PDF(1726 KB)
Wind tunnel testing and dynamic response analysis of transmission towers and lines under strong combined disasters
Na LUO, Guangzheng ZHANG, Yiran YAN, Sheng WANG, Xiaoxia LIN, Quanbing SUN
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1474-1483.
PDF(1726 KB)
PDF(1726 KB)
Wind tunnel testing and dynamic response analysis of transmission towers and lines under strong combined disasters
Objective: Transmission towers are essential components of power transmission systems, and their safety directly affects grid stability. With the increasing frequency of extreme weather events, damage from combined wind-rain loads has become more pronounced. Current design codes primarily address wind loads in isolation, neglecting the effects of wind-rain coupling. In addition, the effects of key factors, such as wind direction, on structural response remain unclear. This study investigates the displacement response of transmission tower-line systems under wind-rain coupling and clarifies how wind speed, rainfall intensity, wind direction angle, and measurement location influence this response. The goal is to provide reliable experimental data to optimize tower design against combined wind and rain loads. Methods: A 1:10-scaled aeroelastic model of a 110 kV cat-head transmission tower was designed and constructed based on similarity criteria. Comprehensive wind tunnel tests were conducted in a large-scale climate wind tunnel while considering three wind speeds (10.0, 14.0, and 18.0 m/s), three rainfall intensities (30, 60, and 90 mm/h), and three wind direction angles (45°, 60°, and 90°). A finite element model of the prototype tower was developed using advanced simulation software tools for modal analysis. A high-stiffness sensor support was designed to minimize vibration interference. Two laser displacement sensors were used to measure the root-mean-square (RMS) and peak displacements at the upper and lower sections (Measuring Points 1 and 2, respectively) of the tower top in a synchronous manner. Key similarity parameters, including length, wind speed, frequency, and stiffness, were strictly controlled to ensure the validity of the test results. Results: The experimental results yielded four key insights: (1) Wind speed had a non-linear strengthening effect on displacement response, with a significantly greater growth rate in the high wind speed range (14.0-18.0 m/s) than in the low wind-speed range (10.0-14.0 m/s). (2) Displacement at measuring point 1 consistently exceeded that at measuring point 2, indicating that the upper section of the tower top is the most vulnerable region under wind-rain coupling. (3) The 45° wind direction angle was identified as the most critical, producing a significantly larger displacement response than other angles. (4) A critical coupling effect between wind and rain was observed, with moderate increases in displacement response at lower rain intensities (≤60 mm/h) and wind speeds (≤14.0 m/s). Under extreme conditions (90 mm/h rain intensity and 18 m/s wind speed), the RMS displacement at measuring point 1 (45° wind angle) increased significantly compared with that under moderate conditions. Conclusions: This study systematically elucidated the displacement response characteristics of transmission towers under combined wind and rain loads, quantitatively assessing the influence of key environmental and structural factors. The results suggest that the upper section of the tower top should be prioritized for reinforcement in design. The combination of a 45° wind direction angle with extreme wind and rain conditions (18.0 m/s, 90 mm/h) constitutes a critical design scenario. In addition, wind direction angles of 60° and 90° can be classified as a "low-response group" allowing for potential design optimization. These findings provide a crucial experimental basis for advancing transmission tower design theory for combined wind and rain conditions, effectively balancing structural safety with economic efficiency.
transmission tower-line / wind-rain coupling / soil-structure interaction / wind tunnel test / "strong winds-heavy rain-waterlogging" disaster chain
| 1 |
孟庆强. 以高标准保障能源转型和新型电力系统全产业链高质量发展[J]. 中国标准化, 2024 (21): 24- 25.
|
| 2 |
国家能源局甘肃监管办公室. 甘肃能源监管办迅速行动督导榆中山洪灾害电力应急等工作[EB/OL]. (2025-08-11)[2025-08-30]. https://gsb.nea.gov.cn/dtyw/jgdt/202508/t20250811_285578.html.
Gansu Energy Regulatory Office of National Energy Administration. Gansu Energy Regulatory Office acts quickly to supervise poweremergency work and other tasks in responseto mountain flooddisaster in Yuzhong[EB/OL]. (2025-08-11)[2025-08-30]. https://gsb.nea.gov.cn/dtyw/jgdt/202508/t20250811_285578.html. (in Chinese)
|
| 3 |
刘亮, 杨风利, 王章轩, 等. 大跨越输电铁塔位移风振系数时频域计算分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2023, 39 (1): 99- 106.
|
| 4 |
赵彬, 李孟轩, 刘彬, 等. 含有阻尼颗粒的零频防舞器试验研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2024, 50 (4): 1518- 1525.
|
| 5 |
刘光辉, 张博, 武鹏飞, 等. 输电塔圆钢管的涡激振动理论分析与风洞试验验证[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2025, 34 (2): 149- 159.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
赵斌滨, 刘毅, 费香泽, 等. 典型输电通道地质灾害危险性评价研究[C]//中国地质学会. 2019年全国工程地质学术年会论文集. 中国, 北京: 中国地质学会, 2019: 140-146.
ZHAO B B, LIU Y, FEI X Z, et al. Study on geological hazards assessment in typical transmission channel[C]// Geological Society of China. 2019 National Engineering Geology Annual Conference. Beijing, China: Geological Society of China, 2019: 140-146. (in Chinese)
|
| 8 |
丁璨, 陈天凡, 李江, 等. 考虑桩-土-结构相互作用的输电塔-线体系风振响应及减振控制[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23 (10): 4234- 4246.
|
| 9 |
杨知, 欧文浩, 费香泽, 等. 基于高分辨率SAR影像和深度学习的输电杆塔智能识别研究[J]. 电测与仪表, 2020, 57 (4): 71- 77.
|
| 10 |
北京市人民政府. 本市举行防汛救灾工作情况新闻发布会灾后重建思路明确[EB/OL]. (2023-08-10)[2025-08-30]. https://www.beijing.gov.cn/ywdt/yaowen/202308/t20230810_3219401.html.
The People's Government of Beijing Municipality. Press conference on flood control and disaster relief held in Beijing with clear ideas for post-disaster reconstruction[EB/OL]. (2023-08-10)[2025-08-30]. https://www.beijing.gov.cn/ywdt/yaowen/202308/t20230810_3219401.html. (in Chinese)
|
| 11 |
国家能源局。国家能源局关于进一步加强电力应急体系和能力建设的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2025-03-28)[2025-08-30]. https://www.nea.gov.cn/20250519/147d7c90371a402296e23de18f6111c3/c.html.
National Energy Administration. Guidelines of the National Energy Administration on further strengthening the construction of the power emergency system and capacity[EB/OL]. (2025-03-28)[2025-08-30]. https://www.nea.gov.cn/20250519/147d7c90371a402296e23de18f6111c3/c.html. (in Chinese)
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
王增平, 相禹维, 王彤. 台风暴雨灾害下的110 kV线路倒塔与断线事故评估方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2022, 46 (3): 59- 66.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
陈伏彬, 康文, 芦佳敏, 等. 输电导线对塔线体系风致响应影响研究[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 22 (1): 122- 130.
|
| 17 |
汪大海, 项旭志, 张志强, 等. 输电线路风荷载耦联机制的气弹性风洞试验研究[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46 (1): 343- 352.
|
| 18 |
程江洲, 谢卓然, 李欣, 等. 海洋大气环境下输电塔线体系强风响应模拟分析[J]. 装备环境工程, 2025, 22 (2): 52- 61.
|
| 19 |
张国强, 李治, 董优, 等. 强风下输电塔-线体系连续性失效反演研究[J/OL]. 建筑钢结构进展. (2025-07-22)[2025-08-16]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1893.TU.20250722.1438.008.
ZHANG G Q, LI Z, DONG Y, et al. Investigation on progressive failure of transmission tower-line system under strong winds[J/OL]. Progress in Steel Building Structures. (2025-07-22) [2025-08-16]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/31.1893.TU.20250722.1438.008. (in Chinese)
|
| 20 |
朱宽军, 徐鸿. 考虑风速时空分布特性的高压输电塔-线体系风致响应分析研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2019, 39 (8): 2348- 2356.
|
| 21 |
谭静, 冯芊, 张星宇, 等. 风振对输电塔线体系损伤动力学研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2024, 46 (6): 878- 886.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
张华恺, 菅明健, 张都清, 等. 强对流天气下输电塔-线体系倒塌破坏与风雨组合系数研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2024, 33 (3): 111- 121.
|
| 25 |
荣卫涛, 王振国, 姜文东, 等. 输电塔风雨荷载特性的CFD数值模拟[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2024, 44 (5): 1115- 1125.
|
| 26 |
田利, 刘凯悦, 刘俊才, 等. 基于土弹簧的桩-土-输电塔抗震性能研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2022, 44 (6): 1268- 1276.
|
| 27 |
蔡青青, 吴海洋, 刘堃, 等. 考虑SSI效应的特高压输电塔风致响应试验[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2020, 43 (5): 67- 75.
|
| 28 |
李升响, 刘登, 张绍良. 关于猫头型直线塔的下曲臂构造计算分析[J]. 云南电力技术, 2024, 52 (3): 52- 54.
|
| 29 |
项旭志. 输电线路风效应耦联机制的气弹性风洞试验研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2021.
XIANG X Z. Wind tunnel testing on coupling mechanism of wind load effect on transmission tower-line system[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2021. (in Chinese)
|
| 30 |
周永强, 盛谦, 付晓东, 等. 强降雨作用下滑坡体上输电塔基础破坏模式: 以巴东燕子崖500 kV输电塔滑坡为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2022, 30 (2): 386- 396.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |