PDF(3637 KB)
Research progress on driving fatigue mechanism and monitoring-warning technology
Shizhe JIA, Weixi WANG, Bo LU, Junni HE, Xin PEI, Shifei SHEN, Jia WANG
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (6) : 1199-1211.
PDF(3637 KB)
PDF(3637 KB)
Research progress on driving fatigue mechanism and monitoring-warning technology
Significance: Driving fatigue is a major contributor to traffic accidents and is characterized by its prevalence, concealment, and associated risks. It impairs drivers' physiological functions and depletes their psychological cognitive resources. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of its underlying mechanisms, coupled with the development of accurate monitoring, early warning, and intervention technologies, is crucial to enhancing road safety. However, existing reviews often lack a systematic integration of research on fatigue mechanisms and advancements in associated monitoring and intervention technologies. To address this gap, this paper systematically reviews the causal factors and mechanistic hypotheses underlying fatigue and evaluates the current status of monitoring, warning, and intervention technologies. Current research indicates that multisource information fusion, which integrates physiological signals, visual imagery, and driving behavior data, significantly enhances the robustness and accuracy of fatigue detection compared to single-modality approaches. Meanwhile, early-warning and intervention strategies are evolving from passive monitoring toward active prediction, incorporating temporal analysis and contextual awareness. These strategies include the use of in-vehicle visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli; the development of autonomous vehicle takeover systems; and the optimization of road infrastructure design. This review synthesizes recent progress and emerging trends in the research on driving fatigue mechanisms and associated monitoring-warning technologies, and proposes integrated strategies to support effective fatigue management. Progress: In physiological monitoring, electroencephalography remains the gold standard, with deep learning models such as convolutional neural network (CNN)-attention methods achieving accuracy rates of up to 97.8%. Electrocardiography and heart rate variability measurements are also widely used, but their applicability is limited by the intrusiveness of the sensors. Therefore, current research focuses on noninvasive alternatives such as photoplethysmography and miniaturized devices, although challenges such as motion artifacts and environmental interference persist. Visual monitoring leverages computer vision and deep learning, including CNNs and long short-term memory models, to analyze features such as eye closure percentage, yawn frequency, and head pose, achieving accuracy rates of up to 92.7%. However, its performance is susceptible to lighting conditions, occlusions, and individual differences, necessitating improvements in real-world robustness. Driving behavior monitoring uses data on vehicle dynamics such as steering wheel variability and lane deviation, and machine learning models trained on these data achieve accuracies of up to 91.2%. While this method is privacy-preserving and readily deployable, it suffers from detection latency and is influenced by road conditions and driving habits, which limit its effectiveness for early warning. Multisource data fusion overcomes these limitations by integrating physiological, visual, and behavioral data using architectures such as multicolumn CNNs, achieving superior accuracy. However, high computational demands, data heterogeneity, and model interpretability issues pose challenges for real-time deployment. In terms of warnings and interventions, conventional systems rely on real-time detection to trigger alerts. Current research is shifting focus toward proactive prediction using bio-mathematical models and recurrent neural networks, achieving accuracies of up to 88.2% in forecasting fatigue several minutes in advance. Large language models enable intelligent, adaptive dialogue for graded intervention, supporting integrated "monitoring-assessment-response" frameworks. Autonomous driving technologies, particularly conditional automation, can reduce fatigue by allowing drivers to perform non-driving tasks and by providing emergency vehicle takeover capabilities. Road design and managerial measures complement these technological solutions within a holistic "human-vehicle-road-environment- management" framework. Conclusions and Prospects: This review outlines the mechanisms underlying fatigue, the associated monitoring technologies, and intervention strategies to address fatigue, emphasizing the key role of multisource data fusion in improving fatigue detection accuracy. The shift from passive warning to proactive intervention, supported by artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, represents a critical technological pathway. However, challenges remain in areas such as the precision of real-time predictions, the comfort of wearable devices, and the computational efficiency of multisource data fusion models. Future research should prioritize dynamic mechanism modeling, cross-scenario adaptive algorithms, and human-machine collaborative intervention to develop more reliable and scalable fatigue mitigation solutions.
traffic safety / driving fatigue / fatigue monitoring / multi-source information fusion / warning and intervention
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
谢晓莉. 驾驶疲劳生成机理研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2010.
XIE X L. Study on driving fatigue formation mechanism[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2010. (in Chinese)
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
谢晓莉, 李平生, 王书云. 道路交通环境中驾驶疲劳的生成模型研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22 (1): 118- 123.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
National Sleep Foundation. Sleep in america poll[R]. Washington, D.C. : National Sleep Foundation (NSF), 2009.
|
| 18 |
BEIRNESS D J, SIMPSON H M, DESMOND K. The road safety monitor 2004: Drowsy driving[R]. Ottawa: Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF), 2005.
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
刘灵, 邓小燕, 徐颖. 汽车驾驶员驾驶疲劳监测方法与装置的研究现状[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2006, 27 (12): 28- 30.
|
| 21 |
刘一雄. 基于人机工程学的驾驶疲劳研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2016.
LIU Y X. Research of driving fatigue based on ergonomics[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2016. (in Chinese)
|
| 22 |
张旭欣, 王雪松, 马勇, 等. 驾驶行为与驾驶风险国际研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33 (6): 1- 17.
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
金键. 驾驶疲劳机理及馈选模式研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2002.
JIN J. Evaluation of driving fatigue mechanism and feedback selecting model[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2002. (in Chinese)
|
| 27 |
赵小平, 龚俊, 万平, 等. 基于生理信号分析的不同风格驾驶人疲劳特性[J]. 中国科技论文, 2022, 17 (10): 1111- 1119.
|
| 28 |
杨渝书. 驾驶疲劳的人机工程学分析和定量评价实验研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2002.
YANG Y S. Study on driving fatigue and its quantitative evaluation based on man-machine engineering[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2002. (in Chinese)
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
张殿业, 张开冉, 金键. 道路标线对驾驶行为模式的影响[J]. 中国公路学报, 2001, 14 (4): 89- 90.
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
王猛. 营运驾驶员驾驶疲劳研究[D]. 北京: 交通部公路科学研究院, 2006.
WANG M. Research on driving fatigue of commercial vehicle drivers[D]. Beijing: Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport, 2006. (in Chinese)
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
DESMOND P A, HANCOCK P A. Active and passive fatigue states[M]// HANCOCK P A, DESMOND P A. Stress, workload, and fatigue. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000: 455-465.
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
颜松, 魏建勤, 吴永红. 汽车驾驶员瞌睡状态脑电波特征提取的研究[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2005, 24 (1): 110- 113.
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
李增勇, 焦昆, 陈铭, 等. 汽车驾驶员模拟精神负荷与心率变异性的相关性分析[J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2002, 21 (3): 190- 193.
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
BAI Y P, ZHAO M, ZHONG W M, et al. The intelligent car seat adjustment system based on a multimodal driving fatigue detection method[C]// 17th International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality and 27th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Gothenburg, Sweden: Springer, 2025: 289-305.
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
FRIEDRICHS F, YANG B. Drowsiness monitoring by steering and lane data based features under real driving conditions[C]// 201018th European Signal Processing Conference. Aalborg, Denmark: IEEE, 2010: 209-213.
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
洪林. 基于多特征融合和长短期记忆网络的疲劳驾驶检测方法研究[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2020.
HONG L. Research on drowsiness driving detection method based on multi-feature fusion and long short-term memory recurrent neural networks[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
|
| 72 |
梁晓昱. 基于深度学习的驾驶员疲劳检测方法研究[D]. 天津: 天津工业大学, 2018.
LIANG X Y. Research on driver fatigue detection method based on deep learning[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Polytechnic University, 2018. (in Chinese)
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
UTOMO D, YANG T H, THANH D T, et al. Driver fatigue prediction using different sensor data with deep learning[C]// 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS). Taipei, China: IEEE, 2019: 242-247.
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
肖昊苏, 朱立源. 音乐干预疲劳驾驶试验平台的搭建与试验研究[J]. 机械工程与自动化, 2021 (6): 7- 9.
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
HO C, SPENCE C, TAN H Z. Warning signals go multisensory[C]// Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Mahwah, USA: Erlbaum, 2005: 1-10.
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
HUANG S S, ZHAO X D, WEI D P, et al. Chatbot and fatigued driver: Exploring the use of LLM-based voice assistants for driving fatigue[C]// Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Honolulu, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024: 74.
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
程瑞, 盘烨, 代军吉, 等. 公路路侧事故风险评估与路侧安全设计研究综述[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33 (9): 214- 226.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |