Engineering application of offshore wind power scour protection based on cemented riprap

Wei WANG, Dong CAI, Xin WANG, Can TANG, Yu LIU, Chong LIAN, Feng JIN

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4) : 722-731.

PDF(25768 KB)
PDF(25768 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4) : 722-731. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.007
Hydraulic Engineering

Engineering application of offshore wind power scour protection based on cemented riprap

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Scour around pile foundations, which are induced by marine currents and waves, greatly threatens the structural integrity of offshore wind turbines and submarine cables. While various scour protection measures have been employed to mitigate these effects, conventional methods such as riprap and sandbags present poor durability under complex hydrodynamic conditions, necessitating frequent maintenance and incurring high long-term costs. Consequently, there is a pressing demand for the development of more efficient and durable scour protection technologies. Methods: This study proposes a scour protection technology using a gridded cemented riprap system for offshore wind power projects, detailing its protective mechanism, material selection, and structural design. Large-scale tests were performed to explore the protective effectiveness and scour resistance of both gridded cemented and traditional riprap systems. To further confirm its engineering applicability, pre-construction casting tests were performed to determine the optimal mix ratio and flowability of self-protecting underwater concrete. In parallel, an investigation was conducted to determine the effects of different pouring parameters on concrete diffusion. Additionally, a case study was performed to compare the performances of the gridded cemented and traditional riprap systems using a newly developed evaluation method for construction quality and long-term scour protection durability. First, the annual protective structure around the foundation was divided into grid units. Then, key indicators such as average elevation, mean elevation difference, and elevation standard deviation within each grid were calculated and analyzed using field monitoring data. By comparing pre- and post-construction (or pre- and post-operation) monitoring data, these parameters were assessed to confirm compliance with protection specifications, with a focus on examining riprap geometry, thickness distribution, and structural uniformity. Results: (1) The large-scale flume tests revealed that the cemented riprap system presented excellent anti-scour performance. Compared with the unprotected condition, the maximum scour depth decreased from pile diameter (D) to 0.18D, and the maximum scour range decreased from 2.00D to 0.42D. By contrast, the traditional riprap system showed that more than 50% of the stone particles were displaced by water flow, leading to structural instability and damage. (2) Pre-construction casting tests demonstrated that the diffusion range of underwater concrete (Ds) on the riprap surface was closely related to the pouring pipe diameter (Dt) and volume (Vm). The ratio Ds/Dt exhibited an inverse proportionality to pipe diameter until reaching a minimum value of 4.5 while demonstrating a linear correlation with pouring volume. (3) Construction quality assessment by the new evaluation method, which was based on average elevation, elevation difference, and standard deviation within grid units, showed that the scour protection for the offshore foundation met design specifications. Specifically, 88% of grids achieved a backfill thickness exceeding three times the median particle size, and post-pouring elevation standard deviations remained within 0.63, satisfying uniformity requirements. (4) Long-term performance comparisons indicated that the gridded cemented riprap system significantly outperformed the traditional system in extreme scour resistance and durability. Under combined wave-current conditions, the gridded cemented riprap system exhibited no structural erosion (local or global) over a one-year monitoring period, with a maximum elevation loss of only 0.30 m and a total scour volume of 18 m3, which was significantly lower than that of the conventional riprap system. Conclusions: This study comprehensively investigates the application of gridded cemented riprap technology in offshore wind turbine scour protection through experimental investigations, construction methodology, and performance evaluation. The results demonstrate its superior erosion resistance and long-term durability compared with the traditional riprap system, offering valuable insights for future engineering applications.

Key words

offshore wind power / cemented riprap / scour protection

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wei WANG , Dong CAI , Xin WANG , et al . Engineering application of offshore wind power scour protection based on cemented riprap[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(4): 722-731 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.007

References

1
王鑫, 林鹏, 黄浩东, 等. 海上风电基础冲刷动力特性及在线监测[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (7): 1087- 1094.
WANG X , LIN P , HUANG H D , et al. Scour dynamic properties and online monitoring of offshore wind power foundation[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (7): 1087- 1094.
2
LI B , QI W G , WANG Y F , et al. Scour-induced unloading effects on lateral response of large-diameter monopiles in dense sand[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 174, 106635.
3
PRENDERGAST L J , HESTER D , GAVIN K , et al. An investigation of the changes in the natural frequency of a pile affected by scour[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013, 332 (25): 6685- 6702.
4
PRENDERGAST L J , GAVIN K , DOHERTY P . An investigation into the effect of scour on the natural frequency of an offshore wind turbine[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 101, 1- 11.
5
DE VOS L , DE ROUCK J , TROCH P , et al. Empirical design of scour protections around monopile foundations: Part 1: Static approach[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2011, 58 (6): 540- 553.
6
OUYANG H R , DAI G L , GAO L C , et al. Local scour characteristics of monopile foundation and scour protection of cement-improved soil in marine environment-laboratory and site investigation[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 255, 111443.
7
王玉芳, 张颖, 贺广零, 等. 海上风电基础冲刷防护措施探讨[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2020, 53 (S1): 137- 141.
WANG Y F , ZHANG Y , HE G L , et al. Discussion on the scour protection around the pile foundation for offshore turbines[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2020, 53 (S1): 137- 141.
8
HANSEN E A, NIELSEN A W, HØGEDAL M, et al. Scour protection around offshore wind turbine foundations, full-scale measurements[C]// Proceedings of the Scientific Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC 2007). Brussels, Belgium: EWEA, 2007.
9
CHIEW Y M . Mechanics of riprap failure at bridge piers[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1995, 121 (9): 635- 643.
10
PETERSEN T U , MUTLU SUMER B , FREDSØE J , et al. Edge scour at scour protections around piles in the marine environment: Laboratory and field investigation[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2015, 106, 42- 72.
11
PETERSEN T U , SUMER B M , BØGELUND J , et al. Flow and edge scour in current adjacent to stone covers[J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2015, 141 (4): 04014044.
12
LAGASSE P F, CLOPPER P E, ARNESON L A. Partially grouted riprap as a pier scour countermeasure[C]// Proceedings of World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008. Honolulu, USA: ASCE, 2008: 1-10.
13
HEIBAUM M H . Scour countermeasures using geosynthetics and partially grouted riprap[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000, 1696 (1): 244- 250.
14
KREYENSCHULTE M , SCHüTTRUMPF H . Tensile bending stresses in mortar-grouted riprap revetments due to wave loading[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2020, 8 (11): 913.
15
ROULUND A , SUMER B M , FREDSØE J , et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of flow and scour around a circular pile[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 534, 351- 401.
16
PAROLA JR A C , JONES J S . Sizing riprap to protect bridge piers from scour[J]. Transportation Research Record, 1991, 1290, 276- 280.
17
SOULSBY R . Dynamics of marine sands: A manual for practical applications[M]. London: Thomas Telford, 1997.
18
DEN BOON J H, SUTHERLAND J, WHITEHOUSE R, et al. Scour behaviour and scour protection for monopile foundations of offshore wind turbines[C]// Proceedings of European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition (EWEC). London, UK: EWEC, 2004.
19
DE VOS L , DE ROUCK J , TROCH P , et al. Empirical design of scour protections around monopile foundations. Part 2: Dynamic approach[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2012, 60, 286- 298.
20
国家能源局. 海上风电机组地基基础防冲刷设计导则: NB/T 11602—2024[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2024.
National Energy Administration. Guide for design of scour protection for offshore wind turbine foundations: NB/T 11602—2024[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2024. (in Chinese)
21
WANG W , YAN J Y , CHEN S G , et al. Gridded cemented riprap for scour protection around monopile in the marine environment[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 272, 113876.
22
国家能源局. 水下自护混凝土技术导则: NB/T 11094—2023[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2023.
National Energy Administration. Technical guide for self-protected underwater concrete: NB/T 11094—2023[S]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2023. (in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(25768 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/