PDF(1631 KB)
Collaborative optimization of power system load control measures for disaster scenarios
Haiting ZHANG, Yifan LI, Bing HOU, Zebang YANG, Hao WU
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1422-1433.
PDF(1631 KB)
PDF(1631 KB)
Collaborative optimization of power system load control measures for disaster scenarios
Objective: Extreme natural disasters and multi-point disturbances, such as earthquakes, typhoons, and equipment failures, significantly affect the stability and reliability of power systems. Traditional control measures often lack efficiency in addressing complex fault scenarios, leading to widespread load loss and prolonged recovery times. This study proposes a multilevel cooperative optimization method for load control in power systems, aiming to minimize load loss and enhance system stability. The method optimizes several control measures—stability-control load shedding, low-frequency and low-voltage load reduction, low-voltage tripping, and zonal operation—thereby improving system resilience to large-scale disturbances. It dynamically adjusts control strategies based on real-time fault conditions, improving recovery speed and anti-disturbance capability, and thus enhancing overall stability and recovery efficiency. Methods: The proposed method integrates multiple strategies to strengthen power system stability under complex fault scenarios. First, a regionally differentiated load-shedding strategy identifies high-risk areas and applies small-scale, multiple rounds of load shedding to avoid instability caused by large-scale load shedding. Second, dynamic threshold adjustment and cross-regional coordination mechanisms optimize load control delays in real time to respond quickly to frequency and voltage fluctuations. Wide-area measurements coordinate shedding and recovery across multiple regions, ensuring grid stability. Finally, a hybrid optimization mechanism combining genetic algorithms and model predictive control (MPC) is employed for real-time optimization. The genetic algorithm addresses nonlinear and multi-constrained problems, whereas MPC dynamically optimizes strategies based on real-time and predictive system states, enhancing response flexibility. Fault-scenario simulations using sequential Monte Carlo methods validate the adaptability of the proposed method under diverse conditions. Results: The simulation results showed that the proposed method significantly improved system performance under extreme fault conditions. The key results included: (1) Reduced overall load loss and accelerated recovery, enhancing system resilience during large-scale faults. (2) Improved real-time optimization through the combination of genetic algorithms and MPC, balancing load shedding across nodes and preventing localized losses. (3) Markedly better load-shedding effectiveness and recovery speed than traditional measures did, particularly in complex fault scenarios. (4) Consistent improvements in recovery speed and balanced load-shedding distribution in 100 simulated fault scenarios. Conclusions: The multilevel cooperative optimization method provides a systematic solution to enhance the resilience and stability of power systems under large-scale fault conditions. Combining multiple load control measures and optimizing them with genetic algorithms and MPC, it significantly strengthens the system's ability to withstand complex faults. The method not only reduces load loss but also accelerates recovery, thereby improving overall operational reliability. Future research may focus on advancing real-time adaptability and cross-regional coordination to further enhance the global optimization of power grids under increasingly frequent and severe fault scenarios.
power system / mass failure / control measures / load loss / defensive strategy
| 1 |
梁志峰, 康重庆, 隋凌峰, 等. 含高比例分布式光伏的主配网运行风险评估与防控策略研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(11): 1964- 1978.
|
| 2 |
马宁宁, 谢小荣, 唐健, 等. "双高"电力系统宽频振荡广域监测与预警系统[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(5): 457- 464.
|
| 3 |
王磊, 赵书强, 张明文, 等. 考虑天气变化的输电系统可靠性评估[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(7): 66- 70.
|
| 4 |
安志国, 杨琨, 潘效文, 等. 城市大面积停电事件影响及特征分析[J]. 电力安全技术, 2021, 23(12): 1- 3.
|
| 5 |
谢敏, 尹一江, 杜余昕, 等. 考虑复杂天气风险源的电力系统可用输电能力评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2018, 38(4): 16- 22.
|
| 6 |
杨鹏, 刘锋, 姜齐荣, 等. "双高"电力系统大扰动稳定性: 问题、挑战与展望[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(5): 403- 414.
|
| 7 |
荣俊杰, 周明, 元博, 等. 台风天气考虑故障演化的电力系统韧性评估方法[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48(3): 1114- 1124.
|
| 8 |
王衡, 姚秀萍, 常喜强, 等. 链式供电结构下受端电网的稳控切负荷策略的优化研究[J]. 四川电力技术, 2014, 37(3): 19- 23.
|
| 9 |
陈勇. 基于实时仿真的稳控系统切负荷建模方法[J]. 云南电力技术, 2024, 52(1): 21- 23.
|
| 10 |
吴耀东. 低频低压减载及其协调控制研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2015.
