[Objective] The legislative process for the European Union (EU)'s carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) has been completed, and it officially became EU law in May 2023. The EU's CBAM imposes charges on imported products from selected industries based on their carbon emissions and the prevailing carbon prices in the EU emissions trading system through the issuance of “CBAM certificates.” Considering the intensified global competition in low-carbon development and the profound changes in the geopolitical energy landscape, the implementation of the EU's CBAM as a unilateral trade measure will have an impact on the global economy, trade, and industry, making it a focal point in the competition among major powers in the long run. Existing studies focus more on the impact of the EU's CBAM on exports and pay less attention to the changes in the international industrial landscape caused by the industrial output changes due to the implementation of the EU's CBAM. Furthermore, most existing studies primarily performed static analysis for the benchmark year and failed to capture the impact of cumulative changes over time and the evolution of CBAM rules on the future economy, trade, and industry. Limited analysis exists on the dynamic effects of the EU's CBAM. In addition, most studies exogenously assume carbon prices, unable to simulate the endogenous trends of carbon prices and their impacts within major economies under the latest low-carbon transition policies. [Methods] This research employs the China-in-global energy model (C-GEM) developed by Tsinghua University to simulate and analyze the impact of the EU's CBAM. C-GEM is a computable general equilibrium model that effectively represents the interlinkages and interactions between different sectors of the economy and the energy system, allowing the assessment of the economic impact of climate policies on major economies. C-GEM is a global multiregional model that can evaluate the effects of the EU's CBAM on the EU and other economies while analyzing the changes in the global industrial landscape from a global perspective. Furthermore, C-GEM is a recursive dynamic model that can simulate the medium- and long-term emissions reduction targets of various economies and analyze the future implications of the EU's CBAM. The EU's CBAM is depicted in the model as follows: First, the CBAM tax rates are calculated based on value-at-the-border, using the value-based carbon intensity, trade values, and endogenous carbon prices from the C-GEM. Second, these tax rates are applied to the EU's import sectors in the model. Finally, the EU's CBAM is made dynamic, and assumptions are made regarding the covered sectors, sectoral coverage ratios, emission types, and other factors at different time points. [Results] The simulated results from the C-GEM revealed the following: (1) Due to the substantial exports of steel and other products to the EU, Russia was heavily affected, with projected GDP changes of -0.12% and -0.32% in 2025 and 2030, respectively, while the EU increased its GDP by producing substitute domestic products. (2) Russia experienced the largest decline in total exports, with projected changes of -0.86% and -2.48% in 2025 and 2030, respectively, while the EU considerably benefited from the exports of specific industries related to the CBAM. (3) The output of industries such as steel, nonmetallic minerals, nonferrous metals, and chemicals in economies such as Russia, Turkey, and China experienced varying degrees of decline, with the chemical and steel industries being more affected than others. (4) The international market shares of key industries in developing economies like Russia and China mostly declined, replaced by increased market share for related industries in developed economies such as the EU. The percentage increase in the EU's market share considerably exceeded the percentage decrease in other economies. However, China's nonferrous metals industry exhibited a trend of further increasing its international market share, reflecting its competitive advantage. [Conclusions] Implementing the EU's CBAM showed heterogeneous impacts on various economies at different times and reshaped the existing international industrial landscape. There is a trend of global key industry output shifting from developing economies with a high dependence on carbon-intensive product exports to developed or more competitive developing economies. To respond to the EU's CBAM, China needs to strengthen multilateral cooperation and proactively address the unilateral trade measures taken by EU and the United States, optimize industrial and trade structures and promote green and low-carbon development, accelerate the development of the national carbon market and improve domestic carbon pricing mechanisms, and actively participate in the formulation of international standards and rules in the areas of climate change and trade.
[1] 何建坤.全球气候治理新形势及我国对策[J].环境经济研究, 2019, 4(3):1-9. HE J K. New situation of global climate governance and China's countermeasures[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics, 2019, 4(3):1-9.(in Chinese)
[2] 王海林,黄晓丹,赵小凡,等.全球气候治理若干关键问题及对策[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(11):26-33. WANG H L, HUANG X D, ZHAO X F, et al. Key problems in global climate governance and China's countermeasures[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(11):26-33.(in Chinese)
[3] BABIKER M H. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage[J]. Journal of international Economics, 2005, 65(2):421-445.
[4] European Council, Council of the European Union. Fit for 55[EB/OL].(2021-07-14)[2023-02-27]. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/green-deal/fit-for-55-the-eu-plan-for-a-green-transition/.
[5] European Commission. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism[EB/OL].(2021-07-14)[2023-02-27]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52021PC0564.
[6] 王谋,吉治璇,康文梅,等.欧盟"碳边境调节机制"要点、影响及应对[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(12):45-52. WANG M, JI Z X, KANG W M, et al. Key points and impact of EU's "carbon border adjustment mechanism" and China's responses[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(12):45-52.(in Chinese)
[7] BÖHRINGER C, FISCHER C, ROSENDAHL K E, et al. Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12(1):22-29.
