Mechanism of superposed magnification of economic losses in "rainstorm–dam breach–urban flooding" disaster chains under beyond-standard rainstorm

Ye ZHANG, Lezhi WANG, Xin SU, Jinhui LI, Xiting LI, Shuang WANG

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 1951-1965.

PDF(8031 KB)
PDF(8031 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 1951-1965. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.057
Pulic Safety

Mechanism of superposed magnification of economic losses in "rainstorm–dam breach–urban flooding" disaster chains under beyond-standard rainstorm

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Global climate change and rapid urbanization have intensified compound flood risks in coastal cities. A critical research gap persists regarding cascading failures triggered by instability in high-standard flood control infrastructure. Prevailing assumptions often underestimate the failure probability of robust defense systems; however, historical events, such as the 2015 dike overflow along the Jiangnan Canal, demonstrate that extreme events can overwhelm even 50–200-year flood defenses. This study examines the Wuxi Yundong Enclosure, a representative high-standard flood control zone in the Yangtze River Delta. Focusing on the "rainstorm–dam Breach–urban flooding" disaster chain, this study aims to quantitatively reveal the superposed magnification mechanism of economic losses under beyond-standard rainfall, providing a scientific basis for resilient urban flood management. Methods: An integrated "hydrodynamic simulation–loss quantification–attribution analysis" framework was developed. A multiscale coupled hydrodynamic model was established to link a Taihu Basin-scale model (boundary conditions), a 1D river network model (canal dynamics), and a 2D inundation model (surface flooding). Validation against the June–July 2016 flood event yielded a Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.85 and R2 of 0.99. A hydrographically triggered breach mechanism was simulated: failure occurred when water levels exceeded the dike crest by 10 cm for 10 min, forming a trapezoidal breach (top width 12 m, bottom width 8 m, height 3 m). Twelve scenarios were designed across four return periods (50-, 100-, 150-, and 200-year) covering rainstorm-only, breach-only, and compound conditions. Economic losses for seven asset types (agriculture, buildings, equipment, and others) were quantified by spatializing high-resolution land-use data and applying depth–damage curves. Novel indices—the composite increment coefficient and amplification factor (AF)—were proposed to isolate the marginal impact of dike breaching. Results: The simulations revealed significant nonlinear amplification in compound scenarios. (1) Hydrological Effect: At the 200-year return period, the maximum inundation depth reached 2.44 m, a 134.7% increase over the linear sum of single-disaster scenarios. (2) Economic Magnitude: Total direct losses in the compound scenario surged by 221.7% relative to linearly superimposed single disasters. High-loss zones (> 30, 000 CNY per 900 m² pixel) expanded by 179.1%. Critically, over 50% of total losses occurred within a narrow 25 h window coinciding with peak rainfall and dike breach. (3) Asset Heterogeneity: Amplification varied significantly by asset type. Due to "plateauing" depth–damage curves, AF values for plantations, fisheries, and equipment remained below 100%. Conversely, buildings exhibited the highest sensitivity, with AF increasing by ~6.9% per decade of return period. (4) Attribution: The net superposition increment for total assets turned positive near the 85-year return period. Buildings accounted for the vast majority of incremental loss, contributing 94.2% of the total superposition at the 200-year return period. The total asset loss growth rate was approximately 3613.8 million CNY per 10-year increase in return period. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that high-standard flood control zones face catastrophic risks during compound disasters with structural failure. The economic impact of the "rainstorm–dam Breach–urban flooding" chain vastly exceeds the sum of individual hazards. The identification of buildings as the primary driver of loss magnification underscores the necessity for targeted structural reinforcements and risk-transfer strategies. Despite focusing on direct losses and excluding indirect disruptions, the framework provides a robust methodology for extreme flood risk analysis. These findings offer critical insights for optimizing flood storage strategies, refining emergency protocols, and updating engineering standards to incorporate compound disaster chains, thereby enhancing urban flood security in deltaic megacities globally.

Key words

beyond-standard rainstorm / rainstorm–dam breach–urban flooding / compound flood disaster / economic loss / superposition amplification

Cite this article

Download Citations
Ye ZHANG , Lezhi WANG , Xin SU , et al . Mechanism of superposed magnification of economic losses in "rainstorm–dam breach–urban flooding" disaster chains under beyond-standard rainstorm[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(10): 1951-1965 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.057

References

1
张建云, 王银堂, 贺瑞敏, 等. 中国城市洪涝问题及成因分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2016, 27(4): 485- 491.
ZHANG J Y, WANG Y T, HE R M, et al. Discussion on the urban flood and waterlogging and causes analysis in China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016, 27(4): 485- 491.
2
徐宗学, 陈浩, 任梅芳, 等. 中国城市洪涝致灾机理与风险评估研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(5): 713- 724.
XU Z X, CHEN H, REN M F, et al. Progress on disaster mechanism and risk assessment of urban flood/waterlogging disasters in China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2020, 31(5): 713- 724.
3
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Reducing and managing risks of disasters in a changing climate[J]. WMO Bulletin, 2013, 62, 23- 31.
4
XU H S, XU K, LIAN J J, et al. Compound effects of rainfall and storm tides on coastal flooding risk[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, 33(7): 1249- 1261.
5
乔煜, 季小梅, 张蔚. 台风事件下的雨潮复合灾害风险研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(6): 1153- 1161.
QIAO Y, JI X M, ZHANG W. Compound flood risk of rainfall and storm surges during typhoon events[J]. Progress in Geography, 2023, 42(6): 1153- 1161.
6
王金虎, 张东晖, 王钰尧. 城市洪涝风险的组合赋重方法研究与应用: 以淮安市为例[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(8): 91- 104.
WANG J H, ZHANG D H, WANG Y Y. Research and application of combined empowerment method for urban flood risk: Take Huai'an City as an example[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2025, 56(8): 91- 104.
7
DEL-ROSAL-SALIDO J, BERMÚDEZ M, ORTEGA-SÁNCHEZ M, et al. A composite index framework for compound flood risk assessment[J]. Communications Earth & Environment, 2025, 6(1): 342.
8
RIDDER N N, PITMAN A J, WESTRA S, et al. Global hotspots for the occurrence of compound events[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 5956.
9
许瀚卿, 谭金凯, 李梦雅, 等. 中国沿海地区雨潮复合灾害联合分布及危险性研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(10): 1859- 1867.
XU H Q, TAN J K, LI M Y, et al. Joint distribution and risk of the compound disaster caused by rainfall and storm surge across Chinese coastal region[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(10): 1859- 1867.
10
SANTIAGO-COLLAZO F L, BILSKIE M V, HAGEN S C. A comprehensive review of compound inundation models in low-gradient coastal watersheds[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2019, 119, 166- 181.
11
许瀚卿. 沿海城市复合洪涝灾害评估与适应对策研究——以上海为例[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2022.
XU H Q. Compound flooding assessing and mitigating across coastal city-a case study in Shanghai[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2022. (in Chinese)
12
贺芳芳, 梁卓然, 董广涛. 上海地区洪涝致灾因子复合概率及未来变化分析[J]. 灾害学, 2021, 36(2): 9–13, 18.
HE F F, LIANG Z R, DONG G T. Analysis on the compound probability and future change of flood and waterlogging disaster factors in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2021, 36(2): 9–13, 18.
13
MOFTAKHARI H, SCHUBERT J E, AGHAKOUCHAK A, et al. Linking statistical and hydrodynamic modeling for compound flood hazard assessment in tidal channels and estuaries[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2019, 128, 28- 38.
14
JALILI PIRANI F, NAJAFI M R. Recent trends in individual and multivariate compound flood drivers in Canada's coasts[J]. Water Resources Research, 2020, 56(8): e2020WR027785.
