PDF(6813 KB)
Research progress on the transient flow characteristics of water hammer during cryogenic propellant filling
Zhiyong SHU, Tianxiang WANG, Gang LEI, Qiang CHEN, Hua QIAN, Wenqing LIANG
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 417-428.
PDF(6813 KB)
PDF(6813 KB)
Research progress on the transient flow characteristics of water hammer during cryogenic propellant filling
Significance: With the rapid development of routine launches, deep space exploration, lunar and Mars missions, and commercial spaceflights, increasingly stringent demands have been placed on the safety, reliability, and efficiency of propulsion systems. Cryogenic propellants, such as liquid hydrogen, liquid oxygen, and liquid methane, have become core working fluids for next-generation launch vehicles and deep space missions owing to their high specific impulse and clean combustion products. However, under conditions of a high flow rate and rapid fuel, severe water hammer and complex transient flow phenomena are likely to occur in propellant feed lines; these phenomer include large-amplitude pressure oscillations, rapid multiphase transitions, and strong coupling between thermal and structural fields. If uncontrolled, such nonequilibrium transient processes may induce pipeline vibrations, valve malfunctions, tank structural damage, or even catastrophic failures. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms of water hammer during the rapid filling of cryogenic propellants is not only of great scientific importance but also an urgent requirement for ensuring spacecraft mission safety and improving the design of modern launch sites. Progress: In recent years, extensive research has been conducted worldwide on the transient flow characteristics of cryogenic propellant filling, leading to a series of significant advances. Theoretical modeling has evolved from traditional one-dimensional water hammer equations to multiphase flow models that incorporate thermodynamic nonequilibrium effects, phase-change dynamics, and interfacial heat transfer, thereby providing a more accurate representation of cryogenic operating conditions. Numerical simulation methods, including high-resolution finite-volume methods, multiscale direct numerical simulations, and coupled fluid-thermal-structural approaches, have been developed, enabling more accurate simulations of pressure oscillations, gas-liquid interface evolution, and heat transfer phenomena. In terms of experimental validation, given the stringent requirements during liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen testing, researchers have employed substitution experiments with liquid nitrogen, liquid helium, and cryogenic simulation test facilities to obtain key transient data; some of these experimental results have already been successfully applied to assess the safety of rocket ground fuel systems. From an engineering perspective, organizations such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and SpaceX have introduced energy dissipators, buffer devices, and active control strategies into next-generation launch site construction to effectively suppress local cavitation, flashing, and water hammer risks. Collectively, these efforts indicate that the research focus is gradually shifting from single-flow modeling to an integrated development paradigm, encompassing mechanistic understanding, model development, experimental validation, and engineering applications. Conclusions and Prospects: Despite these advances, critical challenges remain in the study of cryogenic propellant filling. First, the nonequilibrium nature of phase-change processes under cryogenic conditions still lacks a complete and unified quantitative description. Second, the mechanisms of fluid-thermal-structural multiphysics coupling are highly complex, and the current models show limitations in terms of boundary adaptability and predictive accuracy. Third, experimental validation remains limited, highlighting the urgent need for safe and controllable substitution methods and advanced testing platforms. Future research should establish a closed-loop framework of "mechanistic understanding-model development-experimental validation", promote the integration of high-fidelity multiphase flow models with multiscale simulation techniques, and leverage artificial intelligence and big data approaches to achieve intelligent prediction and real-time control of transient fueling processes. The coordinated advancement of theory, experimentation, and engineering practice in this field is essential to provide solid theoretical support and technological assurance for the safe implementation of next-generation routine launch operations and high-frequency mission scenarios.
aerospace cryogenic propellant / water hammer / multiphase flow / transient current simulation / quick filling
| 1 |
包为民. 可重复使用运载火箭技术发展综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44 (23): 629555.
|
| 2 |
王勇, 钱华, 梁文清, 等. 基于等效电路低温推进剂加注系统固有频率分析[J]. 低温与超导, 2024, 52 (2): 68- 74.
|
| 3 |
陈强, 孙庆国, 王天祥, 等. 基于液氮冷源的液态甲烷过冷加注工艺[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35 (5): 956- 962.
|
| 4 |
杨永忠, 白奉天, 郑林. 火箭发射场新型低温加注系统加注过程仿真研究[J]. 低温工程, 2018 (2): 39- 44.
|
| 5 |
李幸, 陈景鹏, 崔村燕, 等. 液氧加注系统阀控瞬变危害性仿真研究[J]. 低温与超导, 2015, 43 (9): 6- 10.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
陈琛, 应媛媛, 王磊, 等. 低温推进剂管网系统中盲支管充填过程压力演化的模拟与水击特性研究[J]. 真空与低温, 2024, 30 (5): 595- 602.
|
| 9 |
刘海飞, 刘照智, 王鹏飞, 等. 低温盲支管诱发水击振动的实验研究[J]. 低温与超导, 2019, 47 (2): 8- 10.
|
| 10 |
陈强, 王天祥, 邱小林, 等. 液氮输送管路预冷过程流致振动试验研究[J]. 低温工程, 2025 (3): 37- 41.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
李沐泽, 丁华, 郝朝阳, 等. 基于热-固耦合的绝热支撑结构分析及优化[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2025, 25 (12): 5003- 5012.
|
| 17 |
汪翔宇, 高尚鸿, 丰镇平. 涡轮叶片的热流固耦合数值方法研究及应用[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2025, 59 (3): 21- 33.
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
刘照智, 丁鹏飞, 田青亚. 液氢加注系统水击问题数值分析[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2010 (4): 10- 12.
|
| 22 |
闫兴清, 戴行涛, 金鑫, 等. 低温液氢泄漏至地面形成液池的研究进展[J]. 油气与新能源, 2022, 34 (6): 82- 90.
|
| 23 |
刘海飞, 陈虹, 王天祥, 等. 液氢和液氧低温推进剂加注系统中的管路瞬变特性研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展, 2014, 29 (6): 642- 648.
|
| 24 |
张海丽, 张耀东, 邱海云, 等. 基于跨时步求解格式的感知边界外流场重构方法[J]. 力学学报, 2025, 57 (5): 1272- 1285.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
ROY J K, ROY P K, BASAK P. Water hammer protection in water supply system: A new approach with practical implementation[C]// Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Communication and Industrial Application. Kolkata, India: IEEE, 2011: 1-6.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
刘佳兴, 王向南, 刘海飞, 等. 阀门关闭对低温盲支管水击的影响分析[J]. 低温与超导, 2020, 48 (7): 1- 4.
|
| 43 |
李克诚. 新型贮箱增压消能器流场的仿真分析研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2014.
LI K C. Numerical study of flow filed for newly designed energy dissipators in pressurized tanks[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese)
|
| 44 |
胡梦琦, 王非凡, 李颖琦, 等. 运载火箭贮箱增压消能器性能仿真与结构方案分析[J]. 宇航总体技术, 2022, 6 (4): 41- 52.
|
| 45 |
朱康, 厉彦忠, 王磊, 等. 饱和氢气加注过程中低温贮箱降温特性及热应力分布的数值研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2014, 48 (5): 1- 7.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |