PDF(1588 KB)
Impact and challenges of extreme conditions on electrical equipment in desert, Gobi, and other arid regions
Qiang XIE, Qianwei LIU, Hainan WU
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1265-1281.
PDF(1588 KB)
PDF(1588 KB)
Impact and challenges of extreme conditions on electrical equipment in desert, Gobi, and other arid regions
Significance: In line with the development and integration of new power systems, many large-scale renewable energy bases-particularly wind and photovoltaic-are being rapidly established in desert, Gobi, and other arid (DGA) regions across China and beyond. These regions are characterized by harsh climatic and geological conditions, making the reliable operation and rapid recovery of electrical infrastructure under extreme weather events increasingly critical. The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events under global climate change further amplify this challenge. This study investigates the safe operation and resilience of large-scale renewable energy bases in DGA regions under extreme environmental conditions. This study aims to systematically review the impact of various extreme hazards on electrical equipment across the power system chain, assess the current state of disaster prevention and mitigation technologies, and identify critical technical needs for future development. This study provides a solid theoretical foundation and practical technological support for enhancing the resilience and intelligent transformation of modern power systems. Progress: A comprehensive review was conducted on recent domestic and international cases of power system failure and associated economic losses triggered by extreme weather events, including extreme low and high ambient temperatures, atmospheric icing, strong winds, sand and dust storms, earthquakes, lightning strikes, wildfires, floods, and secondary compound disasters. The analysis covers the full lifecycle of electrical infrastructure, including the power generation, transmission, and transformation stages. For each stage, critical threats to the operational security and structural integrity of key electrical equipment are identified. The results indicate that the unique environmental characteristics of DGA regions-high solar radiation, strong convective winds, large diurnal temperature variations, and frequent sandstorms-exacerbate the vulnerability of electrical equipment, particularly outdoor components such as transformers, insulators, switchgears, and towers. The primary types and impact mechanisms of extreme environmental factors on equipment in DGA regions are categorized. Their associated degradation modes, including material embrittlement due to low temperatures, overheating and insulation aging under extreme heat, salt fog and corrosion effects, mechanical fatigue from wind-induced vibration, and flashover risks due to pollution and icing, are discussed in detail. This study delineates the specific vulnerabilities of various types of electrical equipment and the main failure modes associated with each hazard. The current status of monitoring, early warning, emergency response, and disaster mitigation technologies is also critically analyzed. Although solutions such as online monitoring systems, structural reinforcement methods, seismic isolation devices, de-icing systems, and vibration-damping technologies have been proposed and partially implemented, many challenges remain. Despite promising results from pilot-scale deployments and demonstration projects, large-scale practical applications are hindered by technical bottlenecks. These include insufficient monitoring precision in complex environments, limited capacity for real-time online condition assessment, and reduced effectiveness in multihazard detection and degradation tracking. Furthermore, challenges in data integration, system interoperability, and long-term stability in harsh environments significantly undermine the reliability of disaster response systems in real-world engineering applications. Conclusions and Prospects: As the risks posed by extreme climate events continue to grow, transitioning from passive disaster response to active, intelligent risk management across the entire lifecycle of power systems is urgently needed. Future efforts should focus on creating a standardized, modular framework for disaster prevention and mitigation that can be rapidly adapted to a wide range of hazards. Intelligent decision-making platforms, supported by digital twin models, big data analytics, and AI-driven prediction algorithms, should be developed to provide real-time operational guidance under extreme conditions. Moreover, cross-disciplinary collaboration among meteorology, materials science, structural engineering, and electrical engineering is essential for designing equipment and systems inherently resistant to compound disasters.
extreme environments / electrical equipment / power system incidents / disaster mechanisms / disaster prevention technologies / digital and intelligent power grids
| 1 |
刘振亚, 张启平, 董存, 等. 通过特高压直流实现大型能源基地风、光、火电力大规模高效率安全外送研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2014, 34 (16): 2513- 2522.
|
| 2 |
张智刚, 康重庆. 碳中和目标下构建新型电力系统的挑战与展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42 (8): 2806- 2818.
|
| 3 |
董旭柱, 华祝虎, 尚磊, 等. 新型配电系统形态特征与技术展望[J]. 高电压技术, 2021, 47 (9): 3021- 3035.
|
| 4 |
谢强, 李杰. 电力系统自然灾害的现状与对策[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2006, 15 (4): 126- 131.
|
| 5 |
孙为民, 孙华东, 何剑, 等. 面向严重自然灾害的电力系统韧性评估技术综述[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48 (1): 129- 139.
|
| 6 |
王伟胜, 林伟芳, 何国庆, 等. 美国得州2021年大停电事故对我国新能源发展的启示[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41 (12): 4033- 4042.
|
| 7 |
ENTSO-E. Continental Europe synchronous area separation on 24 July 2021[EB/OL]. (2021-11-13) [2025-06-22]. https://www.entsoe.eu/news/2021/11/12/factual-report-on-the-separation-of-thecontinental-europe-synchronous-area-on-24-july-2021/.
|
| 8 |
高红均, 郭明浩, 刘俊勇, 等. 从四川高温干旱限电事件看新型电力系统保供挑战与应对展望[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2023, 43 (12): 4517- 4537.
|
| 9 |
王国尚, 俞祁浩, 王仕俊. 国内外多年冻土区输电线路建设问题探讨[J]. 电力勘测设计, 2015 (S1): 197- 202.
|
| 10 |
祝永坤, 王宝成. 高寒地区输电线路铁塔基础冻害原因分析及防范措施[J]. 内蒙古电力技术, 2011, 29 (6): 90- 93.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
吕妍, 张慧琪, 张谧, 等. 光伏支架差异冻胀融沉偏移对光伏组件发电量影响的研究[J]. 太阳能, 2023 (6): 36- 41.
|
| 13 |
罗传仙, 朱晔, 周正钦, 等. 高热故障下变压器油纸绝缘系统的产气机理研究[J]. 绝缘材料, 2024, 57 (5): 86- 94.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Government Accountability Office. Climate change: Energy infrastructure risks and adaptation efforts [EB/OL]. (2014-03-04) [2025-06-02]. https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-74.
|
| 16 |
郭广胜. 复杂山地柔性光伏系统风致组件隐裂研究[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2023.
GUO G S. Research on wind-induced component cracking of cable supported photovoltaic system in complex terrain [D]. Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, 2023. (in Chinese)
|
| 17 |
SATHAYE J, DALE L, LARSEN P, et al. Estimating risk to California energy infrastructure from projected climate change [R]. Berkeley: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE), 2012.
|
| 18 |
张礼达, 任腊春. 恶劣气候条件对风电机组的影响分析[J]. 水力发电, 2007, 33 (10): 67- 69.
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
杨风利, 李清华, 邵帅, 等. 脱冰工况下特高压输电铁塔地线横担受力特征及破坏模式[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2024, 44 (10): 4157- 4166.
|
| 22 |
舒立春, 李瀚涛, 胡琴, 等. 自然环境叶片覆冰程度对风力机功率损失的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2018, 38 (18): 5599- 5605.
|
| 23 |
蒋兴良, 周洪宇, 何凯, 等. 风机叶片运用超疏水涂层防覆冰的性能衰减[J]. 高电压技术, 2019, 45 (1): 167- 172.
|
| 24 |
胡琴, 王欢, 舒立春, 等. 覆冰条件下风力发电机叶片防/除冰方法综述[J]. 电工技术学报, 2024, 39 (17): 5482- 5496.
|
| 25 |
霍俊, 严国刚, 孙霞, 等. 湖北省大型光伏电站灾害风险及防范对策的研究[J]. 太阳能, 2019 (4): 13- 18.
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
刘慕广, 黄琳玲, 谢壮宁. 雷暴风和良态风下输电塔气弹模型风洞试验[J]. 高电压技术, 2022, 48 (2): 594- 602.
|
| 31 |
毕文哲, 田利. 下击暴流作用下输电塔-线体系倒塌破坏研究[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39 (S1): 78- 83.
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
李嘉祥, 王文瑞, 付兴, 等. 输电铁塔在冰风耦合作用下失效概率分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2024, 43 (3): 136- 146.
|
| 34 |
牛格图, 陈岩, 李林孝, 等. 随机风作用下同塔四回输电杆塔安全性分析[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2022, 45 (12): 103- 115.
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
李宏男, 张文圣, 付兴. 基于大数据深度学习的输电塔结构抗风易损性评估[J]. 土木工程学报, 2022, 55 (9): 54- 64.
|
| 37 |
杨婕, 赵天良, 程叙耕, 等. 2000-2019年中国北方地区沙尘暴时空变化及其相关影响因素[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41 (8): 2966- 2975.
|
| 38 |
屈建军, 俎瑞平, 言穆弘, 等. 扬沙和沙尘暴对导线电位影响的风洞模拟实验[J]. 中国沙漠, 2004, 24 (5): 534- 538.
|
| 39 |
张重远, 李星辰, 马旭东, 等. 高海拔沙尘环境对典型长间隙操作冲击放电特性的影响[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21 (11): 4478- 4485.
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
李彦昭, 杨国华, 伍弘, 等. 悬浮沙尘环境下瓷绝缘子沿面电位与电场的变化规律[J]. 绝缘材料, 2023, 56 (8): 87- 93.
|
| 42 |
赵明智, 苗一鸣, 张旭, 等. 沙漠沙尘粒径对太阳电池输出特性影响的实验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2019, 40 (5): 1247- 1252.
|
| 43 |
王晓辉, 李新梅, 逯平平. 特高压输电线电力金具磨损研究现状[J]. 热加工工艺, 2020, 49 (16): 11- 14.
|
| 44 |
赵建平, 邓鹤鸣, 张伟, 等. 线路金具沙粒磨损模拟试验: 试验设置与电晕分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2018, 44 (9): 2904- 2910.
|
| 45 |
邓鹤鸣, 李勇杰, 蔡炜, 等. 沙漠区域输电问题研究现状及展望[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43 (12): 3850- 3861.
|
| 46 |
张强, 吴学忠, 薄天利. 沙尘暴期间运动尘颗粒对高压输电导线施加的应力预测[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 59 (4): 484- 488.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
王娟, 李兴财. 沙尘暴过程中5~7000 m高度大气电场及其对颗粒带电量影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40 (1): 23- 28.
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
尤红兵, 赵凤新. 芦山7.0级地震及电力设施破坏原因分析[J]. 电力建设, 2013, 34 (8): 100- 104.
|
| 51 |
韩晓言, 刘洋, 范少君, 等. 九寨沟Ms7.0地震四川电网受损分析及处置措施[J]. 四川电力技术, 2018, 41 (2): 68- 71.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
石高扬, 谢强. 在运变电站电流互感器隔震改造仿真及应用研究[J]. 高压电器, 2022, 58 (8): 189- 195.
|
| 54 |
孙宇晗, 程永锋, 卢智成, 等. 特高压GIS瓷质套管与复合套管抗震性能试验研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2019, 45 (2): 541- 548.
|
| 55 |
谢强, 何畅, 杨振宇, 等. 1100 kV特高压变压器瓷套管地震作用破坏试验与分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2017, 43 (10): 3154- 3162.
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
程永锋, 卢智成, 邱宁, 等. 特高压支柱类瓷质电气设备支架动力放大系数研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2015, 41 (11): 3651- 3658.
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
文嘉意, 谢强. 弱耦联体系地震响应的隔离分析求解[J]. 工程力学, 2021, 38 (4): 102- 110.
|
| 62 |
程永锋, 朱祝兵, 卢智成, 等. 硬管母联接的500 kV避雷器和互感器耦联体系地震模拟振动台试验研究[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40 (12): 3945- 3950.
|
| 63 |
谢强, 何畅, 杨振宇, 等. ±800 kV特高压直流穿墙套管地震模拟振动台试验研究[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42 (1): 140- 146.
|
| 64 |
陈星, 谢强, 李晓璇, 等. 地震作用下变压器侧壁套管的理论建模及摆动效应分析[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44 (1): 114- 121.
|
| 65 |
石高扬, 谢强. 特高压GIS套管内绝缘失效地震易损性分析[J/OL]. 工程力学. (2024-04-02) [2025-06-22]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2595.O3.20240401.1527.004.