15
郝思佳, 王文川, 马强, 等. 湖北省柳林镇"8·12"山洪过程模拟分析[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2024, 32(1): 133- 144.
HAO S J, WANG W C, MA Q, et al. Analysis on the disaster mechanism of "8·12" flash flood in Liulin River Basin, Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2024, 32(1): 133- 144.
16
黄晶, 钱雅如, 刘珍珍, 等. 不同遭遇情景下沿海城市复合洪涝灾害耦合风险分析——以深圳市为例[J]. 灾害学, 2025, 40(2): 7- 15.
HUANG J, QIAN Y R, LIU Z Z, et al. Coupling risk analysis of compound flooding in coastal cities under different encounter scenarios: A case study in Shenzhen City, China[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2025, 40(2): 7- 15.
17
WANG J, YI S, LI M Y, et al. Effects of sea level rise, land subsidence, bathymetric change and typhoon tracks on storm flooding in the coastal areas of Shanghai[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 621, 228- 234.
18
贺芳芳, 胡恒智, 董广涛, 等. 上海中心城区复合洪涝淹没模拟及未来重现预估[J]. 灾害学, 2020, 35(4): 93–98, 134.
HE F F, HU H Z, DONG G T, et al. Compound flooding simulation and prediction of future recurrence in Shanghai downtown area[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2020, 35(4): 93–98, 134.
19
ZHAO Z X, HUO A D, LIU Q, et al. Assessment of urban inundation and prediction of combined flood disaster in the Middle reaches of Yellow River Basin under extreme precipitation[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 640, 131707.
20
李子祥, 杨帆, 范子武, 等. 基于多暴雨情景的城市洪涝模拟与风险评估[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(10): 84- 96.
LI Z X, YANG F, FAN Z W, et al. Urban flood risk simulation and assessment in cities based on multi rainstorm scenarios[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2025, 56(10): 84- 96.
21
王浩, 赵铜铁钢, 田雨, 等. 考虑时间变化的洪涝灾害损失评估[J]. 水利学报, 2024, 55(2): 127- 136.
WANG H, ZHAO T T G, TIAN Y, et al. Incorporating temporal changes into flood loss assessments[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2024, 55(2): 127- 136.
22
于启蒙. 洪涝灾害风险下城市韧性评价研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2024.
YU Q M. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master in engineering[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2024. (in Chinese)
23
尹志国, 牛发阳, 汤辉. 基于博弈论和后悔理论的城市洪涝灾害韧性评价: 以西安市为例[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2024, 55(1): 74- 87.
YIN Z G, NIU F Y, TANG H. Resilience evaluation of urban flood disasters based on game theory and regret theory: A case study of Xi'an City[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2024, 55(1): 74- 87.
24
卢婉莹, 邵婷婷, 湛忠宇, 等. 基于复合因子的江苏省洪涝灾害风险分析[J]. 人民珠江, 2025, 46(3): 93- 99.
LU W Y, SHAO T T, ZHAN Z Y, et al. Analysis of flood disaster risks in Jiangsu province based on composite factors[J]. Pearl River, 2025, 46(3): 93- 99.
25
王同生, 周宏伟. 江南运河洪涝分析及治理对策探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2018(15): 16–18, 44.
WANG T S, ZHOU H W. Discussion on flood and waterlogging in the Jiangnan Canal and countermeasures[J]. China Water Resources, 2018(15): 16–18, 44.
26
吴志宜. 余姚市平原水网区洪涝模拟和预测的应用研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.
WU Z Y. Simulation and forecast of flood and waterlogging in plain water network of Yuvao City[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2017. (in Chinese)
27
莫婉媚, 方伟华. 浙江省余姚市室内财产洪水脆弱性曲线——基于台风菲特(201323)灾后问卷调查[J]. 热带地理, 2016, 36(4): 633–641, 657.
MO W M, FANG W H. Empirical vulnerability functions of building contents to flood based on post-typhoon (Fitow, 201323) questionnaire survey in Yuyao, Zhejiang[J]. Tropical Geography, 2016, 36(4): 633–641, 657.
28
季永兴. 黄浦江河口建闸研究40年回顾与展望[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2023, 43(5): 1–9, 87.
JI Y X. Review and prospect of research on sluice construction at Huangpu River Estuary in past 40 years[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2023, 43(5): 1–9, 87.
29
沙治银. 上海市防御202106号台风"烟花"的过程及思考[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(4): 52- 54.
SHA Z Y. The process and thinking of Shanghai's defense against Typhoon "In-Fa" No. 202106[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2022, 32(4): 52- 54.
30
KE Q, JONKMAN S N, VAN GELDER P H A J M, et al. Frequency analysis of storm-surge-induced flooding for the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2018, 6(2): 70.
31
李曦亭, 王磊之, 商守卫, 等. 流域、区域和城镇防洪工程工况与调度变化的洪涝互馈效应研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(2): 12- 18.
LI X T, WANG L Z, SHANG S W, et al. Research on mute feed effect of flood and waterlogging under change of working condition and dispatching of flood control project in Basin, sub-Basin and urban[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2024, 52(2): 12- 18.
32
吴娟, 林荷娟, 姜桂花, 等. 太湖流域超标特大洪水风险预警系统建设及应用[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 51(2): 164- 170.
WU J, LIN H J, JIANG G H, et al. Risk warning system construction and application under excessive extreme flood[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2023, 51(2): 164- 170.
33
程文辉, 王船海, 朱琰. 太湖流域模型[M]. 南京: 河海大学出版社, 2006.
CHENG W H, WANG C H, ZHU Y. Taihu Basin model[M]. Nanjing: Hohai University Press, 2006.
34
苏鑫, 王银堂, 邵薇薇, 等. 基于场次洪涝灾害的损失函数构建方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2024, 35(4): 580- 594.
SU X, WANG Y T, SHAO W W, et al. A method for constructing loss functions based on flood disaster events[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2024, 35(4): 580- 594.
35
FAROOQ U, TAHA BAKHEIT TAHA A, TIAN F C, et al. Flood modelling and risk analysis of Cinan Feizuo flood protection area, Huaihe River Basin[J]. Atmosphere, 2023, 14(4): 678.
36
王一新. 超大城市洪涝灾害情景评估及其在太湖流域应用研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2017.
WANG Y X. Research on flood disaster scenario evaluation of megacity and application in Taihu Basin[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2017. (in Chinese)
37
王营. 城乡洪灾淹没损失分析方法研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2012.
WANG Y. Research on flood loss analysis method of city and countryside[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
38
冯平, 崔广涛, 钟昀. 城市洪涝灾害直接经济损失的评估与预测[J]. 水利学报, 2001(8): 64- 68.
FENG P, CUI G T, ZHONG Y. On the eveluation and prediction of urban flood economic loss[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001(8): 64- 68.
39
韩平. 巢湖流域洪涝灾害损失评估研究[D]. 芜湖: 安徽师范大学, 2013.
HAN P. Study on the loss evaluation of flood disaster in Chaohu Lake Basin[D]. Wuhu: Anhui Normal University, 2013. (in Chinese)
40
李碧琦. 不同空间尺度下深圳市城市暴雨内涝灾害风险评估[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020.
LI B Q. Risk assessment of urban storm and waterlogging disasters at different spatial scales in Shenzhen[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020. (in Chinese)
41
高玉琴, 王辰, 谢梦瑶, 等. 洪涝灾害人口生命损失风险动态评估[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(5): 79- 88.
GAO Y Q, WANG C, XIE M Y, et al. Dynamic assessment of population life loss risk due to flood disasters[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2025, 41(5): 79- 88.
42
季永东, 吴钢, 张小稳, 等. 浅谈大包围建成后的无锡城市排涝[J]. 江苏水利, 2012(6): 14–15, 19.
JI Y D, WU G, ZHANG X W, et al. A brief discussion on urban drainage in Wuxi after the completion of the large enclosure project[J]. Jiangsu Water Resources, 2012(6): 14–15, 19.
43
刘成. 基于MIKE的水库溃坝洪水数值模拟研究[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
LIU C. Numerical simulation of reservoir dam breaking flood based on MIKE[D]. Xianyang: Northwest A&F University, 2019. (in Chinese)
44
LU W J, JIANG R C, LI J H, et al. Cascading floods in multi-level levee protection areas: Case studies of Dongting lake bursting[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2025, 60, 102495.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(8031 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