WU Y D. The research of under-frequency and under-voltage load shedding and their coordinated control[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2015. (in Chinese)
|
| 11 |
刘显枢. 低频低压自动减载装置的研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2010.
LIU X S. The study for low-frequency-low-voltage automatic load shedding device[D]. Ji'nan: Shandong University, 2010. (in Chinese)
|
| 12 |
谢欣玲. 减少变电站负荷损失的低压脱扣器保护配置研究[J]. 电工技术, 2023(23): 147- 149.
|
| 13 |
王康, 李骏, 李昊桐, 等. 降低电压暂降下负荷损失的低压脱扣装置参数优化[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2022, 41(10): 65- 72.
|
| 14 |
王冠, 张青蕾, 张思远, 等. 考虑负荷损失的电网网架结构评价体系研究[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2023, 42(1): 40- 47.
|
| 15 |
张帆, 杨翾, 商佳宜, 等. 考虑负荷损失最小的配网孤岛划分策略研究[J]. 高压电器, 2021, 57(4): 181- 188.
|
| 16 |
李晔. 计及负荷响应的电力系统低频低压联合减载方案[J]. 电力与能源, 2019(3): 283- 287.
|
| 17 |
陈军, 陆旭, 赵子涵, 等. 基于混合模型的优化低频低压减载方法研究[J]. 四川电力技术, 2021, 44(6): 17- 20.
|
| 18 |
程维杰, 何晓峰, 周磊, 等. 负荷密集型城市电网低频低压减载配置方案优化研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2016, 44(24): 159- 163.
|
| 19 |
彭茜, 王爱娟, 李峻阳, 等. 基于高效遗传算法的电网需求侧调度优化研究及其收敛性分析[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(6): 33- 42.
|
| 20 |
吴海伟, 王晓忠, 朱法顺. 一种基于遗传算法的智能电网调度方法[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2020(9): 122- 126.
|
| 21 |
冷亚军, 黄源海, 吴坚. 基于遗传算法和评分一致性的电力黑启动恢复评价研究[J]. 电网分析与研究, 2023, 51(7): 88- 95.
|
| 22 |
骆钊, 聂灵峰, 田肖, 等. 基于模型预测控制的电解铝负荷参与电网频率稳定控制策略[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(10): 1- 11.
|
| 23 |
付阳, 宋运忠. 考虑可控负荷的多区域电力系统分布式模型预测负荷频率控制[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2023, 51(17): 101- 109.
|
| 24 |
孙振亮. 基于MPC的风电场功率协同控制优化研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2023.
SUN Z L. Research on power cooperative control optimization of wind farm based on MPC[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
|
| 25 |
莫熙, 王宜立, 高道春, 等. 基于改进蒙特卡洛法的智能电网实时运行风险评估[J]. 能源与环保, 2022, 44(11): 233- 237.
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
班勇霜, 李春华, 汪本科, 等. 基于序贯蒙特卡洛模拟法的孤岛微电网可靠性评估[J]. 分布式能源, 2024, 9(3): 39- 46.
|
| 28 |
朱介北, 邱威, 孙宁, 等. 基于序贯蒙特卡洛法的安全稳定控制系统架构可靠性分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(15): 21- 27.
|
| 29 |
倪伟, 吕林, 向月, 等. 基于马尔可夫过程蒙特卡洛法的综合能源系统可靠性评估[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(1): 150- 158.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
马燕峰, 骆泽榕, 赵书强, 等. 基于改进蒙特卡洛混合抽样的含风光电力系统风险评估[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(9): 75- 83.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |