Post-earthquake functionality analysis method for an urban power system based on DC power flow

Yunlong CHEN, Tao WANG, Jichao LI, Rushan LIU

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1408-1421.

PDF(2387 KB)
PDF(2387 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (7) : 1408-1421. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.037

Post-earthquake functionality analysis method for an urban power system based on DC power flow

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: As a critical component of lifeline infrastructure, urban power systems (UPSs) are essential for maintaining city functionality and supporting daily societal needs. Accurately assessing the post-earthquake functionality (PEF) of power systems is crucial due to its great importance for emergency response, urban recovery, and social stability. Traditional connectivity-based assessment methodstend to overestimate the post-earthquake power supply capability because they ignore the physical constraints of power transmission and distribution. To address this limitation, this study proposes a comprehensive PEF assessment framework to accurately quantify UPS performance under seismic scenarios. The framework explicitly integrates topology, physical damage, power redistribution, and cascading failures, providing reliable support for emergency decision-making and recovery planning. Methods: The proposed framework consists of five interrelated steps. (1) A unified topological representation of the UPS is derived using single-line diagrams, in which buses serve as core units and sources, while transformers, lines, and switching stations are consistently abstracted across voltage levels. (2) A spatially distributed ground-motion field over the urban area is generated, and engineering demand parameters (e.g., peak ground acceleration) are assigned to different electrical facilities. (3) Seismic damage scenarios, i.e., damage to substations, lines, and switching stations, are generated using Monte Carlo simulations. Each damage state is mapped to a reduction in power supply capacity, allowing partial functionality loss rather than a binary failure mode. Damaged components are removed from the network, while components with no power supply are identified and excluded through connectivity analysis. (4) DC power flow is executed within each source-connected island, with a slack bus to enforce power balance. Cascading failures are simulated by iteratively removing the lines that exceed their rated capacity until the system reaches a stable state. Load curtailment follows explicit rules: priority users are supplied first, and remaining capacity is proportionally distributed among non-priority users based on load weight. (5) The load-supply performance index (ηLS) is employed to quantify the overall and regional PEF of the UPS under seismic scenarios, incorporating land-use classifications and spatial zoning for differentiated analysis. Results: A case study was conducted on a benchmark city model representing a medium-sized coastal city in southeastern China with over 500 land parcels and a total forecasted load of 1 873.46 MW. The PEF of the UPS was assessed with 10 000 Monte Carlo realizations considering a seismic scenario in which an Mw 6.5 earthquake occurred 10 km northeast of the city center. The results showed that the average ηLS was 46.87%, with the most severe functionality losses concentrated in the northeastern region near the epicenter. Functionality varied across land-use types: logistic and public service lands showed the highest median functionality levels (>70.00%), while industrial lands exhibited high variability (median approximately 62.99%). Residential, green space, and commercial lands showed mean functionality levels of approximately 45.00%. The earthquake epicenter location strongly influenced UPS performance, with the ηLS degrading to 35.69%-37.88% when the earthquake occurred to the west, north, and northwest of the city. Conclusions: This study validates the applicability of the proposed DC power flow-based functionality assessment method. Key findings include: (1) the framework captures the influence of network topology, seismic input randomness, power redistribution, and cascading failures on the PEF of UPS; (2) cascading failures significantly amplify functionality loss because partially damaged components may become non-functional due to overloading or islanding effects; (3) functionality differs across land-use types, with logistic and public service lands performing best, industrial lands showing high variability, and residential, green, and commercial lands maintaining stability close to the system average; (4) earthquake epicenter orientation strongly affects system functionality, highlighting the need to locate high-demand areas away from potential seismic sources and improve redundancy in critical transmission paths; and (5) current limitations, including the absence of post-earthquake redispatch modeling and the simplified power flow representation, will be addressed in future studies.

Key words

urban power system / post-earthquake functionality assessment / topological network / power flow analysis / cascading failure

Cite this article

Download Citations
Yunlong CHEN , Tao WANG , Jichao LI , et al. Post-earthquake functionality analysis method for an urban power system based on DC power flow[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(7): 1408-1421 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.26.037

References

1
李宏男, 柳春光. 生命线工程系统减灾研究趋势与展望[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2005, 45(6): 931- 936.
LI H N , LIU C G . Trends and prospects for research on disaster mitigation in lifeline engineering system[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2005, 45(6): 931- 936.
2
HE C , XIE Q , YANG Z Y , et al. Modelling large planar deflections of flexible bundled conductors in substations using a modified chained-beam constraint model[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 185, 278- 285.
3
何畅, 王社良, 江力强. 多重不确定性下的电气设备地震失效风险评估[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(12): 84- 94.
HE C , WANG S L , JIANG L Q . Seismic failure risk assessment of electrical equipment considering different sorts of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(12): 84- 94.
4
DUEÑAS-OSORIO L , CRAIG J I , GOODNO B J . Seismic response of critical interdependent networks[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2007, 36(2): 285- 306.
5
ALBERT R , ALBERT I , NAKARADO G L . Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid[J]. Physical Review E, 2004, 69(2): 025103.
6
林均岐, 陈永盛, 刘金龙. 电力系统震后网络连通性研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2011, 31(6): 181- 185.
LIN J Q , CHEN Y S , LIU J L . Study on post-earthquake connectivity of electric power systems[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2011, 31(6): 181- 185.
7
FERRARIO E , POULOS A , CASTRO S , et al. Predictive capacity of topological measures in evaluating seismic risk and resilience of electric power networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 217, 108040.
8
赵晋泉, 叶君玲, 邓勇. 直流潮流与交流潮流的对比分析[J]. 电网技术, 2012, 36(10): 147- 152.
ZHAO J Q , YE J L , DENG Y . Comparative analysis on DC power flow and AC power flow[J]. Power System Technology, 2012, 36(10): 147- 152.
9
ANG A H S , PIRES J A , VILLAVERDE R . A model for the seismic reliability assessment of electric power transmission systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1996, 51(1): 7- 22.
10
RASCHKE M, BILIS E, KRÖGER W. Vulnerability of the Swiss electric power transmission grid against natural hazards[C]// Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering. Zurich, Switzerland: ETH Zurich, 2011: 1407-1414.
11
WU Z G, CHANG L, SHI S S. Reliability analysis of power systems under disaster impacts[R]. Beijing: Santa Fe Institute, 2006.
12
VANZI I . Seismic reliability of electric power networks: Methodology and application[J]. Structural Safety, 1996, 18(4): 311- 327.
13
CHENG B Y , NOZICK L , DOBSON I . Investment planning for earthquake-resilient electric power systems considering cascading outages[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2022, 38(3): 1734- 1760.
14
郑国鑫, 雷霞, 王湘, 等. 地震灾害模拟及配电网的风险评估[J]. 电工技术学报, 2020, 35(24): 5218- 5226.
ZHENG G X , LEI X , WANG X , et al. Earthquake simulation and risk assessment of distribution network[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2020, 35(24): 5218- 5226.
15
雷霞, 郑国鑫, 胡益. 地震灾害下配电网的脆弱性分析及弹性提升措施[J]. 电网技术, 2021, 45(9): 3674- 3680.
LEI X , ZHENG G X , HU Y . Vulnerability analysis and resilience improvement of distribution network under earthquake disasters[J]. Power System Technology, 2021, 45(9): 3674- 3680.
16
AMANI-JOUNEGHANI F , FOTUHI-FIRUZABAD M , MOEINI-AGHTAIE M , et al. Seismic resilience assessment of electric power distribution networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2025, 40(1): 387- 397.
17
AKDAǦ O . Strengthening distribution systems after earthquakes with a new analytical model[J]. Electric Power Systems Research, 2024, 232, 110337.
18
徐雪松, 唐加乐, 曾子洋, 等. 极端自然灾害下我国城市电力系统韧性提升框架与发展策略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2024, 26(2): 198- 209.
XU X S , TANG J L , ZENG Z Y , et al. Framework and strategy for enhancing resilience of China's urban power systems under extreme natural disasters[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2024, 26(2): 198- 209.
19
阮前途, 谢伟, 许寅, 等. 韧性电网的概念与关键特征[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2020, 40(21): 6773- 6783.
RUAN Q T , XIE W , XU Y , et al. Concept and key features of resilient power grids[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020, 40(21): 6773- 6783.
20
CHALISHAZAR V, POUDEL S, HANIF S, et al. Power system resilience metrics augmentation for critical load prioritization[R]. Richland: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), 2021.
21
ROSALES-ASENSIO E , ELEJALDE J L , PULIDO-ALONSO A , et al. Resilience framework, methods, and metrics for the prioritization of critical electrical grid customers[J]. Electronics, 2022, 11(14): 2246.
22
RACHUNOK B , NATEGHI R . The sensitivity of electric power infrastructure resilience to the spatial distribution of disaster impacts[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2020, 193, 106658.
23
王茜. 供电系统抗震可靠性分析及脆弱性评估[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2012.
WANG Q. Seismic reliability analysis and vulnerability assessment of electric power system[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
24
杨鹏, 刘锋, 姜齐荣, 等. "双高"电力系统大扰动稳定性: 问题、挑战与展望[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(5): 403- 414.
YANG P , LIU F , JIANG Q R , et al. Large-disturbance stability of power systems with high penetration of renewables and inverters: Phenomena, challenges, and perspectives[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2021, 61(5): 403- 414.
25
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 城市电力规划规范: GB/T 50293—2014[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Code for planning of urban electric power: GB/T 50293—2014[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015. (in Chinese)
26
International Electrotechnical Commission. Graphical symbols for diagrams: IEC 60617[S]. Geneva: IEC, 2025.
27
徐哲. 区域电网系统抗震韧性评估理论与方法研究[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2024.
XU Z. Research on the theory and method of seismic resilience evaluation of regional power grid system[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2024. (in Chinese)
28
邱丽萍. 城市电网最大供电能力评估算法研究[D]. 北京: 中国电力科学研究院, 2006.
QIU L P. Research on the evaluation algorithm for maximum power supply capacity of urban power grid[D]. Beijing: China Electric Power Research Institute, 2006. (in Chinese)
29
何畅, 何紫薇, 江力强, 等. 多重不确定性对特高压变压器瓷套管地震失效风险的影响[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(15): 5763- 5774.
HE C , HE Z W , JIANG L Q , et al. Effects of different sorts of uncertainties on seismic failure risk of ultra-high-voltage porcelain transformer bushing[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2022, 42(15): 5763- 5774.
30
PORTANTE E C, KAVICKY J A, FOLGA S F, et al. Simulating the seismic performance of a large-scale electric network in the U.S. Midwest[C]// Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference. Baltimore, USA: IEEE, 2010: 3482-3493.
31
李吉超. 基于概率的变电站系统抗震性能评估方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2018.
LI J C. Study on probability-based seismic performance assessment method for substation systems[D]. Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2018. (in Chinese)
32
FEMA. Hazus earthquake model: Technical manual, version 2.1[R]. Washington, D. C. : FEMA, 2012.
33
STOTT B , JARDIM J , ALSAÇ O . DC power flow revisited[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2009, 24(3): 1290- 1300.
34
ZHANG G X , TONG X Y , HONG Q T , et al. A novel fault isolation scheme in power system with dynamic topology using wide-area information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2022, 18(4): 2399- 2410.
35
WORKU M Y , HASSAN M A , MARAABA L S , et al. Islanding detection methods for microgrids: A comprehensive review[J]. Mathematics, 2021, 9(24): 3174.
36
DHOPLE S V , CHEN Y C , AL-DIGS A , et al. Reexamining the distributed slack bus[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2020, 35(6): 4870- 4879.
37
SHANG Q X , GUO X D , LI Q W , et al. A benchmark city for seismic resilience assessment[J]. Earthquake Enginee- ring and Engineering Vibration, 2020, 19(4): 811- 826.
38
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 建筑抗震设计标准: GB/T 50011—2010 (2024年版)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2024.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Standard for seismic design of buildings: GB/T 50011—2010 (2024 edition)[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2024. (in Chinese)
39
WEATHERILL G, ESPOSITO S, IERVOLINO I, et al. Framework for seismic hazard analysis of spatially distributed systems[M]// PITILAKIS K, FRANCHIN P, KHAZAI B, et al. SYNER-G: Systemic seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of complex urban, utility, lifeline systems and critical facilities: Methodology and applications. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014: 57-88.
40
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 城市用地分类与规划建设用地标准: GB 50137—2011[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2012.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Code for classification of urban land use and planning standards of development land: GB 50137—2011[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
41
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 中国地震动参数区划图: GB 18306—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. Seismic ground motion parameters zonation map of China: GB 18306—2015[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2016. (in Chinese)
42
刘天琪. 现代电力系统分析理论与方法[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2007.
LIU T Q . Modern power system analysis theory and methods[M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2007.
43
杨淑英. 电力系统概论[M]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2003.
YANG S Y . Introduction to electric power systems[M]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2003.
44
何仰赞, 温增银. 电力系统分析(上册)[M]. 3版. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社, 2002.
HE Y Z , WEN Z Y . Electric power system analysis (vol[M]. 3rd ed. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 2002.
45
中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 电力设施抗震设计规范: GB 50260—2013[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. Code for seismic design of electrical installations: GB 50260—2013[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
46
RUBINSTEIN R Y , KROESE D P . Simulation and the Monte Carlo method[M]. 3rd ed. Newark: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
47
NOMAN M , ULLAH I , KHAN M A , et al. Analysis of overcurrent protective relaying as minimum adopted fault protection for small-scale hydropower plants[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2024, 21(4): 4457- 4470.
48
MEI S W , NI Y X , WANG G , et al. A study of self-organized criticality of power system under cascading failures based on AC-OPF with voltage stability margin[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(4): 1719- 1726.
49
PAHWA S , SCOGLIO C , DAS S , et al. Load-shedding strategies for preventing cascading failures in power grid[J]. Electric Power Components and Systems, 2013, 41(9): 879- 895.
50
ZENG X L , LIU Z Y , HUI Q . Energy equipartition stabilization and cascading resilience optimization for geospatially distributed cyber-physical network systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2015, 45(1): 25- 43.
51
FERREIRA P D F , CARVALHO P M S , FERREIRA L A F M , et al. Distributed energy resources integration challenges in low-voltage networks: Voltage control limitations and risk of cascading[J]. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 2013, 4(1): 82- 88.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(2387 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/