Fire smoke and interference sources identification using scattering spectrum

Weisi LIU, Yuxin KANG, Kaiyuan LI, Lida HUANG, Tao CHEN, Hongyong YUAN, Jingwu WANG, Bei YANG

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1) : 17-25.

PDF(5585 KB)
PDF(5585 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (1) : 17-25. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.056

Fire smoke and interference sources identification using scattering spectrum

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Conventional photoelectric smoke detectors frequently present challenges in complex environments owing to their reliance on single-angle and single-wavelength scattering signals, which can result in high false alarm rates and limited accuracy. To address these limitations, this study proposes an advanced method for distinguishing between fire smoke and interference sources by leveraging multi-angle and multi-wavelength scattering spectral analysis. The primary objective of this study is to enhance the reliability of detection, reduce the occurrence of false alarms, and improve generalization capability in real-world scenarios. These contributions will facilitate the development of next-generation intelligent fire detection systems. Methods: The system incorporated a broadband LED light source with controlled illumination characteristics and an AS7341 multi-channel spectral sensor capable of simultaneous detection across eight discrete wavelength channels (415, 445, 480, 515, 555, 590, 630, and 680 nm). Scattering signals were systematically acquired at 10 discrete angles ranging from 40° to 85°, with an interval of 5°. Spectral data were synchronously captured across all channels at each angle, forming a comprehensive wavelength-versus-angle feature matrix. The experimental design encompassed five types of standard fires (smoldering cotton, wood, polyurethane, heptane flame, and paper fire) and five typical interference sources (water mist, cooking fumes, cement dust, loest dust, and A2 test dust). The model's capacity for generalization was subsequently assessed using a set of five non-standard fire categories. A range of machine learning algorithms were utilized to construct classification models, including random forest, XGBoost, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and logistic regression. The feature selection and hyperparameter tuning steps were implemented to enhance the model's performance and interpretability. Results: Under controlled chamber conditions, the 50° scattering angle consistently yielded optimal performance across all tested scenarios. At this angle, the XGBoost model demonstrated an accuracy of 100% in discriminating standard fires from interference sources. For non-standard fires, the KNN model demonstrated an accuracy of 97.2%, with a recall rate exceeding 95%, suggesting robust generalization capability and minimal false negatives. Within the 40°~55° angular range, all models demonstrated accuracy levels exceeding 85% and recall rates surpassing 80%, thereby substantiating the resilience of the proposed spectral feature representation. A comparative analysis revealed that models utilizing multi-angle spectral features significantly outperformed conventional single-angle methods across all evaluation metrics, including precision, F1-score, and AUC. The system's performance demonstrated stability across a series of experimental trials, thereby substantiating its capacity for consistent detection under controlled conditions. Conclusions: The integration of angle-resolved scattering spectroscopy and machine learning has proven to be a highly effective and reliable solution for accurate fire smoke detection amidst diverse interference sources. The proposed method offers significant advantages in reducing false alarms and enhancing detection sensitivity, particularly in challenging operational conditions. This research establishes a robust framework for intelligent fire detection systems with stronger generalization abilities and higher operational precision. Subsequent endeavors will concentrate on real-world validation, system miniaturization, and the development of adaptive learning mechanisms for continuous performance enhancement in dynamic environments. The findings of this study bear significant implications for practical applications in smart buildings, industrial fire safety, and public infrastructure protection.

Key words

scattering spectrum / fire smoke / interference sources / machine learning

Cite this article

Download Citations
Weisi LIU , Yuxin KANG , Kaiyuan LI , et al . Fire smoke and interference sources identification using scattering spectrum[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(1): 17-25 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2025.27.056

References

1
MUÑOZ O , MORENO F , GUIRADO D , et al. Experimental determination of scattering matrices of dust particles at visible wavelengths: The IAA light scattering apparatus[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2010, 111 (1): 187- 196.
2
VOLTEN H , MUÑOZ O , ROL E , et al. Scattering matrices of mineral aerosol particles at 441.6 nm and 632.8 nm[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001, 106 (D15): 17375- 17401.
3
FRANCIS M , RENARD J B , HADAMCIK E , et al. New studies on scattering properties of different kinds of soot and carbon-black[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2011, 112 (11): 1766- 1775.
4
MIFFRE A , MEHRI T , FRANCIS M , et al. UV-VIS depolarization from Arizona Test Dust particles at exact backscattering angle[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2016, 169, 79- 90.
5
MIFFRE A , CHOLLETON D , RAIROUX P . Laboratory evaluation of the scattering matrix elements of mineral dust particles from 176.0° up to 180.0°-exact backscattering angle[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2019, 222-223, 45- 59.
6
张启兴, 李耀东, 邓小玖, 等. 火灾烟雾颗粒532 nm光散射矩阵实验研究[J]. 物理学报, 2011, 60 (8): 084216.
ZHANG Q X , LI Y D , DENG X J , et al. Experimental determination of scattering matrix of fire smoke particles at 532 nm[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60 (8): 084216.
7
LIU J , ZHANG Y M , ZHANG Q X , et al. Scattering matrix for typical urban anthropogenic origin cement dust and discrimination of representative atmospheric particulates[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2018, 123 (6): 3159- 3174.
8
LIU J , ZHANG Y M , ZHANG Q X . Laboratory measurements of light scattering matrices for resuspended small loess dust particles at 532 nm wavelength[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2019, 229, 71- 79.
9
KOBAYASHI H , HAYASHI M , SHIRAISHI K , et al. Development of a polarization optical particle counter capable of aerosol type classification[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2014, 97, 486- 492.
10
LI D, ZENG N, ZENG M M, et al. Identification of soot particles in air using polarization scattering method[C]// Proceedings of the Polarization Science and Remote Sensing Ⅶ; 961315. San Diego, United States: SPIE, 2015.
11
LI D , ZENG N , ZHAN D J , et al. Differentiation of soot particulates in air using polarized light scattering method[J]. Applied Optics, 2017, 56 (14): 4123- 4129.
12
CHEN Y R , ZENG N , CHEN S R , et al. Study on morphological analysis of suspended particles using single angle polarization scattering measurements[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2019, 224, 556- 565.
13
WEINERT D , CLEARY T G , MULHOLLAND G W , et al. Light scattering characteristics and size distribution of smoke and nuisance aerosols[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2003, 7, 209- 220.
14
LOEPFE M , RYSER P , TOMPKIN C , et al. Optical properties of fire and non-fire aerosols[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1997, 29 (2-3): 185- 194.
15
DENG T , WANG S , ZHU M . Dual-wavelength optical sensor for measuring the surface area concentration and the volume concentration of aerosols[J]. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2016, 236, 334- 342.
16
DENG T , WANG S , XIAO X , et al. Eliminating the effects of refractive indices for both white smokes and black smokes in optical fire detector[J]. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2017, 253, 187- 195.
17
XIAO X , WANG S , ZHU M , et al. Three-wavelength optical sensor for measuring distributed mass concentrations of aerosols from stationary sources[J]. Optics Express, 2021, 29 (5): 6407- 6423.
18
WANG S , XIAO X , DENG T , et al. A Sauter mean diameter sensor for fire smoke detection[J]. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 2019, 281, 920- 932.
19
XIAO X , ZHU M , WANG Q Y , et al. A three-wavelength optical sensor for measuring the multi-particle-size channel mass concentration of thermal power plant emissions[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24 (5): 1424.
20
JURÁNYI Z , BURTSCHER H , LOEPFE M , et al. Dual-wavelength light-scattering technique for selective detection of volcanic ash particles in the presence of water droplets[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015, 8 (12): 5213- 5222.
21
ESPÍN F, MANZANO E, VELÁSQUEZ C, et al. Modeling variability in the readings of an 8-channel color sensor and its uncertainty Estimation[C]//Proceedings of the CI3 2023 on Innovation and Research-Smart Technologies & Systems. Cham, Germany: Springer, 2024: 155-166.
22
KELLER A , LOEPFE M , NEBIKER P , et al. On-line determination of the optical properties of particles produced by test fires[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2006, 41 (4): 266- 273.
23
DONG W H , SHENG X E , WANG S , et al. Experimental study on particle size distribution characteristics of aerosol for fire detection[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13 (9): 5592.
24
郑荣. 基于不对称比的飞机货舱抗干扰烟雾探测技术研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2020.
ZHENG R. Study on low false-alarm smoke detection technology based on asymmetry ratio for aircraft cargo compartment[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2020. (in Chinese)
25
邓田. 基于双波长的多参数火灾探测方法研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2017.
DENG T. Multi-parameter fire detection method based on dual wavelengths[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)
26
刘佳. 典型火灾烟雾及大气气溶胶颗粒光散射矩阵角度分布规律研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2020.
LIU J. Study on angular distributions of light scattering matrices for typical fire smoke and atmospheric aerosol particles[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2020. (in Chinese)
27
NIELSEN S S . Instructor's manual for food analysis: Answers to study questions[M]. Cham: Springer, 2012.
28
SUMLIN B J , HEINSON W R , CHAKRABARTY R K . Retrieving the aerosol complex refractive index using PyMieScatt: A Mie computational package with visualization capabilities[J]. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 2018, 205, 127- 134.
29
KANG Y X, LI K Y, LIU W S, et al. Simulations to discriminate between different fire smokes and nuisance aerosols through broadband light scattering[J/OL]. Fire Technology. (2025-07-02)[2025-07-25]. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-025-01785-z.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(5585 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/