A method for calculating the system matrix of large animal SPECT with sparse measurement data

Zhengyang ZHAO, Hui LIU, Hongyang ZHANG, Zhenlei LYU, Shi WANG, Zhaoxia WU, Yaqiang LIU

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8) : 1726-1736.

PDF(8754 KB)
PDF(8754 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8) : 1726-1736. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.28.017
Biomedical Engineering

A method for calculating the system matrix of large animal SPECT with sparse measurement data

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Large-animal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) systems are crucial for preclinical cardiovascular research. An accurate system matrix (or system response matrix) is essential for high-quality iterative image reconstruction. However, directly measuring the system matrix on large-animal SPECT systems is often prohibitively time-consuming due to the extensive field of view and high spatial resolution needs. To address the lengthy measurement process for the system matrix in large-animal SPECT, this work proposes and validates a calculation method based on two-dimensional (2D) Gaussian fitting. This method leverages the inherent continuity of the projection probability density function (PPDF) in the image domain. Instead of measuring the system response for each voxel, the proposed approach demonstrates that an accurate system matrix can be built by acquiring only sparse point-source measurement data. Using 2D Gaussian fitting, the method effectively models the system's spatial response and connects sparse data points to synthesize the full matrix. Methods: The complete dataset of point-source projections for 37 210 voxels was collected on the large-animal SPECT system, with a total acquisition time of 124 h. Down-sampled subsets at ratios of 1/4 and 1/9 were created from the full dataset to simulate accelerated protocols and to thoroughly evaluate the feasibility and robustness of the proposed method. The accuracy of the fitted PPDFs was quantitatively assessed against the fully measured ground truth using two metrics: the relative root mean square error (RRMSE) and the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Additionally, to evaluate the reconstruction performance of the system matrix derived from the fitted PPDFs both qualitatively and quantitatively, 3.5 and 4 mm hot-rod phantom images were reconstructed. The performance of the proposed method was compared with several traditional approaches, including fully sampled direct measurement, barycentric Lagrange interpolation, and cubic spline interpolation. Results: Quantitative analyses showed exceptional fidelity in the estimated system matrices. The matrix computed under the 1/4 sparse sampling condition achieved an RRMSE of 0.023 ± 0.068 and an SSIM of 0.997 ± 0.003. Even with the more aggressive 1/9 sparse sampling, the method produced an RRMSE of 0.035 ± 0.095 and an SSIM of 0.996 ± 0.006. The system matrix generated with this method successfully resolved 3.5-mm hot rods. Under the 1/4 sparse sampling, the reconstructed images of 3.5 and 4 mm rods had RRMSE values of 0.795 and 0.654 against the ground truth, and SSIM values of 0.981 and 0.988. For the same sampling, the reconstructed images showed RRMSE values of 1.042 and 0.797, with SSIM values of 0.971 and 0.981. These imaging results were visually and quantitatively superior to those obtained with other methods. Importantly, the computational time remained efficient, with calculations taking only 1.9 hours and 1.8 hours for the 1/4 and 1/9 sparse datasets, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed 2D Gaussian fitting approach effectively overcomes the traditional limitations in generating system matrices for large-animal SPECT systems. It significantly reduces measurement time and computational costs without sacrificing tomographic image quality. This method presents a practical and efficient solution for acquiring precise system matrices in large-animal SPECT imaging.

Key words

large animal SPECT system / system matrix / image reconstruction / Gaussian function fitting

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhengyang ZHAO , Hui LIU , Hongyang ZHANG , et al . A method for calculating the system matrix of large animal SPECT with sparse measurement data[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(8): 1726-1736 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.28.017

References

1
KUHL D E. Section scanning for image separation[M]. Progress in Medical Radioisotope Scanning USAEC TID, 1963.
2
MARIANI G, BRUSELLI L, KUWERT T, et al. A review on the clinical uses of SPECT/CT[J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2010, 37(10): 1959- 1985.
3
杨宏博, 廖伟, 史新辉, 等. 血塞通注射液重复肌肉注射给药4周对成年清醒雄性猴ECG Ⅱ及血压的影响[C]//第四届(2023年)中国安全药理学学术年会论文集. 大同, 中国: 中国药理学会安全药理学专业委员会, 2023: 133–134.
YANG H B, LIAO W, SHI X H, et al. Effects of four-week repeated intramuscular administration of Xuesaitong Injection on ECG Ⅱ and Blood Pressure in Adult Conscious Male Monkeys [C]//Proceedings of the 4th (2023) Annual Meeting of China Safety Pharmacological Society. Datong, China: Safety Pharmacology Professional Committee of the Chinese Pharmacological Society, 2023: 133–134. (in Chinese)
4
TSANG H G, RASHDAN N A, WHITELAW C B A, et al. Large animal models of cardiovascular disease[J]. Cell Biochemistry & Function, 2016, 34(3): 113- 132.
5
MUNFORD R S. Murine responses to endotoxin: another dirty little secret?[J]. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010, 201(2): 175- 177.
6
RAHMAN A, LI Y H, CHAN T K, et al. Large animal models of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury: Where are we now?[J]. Zoological Research, 2023, 44(3): 591- 603.
7
张旨晗, 刘辉, 吕振雷, 等. 大动物SPECT系统设计与数值模拟[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(12): 1875- 1883.
ZHANG Z H, LIU H, Z L, et al. Design and numerical simulations of a large animal SPECT system[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(12): 1875- 1883.
8
张旨晗. 大动物SPECT系统设计与初步验证[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2024.
ZHANG Z H. Design and preliminary verification of a large animal SPECT system[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2024. (in Chinese)
9
DEMPSTER A P, LAIRD N M, RUBIN D B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 1977, 39(1): 1- 22.
10
CHAN C, DEY J, GROBSHTEIN Y, et al. The impact of system matrix dimension on small FOV SPECT reconstruction with truncated projections[J]. Medical Physics, 2016, 43(1): 213- 224.
11
ZENG G L. Medical image reconstruction[M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.
12
BORYS D, SZCZUCKA-BORYS K, GORCZEWSKI K. System matrix computation for iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT based on direct measurements[J]. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 2011, 21(1): 193- 202.
13
FENG Y M, KUPINSKI M A, OTTENSMEYER M P, et al. Analytical methods for system matrix calculation and spatial resolution evaluation of DC-SPECT system[J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2025, 70(14): 145031.
14
戴甜甜, 刘亚强, 马天予, 等. 高分辨率小动物SPECT成像系统的设计与性能评估[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2011, 45(3): 369- 373.
DAI T T, LIU Y Q, MA T Y, et al. Design and performance evaluation of high-resolution small animal SPECT system[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2011, 45(3): 369- 373.
15
MA T Y, WEI Q Y, LYU Z L, et al. Self-collimating SPECT with multi-layer interspaced mosaic detectors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2021, 40(8): 2152- 2169.
16
BERRUT J P, TREFETHEN L N. Barycentric Lagrange interpolation[J]. SIAM Review, 2004, 46(3): 501- 517.
17
MCKINLEY S, LEVINE M. Cubic spline interpolation[M]. Eureka: College of the Redwoods, 1998.
18
WEI Q Y, LYU Z L, JIANG N M, et al. Study of 99mTc absorption on micro-sized ion exchange resins to achieve high activity for SPECT[J]. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 2022, 186, 110256.
19
DAI T T, WEI Q Y, QIU Y H, et al. High-activity 99Mo microresin fabrication for submillimeter SPECT system matrix acquisition[J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2026, 71(4): 045013.
20
WANG Z, BOVIK A C, SHEIKH H R, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600- 612.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(8754 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/