[Objective] The process of buses entering and exiting a station often accompanies mandatory lane change, which can significantly impact traffic safety and efficiency. However, current research on lane change strategies for intelligent and connected buses relies on single-vehicle algorithms, lacking consideration for surrounding vehicles and facing challenges in handling inter-vehicle conflicts. These approaches also struggle to ensure the safety and success rate of mandatory lane change during entry and exit, and easily impact the traffic flow. To improve the performance of mandatory lane change for intelligent and connected buses during the entry and exit processes, a two-vehicle cooperative lane change strategy based on the cloud control system (CCS) is proposed, which can schedule buses and cooperating vehicles simultaneously. [Methods] This study designed a set of cooperative lane change strategies for the entry and exit processes. For the entry process, the road segment leading to the bus station was divided according to the distance to the station, and a decision-making model based on the lane change benefit criterion was established. A two-stage trajectory planning method was developed for lane change trajectories, incorporating the longitudinal adjustment and cooperative lane change stages. Optimization problems were formulated and solved in a receding horizon to obtain the optimal trajectories. A layered quadratic programming method was also employed to improve the real-time performance of the algorithm. For the exit process, to adapt to the characteristics of the exiting motion of buses, a rule-based decision-making method and pre-deceleration rule were designed. Lane change trajectories were optimized considering the characteristics of bay-style bus stations to meet the station shape and bus mobility requirements. Finally, the NGSIM dataset was used to design typical scenarios for simulation and hardware-in-the-loop experiments. The effectiveness of the proposed strategy was tested. The proposed strategy was also compared with baseline methods, i.e., the minimizing overall braking induced by lane change (MOBIL) decision model along with the fifth-order polynomial single-vehicle planning method, and the rule-based decision model along with the fifth-order polynomial single-vehicle planning method for the entry and exit processes, respectively. [Results] The simulation and hardware-in-the-loop experiments under typical scenarios demonstrate that the proposed strategy can effectively adapt to realistic vehicle speed changes, assisting buses in completing lane changes during station entry and exit. Moreover, when faced with the actual computing and communication environment of the cloud platform, the proposed strategy meets the requirements for real-time and effective calculations. The comparison with the baseline method shows that, in batch tests for station entry and exit, the lane change success rates of the proposed strategy were 87.4% and 82.4%, respectively, both higher than the baseline method's 51.9% and 20.4%, respectively. Evaluation metrics based on the following vehicle's speed, acceleration, and time to collision (TTC) also indicate that, compared with the baseline method, the proposed strategy can reduce the impact of mandatory lane change on traffic efficiency while maintaining better safety standards. [Conclusions] Using the CCS to achieve centralized decision-making and trajectory planning for scheduling buses and cooperating vehicles simultaneously, the proposed strategy can effectively handle mandatory lane change under high traffic density conditions. The proposed strategy not only improves the success rate of mandatory lane changes for buses entering and exiting stations, but also ensures lane change safety and reduces the impact on upstream traffic. The proposed strategy is also applicable in cloud platforms under realistic computing and communication environments.
REN Hanxiao
,
LUO Yugong
,
GUAN Shurui
,
YU Jie
,
ZHOU Junyu
,
LI Keqiang
. Two-vehicle cooperative lane change strategy for intelligent and connected buses in the mandatory lane change process of entry and exit[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2024
, 64(8)
: 1456
-1468
.
DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.21.019
[1] 刘悦棋.公交车进站过程中的换道行为及影响研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学, 2018. LIU Y Q. Bus entering lane-changing behavior and its impacts[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2018.(in Chinese)
[2] 李克强,戴一凡,李升波,等.智能网联汽车(ICV)技术的发展现状及趋势[J].汽车安全与节能学报, 2017, 8(1):1-14. LI K Q, DAI Y F, LI S B, et al. State-of-the-art and technical trends of intelligent and connected vehicles[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2017, 8(1):1-14.(in Chinese)
[3] 李克强,李家文,常雪阳,等.智能网联汽车云控系统原理及其典型应用[J].汽车安全与节能学报, 2020, 11(3):261-275. LI K Q, LI J W, CHANG X Y, et al. Principles and typical applications of cloud control system for intelligent and connected vehicles[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2020, 11(3):261-275.(in Chinese)
[4] ZHENG Z D. Recent developments and research needs in modeling lane changing[J]. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 2014, 60:16-32.
[5] YAO R H, DU X J, QI W Y, et al. Evolutionary dynamics of mandatory lane changing for bus exiting[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2021:2958647.
[6] Lü W J, Lü Y B, GUO J W, et al. A lane-changing decision-making model of bus entering considering bus priority based on GRU neural network[J]. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, 2022:4558946.
[7] SHI M, HE H W, LI J W, et al. Path planning and following control of autonomous bus under time-varying parameters against parametric uncertainties and external disturbances[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2022, 71(7):7057-7070.
[8] BAE I, MOON J, SEO J. Toward a comfortable driving experience for a self-driving shuttle bus[J]. Electronics, 2019, 8(9):943.
[9] YU L L, KONG D C, YAN X X. A driving behavior planning and trajectory generation method for autonomous electric bus[J]. Future Internet, 2018, 10(6):51.
[10] ALCÁZAR A R. Path planning for autonomous buses based on optimal control[D]. Gothenburg:Chalmers University of Technology, 2018.
[11] 冯敏.公交车自主靠站运行轨迹分析与评价[D].重庆:重庆交通大学, 2020. FENG M. Analysis and evaluation on the operation track of bus independent stop[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2020.(in Chinese)
[12] WANG Z, SHI X W, ZHAO X M, et al. Modeling decentralized mandatory lane change for connected and autonomous vehicles:An analytical method[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2021, 133:103441.
[13] KESTING A, TREIBER M, HELBING D. General lane-changing model MOBIL for car-following models[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1999(1):86-94.
[14] HELBING D, TILCH B. Generalized force model of traffic dynamics[J]. Physical Review E, 1998, 58(1):133-138.
[15] 关书睿,李克强,周俊宇,等.面向强制换道场景的智能网联汽车协同换道策略[J].汽车工程, 2024, 46(2):201-210, 280. GUAN S R, LI K Q, ZHOU J Y, et al. A cooperative lane change strategy for intelligent connected vehicles oriented to mandatory lane change scenarios[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46(2):201-210, 280.(in Chinese)
[16] 韩静文.智能网联条件下的多车协同换道研究[D].镇江:江苏大学, 2020. HAN J W. Research on multi-vehicle cooperative lane changing under the condition of intelligent network[D]. Zhenjiang:Jiangsu University, 2020.(in Chinese)
[17] 杨刚.基于车车通信的多车协同自动换道控制策略研究[D].北京:清华大学, 2016. YANG G. Research on the multi-vehicle cooperative automated lane change maneuver based on vehicle-to-vehicle communication[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2016.(in Chinese)
[18] U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Next generation simulation (NGSIM) vehicle trajectories and supporting data[DS/OL].[2024-01-16]. https://data.transportation.gov/d/8ect-6jqj.
[19] WANG J W, ZHENG Y, CHEN C Y, et al. Leading cruise control in mixed traffic flow:system modeling, controllability, and string stability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(8):12861-12876.