Collaborative optimization of power system load control measures for disaster scenarios

Haiting ZHANG, Yifan LI, Bing HOU, Zebang YANG, Hao WU

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1422-1433.

PDF(1631 KB)
PDF(1631 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1422-1433. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.004

Collaborative optimization of power system load control measures for disaster scenarios

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Extreme natural disasters and multi-point disturbances, such as earthquakes, typhoons, and equipment failures, significantly affect the stability and reliability of power systems. Traditional control measures often lack efficiency in addressing complex fault scenarios, leading to widespread load loss and prolonged recovery times. This study proposes a multilevel cooperative optimization method for load control in power systems, aiming to minimize load loss and enhance system stability. The method optimizes several control measures—stability-control load shedding, low-frequency and low-voltage load reduction, low-voltage tripping, and zonal operation—thereby improving system resilience to large-scale disturbances. It dynamically adjusts control strategies based on real-time fault conditions, improving recovery speed and anti-disturbance capability, and thus enhancing overall stability and recovery efficiency. Methods: The proposed method integrates multiple strategies to strengthen power system stability under complex fault scenarios. First, a regionally differentiated load-shedding strategy identifies high-risk areas and applies small-scale, multiple rounds of load shedding to avoid instability caused by large-scale load shedding. Second, dynamic threshold adjustment and cross-regional coordination mechanisms optimize load control delays in real time to respond quickly to frequency and voltage fluctuations. Wide-area measurements coordinate shedding and recovery across multiple regions, ensuring grid stability. Finally, a hybrid optimization mechanism combining genetic algorithms and model predictive control (MPC) is employed for real-time optimization. The genetic algorithm addresses nonlinear and multi-constrained problems, whereas MPC dynamically optimizes strategies based on real-time and predictive system states, enhancing response flexibility. Fault-scenario simulations using sequential Monte Carlo methods validate the adaptability of the proposed method under diverse conditions. Results: The simulation results showed that the proposed method significantly improved system performance under extreme fault conditions. The key results included: (1) Reduced overall load loss and accelerated recovery, enhancing system resilience during large-scale faults. (2) Improved real-time optimization through the combination of genetic algorithms and MPC, balancing load shedding across nodes and preventing localized losses. (3) Markedly better load-shedding effectiveness and recovery speed than traditional measures did, particularly in complex fault scenarios. (4) Consistent improvements in recovery speed and balanced load-shedding distribution in 100 simulated fault scenarios. Conclusions: The multilevel cooperative optimization method provides a systematic solution to enhance the resilience and stability of power systems under large-scale fault conditions. Combining multiple load control measures and optimizing them with genetic algorithms and MPC, it significantly strengthens the system's ability to withstand complex faults. The method not only reduces load loss but also accelerates recovery, thereby improving overall operational reliability. Future research may focus on advancing real-time adaptability and cross-regional coordination to further enhance the global optimization of power grids under increasingly frequent and severe fault scenarios.

Key words

power system / mass failure / control measures / load loss / defensive strategy

Cite this article

Download Citations
Haiting ZHANG , Yifan LI , Bing HOU , et al . Collaborative optimization of power system load control measures for disaster scenarios[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(7): 1422-1433 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.004

References

1
梁志峰, 康重庆, 隋凌峰, 等. 含高比例分布式光伏的主配网运行风险评估与防控策略研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(11): 1964- 1978.
LIANG Z F , KANG C Q , SUI L F , et al. Research on risk warning and prevention strategies for main distribution networks with high proportion distributed photovoltaics[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2024, 64(11): 1964- 1978.
2
马宁宁, 谢小荣, 唐健, 等. "双高"电力系统宽频振荡广域监测与预警系统[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(5): 457- 464.
MA N N , XIE X R , TANG J , et al. Wide-area measurement and early warning system for wide-band oscillations in "double-high" power systems[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2021, 61(5): 457- 464.
3
王磊, 赵书强, 张明文, 等. 考虑天气变化的输电系统可靠性评估[J]. 电网技术, 2011, 35(7): 66- 70.
WANG L , ZHAO S Q , ZHANG M W , et al. Reliability evaluation of transmission system considering weather change[J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35(7): 66- 70.
4
安志国, 杨琨, 潘效文, 等. 城市大面积停电事件影响及特征分析[J]. 电力安全技术, 2021, 23(12): 1- 3.
AN Z G , YANG K , PAN X W , et al. Analysis on the influence and characteristics of large urban blackouts[J]. Electric Safety Technology, 2021, 23(12): 1- 3.
5
谢敏, 尹一江, 杜余昕, 等. 考虑复杂天气风险源的电力系统可用输电能力评估[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2018, 38(4): 16- 22.
XIE M , YIN Y J , DU Y X , et al. Assessment on available transfer capability considering complex weather risk sources[J]. Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2018, 38(4): 16- 22.
6
杨鹏, 刘锋, 姜齐荣, 等. "双高"电力系统大扰动稳定性: 问题、挑战与展望[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(5): 403- 414.
YANG P , LIU F , JIANG Q R , et al. Large-disturbance stability of power systems with high penetration of renewables and inverters: Phenomena, challenges, and perspectives[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2021, 61(5): 403- 414.
7
荣俊杰, 周明, 元博, 等. 台风天气考虑故障演化的电力系统韧性评估方法[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48(3): 1114- 1124.
RONG J J , ZHOU M , YUAN B , et al. Resilience assessment method on power systems under typhoon disaster considering failure evolution process[J]. Power System Technology, 2024, 48(3): 1114- 1124.
8
王衡, 姚秀萍, 常喜强, 等. 链式供电结构下受端电网的稳控切负荷策略的优化研究[J]. 四川电力技术, 2014, 37(3): 19- 23.
WANG H , YAO X P , CHANG X Q , et al. Optimization study of load shedding strategy for stability control in receiving-end power grid based on chained structure of power supply[J]. Sichuan Electric Power Technology, 2014, 37(3): 19- 23.
9
陈勇. 基于实时仿真的稳控系统切负荷建模方法[J]. 云南电力技术, 2024, 52(1): 21- 23.
CHEN Y . Modeling method of load shedding for stability control system based on real-time simulation[J]. Yunnan Electric Power, 2024, 52(1): 21- 23.
10
吴耀东. 低频低压减载及其协调控制研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2015.
WU Y D. The research of under-frequency and under-voltage load shedding and their coordinated control[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University, 2015. (in Chinese)
11
刘显枢. 低频低压自动减载装置的研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2010.
LIU X S. The study for low-frequency-low-voltage automatic load shedding device[D]. Ji'nan: Shandong University, 2010. (in Chinese)
12
谢欣玲. 减少变电站负荷损失的低压脱扣器保护配置研究[J]. 电工技术, 2023(23): 147- 149.
XIE X L . Study on protection configuration of low-voltage release device to reduce load loss of substation[J]. Electric Engineering, 2023(23): 147- 149.
13
王康, 李骏, 李昊桐, 等. 降低电压暂降下负荷损失的低压脱扣装置参数优化[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2022, 41(10): 65- 72.
WANG K , LI J , LI H T , et al. A parameter optimization of low voltage release for reducing load loss under voltage sag[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 2022, 41(10): 65- 72.
14
王冠, 张青蕾, 张思远, 等. 考虑负荷损失的电网网架结构评价体系研究[J]. 电工电能新技术, 2023, 42(1): 40- 47.
WANG G , ZHANG Q L , ZHANG S Y , et al. An evaluation system of power grid structure considering load loss[J]. Advanced Technology of Electrical Engineering and Energy, 2023, 42(1): 40- 47.
15
张帆, 杨翾, 商佳宜, 等. 考虑负荷损失最小的配网孤岛划分策略研究[J]. 高压电器, 2021, 57(4): 181- 188.
ZHANG F , YANG X , SHANG J Y , et al. Study on island partition strategy of distribution network considering minimum load loss[J]. High Voltage Apparatus, 2021, 57(4): 181- 188.
16
李晔. 计及负荷响应的电力系统低频低压联合减载方案[J]. 电力与能源, 2019(3): 283- 287.
LI Y . A response-based undervoltage-underfrequency cooperative load shedding scheme for power system[J]. Electric Power and Energy, 2019(3): 283- 287.
17
陈军, 陆旭, 赵子涵, 等. 基于混合模型的优化低频低压减载方法研究[J]. 四川电力技术, 2021, 44(6): 17- 20.
CHEN J , LU X , ZHAO Z H , et al. Research on optimal low-frequency and low-voltage load shedding method based on hybrid model[J]. Sichuan Electric Power Technology, 2021, 44(6): 17- 20.
18
程维杰, 何晓峰, 周磊, 等. 负荷密集型城市电网低频低压减载配置方案优化研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2016, 44(24): 159- 163.
CHENG W J , HE X F , ZHOU L , et al. Coordination strategy of UFLS and UVLS of load density urban power network[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2016, 44(24): 159- 163.
19
彭茜, 王爱娟, 李峻阳, 等. 基于高效遗传算法的电网需求侧调度优化研究及其收敛性分析[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(6): 33- 42.
PENG Q , WANG A J , LI J Y , et al. Optimization of the demand side dispatching of a power grid based on an efficient genetic algorithm and its convergence analysis[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(6): 33- 42.
20
吴海伟, 王晓忠, 朱法顺. 一种基于遗传算法的智能电网调度方法[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2020(9): 122- 126.
WU H W , WANG X Z , ZHU F S . A scheduling method of smart grid based on genetic algorithm[J]. Computers and Modernization, 2020(9): 122- 126.
21
冷亚军, 黄源海, 吴坚. 基于遗传算法和评分一致性的电力黑启动恢复评价研究[J]. 电网分析与研究, 2023, 51(7): 88- 95.
LENG Y J , HUANG Y H , WU J . Black-start evaluation method for power system restoration based on genetic algorithm and score consistency[J]. Power Grid Analysis & Study, 2023, 51(7): 88- 95.
22
骆钊, 聂灵峰, 田肖, 等. 基于模型预测控制的电解铝负荷参与电网频率稳定控制策略[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(10): 1- 11.
LUO Z , NIE L F , TIAN X , et al. Control strategy of electrolytic aluminum load participating in power network frequency stability based on model predictive control[J]. Electric Power Construction, 2023, 44(10): 1- 11.
23
付阳, 宋运忠. 考虑可控负荷的多区域电力系统分布式模型预测负荷频率控制[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2023, 51(17): 101- 109.
FU Y , SONG Y Z . Distributed model predictive load frequency control of a multi-area power system considering controllable load[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2023, 51(17): 101- 109.
24
孙振亮. 基于MPC的风电场功率协同控制优化研究[D]. 西安: 西安理工大学, 2023.
SUN Z L. Research on power cooperative control optimization of wind farm based on MPC[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
25
莫熙, 王宜立, 高道春, 等. 基于改进蒙特卡洛法的智能电网实时运行风险评估[J]. 能源与环保, 2022, 44(11): 233- 237.
MO X , WANG Y L , GAO D C , et al. Real-time operation risk assessment of smart grid based on improved monte carlo method[J]. China Energy and Environmental Protection, 2022, 44(11): 233- 237.
26
SINGHEE A , RUTENBAR R A . Why quasi-Monte Carlo is better than Monte Carlo or latin hypercube sampling for statistical circuit analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2010, 29(11): 1763- 1776.
27
班勇霜, 李春华, 汪本科, 等. 基于序贯蒙特卡洛模拟法的孤岛微电网可靠性评估[J]. 分布式能源, 2024, 9(3): 39- 46.
BAN Y S , LI C H , WANG B K , et al. Reliability assessment of islanded microgrids based on sequential Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Distributed Energy, 2024, 9(3): 39- 46.
28
朱介北, 邱威, 孙宁, 等. 基于序贯蒙特卡洛法的安全稳定控制系统架构可靠性分析[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2021, 45(15): 21- 27.
ZHU J B , QIU W , SUN N , et al. Reliability analysis of security and stability control system architecture based on sequential Monte Carlo method[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2021, 45(15): 21- 27.
29
倪伟, 吕林, 向月, 等. 基于马尔可夫过程蒙特卡洛法的综合能源系统可靠性评估[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(1): 150- 158.
NI W , LV L , XIANG Y , et al. Reliability evaluation of integrated energy system based on Markov process Monte Carlo method[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(1): 150- 158.
30
TÓMASSON E , SÖDER L . Improved importance sampling for reliability evaluation of composite power systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2017, 32(3): 2426- 2434.
31
LI N , WANG X L , ZHU Z H , et al. Reliability evaluation of power system based on isodisperse important sampling method and dynamic parallel calculation[J]. Energy Procedia, 2019, 156, 343- 348.
32
马燕峰, 骆泽榕, 赵书强, 等. 基于改进蒙特卡洛混合抽样的含风光电力系统风险评估[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2022, 50(9): 75- 83.
MA Y F , LUO Z R , ZHAO S Q , et al. Risk assessment of a power system containing wind power and photovoltaic based on improved Monte Carlo mixed sampling[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2022, 50(9): 75- 83.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(1631 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/