A weighted regularization-based signal enhancement method for high-resolution SAS imaging of small underwater targets

Hao WANG, Haiqi LIANG, Yue SUN, Gongju GUO, Wei YAO, Weiqing MAO

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 2067-2077.

PDF(6881 KB)
PDF(6881 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 2067-2077. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.058
Computer Science and Technology

A weighted regularization-based signal enhancement method for high-resolution SAS imaging of small underwater targets

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) achieves high-resolution underwater imaging by synthesizing a large virtual aperture through platform motion. However, system parameters still constrain SAS imaging resolution, especially under low-frequency detection conditions. Additionally, echoes from small underwater targets are usually weak and can be easily contaminated by background noise and interference, which further reduces imaging quality and target detectability. To improve imaging resolution and enhance weak target echoes, this study proposes a weighted regularization-based signal enhancement SAS method, termed RSE-SAS. This method exploits the sparse spatial distribution characteristics of small underwater targets and aims to improve target focusing while suppressing background noise. Methods: A multisubarray SAS signal model was first established, and the imaging region was discretized into candidate scattering grids. Rather than directly fusing the signals collected by multiple subarrays, a mapping space for the imaging region was constructed using theoretical multichannel echoes from different candidate scattering positions. The received echoes were then mapped into this space. As a result, the imaging problem was transformed into the estimation of sparse projection coefficients. Based on the sparse distribution prior of small targets, an L1-norm regularization term was introduced to formulate the imaging problem as a sparse reconstruction problem. An iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm based on the majorization–minimization framework was employed for optimization. To alleviate amplitude underestimation caused by the fixed threshold in conventional sparse reconstruction, a weighted regularization strategy was further introduced. Target-related coefficients with relatively large amplitudes were assigned smaller penalty thresholds. In contrast, noise- and interference-related coefficients were subjected to stronger penalties. Therefore, target echoes were preserved and enhanced while background components were gradually suppressed during iteration. Point- and extended-target simulations were conducted. DAS, RD, conventional CS-SAS, and the proposed RSE-SAS were then compared in terms of imaging resolution, target detection probability, output signal-to-noise ratio, convergence performance, and computational efficiency. Results: The simulation results showed that RSE-SAS achieved better target focusing and background suppression than the comparison methods. For point-target imaging, DAS and RD exhibited relatively broad mainlobes, whereas CS-SAS improved target focusing while retaining noticeable background noise. RSE-SAS further suppressed the background components while maintaining a concentrated target response. Similar improvements were observed for extended-target imaging. Quantitative analysis based on 100 Monte Carlo trials showed that the azimuth and range −3 dB mainlobe widths of RSE-SAS were 0.29 and 0.81 m, respectively, compared with 1.46 and 1.82 m for DAS. The target detection probability increases from 0.77 for DAS to 0.98 for RSE-SAS, while the output signal-to-noise ratio increased from 12.3 to 31.6 dB. Compared with CS-SAS, RSE-SAS reduced the azimuth and range mainlobe widths by approximately 35.2% and 12.9%, respectively. It also increased the detection probability by 0.05 and improved the output signal-to-noise ratio by 3.1 dB. Furthermore, the target-related coefficients stabilized after approximately 10 iterations. With the same data scale and computational platform, the average single-frame imaging time for RSE-SAS was 52 ms, indicating that weighted regularization incurred limited additional computational cost. Conclusions: The proposed RSE-SAS method combines the sparse spatial prior of small underwater targets with a weighted regularization strategy. By applying different penalty strengths to target- and noise-related coefficients, this method alleviates amplitude underestimation in conventional sparse reconstruction and realizes simultaneous target echo enhancement and background suppression. The results demonstrate that RSE-SAS provides improved imaging resolution, target detection performance, noise robustness, and focusing capability while maintaining acceptable convergence and computational efficiency. The proposed method therefore has potential for high-resolution imaging of small underwater targets. Future work will focus on validation using measured SAS data and further evaluation under more complex underwater propagation conditions.

Key words

synthetic aperture sonar / compressed sensing / weighted regularization / weak target detection / high-resolution imaging

Cite this article

Download Citations
Hao WANG , Haiqi LIANG , Yue SUN , et al . A weighted regularization-based signal enhancement method for high-resolution SAS imaging of small underwater targets[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(10): 2067-2077 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.27.058

References

1
李光廷, 谭小敏, 李财品, 等. 陆地探测四号01星合成孔径雷达载荷设计与实现[J]. 中国空间科学技术(中英文), 2025, 45(4): 123- 130.
LI G T , TAN X M , LI C P , et al. The load design and implementation of LT-4 space-borne SAR[J]. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2025, 45(4): 123- 130.
2
许志勇, 田巳睿, 许克勤, 等. 基于逆合成孔径雷达的旋翼目标微动参数分层式估计方法研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2025, 36(7): 57- 66.
XU Z Y , TIAN S R , XU K Q , et al. Multi-stage parameter estimation method for the micro-Doppler of rotor targets using ISAR[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2025, 36(7): 57- 66.
3
张熙, 于君明, 刘杰, 等. 基于SSA算法的无人机载穿墙SAR空变运动误差补偿方法[J]. 雷达学报(中英文), 2026, 15(1): 261- 275.
ZHANG X , YU J M , LIU J , et al. Space-varying motion error compensation for UAV-mounted through-the-wall SAR based on SSA algorithm[J]. Journal of Radars, 2026, 15(1): 261- 275.
4
纪小雪, 曾赛, 杜选民, 等. 采用粒子群优化的多基线圆周合成孔径声呐三维成像方法[J]. 声学学报, 2025, 50(5): 1206- 1217.
JI X X , ZENG S , DU X M , et al. Three-dimensional imaging method for multi-baseline circular synthetic aperture sonar based on particle swarm optimization[J]. Acta Acustica, 2025, 50(5): 1206- 1217.
5
雷亮, 钟何平. 基于背景估计的合成孔径声呐图像自动均衡方法[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2024, 44(10): 37- 42.
LEI L , ZHONG H P . Automatic equalization method for synthetic aperture sonar image based on background estimation[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2024, 44(10): 37- 42.
6
雷亮, 钟何平, 李涵, 等. 基于Retinex变分分解的合成孔径声呐图像增强方法[J]. 声学技术, 2025, 44(3): 438- 444.
LEI L , ZHONG H P , LI H , et al. Synthetic aperture image enhancement method based on Retinex variational decomposition[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2025, 44(3): 438- 444.
7
田振, 张森, 庞立伟, 等. 多子阵SAS方位空变运动补偿子孔径算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(10): 3293- 3302.
TIAN Z , ZHANG S , PANG L W , et al. Sub-aperture algorithm for multiple-subarry SAS azimuth-variant motion compensation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(10): 3293- 3302.
8
张学波, 王砚梅, 杨家崇, 等. 多子阵合成孔径声纳距离-多普勒成像算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(5): 2104- 2110.
ZHANG X B , WANG Y M , YANG J C , et al. Range-Doppler imaging algorithm for multireceiver synthetic aperture sonar[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(5): 2104- 2110.
9
田振, 钟何平, 唐劲松. 多子阵合成孔径声呐6阶方位空变运动补偿快速算法[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2024, 45(11): 2150- 2159.
TIAN Z , ZHONG H P , TANG J S . A fast algorithm based on a sixth-order azimuth variance model for multi-receiver synthetic aperture sonar motion compensation[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2024, 45(11): 2150- 2159.
10
WALKER J L . Range-Doppler imaging of rotating objects[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1980, AES-16(1): 23- 52.
11
WINKLER V. Range Doppler detection for automotive FMCW radars[C]//Proceedings of the 2007 European Microwave Conference. Munich: IEEE, 2007: 1445–1448.
12
RANEY R K , RUNGE H , BAMLER R , et al. Precision SAR processing using chirp scaling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(4): 786- 799.
13
ZHANG W R , JI Y C , SHAO W Y , et al. A fast 3-D chirp scaling imaging technique for millimeter-wave near-field imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2023, 71(2): 827- 841.
14
UEDA T , OHNO Y , YAMAMOTO K , et al. Compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for women's pelvic MRI denoising: Utility for improving image quality and examination time in routine clinical practice[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2021, 134, 109430.
15
XIAO Z Y , CAO S Q , ZHU L P , et al. Channel estimation for movable antenna communication systems: A framework based on compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2024, 23(9): 11814- 11830.
16
MOU J , ZHANG Z Y , BANERJEE S , et al. Combining semi-tensor product compressed sensing and session keys for low-cost encryption of batch information in WBANs[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(20): 33565- 33576.
17
XIE Z H , LIU L J , CHEN Z H . Image compressed sensing: From deep learning to adaptive learning[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2024, 293, 111659.
18
刘勇, 张静, 杨春夏. 基于交替方向乘子法的XL-MIMO混合场稀疏信道估计[J]. 无线电通信技术, 2025, 51(1): 12- 19.
LIU Y , ZHANG J , YANG C X . XL-MIMO hybrid field sparse channel estimation based on alternating direction method of multiplier[J]. Radio Communications Technology, 2025, 51(1): 12- 19.
19
YU Y S , FENG T , QIU H X , et al. Simultaneous photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging: A review[J]. Ultrasonics, 2024, 139, 107277.
20
BI Y , JIANG Z L , DUELMER F , et al. Machine learning in robotic ultrasound imaging: Challenges and perspectives[J]. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, 2024, 7, 335- 357.
21
ZHU Z Q , ZHANG Z M , QI G Q , et al. A dual-branch network for ultrasound image segmentation[J]. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2025, 103, 107368.
22
兰旭辉, 杨成竹, 徐立军. 离网格压缩匹配场处理[J]. 信号处理, 2023, 39(10): 1784- 1792.
LAN X H , YANG C Z , XU L J . Off-grid compressive matched field processing[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2023, 39(10): 1784- 1792.
23
樊新成, 张喜来, 林庆润, 等. 融合合成孔径雷达和光学影像的土地覆被分类方法研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2024(S2): 167- 174.
FAN X C , ZHANG X L , LIN Q R , et al. Research on land cover classification method combining synthetic aperture radar and optical imagery[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2024(S2): 167- 174.
24
王冬萍, 梁钊雄, 麦倩文, 等. 基于合成孔径雷达干涉测量的佛山市地铁沿线地面沉降监测[J]. 测绘通报, 2024(S1): 274- 278.
WANG D P , LIANG Z X , MAI Q W , et al. Ground subsidence monitoring along the Foshan metro lines using on synthetic aperture radar interferometry[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2024(S1): 274- 278.
25
YANG P X . An imaging algorithm for high-resolution imaging sonar system[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83(11): 31957- 31973.
26
ZHANG X B , YANG P X , WANG Y M , et al. LBF-based CS algorithm for multireceiver SAS[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2024, 21, 1502505.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(6881 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