Vibration reduction and energy dissipation technology for control rod hydraulic drive system circuits

Wanchun WU, Benke QIN, Yun Li, Hanliang BO

Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8) : 1694-1703.

PDF(5534 KB)
PDF(5534 KB)
Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology) ›› 2026, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (8) : 1694-1703. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.28.024
Nuclear Energy and New Energy

Vibration reduction and energy dissipation technology for control rod hydraulic drive system circuits

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: The control rod hydraulic drive system (CRHDS) is an innovative internal control rod drive technology developed by Tsinghua University for the low-temperature nuclear heating reactor NHR200-Ⅱ, in which the drive pump serves as the critical hydraulic power equipment. Its operational reliability is directly linked to reactor safety. However, the bypass circuit of the drive pump suffers from significant vibration and noise induced by the throttling of the control valve. Consequently, developing a high-efficiency multi-stage bypass energy dissipation and vibration reduction component is essential. This study aims to reduce pipeline vibration and enhance the operational reliability and safety of the CRHDS bypass loop through an optimization approach, thereby providing robust design criteria and theoretical guidance for bypass energy dissipation equipment. Methods: This study employed an integrated approach combining fluid-structure interaction (FSI) experiments, machine learning, multi-objective evolutionary optimization, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. First, an FSI experimental loop simulating the CRHDS bypass was constructed, comprising a water tank, a centrifugal pump, adjustable flow resistance components, and pipe supports. Three series-connected ball valves were used to simulate a multi-stage flow resistance component, with system parameters recorded at a sampling frequency of 4 000 Hz using four fast-response pressure sensors, a three-axis pipe accelerometer, and an ultrasonic flow meter. A 125-group full-factorial FSI experiment was conducted using characteristic valve closing angles of 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°. Second, a physics-informed neural network (PINN) surrogate model, evaluated via 5-fold cross-validation, was developed to predict the total pressure drop and synthetic vibration acceleration using the three-stage resistance coefficients. To improve prediction accuracy, a physical constraint stipulating that the total pressure drop increases monotonically with the sum of the resistance coefficients was integrated into the network's loss function. Third, the PINN surrogate was coupled with the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm Ⅱ (NSGA-Ⅱ) to perform multi-objective optimization, targeting minimized synthetic vibration acceleration under rated pressure drop constraints. Based on the resulting Pareto optimal front, an optimized design was selected to fabricate a physical three-stage orifice component for experimental validation. Finally, CFD simulations were carried out to analyze the internal flow fields of the optimized component under high-temperature operating conditions. Results: The experimental, optimization, and simulation results indicated the following: 1) The loop vibration acceleration exhibited a non-monotonic trend, initially increasing and subsequently decreasing with increasing valve closing angles, with the final-stage valve angle exerting a dominant influence; 2) The prediction accuracy of the PINN model for the total pressure drop and synthetic acceleration improved by 27.9% and 29.4%, respectively, compared with the conventional radial basis function model; 3) The optimized multistage orifice component achieved an 84.9% reduction in synthetic vibration acceleration compared with the initial FSI tests while successfully satisfying the loop pressure-drop requirements; 4) Under the 230 ℃ high-temperature condition, the minimum pressure in the flow field was 3.58 MPa, which was considerably above the saturation vapor pressure of water (2.7 MPa), thereby ensuring an ample cavitation margin. Conclusions: By implementing an integrated framework of FSI experiments and multi-objective optimization, the optimal flow resistance configuration of multi-stage throttling components can be systematically determined to achieve vibration reduction and energy dissipation, thereby mitigating pipeline vibration induced by single-stage throttling. The optimized multi-stage orifice component achieved an 84.9% reduction in loop vibration acceleration under rated driving pressure and was verified to possess a sufficient cavitation margin under high-temperature reactor conditions.

Key words

control rod hydraulic drive system / multi-stage orifice / physics-informed neural networks / genetic algorithm / multi-objective optimization

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wanchun WU , Benke QIN , Yun Li , et al. Vibration reduction and energy dissipation technology for control rod hydraulic drive system circuits[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology). 2026, 66(8): 1694-1703 https://doi.org/10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2026.28.024

References

1
薄涵亮, 郑文祥, 王大中, 等. 核反应堆控制棒水压驱动技术[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 45(3): 424- 427.
BO H L, ZHENG W X, WANG D Z, et al. Hydraulic control rod drive technology for nuclear reactors[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2005, 45(3): 424- 427.
2
PARK B J, PHAM P T, HONG K S. Model reference robust adaptive control of control element drive mechanism in a nuclear power plant[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2020, 18(7): 1651- 1661.
3
薄涵亮, 郑文祥, 董铎, 等. 水力驱动控制棒步进动态过程的研究[J]. 核科学与工程, 2000, 20(4): 322- 328.
BO H L, ZHENG W X, DONG D, et al. Analysis on step action of hydraulic control rod driving[J]. Chinese Journal of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2000, 20(4): 322- 328.
4
宋青, 孙磊, 杨红义, 等. 中国实验快堆控制棒驱动机构抗震鉴定试验[J]. 核科学与工程, 2008, 28(3): 218- 223.
SONE Q, SUN L, YANG H Y, et al. Seismic appraisal test of control rod drive mechanism of China experiment fast reactor[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2008, 28(3): 218- 223.
5
ZHENG Y H, BO H L, DONG D, et al. Experiment study on rod ejection accident of hydraulic control rod driving system[J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2001, 38(12): 1133- 1137.
6
陈济东. 大亚湾核电站系统及运行[M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 1995.
CHEN J D. System and operation on Daya Bay nuclear power station[M]. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press, 1995.
7
薄涵亮, 王大中, 张作义, 等. 一体化水堆内置式控制棒水压驱动技术研究[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(4): 338- 349.
BO H L, WANG D Z, ZHANG Z Y, et al. In-vessel control rod hydraulic drive mechanism for integrated water reactors[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2021, 61(4): 338- 349.
8
LI Y L, QIN B K, BO H L. Study on static characteristics of array electrode capacitance control rod position measurement sensor[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2022, 179, 109445.
9
蒋骏飞. 控制棒驱动线水压缸提升与复位过程流固耦合特性研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2019.
JIANG J F. Study on fluid-solid coupling characteristics of control rod driving line hydraulic cylinder during step up and step down process [D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2019. (in Chinese)
10
杨林清, 秦本科, 薄涵亮. 控制棒水压驱动系统步降过程瞬变流特性分析[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(10): 1839- 1848.
YANG L Q, QIN B K, BO H L. Transient flow characteristic analysis of the step-down process of the control rod hydraulic drive system[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2024, 64(10): 1839- 1848.
11
李旭东, 李勇, 曾小康, 等. 大压降管路节流特性分析及孔板优化设计[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(5): 808- 815.
LI X D, LI Y, ZENG X K, et al. Throttling characteristic analysis for pipeline with large pressure drop and optimal design of orifice plate[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(5): 808- 815.
12
AHMED S, HASSAN A, ZUBAIR R, et al. Design modification in an industrial multistage orifice to avoid cavitation using CFD simulation[J]. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2023, 148, 104833.
13
ARAOYE A A, BADR H M, AHMED W H. Investigation of flow through multi-stage restricting orifices[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2017, 104, 75- 90.
14
GAN R L, LI B R, TANG T F, et al. Noise optimization of multi-stage orifice plates based on RBF neural network response surface and adaptive NSGA-Ⅱ[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2022, 178, 109372.
15
骆斌, 刘德祥, 陈捷. 离心泵汽蚀振动特性研究[J]. 水电与新能源, 2015(6): 34–38, 42.
LUO B, LIU D X, CHEN J. On vibration characteristics of the centrifugal pump under cavitation condition[J]. Hydropower and New Energy, 2015(6): 34–38, 42.
16
WANG Q, CAI K C, QIN Z Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization of laminated structures for central cone based on NSGA-Ⅱ genetic algorithm[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2025, 253, 127531.
17
RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378, 686- 707.
18
李道伦, 沈路航, 查文舒, 等. 基于神经算子与类物理信息神经网络智能求解新进展[J]. 力学学报, 2024, 56(4): 875- 889.
LI D L, SHEN L H, ZHA W S, et al. New progress in intelligent solution of neural operators and physics-informed-based methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(4): 875- 889.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
PDF(5534 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/