SHI G Y, XIE Q. Seismic vulnerability analysis of internal insulation failure of ultra-high voltage GIS bushing [J/OL]. Engineering Mechanics, (2024-04-02) [2025-06-22]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.2595.O3.20240401.1527.004. (in Chinese)
|
| 66 |
刘鹏, 谢韬, 靳守锋, 等. GIS/GIL滑动触头电连接部件过热故障机制仿真分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2023, 49 (5): 2090- 2100.
|
| 67 |
谷山强, 王剑, 冯万兴, 等. 电网雷电监测数据统计与挖掘分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2016, 42 (11): 3383- 3391.
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
韩建海, 常晓丽. 山区风力发电机组防雷技术探讨[J]. 气象研究与应用, 2013, 34 (3): 86- 87.
|
| 70 |
刘洋. 浅谈风力发电设备的雷电灾害风险评估[C]//第31届中国气象学会年会S9第十二届防雷减灾论坛: 雷电物理防雷新技术. 北京, 中国: 雷电委员会, 中国气象科学研究院, 2014: 7.
LIU Y. Discussion on lightning hazard risk assessment of wind power generation equipment [C]//The 31st Annual Meeting of the Chinese Meteorological Society S9 the 12th Lightning Protection and Disaster Reduction Forum: New Technology of Lightning Physical Lightning Protection. Beijing, China: Committee of Lightning Protection, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, 2014: 7. (in Chinese)
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
YOKOYAMA S, HONJO N, YASUDA Y, et al. Causes of wind turbine blade damages due to lightning and future research target to get better protection measures [C]//2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP). Shanghai, China: IEEE, 2014: 823-830.
|
| 73 |
张毅龙, 沈思远, 杨冬阳, 等. 风光储混合系统的雷电过电压仿真[J]. 高电压技术, 2023, 49 (2): 738- 746.
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
陆佳政, 周特军, 吴传平, 等. 某省级电网220 kV及以上输电线路故障统计与分析[J]. 高电压技术, 2016, 42 (1): 200- 207.
|
| 76 |
胡湘, 陆佳政, 曾祥君, 等. 输电线路山火跳闸原因分析及其防治措施探讨[J]. 电力科学与技术学报, 2010, 25 (2): 73- 78.
|
| 77 |
雷国伟, 何伟明, 林健枝. 架空输电线路走廊防山火综合监测系统实现与应用[J]. 电气技术, 2013 (12): 112- 115.
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
孙宝军. 内蒙古电力系统自然灾害链分析[J]. 灾害学, 2020, 35 (4): 8- 12.
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
COSTA R E, MCALLISTER G R. Substation flood program and flood hardening case study [C]//2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. Chicago, USA: IEEE, 2017: 1-5.
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
罗远峰, 雷朝煜, 吴保义, 等. 天广HVDC换流阀阻尼电阻O型圈加速老化试验及使用寿命研究[J]. 合成材料老化与应用, 2021, 50 (2): 23- 26.
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
邢媛. 高原地区电子设备质量改进研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2017.
XING Y. Study on quality improvement of electronic equipment in plateau area [D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2017. (in Chinese)
|
| 90 |
谢章用, 闫杰, 陆家乐. 高原环境下电子装备环境适应性问题研究[J]. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2022, 40 (S2): 94- 96.
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
孙新豪, 谢强, 李晓璇, 等. 带有滑动摩擦摆支座的500 kV变压器地震响应[J]. 高电压技术, 2021, 47 (9): 3226- 3235.
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
石高扬, 谢强. 支柱类电气设备中间层三维隔震振动台试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2025, 58 (2): 1- 9.
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |