework for floating wind turbines[C]//Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE OCEANS-Bergen. Bergen, Norway: IEEE, 2013: 1-10.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
FYLLING I, BERTHELSEN P A. WINDOPT: An optimization tool for floating support structures for deep water wind turbines[C]//Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: ASME, 2011: 767-776.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
李昌, 王渊博, 蒋明真, 等. 不同风况下半潜漂浮式风力机动力学响应分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44 (4): 85- 91.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
邱博. 浮式风机基础结构强度分析和优化研究[D]. 辽宁: 大连理工大学, 2023.
QIU B. Strenth analysis and optimization study of floating wind turbine infrastructure[D]. Liaoning: Dalian University of Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
|
| 32 |
王宇航, 王文玲, 周绪红, 等. 海上风电机组格构式浮式基础结构优化及响应分析[J]. 中国电力, 2022, 55 (5): 21- 31.
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
周盛涛. 基于快速动力响应分析的半潜式风机下部结构主尺寸优化[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.
ZHOU S T. Substructure optimization of semi-submersible floating wind turbines based on quick dynamic analysis[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
SCLAVOUNOS P, TRACY C, LEE S. Floating offshore wind turbines: Responses in a seastate pareto optimal designs and economic assessment[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Estoril, Portugal: ASME, 2008: 31-41.
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
DNV. Coupled analysis of floating wind turbines: DNV-RP-0286[S]. DNV, 2019.
|
| 45 |
ABS. Guidance notes on global performance analysis for floating offshore wind turbine installations: ABS-206[S]. ABS, 2014.
|
| 46 |
陈宇, 祝磊, 吴松熊. 新型漂浮式海上风电基础概念设计和初步动力响应分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45 (8): 581- 586.
|
| 47 |
姜宜辰, 于言蔚, 段英杰, 等. 半潜式风电平台主尺度参数智能优化研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45 (5): 27- 31.
|
| 48 |
MATLAB. Optimization toolbox[R]. Natick: The MathWorks, Inc., 2024.
|
| 49 |
中国科学院. 中国科学发展战略: 数学优化[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020.
|
| 50 |
European Commission. Qualification of innovative floating substructures for 10MW wind turbines and water depths greater than 50m[R]. Danmarks: European Commission, 2016.
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
WAMIT, Inc. WAMIT user manual[R]. Chestnut Hill: WAMIT Inc., 2019.
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
ORCINA. OrcaFlex manual[R]. Cumbria: ORCINA Ltd., 2018.
|
| 57 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |