PDF(13832 KB)
Experimental study on self-protected underwater concrete filling rockfill under static and dynamic water conditions
Wei WANG, Zhangruilong YU, Tao LI, Guanming MOU, Xin WANG, Duruo HUANG
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (4) : 712-721.
PDF(13832 KB)
PDF(13832 KB)
Experimental study on self-protected underwater concrete filling rockfill under static and dynamic water conditions
Objective: Self-protected underwater concrete (SPUC), characterized by strong anti-washout performance and adaptability to underwater construction, offers a promising solution for scour protection of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations. Conventional riprap protection systems rely on loose granular materials and are therefore susceptible to stone displacement, progressive scour, and structural instability under long-term wave-current interactions, leading to limited durability and high maintenance costs. Cementing riprap using underwater concrete has been proposed to improve the integrity and stability of the protection layer; however, the formation mechanisms of cemented rockfill under underwater conditions remain insufficiently understood. In particular, the effects of key construction and material parameters on the filling behavior and final morphology of cemented rockfill have not been systematically quantified. Methods: Systematic physical model experiments were conducted to investigate the free filling and cementation behavior of SPUC in rockfill under unconfined conditions. Rockfill with particle sizes of 10—15 cm, representative of offshore wind engineering practice, was used. Three key parameters-pouring height, concrete slump-flow diameter, and aggregate particle size-were varied to examine their effects on cemented rockfill morphology and cementation characteristics under static water conditions. Nine static-water test cases were designed. After curing, uncemented surrounding stones were removed to expose the cemented rockfill bodies. A layered measurement method based on equivalent diameters was applied to quantitatively characterize the spatial distribution, slope angle, and fully cemented height. In addition, large-scale flume experiments were performed to assess SPUC feasibility under dynamic water conditions representative of offshore construction environments. Results: Pouring height was identified as a critical construction parameter controlling concrete discharge behavior and penetration depth. At a pouring height of 15 cm, outlet blockage occurred, causing concrete accumulation near the rockfill surface and resulting in hourglass-shaped or inverted conical cemented structures. When the pouring height was increased to 25 cm or greater, concrete flowed freely into rockfill pores, forming typical pyramidal cemented bodies with wider bases. Increasing pouring height enhanced shear-induced mixing between concrete and water, increasing the apparent water-cement ratio and reducing viscosity and yield stress, thereby improving penetration capacity. The slump-flow diameter governed cemented rockfill morphology through the competition between surface spreading and downward penetration. A slump-flow diameter of approximately 500 mm achieved an optimal balance between low yield stress and moderate plastic viscosity, promoting deeper penetration and producing the largest cemented base area. In contrast, excessively large or small slump-flow diameters intensified surface spreading and inhibited penetration, resulting in steeper cemented slopes. Aggregate particle size controlled the filling mechanism through a particle-to-throat size ratio effect. Concrete with smaller aggregates (5—10 mm) readily passed through rockfill pore channels and achieved integral cementation, whereas larger aggregates (10—20 mm) induced pronounced particle blocking, leading to surface retention and inverted conical cemented structures. Dynamic water experiments demonstrated that SPUC application remains feasible at a flow velocity of approximately 0.63 m/s. Although flowing water enhanced surface spreading and reduced penetration depth relative to static conditions, stable cemented rockfill structures were still achieved through appropriate aggregate selection and continuous anti-washout admixture supply. Conclusions: This study advances the mechanistic understanding of cemented rockfill formation by quantitatively elucidating penetration-diffusion competition and particle exclusion thresholds. Pouring height, slump-flow diameter, and aggregate size were identified as key design parameters governing SPUC performance. Large-scale flume experiments confirmed the feasibility of SPUC under representative offshore flow conditions. The results provide practical guidance for material design, construction parameter optimization, and offshore engineering applications.
offshore wind power / self-protected underwater concrete / underwater cemented rockfill
| 1 |
程建荣, 谢素美, 曹艳, 等. 中国海上风电发展现状及对策建议研究[J]. 科技导报, 2025, 43 (3): 115- 128.
|
| 2 |
隋倜倜, 张弛, 高玉峰, 等. 波浪作用下单桩基础周围海床液化机制研究[J]. 海洋工程, 2018, 36 (4): 88- 96.
|
| 3 |
宫恩宇, 陈松贵, 何茜, 等. 波浪条件下单桩周围平衡冲刷深度的比尺效应[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 65 (8): 1561- 1568.
|
| 4 |
焦钰祺, 乔东生, 唐国强, 等. 考虑冲刷影响的海上风电单桩基础动力响应分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 65 (8): 1455- 1464.
|
| 5 |
张融圣, 刘寒秋, 朱嵘华, 等. 考虑局部冲刷的海上风电单桩基础侧向承载特性[J]. 可再生能源, 2024, 42 (8): 1061- 1067.
|
| 6 |
王亚康. 海上风电单桩基础采用抛石修复冲刷坑的施工实践[J]. 船舶工程, 2021, 43 (S1): 66- 70.
|
| 7 |
齐梅兰, 周马生, 汤改春. 群桩冲刷及抛石级配与厚度对防护效果的影响[J]. 水利学报, 2021, 52 (6): 723- 730.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
王百智, 王卫, 闫俊义, 等. 海上风电单桩部分胶结抛石体防冲刷措施模型试验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44 (6): 383- 389.
|
| 13 |
王卫, 王百智, 陈松贵, 等. 海上风电单桩胶结抛石体防冲刷措施模型试验研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62 (9): 1401- 1407.
|
| 14 |
谢越韬. 自密实混凝土填充性能及堆石混凝土界面微观特性研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014.
XIE Y T. Experimental study on the filling capacity of SCC and the microscopic properties of the interfaces in RFC[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2014. (in Chinese)
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
王易阳, 自密实材料在堆石体中流动填充效果评价方法研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2019.
WANG Y Y. Study on evaluating filling performance of self-compacting material in rockfill body[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2019. (in Chinese)
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |