Model tests on the dynamic characteristics of semi-submersible wind turbines with central and eccentric arrangements

Shunyun ZHENG, Shengtao ZHOU, Bing SHI, Chao LI, Gang HU, Yu ZENG, Lixiao LI

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (8) : 1489-1502.

PDF(18517 KB)
PDF(18517 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2025, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (8) : 1489-1502. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.037
Advanced Ocean Energy Technology

Model tests on the dynamic characteristics of semi-submersible wind turbines with central and eccentric arrangements

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Harnessing high-quality deep-sea wind energy, semi-submersible wind turbines have emerged as a prevalent structural solution in the offshore wind energy industry. In particular, the Y-shaped semi-submersible platform, featuring a centrally arranged wind turbine, and the Δ-shaped semi-submersible platform, with an eccentrically arranged wind turbine, are two dominant configurations for deep-sea applications. However, the systematic quantification of their dynamic characteristic disparities remains lacking, which can be attributed to various factors, such as incomplete numerical methodologies, variations in turbine power capacities, divergent design standards, and construction techniques among existing prototypes, as well as potential technical and commercial confidentiality constraints. Methods: To facilitate an equitable comparison, the optimized design of centrally and eccentrically arranged semi-submersible platforms and mooring systems suitable for the DTU 10-MW wind turbine is obtained, with minimizing the system costs and cumulative fatigue damage as the objectives and the main dimensions of the platform and mooring as the key variables. Subsequently, semi-submersible wind turbine test models with a scale ratio of 1∶70 were designed and established based on the similarity criterion. Dynamic characteristic testing was conducted using scaled model tests under combined wind and wave conditions, focusing on the rated operation and extreme survival mode of the wind turbines. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the effects of wind-only, wave-only, and combined wind-wave conditions on dynamic responses of the two semi-submersible wind turbines. Through statistical analysis of the time and frequency domains of key dynamic performance indicators, such as platform motion, nacelle acceleration, tower base bending moment, and mooring fairlead tension, the effect of different loads, the coupling characteristics among various dynamic responses, and the excitation mechanisms were investigated. Results: The results indicate that the pitch natural periods of the two semi-submersible wind turbines are similar. The larger vertical static water stiffness of the Y-shaped semi-submersible wind turbine results in a shorter heave natural period. The Δ-shaped semi-submersible platform's four-line mooring system demonstrates greater structural stiffness over the Y-shaped semi-submersible platform's three-line system, resulting in a reduced surge natural period. The eccentric arrangement of the Δ-shaped semi-submersible wind turbine is prone to the coupling effects of the heave and pitch; the pitch amplifies the vertical motion of the wind turbine. The difference in mooring stiffness caused by different mooring schemes leads to a significantly smaller surge response and marginally smaller pitch response in the Δ-shaped semi-submersible wind turbine compared with that in the Y-shaped one. Nacelle accelerations and tower base bending moments are more pronounced in the Y-shaped semi-submersible wind turbine under long-period extreme waves, whereas the Δ-shaped semisubmersible wind turbine exhibits higher responses under short-period operational waves. Nonlinear mooring system behavior driven by load-induced equilibrium shifts causes upstream lines to enter a tensioned, nonlinear stiffness regime under combined wind-wave loading, exacerbating fairlead tension fluctuations and spectral peak magnitudes. Conclusions: This study highlights the necessity of accounting for the dynamic characteristic differences between Y-shaped and Δ-shaped semi-submersible wind turbines for various sea states and limit states during engineering design. Furthermore, by integrating the dynamic characteristics observed in typical working conditions with full-lifecycle sea condition data, this research provides a quantitative framework for the selection and design optimization of deep-sea floating wind turbine platforms.

Key words

semi-submersible wind turbine / model tests / dynamic characteristics / wind tunnel / wave flume

Cite this article

Download Citations
Shunyun ZHENG , Shengtao ZHOU , Bing SHI , et al . Model tests on the dynamic characteristics of semi-submersible wind turbines with central and eccentric arrangements[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2025, 65(8): 1489-1502 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.037

