A particle-system-based simulation method for robot spray coating thickness

Xinyue GONG, Guolei WANG

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8) : 1644-1654.

PDF(5084 KB)
PDF(5084 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8) : 1644-1654. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.28.019
Mechanical Engineering

A particle-system-based simulation method for robot spray coating thickness

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Coating thickness uniformity is a key indicator of spray quality, and its improvement depends on process parameter optimization. Therefore, a simulation method combining computational efficiency with physical interpretability is required to predict coating thickness distribution under different process parameters. Existing methods primarily include physics- and model-based simulations. The former offers high physical interpretability but suffers from high computational cost and long solution times, while the latter is efficient but relies heavily on fitted experimental data and often lacks robustness when spray conditions or workpiece geometry change. To address these limitations, this study proposes a particle system-based simulation method for robot spray coating thickness prediction and trajectory optimization. Methods: A particle system-based simulation framework for robot spray coating thickness is established in Unity. By retaining essential particle attributes, such as mass, velocity, and acceleration, and simplifying complex multiphysics processes such as atomization, airflow coupling, droplet breakup, and splash, the spray process is efficiently modeled. The workpiece surface is discretized into grid cells, and coating thickness is obtained by accumulating particle impacts on each grid element. For particle emission modeling, the droplet size is characterized by the volume median diameter, and the particle emission rate is determined based on the paint flow rate. A probability density approximation method for the initial particle emission velocity direction is established based on rejection sampling, enabling the simulation to be theoretically applicable to arbitrary distribution models. Furthermore, an elliptical double-beta distribution is adopted to describe the initial particle emission velocity direction. For spray gun motion modeling, trajectory interpolation is employed, with trapezoidal velocity interpolation used for position and spherical linear interpolation used for orientation to ensure smooth and continuous motion. In addition, a transfer efficiency parameter is introduced to represent the effective deposition ratio after the combined effects of diffusion, evaporation, and splash, such that the dissipative effects in the particle flight and deposition processes can be considered in a simplified manner. Coating thickness is then calculated based on the particle volume and material properties. Furthermore, a joint simulation and optimization framework is constructed by integrating Unity and Python through ML-Agents, enabling interaction between the simulation environment and external optimization algorithms. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated in terms of computational efficiency and prediction accuracy under typical spraying conditions. Results: The experimental results are as follows: 1) The computational efficiency of the proposed framework is mainly affected by the particle emission rate and grid density. Under appropriate parameter settings, the computation time of a single simulation ranges from several seconds to tens of seconds, which is significantly shorter than the tens of hours required by traditional physics-based simulation methods; 2) In planar specimen validation, the relative error between simulated and measured coating thickness is within 12%, indicating that the proposed method achieves acceptable prediction accuracy for practical applications. Conclusions: By combining simplified physical modeling with an efficient particle system framework, this study efficiently predicts coating thickness distribution under different process parameters while balancing computational efficiency and physical interpretability. The proposed method maintains an acceptable prediction accuracy and can provide effective support for spray process parameter optimization.

Key words

air-spray coating / thickness simulation / rejection sampling / particle system / trajectory optimization

Cite this article

Download Citations
Xinyue GONG , Guolei WANG. A particle-system-based simulation method for robot spray coating thickness[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(8): 1644-1654 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.28.019

References

1
姜帅, 宋立滨, 陈晓永, 等. 基于视觉识别的民机零件专用自动喷涂系统[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(10): 1650- 1657.
JIANG S, SONG L B, CHEN X Y, et al. Special automatic spraying system for civil aircraft parts based on visual recognition[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63(10): 1650- 1657.
2
HAN D Q, ZENG Y, GU J T, et al. Investigation of the film formation in dynamic air spray painting[J]. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 2024, 20(10): 2393- 2415.
3
LIU J X, ZENG Y, ZHAO X Y, et al. Influence of spray gun position and orientation on liquid film development along a cylindrical surface[J]. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 2023, 19(10): 2499- 2518.
4
CHEN H P, XI N, SHENG W H, et al. General framework of optimal tool trajectory planning for free-form surfaces in surface manufacturing[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2005, 127(1): 49- 59.
5
SAHIR ARIKAN M A, BALKAN T. Process modeling, simulation, and paint thickness measurement for robotic spray painting[J]. Journal of Robotic Systems, 2000, 17(9): 479- 494.
6
冯川, 孙增圻. 机器人喷涂过程中的喷炬建模及仿真研究[J]. 机器人, 2003, 25(4): 353- 358.
FENG C, SUN Z Q. Models of spray gun and simulation in robotics spray painting[J]. Robot, 2003, 25(4): 353- 358.
7
张永贵, 黄玉美, 高峰, 等. 喷漆机器人空气喷枪的新模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2006, 42(11): 226- 233.
ZHANG Y G, HUANG Y M, GAO F, et al. New model for air spray gun of robotic spray-painting[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2006, 42(11): 226- 233.
8
LEITZ K H, O'SULLIVAN M, PLANKENSTEINER A, et al. CFDEM modelling of particle heating and acceleration in cold spraying[J]. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2018, 73, 192- 198.
9
LI X, CHEN X, HONG N C, et al. A CFD-DEM simulation of droplets in an airless spray coating process of a square duct[J]. Coatings, 2024, 14(3): 282.
10
CHEN S M, ZHANG Y, WU Z J, et al. Near-nozzle atomization characteristics in air-assisted spraying: Integrated VOF-DPM modeling and experimental validation[J]. Coatings, 2025, 15(8): 939.
11
YE Q, TIEDJE O, SHEN B, et al. Impact of viscous droplets on dry and wet substrates for spray painting processes[J]. Fluids, 2025, 10(5): 131.
12
TAHIR M, SIDAWI K, DI PALMA P A, et al. Transfer efficiency and area coverage of spray droplets impacting planar surfaces[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2025, 66(8): 162.
13
WASEEM M, HONG M. Moving towards large-scale particle based fluid simulation in Unity 3D[J]. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(17): 9706.
14
PARK S, PARK K. Principles and droplet size distributions of various spraying methods: A review[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2022, 36(8): 4033- 4041.
15
MARTINO L, LUENGO D, MÍGUEZ J. Independent random sampling methods[M]. Cham: Springer, 2018.
16
TAN Y J, WANG Z, ZHANG Z C, et al. Optimization of elliptical double-beta spray gun model under the control of fan air pressure[J]. Coatings, 2025, 15(5): 581.
17
MURUGAN R, BALUSAMY S, KOLHE P. Experimental study of liquid spray mode of twin fluid atomizer using optical diagnostic tool[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2021, 106(1): 261- 289.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(5084 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/