PDF(9491 KB)
Pyrolysis and combustion behavior of rigid polyurethane foam modified via melamine/silk fibroin co-blending
Honghao SHENG, Changpeng SONG, Wenbo XU, Cong LI, Li HE, Jian LI
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (10) : 1991-2003.
PDF(9491 KB)
PDF(9491 KB)
Pyrolysis and combustion behavior of rigid polyurethane foam modified via melamine/silk fibroin co-blending
Objective: Rigid polyurethane foam (RPUF) is widely used in building insulation and other applications, yet its inherent flammability and substantial release of toxic smoke during combustion severely limit its safe use across various scenarios. Conventional flame-retardant strategies often cause environmental pollution and impair mechanical properties, whereas bio-based flame retardants alone exhibit limited effectiveness. Herein, based on the intumescent flame-retardant theory, a synergistic flame-retardant system was constructed using melamine (MEL) as the gas source and silk fibroin (SF) as the charring agent. This study systematically examines the effects of different MEL/SF mass ratios on the pyrolysis, combustion, and smoke-toxicity characteristics, and elucidates the underlying synergistic mechanism to provide a design reference for developing high-efficiency, low-toxicity bio-based flame-retardant RPUF. Methods: MEL/SF/RPUF composites with MEL/SF mass ratios of 0, 5∶2, 5∶1, 15∶2, and 10∶1 were fabricated via a one-step foaming method at a total additive loading of 10 wt%. Thermogravimetric analysis was used to examine the thermal decomposition behavior. Apparent activation energies were calculated via the Friedman differential and Starink integral methods, and the Malek method was applied to identify the most probable reaction mechanisms. Cone calorimetry was conducted to record the heat release rate, smoke production, and CO yield, from which the fire growth index and toxicity potential index were derived to quantify fire hazards. The residual chars were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy to determine their micromorphology, elemental composition, and graphitization degree. Thermogravimetry–infrared spectrometry was additionally employed to identify the gaseous pyrolysis products. Results: The pyrolysis process of MEL/SF/RPUF composites can be divided into three stages. Increasing MEL content lowered the onset decomposition temperature, and the apparent activation energy followed a three-stage trend of "rising–fluctuating–high-level stabilization." The MEL/SF/RPUF-4 sample (MEL/SF = 15∶2) consistently showed the highest average activation energies across all stages, with final-stage values reaching 147.59 kJ·mol−1 (Friedman method) and 140.84 kJ·mol−1 (Starink method), indicating superior thermal stability. As MEL content increased, the reaction mechanism in the first half of pyrolysis gradually transitioned from the F2 model to the A2 model, whereas the second half deviated from all theoretical models, exhibiting complex mixed-control kinetics. At an MEL/SF ratio of 15∶2, the composite achieved the lowest mass loss rate and the highest residual mass (21.58%), which was 1.5 times that of the SF-only modified group. The peak heat release rate decreased by 23.36%, the peak smoke release rate dropped by 63.69%, and both the fire growth index and the toxicity potential index reached their minimum values. The char layer at this ratio was the most compact, smooth, and highly graphitized, with a carbon content of 75.9% and nitrogen retention of 11.3%. The early decomposition of MEL released NH3, which diluted the gas phase while promoting char formation in SF, demonstrating a pronounced gas–solid synergistic flame-retardant mechanism. Conclusions: The MEL/SF system exhibits a pronounced gas–solid synergistic flame-retardant mechanism, with the MEL/SF ratio of 15∶2 identified as the optimal formulation. The composite at this ratio achieves the best overall performance in thermal stability, heat suppression, smoke reduction, and toxicity mitigation, offering a design reference for developing high-performance, environmentally friendly bio-based flame-retardant RPUF.
rigid polyurethane foam / melamine / silk fibroin / pyrolysis characteristics / combustion characteristics
| 1 |
王在花, 杨英, 孙钰琳. 聚氨酯硬泡在中国化学建材领域的发展现状及前景分析[J]. 现代化工, 2024, 44(8): 1–6, 11.
|
| 2 |
王莫涵, 吴宁晶, 王菲, 等. 聚氨酯硬质泡沫材料的阻燃改性进展[J]. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2024, 40(9): 182- 190.
|
| 3 |
刘小雅, 杨伏生. 阻燃聚合物复合材料研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(23): 24110008.
|
| 4 |
向军淮, 安佳琪, 胡梦婷, 等. 多功能特性的聚氨酯泡沫材料研究进展[J]. 工程塑料应用, 2025, 53(12): 234- 240.
|
| 5 |
王正洲, 孙皓宇, 徐小燕. 三聚氰胺苯基磷酸盐的合成及在硬质聚氨酯泡沫中的应用[J]. 材料导报, 2017, 31(14): 4- 10.
|
| 6 |
赵小龙, 周海涛, 周斯琛, 等. 膨胀阻燃热塑性聚氨酯复合材料的制备与性能[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(6): 1074- 1080.
|
| 7 |
徐建林, 王涛, 康成虎, 等. 阻燃剂研究与应用进展及问题思考[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(10): 20110227.
|
| 8 |
周启星, 王辉, 欧阳少虎. 基于碳中和新技术的美丽中国建设[J]. 中国环境科学, 2024, 44(4): 1777- 1787.
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
邓诗碧, 赵海波. "双碳"目标下的潜在新型建筑保温材料——全生物质阻燃气凝胶[J]. 科学通报, 2022, 67(21): 2444- 2446.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
罗力源, 王玉栋, 姬长春. 生物质阻燃剂的研究进展[J]. 工程塑料应用, 2025, 53(9): 216- 226.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
张佳燕, 刘博文, 王玉忠, 等. 聚氨酯泡沫无卤阻燃研究进展[J]. 高分子学报, 2022, 53(7): 842- 855.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
丁延伟, 郑康, 钱义祥. 热分析实验方案设计与曲线解析概论[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2020.
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
张紫涛, 向宇姝, 张晋川, 等. APBA/MEL协效阻燃TPEE性能及阻燃机理[J]. 工程塑料应用, 2026, 54(2): 174- 183.
|
| 25 |
段君瑞, 尹仕成, 吴文州, 等. 加热卷烟烟粉生物质的热解特性及动力学研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 66(1): 1- 9.
|
| 26 |
胡荣祖, 高胜利, 赵凤起, 等. 热分析动力学[M]. 2版 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
|
| 27 |
杨子建, 方洋, 赵海涵, 等. 蒙脱土对交联成炭阻燃环氧树脂的协同阻燃与抑烟作用[J]. 塑料科技, 2026, 54(3): 31- 37.
|
| 28 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |