Strategy of cutting and mitigating the disaster chain for secondary and derivative accidents of overhead line failures and wildfire

Binbin ZHANG, Hongrui JIANG, Jiaqing ZHANG, Tao SUN, Jie JI, Long DING

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1) : 100-109.

PDF(1677 KB)
PDF(1677 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1) : 100-109. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.049
Fire Science

Strategy of cutting and mitigating the disaster chain for secondary and derivative accidents of overhead line failures and wildfire

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Forest fires can be triggered by the failure of overhead power lines, especially in forests that are prone to wildfires and have dense power transmission networks. The spread of such fires can, in turn, endanger the safety and stability of nearby power infrastructure. Understanding the evolution of forest fires and the mechanisms behind secondary and derivative accidents is essential for implementing risk control at key nodes within the disaster chain. This is crucial in reducing the likelihood of disaster occurrence and the severity of its consequences. However, research on secondary and derivative disaster chains related to forest fires remains limited, and no existing studies have addressed the coupling induction between forest fires and overhead line failures. This gap may lead to risk control measures that are inadequately targeted. Methods: In this study, a secondary and derivative disaster chain network of overhead line failures and forest fires is built based on complex network theory, and the effect of the coupling induction of forest fires and overhead line failures on the formation mechanism of the disaster chain is investigated. First, indicators such as degree centrality and closeness centrality are calculated to evaluate the role and influence degree of each disaster node in the disaster chain network from multiple perspectives. Subsequently, the key nodes in the failure and secondary and derivative disaster chains between overhead lines and forest fires are determined. Second, the transmission probability of each evolution path in the disaster chain is used as the assessment criterion, and the Jaccard index is employed to identify the key evolution paths. Results: First, 92 related accident cases are analyzed, and experts are consulted to determine the inducing relationships among various disaster nodes. Based on this, a disaster chain evolution model is constructed to investigate the failure and secondary and derivative accident chains of the overhead lines and forest fires. This model has 21 disaster nodes, 46 edges, and 60 disaster evolution paths. Four indicators are calculated: degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, and disaster node hub count. The top five disaster nodes are forest fires, casualties, overhead line failure, forest resource destruction, and toxic gas leakage. The transmission probabilities of different disaster evolution paths are calculated based on the frequency of the disaster chain nodes in statistics and the Jaccard index. To confirm the validity of the model and its conclusions, a sensitivity analysis is conducted at the node of overhead line failures, which verifies the relevance of risk management for overhead lines in reducing the risk of the disaster chain. Conclusions: Based on theory of chain-cutting disaster mitigation, how to cut off the evolution paths of the disaster chain or the control key disaster nodes and how to prevent the occurrence of secondary and derivative accidents are clarified in this paper to provide decision support for the actual prevention and control of forest fires and the operation and maintenance of forest power grids.

Key words

wildfire / overhead line failure / coupling-induced disasters / disaster chain network

Cite this article

Download Citations
Binbin ZHANG , Hongrui JIANG , Jiaqing ZHANG , et al . Strategy of cutting and mitigating the disaster chain for secondary and derivative accidents of overhead line failures and wildfire[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(1): 100-109 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.049