References

1
IUPPA C , CAVALLARO L , FOTI E , et al. Potential wave energy production by different wave energy converters around Sicily[J]. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2015, 7 (6): 061701.
2
CONTESTABILE P , FERRANTE V , VICINANZA D . Wave Energy Resource along the Coast of Santa Catarina (Brazil)[J]. Energies, 2015, 8 (12): 14219- 14243.
3
UIHLEIN A , MAGAGNA D . Wave and tidal current energy-A review of the current state of research beyond technology[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 58, 1070- 1081.
4
SOUKISSIAN T , KARATHANASI F , AXAOPOULOS P . Satellite-Based Offshore Wind Resource Assessment in the Mediterranean Sea[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2017, 42 (1): 73- 86.
5
SAHU B K . Wind energy developments and policies in China: A short review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81, 1393- 1405.
6
WWEA. Worldwide Wind Capacity Reaches 744 gigawatts-an Unprecedented 93 gigawatts added in 2020[R]. Bonn: World Wind Energy Association, 2021.
7
IRENA. Renewable capacity highlights[R]. Bonn: International Renewable Energy Agency, 2022.
8
GWEC. Global Wind Report 2024[R]. Brussels: Global Wind Energy Council, 2024.
9
王仲颖, 时璟丽, 赵勇强, 等. 中国风电发展路线图2050[R]. 北京: 国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所, 2011.
WANG Z Y, SHI J L, ZHAO Y Q, et al. Roadmap for China's Wind Power Development 2050[R]. Beijing: Energy Research Institute of the National Development and Reform Commission, 2011. (in Chinese)
10
刘焕彬, 董旭光. 风电场风能资源评估综述[C]// 中国气象学会2007年中国气象学会年会. 广州: 中国气象学会, 2007.
LIU H B, DONG X G. A Review of Wind Energy Resource Assessment for Wind Farms[C]// 2007 Chinese Meteorological Society Annual Conference. Guangzhou, China: Chinese Meteorological Society, 2007. (in Chinese)
11
国家能源局. 全国深远海海上风电规划[R]. 北京: 国家能源局, 2021.
National Energy Administration. National Plan for Deep-Sea Offshore Wind Power[R]. Beijing: National Energy Administration, 2021. (in Chinese)
12
温斌荣, 田新亮, 李占伟, 等. 大型漂浮式风电装备耦合动力学研究: 历史、进展与挑战[J]. 力学进展, 2022, 52 (4): 731- 808.
WEN B R , TIAN X L , LI Z W , et al. Coupling dynamics of floating wind turbines: History, progress and challenges[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2022, 52 (4): 731- 808.
13
CASTILLO C A R , COLLU M , BRENNAN F . Comparative design space exploration of centred and off-centred semisubmersible configurations for floating offshore wind turbines[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2025, 324, 120740.
14
BRUINSMA N , PAULSEN B T , JACOBSEN N G . Validation and application of a fully nonlinear numerical wave tank for simulating floating offshore wind turbines[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 147, 647- 658.
15
AZCONA J , BOUCHOTROUCH F , GONZÁLEZ M , et al. Aerodynamic thrust modelling in wave tank tests of offshore floating wind turbines using a ducted fan[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 524, 012089.
16
SAUDER T, CHABAUD V, THYS M, et al. Real-time hybrid model testing of a braceless semi-submersible wind turbine: Part I-The hybrid approach[C]// International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Busan, the Republic of Korea: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016.
17
AZCONA J , BOUCHOTROUCH F , VITTORI F . Low-frequency dynamics of a floating wind turbine in wave tank-scaled experiments with SiL hybrid method[J]. Wind Energy, 2019, 22 (10): 1402- 1413.
18
WEN B R , LIANG Z H , ZHANG H , et al. A multi-drive aerodynamic load simulator for floating wind turbine model tests: Development, test and application[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 286, 115579.
19
BARAKATI S M , KAZERANI M , APLEVICH J D . Maximum power tracking control for a wind turbine system including a matrix converter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2009, 24 (3): 705- 713.
20
刘浩学, 温斌荣, 魏汉迪, 等. 海上浮式风机混合模型试验系统开发[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2020, 39 (5): 71- 76.
LIU H X , WEN B R , WEI H D , et al. Development of Hybrid Model Test System for Floating Wind Turbines[J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2020, 39 (5): 71- 76.
21
刘浩学. 海上浮式风机混合模型试验系统开发[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2020.
LIU H X. Development of Hybrid Model Test System for Offshore Floating Wind Turbine[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020. (in Chinese)
22
UTSUNOMIYA T, SATO T, MATSUKUMA H, et al. Experimental validation for motion of a Spar-type floating offshore wind turbine using 1/22.5 scale model[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Honolulu, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2009.
23
DE RIDDER E J, OTTO W, ZONDERVAN G J, et al. Development of a scaled-down floating wind turbine for offshore basin testing[C]//ASME 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. San Francisco, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014.
24
CHEN J H , HU Z Q . Experimental investigation of aerodynamic effect-induced dynamic characteristics of anOC4 semi-submersible floating wind turbine[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 2018, 232 (1): 19- 36.
25
AHN H , SHIN H . Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a 10 MW Floating Offshore Wind Turbine in Regular Waves[J]. Energies, 2020, 13 (10): 2608.
26
MICHAILIDES C , GAO Z , MOAN T . Experimental and numerical study of the response of the offshore combined wind/wave energy concept SFC in extreme environmental conditions[J]. Marine Structures, 2016, 50, 35- 54.
27
MICHAILIDES C , GAO Z , MOAN T . Experimental study of the functionality of a semisubmersible wind turbine combined with flap-type Wave Energy Converters[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 93, 675- 690.
28
GAO Z , MOAN T , WAN L , et al. Comparative Numerical and Experimental Study of two Combined Wind and Wave Energy Concepts[J]. Journal of Ocean Engineering & Science, 2016, 1 (1): 36- 51.
29
YU W, MVLLER K, LEMMER F. Deliverable D4.2 Public definition of the two LIFES50+ 10MW Floater Concepts[R]. Norway: Dr. techn. Olav Olsen AS, 2017.
30
ZHOU S T , LI C , XIAO Y Q , et al. Evaluation of floating wind turbine substructure designs by using long-term dynamic optimization[J]. Applied Energy, 2023, 352, 121941.
31
ZHENG S Y , LI C , WANG P C , et al. Wind tunnel and wave flume testing on directionality dynamic responses of a 10 MW Y-shaped semi-submersible wind turbine[J]. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2023, 15 (1): 013305.
32
BAK C, ZAHLE F, BITSCHE R, et al. The DTU 10-MW Reference Wind Turbine[R]. Copenhagen: Technical University of Denmark, 2013.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(18517 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/