[8] 胡晓红.欧盟航空碳排放交易制度及其启示[J].法商研究, 2011, 28(5):145-151. HU X H. The EU aviation emissions trading system and its implications[J]. Studies in Law and Business, 2011, 28(5):145-151.(in Chinese)
[9] 张泽平.航空碳排放及其交易的国际法规制:从"欧盟航空碳排放案"说起[J].环球法律评论, 2013, 35(1):168-176. ZHANG Z P. International regulation of aviation carbon emissions and the trading:Starting with the EU aviation carbon emissions case[J]. Global Law Review, 2013, 35(1):168-176.(in Chinese)
[10] 鲍勤,汤铃,杨列勋.美国征收碳关税对中国的影响:基于可计算一般均衡模型的分析[J].管理评论, 2010, 22(6):24-33. BAO Q, TANG L, YANG L X. The impact of carbon motivated border tax on China:An analysis based on computable general equilibrium model[J]. Management Review, 2010, 22(6):24-33.(in Chinese)
[11] ZHANG Z X. The U.S. proposed carbon tariffs, WTO scrutiny and China's responses[J]. International Economics and Economic Policy, 2010, 7(2):203-225.
[12] 谢来辉,穆范椭.美国挥舞"碳关税"大棒:意在中国?[J].世界环境, 2009(4):69-72. XIE L H, MU F T. America waved its "carbon tariff" stick, aimed at China?[J]. World Environment, 2009(4):69-72.(in Chinese)
[13] 韩立群.欧盟碳关税政策及其影响[J].现代国际关系, 2021(5):51-59, 61. HAN L Q. The background and impact of EU carbon border adjustment mechanism[J]. Contemporary International Relations, 2021(5):51-59, 61.(in Chinese)
[14] HELM D, HEPBURN C, RUTA G. Trade, climate change, and the political game theory of border carbon adjustments[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2012, 28(2):368-394.
[15] 邬彩霞.碳减排目标下边境调整政策的政治经济学分析[J].理论学刊, 2016(3):68-73. WU C X. Political economy analysis of border adjustment policy under carbon reduction targets[J]. Theory Journal, 2016(3):68-73.(in Chinese)
[16] United Nations. United Nations framework convention on climate change[EB/OL].(1992-05-09)[2023-05-23]. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.
[17] HOLZER K. Carbon-related border adjustment and WTO law[M]. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.
[18] 林伯强,李爱军.碳关税的合理性何在?[J].经济研究, 2012, 47(11):118-127. LIN B Q, LI A J. Is carbon motivated border tax justifiable?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012, 47(11):118-127.(in Chinese)
[19] 李晓玲,陈雨松."碳关税"与WTO规则相符性研究[J].国际经济合作, 2010(3):77-81. LI X L, CHEN Y S. Study on the compliance of "carbon tariffs" with WTO rules[J]. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 2010(3):77-81.(in Chinese)
[20] PAUWELYN J, KLEIMANN D. Trade related aspects of a carbon border adjustment mechanism:A legal assessment[R]. Belgium:European Union, Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies, 2020.
[21] 安琪.碳边境调节机制与世界贸易组织规则适应性探讨与启示[J].国际石油经济, 2020, 28(11):10-13. AN Q. The adaptability of the carbon border adjustment mechanism&WTO rule and its enlightenment[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2020, 28(11):10-13.(in Chinese)
[22] 刘斌,赵飞.欧盟碳边境调节机制对中国出口的影响与对策建议[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 36(6):185-194, 210. LIU B, ZHAO F. The impact of EU carbon tariff policy on China's export and suggestions for China[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2021, 36(6):185-194, 210.(in Chinese)
[23] 许英明,李晓依.欧盟碳边境调节机制对中欧贸易的影响及中国对策[J].国际经济合作, 2021(5):25-32. XU Y M, LI X Y. The impact of the EU's CBAM on China-EU's trade and China's countermeasures[J]. Journal of International Economic Cooperation, 2021(5):25-32.(in Chinese)
[24] 张中祥.碳达峰、碳中和目标下的中国与世界:绿色低碳转型、绿色金融、碳市场与碳边境调节机制[J].人民论坛·学术前沿, 2021(14):69-79. ZHANG Z X. China and the world under the targets of carbon peak and carbon neutralization:Green low-carbon transformation, green finance, carbon market and carbon border adjustment mechanism[J]. Frontiers, 2021(14):69-79.(in Chinese)
[25] BÖHRINGER C, BALISTRERI E J, RUTHERFORD T F. The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy:Overview of an energy modeling forum study (EMF 29)[J]. Energy Economics, 2012, 34(S2):S97-S110.
[26] KORTUM S, WEISBACH D. The design of border adjustments for carbon prices[J]. National Tax Journal, 2017, 70(2):421-446.
[27] MEHLING M A, VAN ASSELT H, DAS K, et al. Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action[J]. American Journal of International Law, 2019, 113(3):433-481.
[28] European Commission. Inception impact assessment[EB/OL].(2020-07-01)[2023-03-11]. https://www.euractiv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/CBAM.pdf.
[29] 谢超,彭文生.欧盟碳边境调节机制对中国经济和全球碳减排影响的量化分析[R].北京:中金研究院, 2021. XIE C, PENG W S. Quantitative analysis of the impact of the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism on China's economy and global carbon emission reduction[R]. Beijing:China International Capital Corporation Limited Global Institute, 2021.(in Chinese)
[30] ZHONG J R, PEI J S. Beggar thy neighbor?On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism[J]. Energy Policy, 2022, 162:112802.
[31] BELLORA C, FONTAGNÉ L. EU in search of a carbon border adjustment mechanism[J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 123:106673.
[32] CLAUSING K A, WOLFRAM C. Carbon border adjustments, climate clubs, and subsidy races when climate policies vary[R]. Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, 2023.
[33] HE X B, ZHAI F, MA J. The global impact of a carbon border adjustment mechanism:A quantitative assessment[R/OL].(2022-03-11)[2023-03-12]. https://en.nsd.pku.edu.cn/docs/20220329114245125696.pdf.
[34] PERDANA S, VIELLE M. Making the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries[J]. Energy Policy, 2022, 170, 113245.
[35] RAMADHANI D P, KOO Y. Comparative analysis of carbon border tax adjustment and domestic carbon tax under general equilibrium model:Focusing on the Indonesian economy[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 377:134288.
[36] 庞军,常原华.欧盟碳边境调节机制对我国的影响及应对策略[J].可持续发展经济导刊, 2023(S1):32-35. PANG J, CHANG Y H. Influence of carbon border adjustment mechanism and China's countermeasures[J]. China Sustainability Tribune, 2023(S1):32-35.(in Chinese)
[37] 李继峰,张亚雄.基于CGE模型定量分析国际贸易绿色壁垒对我国经济的影响:以发达国家对我国出口品征收碳关税为例[J].国际贸易问题, 2012(5):105-118. LI J F, ZHANG Y X. A quantitative analysis on economic impact of potential green barrier of international trade for China:Case study of carbon tariff with SIC-GE Model[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2012(5):105-118.(in Chinese)
[38] 沈可挺,李钢.碳关税对中国工业品出口的影响:基于可计算一般均衡模型的评估[J].财贸经济, 2010(1):75-82, 136-137. SHEN K T, LI G. The impacts of carbon-motivated border tax adjustment to China's industrial exports:A CGE based analysis[J]. Finance&Trade Economics, 2010(1):75-82, 136-137.(in Chinese)
[39] 袁嫣.基于CGE模型定量探析碳关税对我国经济的影响[J].国际贸易问题, 2013(2):92-99. YUAN Y. CGE model-based quantitative analysis of the impact of carbon tariffs on Chinese economy[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2013(2):92-99.(in Chinese)
[40] 沈可挺.碳关税争端及其对中国制造业的影响[J].中国工业经济, 2010(1):65-74. SHEN K T. The international carbon-motivated border tax adjustment controversy and its impact on China's manufacturing industries[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2010(1):65-74.(in Chinese)
[41] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. A European Union carbon border adjustment mechanism:Implications for developing countries[EB/OL].(2021-07-14)[2023-03-11]. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/osginf2021d2_en.pdf.
[42] BRANGER F, QUIRION P. Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses?Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 99:29-39.
[43] LARCH M, WANNER J. Carbon tariffs:An analysis of the trade, welfare, and emission effects[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2017, 109:195-213.
[44] CLORA F, YU W S, CORONG E. Alternative carbon border adjustment mechanisms in the European Union and international responses:Aggregate and within-coalition results[J]. Energy Policy, 2023, 174:113454.
[45] QI T Y, WINCHESTER N, ZHANG D, et al. The China-in-Global energy model[R]. Cambridge:Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014.
[46] WENG Y Y, ZHANG D, LU L L, et al. A general equilibrium analysis of floor prices for China's national carbon emissions trading system[J]. Climate Policy, 2018, 18(S1):60-70.
[47] QI T Y, WENG Y Y. Economic impacts of an international carbon market in achieving the INDC targets[J]. Energy, 2016, 109:886-893.
[48] 翁玉艳.碳市场在全球碳减排中的作用研究[D].北京:清华大学, 2018. WENG Y Y. Study on the role of the carbon market in global carbon dioxide mitigation[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2018.(in Chinese)
[49] AGUIAR A, CHEPELIEV M, CORONG E L, et al. The GTAP data base:Version 10[J]. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 2019, 4(1):1-27.