References

1
高玉琴, 徐诺, 汪键, 等. 基于复杂网络的洪涝灾害链风险评估[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41 (2): 115- 122.
GAO Y Q , XU N , WANG J , et al. Risk assessment of flood disaster chain based on complex network[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2025, 41 (2): 115- 122.
2
BANDARA S , RAJEEV P , GAD E . Power distribution system faults and wildfires: Mechanisms and Prevention[J]. Forests, 2023, 14 (6): 1146.
3
张佳庆, 孙韬, 蒋弘瑞, 等. 基于林火风险的高压输电线路无人机巡检路径规划[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64 (5): 911- 921.
ZHANG J Q , SUN T , JIANG H R , et al. Path planning for transmission line unmanned aircraft inspection based on forest fire risk[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2024, 64 (5): 911- 921.
4
CHOOBINEH M , ANSARI B , MOHAGHEGHI S . Vulnerability assessment of the power grid against progressing wildfires[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2015, 73, 20- 28.
5
GUO Y F , CHEN R X , SHI J G , et al. Determination of the power transmission line ageing failure probability due to the impact of forest fire[J]. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2018, 12 (16): 3812- 3819.
6
HARDY C E. The Gisborne era of forest fire research: Legacy of a pioneer[M]. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 1983.
7
CHUVIECO E , AGUADO I , YEBRA M , et al. Development of a framework for fire risk assessment using remote sensing and geographic information system technologies[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2010, 221 (1): 46- 58.
8
JIANG H R , ZHANG J Q , DING L , et al. Regional-scale risk assessment of forest fires induced by distribution lines via a hybrid approach[J]. JUSTC, 2024, 54 (12): 1207.
9
郭增建. 简论灾害物理学[J]. 高原地震, 1993 (2): 1- 3.
GUO Z J . Brief discussion on disaster physics[J]. Earthquake Research in Plateau, 1993 (2): 1- 3.
10
方志耕, 杨保华, 陆志鹏, 等. 基于Bayes推理的灾害演化GERT网络模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17 (2): 102- 107.
FANG Z G , YANG B H , LU Z P , et al. The GERT network model study of disaster evolution based on Bayes inference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17 (2): 102- 107.
11
QIE Z J , RONG L L . An integrated relative risk assessment model for urban disaster loss in view of disaster system theory[J]. Natural Hazards, 2017, 88 (1): 165- 190.
12
NADERPOUR M , RIZEEI H M , KHAKZAD N , et al. Forest fire induced Natech risk assessment: A survey of geospatial technologies[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2019, 191, 106558.
13
JENSEN T , MAHMUD Y . Decentering sensemaking: The Mann Gulch disaster revisited[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2023, 39 (3): 101279.
14
YANG Y , YANG H J . Complex network-based time series analysis[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2008, 387 (5-6): 1381- 1386.
15
汪小帆, 李翔, 陈关荣. 复杂网络理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006.
WANG X F, LI X, CHEN G R. Complex networks and its application[M]. Tsinghua University Press, 2006. (in Chinese)
16
戴剑勇, 甘美艳. 基于Jaccard-Markov模型的核事故灾害链演化概率分析[J]. 科技与创新, 2024 (1): 147- 149.
DAI J Y , GAN M Y . Probability analysis of nuclear accident disaster chain evolution based on Jaccard-Markov model[J]. Science and Technology & Innovation, 2024 (1): 147- 149.
17
李浩然, 王子恒, 杨起帆, 等. 复杂网络下地铁灾害链演化模型与风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31 (11): 141- 147.
LI H R , WANG Z H , YANG Q F , et al. Evolutionary model and risk analysis of metro disaster chain under complex network[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31 (11): 141- 147.
18
全英楠. 城市暴雨灾害链网络及关键演化路径研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2022.
QUAN Y N. Research on urban rainstorm disaster chain network and critical evolution path[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2022. (in Chinese)
19
李磊, 马梦格, 折亚亚, 等. 复杂网络下雨洪灾害链风险分析及断链减灾研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33 (12): 192- 197.
LI L , MA M G , SHE Y Y , et al. Risk analysis of rainstorm flood disaster chain and research on disaster mitigation of broken chain under complex network[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33 (12): 192- 197.
20
JACCARD P . Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et du Jura[J]. Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 1901, 37 (142): 547- 579.
21
陈国华, 李佳玲, 陈学希, 等. 灾害链网络下城市区域安全风险评估模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 31 (11): 146- 153.
CHEN G H , LI J L , CHEN X X , et al. A safety risk assessment model of urban areas under disaster chain network[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2022, 32 (11): 146- 153.
22
林宇航. 基于复杂网络的地铁灾害链演化分析及影响仿真[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2022.
LIN Y H. Evolution analysis and impact simulation of subway disaster chain based on complex network[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
23
AL-REFAEIO M M A, 李尔彬, AL-RAHAWIM. 森林火灾的影响及应对策略分析——以阿尔及利亚北部地区为例[J]. 中国林业经济, 2024 (5): 35- 44.
AL-REFAEI O M M A , LI E B , AL-RAHAWI M . Impacts and response strategies of forest fires: A case study of Northern Algeria[J]. China Forestry Economics, 2024 (5): 35- 44.
24
白夜, 武英达, 王博, 等. 我国森林草原火灾潜在风险应对策略研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020 (1): 11-14, 29.
BAI Y , WU Y D , WANG B , et al. Risk-coping strategies for forest and grassland fires in China[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2020 (1): 11-14, 29.
25
MOORE P F . Global wildland fire management research needs[J]. Current Forestry Reports, 2019, 5 (4): 210- 225.
26
肖盛燮, 隋严春, 刘文方, 等. 孕源断链在土地沙漠化防御技术中的实践剖析[J]. 重庆交通学院学报, 2007, 26 (3): 149- 152.
XIAO S X , SUI Y C , LIU W F , et al. Application of chain-cutting disaster mitigation from gestation source to preventing land desertification[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2007, 26 (3): 149- 152.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(1677 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/