Full-scale simulation and safety analysis of leakage and dispersion in large-scale liquid hydrogen storage areas

Ruotong WANG, Zhiyong SHU, Gang LEI, Wenqing LIANG, Qiang CHEN, Haiyang LIU, Xiaohong ZHENG, Hua QIAN

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 440-451.

PDF(13961 KB)
PDF(13961 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (3) : 440-451. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.011
Space Launch Support Technology and Engineering Application

Full-scale simulation and safety analysis of leakage and dispersion in large-scale liquid hydrogen storage areas

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Although liquid hydrogen provides high energy density and clean combustion, it poses significant safety risks due to its low boiling point, high diffusivity, and flammability. Therefore, addressing the safety challenges associated with large-scale liquid hydrogen leaks is essential for operational safety and risk management in hydrogen infrastructure, particularly in large-scale storage areas. This study investigates the dispersion characteristics of hydrogen vapor clouds and subsequent fire hazards following catastrophic leakage events, providing critical insights into safety implications under diverse environmental conditions. Methods: A numerical model based on the fire dynamics simulator (FDS)—an advanced computational fluid dynamics tool developed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology—was developed. The applicability and accuracy of FDS in hydrogen safety simulations were systematically validated through comparisons with experimental data, quantitative error analysis, and cross-validation using peer studies. The simulations examined leakage scenarios involving evaporation, vapor dispersion, and fire development, incorporating fluid dynamics, phase change, combustion, and thermal radiation processes. Environmental factors such as overhead obstructions and solar radiation were also considered. The leakage source was modeled as a liquid hydrogen storage tank located at the center of a large-scale storage area. The lateral dispersion behavior of the hydrogen cloud under varying wind speeds and its impact on structures located off the downwind direction were analyzed. Subsequently, three comparative scenarios were established: a baseline case, a case with overhead confinement, and one with solar radiation. The effects of ceiling obstructions and solar heating on hazardous exposure times and cloud dispersion were evaluated. Moreover, the fire development and potential hazards in the vicinity of the storage area following immediate ignition after leakage were examined. Results: Simulation results indicated that: (1) Buildings located offset from the main wind direction were not affected by the lateral dispersion of the flammable hydrogen cloud. (2) The ceiling structure suppressed the vertical dispersion of the hydrogen cloud during the initial leakage phase and increased the horizontal transport rate, leading to a large gas-to-ground contact area and a prolonged hazardous exposure duration in near-field regions, which resulted in an increase in hazardous exposure time at Building 2 by 5s. (3) Solar radiation played a minimal role in the early-stage evaporation and dispersion of liquid hydrogen. Its thermal effect grew with time, serving to prolong the hazardous exposure time at building facility 2 by 12 s through accelerated cloud dispersion, with a corresponding delay in far-field arrival due to enhanced dilution. (4) In the event of ignition, the liquid hydrogen fire developed extremely rapidly, reaching a flame height of 30m and a lateral spread of 15 m within 9s; the core flame temperature exceeded 700℃. In the simulated fire scenario, the thermal radiation intensity in the ceiling monitoring area consistently exceeded the safety threshold. The thermal radiation intensity exceeded 12.5kW/m2, accounting for over 70% of the total simulation time, potentially causing structural damage such as steel failure and concrete spalling. Conclusions: Quantitative studies on overhead confinement and solar radiation provide new insights into the potential risks of hydrogen facilities in complex environments, while research on the dynamic characteristics of accidental fires offers valuable information for the prevention of daily fires and the development of appropriate strategies to suppress fires.

Key words

hydrogen safety / liquid hydrogen / leakage and diffusion / fire hazards / numerical simulation

Cite this article

Download Citations
Ruotong WANG , Zhiyong SHU , Gang LEI , et al . Full-scale simulation and safety analysis of leakage and dispersion in large-scale liquid hydrogen storage areas[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(3): 440-451 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.011

References

1
LIU Z F . Analysis of current utilization of hydrogen energy[J]. Scientific and Social Research, 2024, 6 (4): 92- 96.
2
ZHANG L , JIA C Q , BAI F Q , et al. A comprehensive review of the promising clean energy carrier: Hydrogen production, transportation, storage, and utilization (HPTSU) technologies[J]. Fuel, 2024, 355, 129455.
3
ADLER E J , MARTINS J R R A . Hydrogen-powered aircraft: Fundamental concepts, key technologies, and environmental impacts[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2023, 141, 100922.
4
SADEQ A M , HOMOD R Z , HUSSEIN A K , et al. Hydrogen energy systems: Technologies, trends, and future prospects[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 939, 173622.
5
李雪芳, 何倩, 柯道友, 等. 高压氢气小孔泄漏射流分层流动模型与验证[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 58 (12): 1095- 1100.
LI X F , HE Q , CHRISTOPHER D M , et al. Validation of flow partitioning model for high pressure hydrogen jets through small orifices[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2018, 58 (12): 1095- 1100.
6
扈学超, 毕笑天, 刘策, 等. 氢燃料微预混火焰燃烧不稳定性实验研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63 (4): 572- 584.
HU X C , BI X T , LIU C , et al. Study of combustion characteristics and flame stabilization mechanism of hydrogen-containing micromix jet flames[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (4): 572- 584.
7
RONG Y Y M , YUAN W H , PENG J B , et al. An review of research on liquid hydrogen leakage: Regarding China's hydrogen refueling stations[J]. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2024, 12, 1408338.
8
WITCOFSKI R D , CHIRIVELLA J E . Experimental and analytical analyses of the mechanisms governing the dispersion of flammable clouds formed by liquid hydrogen spills[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1984, 9 (5): 425- 435.
9
HEDLEY D , HAWKSWORTH S J , RATTIGAN W , et al. Large scale passive ventilation trials of hydrogen[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39 (35): 20325- 20330.
10
HANSEN O R , HANSEN E S . CFD-modelling of large-scale LH2 release and explosion experiments[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 174, 376- 390.
11
SHU Z Y , LEI G , LIANG W Q , et al. Experimental investigation of hydrogen dispersion characteristics with liquid helium spills in moist air[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 162, 923- 931.
12
SHU Z Y , LEI G , LIANG W Q , et al. Investigation of hydrogen dispersion characteristics with liquid helium spills[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, 2208, 012020.
13
ZHANG Z , LEI G , SUN R F , et al. An experimental study on the large-volume liquid hydrogen release in an open space[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14 (9): 3645.
14
VENETSANOS A G , PAPANIKOLAOU E , BARTZIS J G . The ADREA-HF CFD code for consequence assessment of hydrogen applications[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35 (8): 3908- 3918.
15
SUN R F , PU L , HE Y C , et al. Phase change modeling of air at the liquid hydrogen release[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 50, 717- 731.
16
XIAO J S , HE P , LI X F , et al. Computational fluid dynamics model based artificial neural network prediction of flammable vapor clouds formed by liquid hydrogen releases[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2022, 46 (8): 11011- 11026.
17
CHOI S Y , OH C B , DO K H , et al. A computational study of hydrogen dispersion and explosion after large-scale leakage of liquid hydrogen[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13 (23): 12838.
18
LIANG Y W , QU Y F , PENG N , et al. Numerical simulation of process analysis and sensitivity analysis of factors influencing liquid hydrogen release in open spaces[J]. Renewable Energy, 2025, 252, 123455.
19
FU X , LI G D , CHEN S Y , et al. Study on liquid hydrogen leakage and diffusion behavior in a hydrogen production station[J]. Fire, 2024, 7 (7): 217.
20
CHAUHAN A , LIU H R , MOHAMMADPOUR J , et al. Towards safer hydrogen refuelling stations: Insights from computational fluid dynamics on LH2 leakage[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2024, 90, 105355.
21
LI Y J , WANG Z R , SHI X M , et al. Safety analysis of hydrogen leakage accident with a mobile hydrogen refueling station[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 171, 619- 629.
22
TANG X , PU L , SHAO X Y , et al. Dispersion behavior and safety study of liquid hydrogen leakage under different application situations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45 (55): 31278- 31288.
23
THAWANI B , HAZAEL R , CRITCHLEY R . Numerical modelling of hydrogen leakages in confined spaces for domestic applications[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 56, 797- 806.
24
LI H, CAO X W, TENG L, et al. Numerical simulation of accidental leakage and diffusion of liquid hydrogen in the laboratory[C]// ASME 2022 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Columbus, USA: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2022: 755-762.
25
MCGRATTAN K, HOSTIKKA S, FLOYD J, et al. Fire dynamics simulator technical reference guide volume 1: Mathematical model[R]. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2020.
26
ZHANG J , DELICHATSIOS M A , VENETSANOS A G . Numerical studies of dispersion and flammable volume of hydrogen in enclosures[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35 (12): 6431- 6437.
27
YUAN Y P , WU S F , SHEN B Y . A numerical simulation of the suppression of hydrogen jet fires on hydrogen fuel cell ships using a fine water mist[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46 (24): 13353- 13364.
28
DAVIDY A . Large eddy simulation (LES) of hydrogen jet flames and finite element analysis of thermal barrier coating[J]. Fluids, 2024, 9 (12): 287.
29
NOBILI M , CARUSO G . Comparative CFD simulations of a hydrogen fire scenario[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 796 (1): 012035.
30
李文然, 雷亚彤, 李春晓, 等. 低温运载火箭加注技术研究进展及海上发射应用展望[C]//第十九届上海航天科技论坛暨上海市宇航学会2024学术年会. 中国, 上海: 上海航天技术研究院, 上海市宇航学会, 2024: 136-144.
LI W R, LEI Y T, LI C X, et al. Research progress in cryogenic launch vehicle propellant loading technologies and prospects for maritime launch applications[C]// Proceedings of the 19th Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Forum & 2024 Academic Annual Conference of Shanghai Society of Astronautics. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology, Shanghai Society of Astronautics, 2024: 136-144. (in Chinese)
31
LI M R , TANG K C , HUANG C Y , et al. Numerical simulation study on liquid hydrogen leakage diffusion behavior and solid-air deposition formation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 79, 478- 491.
32
TAMURA Y , OHKUMA T , OKADA H , et al. Wind loading standards and design criteria in Japan[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999, 83 (1-3): 555- 566.
33
CHOI S , JEONG B . CFD simulation of gas dispersion at hydrogen bunkering station[J]. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 2023, 7 (4): 2261350.
34
LIM S J , WOO D H , LEE Y H . Numerical analysis on extinguishing of sprinklers in a hydrogen pool fire[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 54, 118- 126.
35
张召, 郑直, 陈强, 等. 液氢泄漏扩散行为的数值及实验研究[J]. 低温工程, 2024 (5): 73- 78.
ZHANG Z , ZHENG Z , CHEN Q , et al. Numerical and experimental study on leakage and diffusion behavior of liquid hydrogen[J]. Cryogenics, 2024 (5): 73- 78.
36
SHU Z Y , LEI G , LIU Z Q , et al. Motion trajectory prediction model of hydrogen leak and diffusion in a stable thermally-stratified environment[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47 (3): 2040- 2049.
37
巴清心, 赵明斌, 赵泽滢, 等. 高压氢气射流火焰的数值模拟[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62 (2): 303- 311.
BA Q X , ZHAO M B , ZHAO Z Y , et al. Modeling of high pressure hydrogen jet fires[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62 (2): 303- 311.
38
Center for Chemical Process Safety . Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis[M]. 2nd ed New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2010.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(13961 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/